View Single Post
Old 03-25-2004, 05:46 AM   #44 (permalink)
CSflim
Sky Piercer
 
CSflim's Avatar
 
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally posted by raeanna74
Well if you believe that
1. Evolution is NOT a theory.
I have already explained my views on this.
To claim "Evolution is only a theory" does not constitute an argument. See my reasoning above.

Quote:

2. Seciation has been observed.
Then this debate has no purpose whatsoever.

When you refer to dogs that were a different species. Were you saying that they were so simply because they could not reproduce? If that is what you meant that we also created a new species by breeding horses with donkeys and creating Mules. The only problem with this is that BOTH of those new species were completely unable to replicate themselves on their own and thus would be a dead us branch of evolution.
The definition of "species" is not a very strong one. Much of Darwin's Origin of Species is spent explaining how nature simply dpesn't fall into the categories that we design for them. Nature doesn't care about the words we use to describe it, it just is.

As a result "speices" and "speciation", are difficult to pin down.
The most common "working model" defnition of a species is:
Two creatures who cannot produce viable offspring with each other, belong to different species.
(viable meaning...that creature itself being capable of reproduction)

So to your question "Were you saying that they were so simply because they could not reproduce?", I answer YES, because that is the definiton of a species.

For a more in depth look at the meanings of such words, take a look at that first link I provided.

So, in other words....
a) different breeds of dogs, who cannot produce viable offspring, are actually members of a "different species". They will eaither be unable to reproduce, or anything that they do give birth to will be too deformed to be able to reproduce.

b) Donkeys are a different spcies of animal from mules, because they cannot create viable offspring.

Quote:
Can you find ANY form of speciation that actually produces positive results?
Yes! I provided two links, each of which give dozens of examples of observed speciation.

I chose the example of dogs because it is a well known one. However it happens to be a bit of a messy one. (X can mate with Y which can mate with Z, but X can't mate with Z). But if you don't like it, there's plenty more.
__________________
CSflim is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360