non-debate - discussion thread 02: realism/idealism
It appears that many of our differences are the result of strong idealistic thinking versus strongly realistic approaches to solutions.
The terms may be loaded some but I do see them at the root of many conflicts. I'm using them not because I want to endlessly parse them or debate their loaded meanings but because they can illuminate the discussion. If we could gingerly approach the notion that we are all somewhat idealistic and realistic - albeit with different proportions of each - perhaps we could see ourselves on a continuum of common thought rather than at polarized ends of some spectrum.
Many times I would willingly say "I share your ideals" but I would differ regarding how to realistically achieve them. In other words, I see many notions as the result of wishful thinking that simply refuses to "get real."
Are you willing to put your notions of political thinking to the idealistic/realistic test? I do believe in the realm of political action only what is doable and achievable is sensible to consider...
__________________
create evolution
|