View Single Post
Old 03-23-2004, 05:56 PM   #1 (permalink)
Tomservo
Crazy
 
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Rummy testifies, cat officially out of bag!

Well, it's nice to see it's all coming out. 'Bout damn time. Strip all the nonsense away, and maybe we can get to the bottom of this. What I read from what he says is this:

1. We couldn't have taken out bin Laden prior to 9/11 because the Intelligence was too shaky. (Still is)
2. Even if we HAD taken him out, they probably would've still hit the towers on 9/11.

Regardless of the honesty or dishonesty behind all the speechifying, this brings us to the official "brass tacks". Clinton wanted to kill Osama, but couldn't, and even if he did, it wouldn't have mattered. (Substitute Bush's name in there if you prefer) Enough finger-pointing! Hindsight IS 20/20!

http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/...ion/index.html

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld said Tuesday that he had no indication in the months before September 11, 2001, that the al Qaeda terrorist network was planning attacks with hijacked jetliners.

In testimony before the independent commission investigating the attacks, Rumsfeld also said even killing al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden would have been unlikely to prevent the attacks because the men who carried them out were already inside the United States.

Rumsfeld said the National Security Council was working on a new strategy to deal with al Qaeda in the spring and summer of 2001.

But "I knew of no intelligence during the six-plus months leading up to September 11 to indicate terrorists would hijack commercial airliners, use them as missiles to fly into the Pentagon or the World Trade Center towers," he said.

In any event, any large-scale effort to attack al Qaeda inside its sanctuary in Afghanistan was unlikely to draw public or congressional support before the attacks, which killed 3,000 people, he said.

Rumsfeld's predecessor, William Cohen, told the commission that the Clinton administration debated whether to launch airstrikes to kill bin Laden on three occasions in 1998 and 1999, but decided against them because of doubts about the intelligence and concerns about killing civilians.

"There were three occasions. Each time, the munitions and people were spun up," Cohen told the commission. "They were called off because the word came back, 'We're not sure.' "

**More in the article, click the link if you so desire!**

P.S. I still don't believe a word Rumsfeld says, on general principle, but this was interesting.
Tomservo is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360