|
There is actually a lot of discussion on whether the sexual liberation has of women has been beneficial to women or not. The argumnt is that sure, women are having more sex nowadays and they're free to have as much as they want, but are they any happier than their sexually repressed and enslaved foremothers because of it?
The general consensus among women is "no". Sexual freedom has not brought any real happiness. Part of this reason is the topic of this thread, and another is that even women regard their peers who get laid a lot as whores. Added to that is the fact that a women's sexual makeup is dependant on more factors than the mere physical makeup of the sexual drives of men. By pushing women to explore "meaningless" sex, we are just making them surrogate men. And they dont even have to pursue a man to get sex: they just have to open their legs.
Sure, guys would like this sutuation, but over the centuries women have evolved as caregivers and carry the weight of the emotional components of a relationship. Its thus expected that a male "partner" should mean more than just a lay for a women. Otherwise she's losing what essentially makes her woman. In simple terms: Sluts are just pussy. They're not women.
This of course does not contribute to the already long-suffering fight for gender equality.
This long explanation brings us back to VF19's original assessment at the top of the thread.
__________________
"Failing tastes of bile and dog vomit. Pity any man that gets used to that taste."
|