Quote:
Originally posted by Thagrastay
As I said before- there are plenty of facts to disprove evolution, but evolution does not allow these into their paradigm and it merely closes ranks and closets its ideas until it can shift gears with a new spin, or talks a bit louder and with more force over you so that you must then stop civil discourse altogether, and then they feel they have gained the day.
Evolution is nothing more than a religion, csfilm. There is no shame in admitting that.
I will nominat you and Lebell for pontiff and bishop, if you would like as well and this can be your very own order, then!
Evolution is no more a science than the tarot or tea leaves, because the ones making the interpretations are also the ones hiding behind the mirrors and teaching the classes.
Was it Marx, Lenin or Trotsky who said: "Give me one generation and I'll change the world"?
|
So, are you going to actually read the posts that disagreed with you, where they provide evidence of specification, and possibly argue against their points?
Or are you just going to repeat yourself, louder?
Are you going to provide
Quote:
|
plenty of facts to disprove evolution
|
then listen to the arguements against those facts, or are you going to talk
Quote:
|
a bit louder and with more force over (them) so that (they) must then stop civil discourse altogether, and then they feel (you) have gained the day.
|
? Because the post above is just talking loudly, and ignoring the points and content brought forward.
Possibly it is against your religious beliefs to look at the evidence on evolution and arguements logically and rationally? Ie, if it is an article of faith that whatever you call "evolution" is a lie, then any evidence brought forward won't matter to you: you value your faith more than you value rational thought.