Quote:
Originally posted by Superbelt
Sorry but I still see "disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned." as all the justification needed to call for his recusal.
I of course would be happy entertain impartial, expert analysis of what Liteky v United States entails. Or even if anyone else here wants to weigh in on their opinion of the applicability of that ruling.
I also don't believe I have been proven untrue. Unless you, j8ear or dy156 are attorneys.
|
The "facts" as you describe them have been completely wrong since you first posted in this thread. The trip was not paid for by the company you identify, the industry and the company are not "plaintiffs", and you never answered the question with regard to all personal relationships that Justices will inevitably have and the supposed conflict they entail. You also completely ignore the point that a District Judge is not the same as a Supreme Court Justice.