Quote:
Originally posted by kutulu
They probably got sick of AMD customers having such an easy way to compare products. [/B]
|
well for your info, the AMD name comparison was good up to the 2.8G point. ie 2800+ is not quite as good as 2.8G P4 and it gets considerably worse after that. with 64 Bit screwing the comparison up completely if you go that far.
so trying to fool the consumer into comparing like that was dangerous and misleading. the companies should make an effort into educating the consumers on the many facets of CPU's such as cache size, FSB etc. with intel putting a code for that info in the name, its at least there. and if they do it right, ie educate the consumer. everybody will be better off