Sorry but I still see "disqualify himself in any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned." as all the justification needed to call for his recusal.
I of course would be happy entertain impartial, expert analysis of what Liteky v United States entails. Or even if anyone else here wants to weigh in on their opinion of the applicability of that ruling.
I also don't believe I have been proven untrue. Unless you, j8ear or dy156 are attorneys.
Last edited by Superbelt; 03-24-2004 at 11:27 AM..
|