View Single Post
Old 03-17-2004, 02:05 AM   #13 (permalink)
sprocket
Psycho
 
sprocket's Avatar
 
Location: In transit
Quote:
Originally posted by smooth
Why can't it be a question of both one's freedom and what's best for society?
You can, but ultimately the rights of the individual should be considered first. At least thats how its supposed to work in America.

Quote:
Originally posted by Macheath
I think the problem is the views on legalization are so polarized.

Look at cigarettes and alcohol. These have been legal (except for a few years) in western society for a hell of a long time yet we still have troubles with them. We don't fully know how to help alcoholics properly. We have trouble figuring out how to protect the majority without infringing on the rights of the individual.

If it were legalized, some people would still abuse it just like they abuse cigarettes and alcohol now. These people would slip through the cracks because of the old polarizing opinions. Many legalizers would, in their triumph pretend that nobody was suffering;


Well right now its the legislators and law enforcement who pretend no one is suffering every time they make a drug bust and congragulate themselves for keeping someone from getting high for a night. We're in the same boat we are in now, legal or not legal. At least if drugs are legal we will probably have less people in jail, and those who choose to use a drug responsibly have the freedom to do so.

Quote:
while many prohibitionists would petulantly cross their arms and declare that, "īt's your problem now hippies!"

It would take a lot of cooperative effort and clearheadedness to make smoking a joint just like going to the pub for a quiet drink.
The problem exists even while drugs are illegal. Everywhere you go.. people are high. Next time you go out to eat.. guess what? People in the resteraunt are high. Next time you go to a movie.. there are people there who are high. And guess what.. when alcohol prohibition was in affect, you could go to a party.. and guess what? People were probably drunk.

I havnt heard anyone make a rational argument as to why tobacco and alcohol should be legal and other "recreational chemicals" should be illegal. If someone can make that argument here, please do. I would like to hear that side of the debate.
__________________
Remember, wherever you go... there you are.

Last edited by sprocket; 03-17-2004 at 02:07 AM..
sprocket is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360