View Single Post
Old 03-16-2004, 11:51 AM   #22 (permalink)
kutulu
Junkie
 
kutulu's Avatar
 
So you people see nothing wrong with a shitty team like the Brewers getting $20M in revenue sharing while only having a $30M payroll? You see nothing wrong with the rich teams having to pay 2/3 of their payroll?

The Devil Rays also spent about $18M. You see nothing wrong with a team doing nothing to help itself out?

The money you spend doesn't guarantee that you will win. Look at the Mets, Red Sox, and the Dodgers. They have been in the top five for quite some time and only have a few playoff games to show for it. In the meantime, the DBacks (high salary at the time), Angels, and Marlins have won the last three WS.

Hell, Steinfucker didn't start going mad with the checkbook until the DBacks beat them. What has it got them? Out in first round 2002, lost WS in 2003.

The A's have been in the bottom of the spending and have made the playoffs the last 4 years. They should be in there this season too. The Twins have had reasonable salaries and were there the last two years.

Owners wouldn't lower prices. Businesses don't cut profits for no reason. Limiting salaries would be wrong. The players make mlb, not the owners. They deserve a substantial share of the money.

Quote:
Originally posted by Kurant
Selig said like 3 years ago only 6 teams in Major Leauge Baseball that year made money. True or not, who else is to argue that's not true? Did you see Tiger Stadium this year when the Yankees or Red Sox weren't in town? They had 2/3rds the stadium empty. I woulden't doubt it one bit very few teams made money.
There are all sorts of ways to make up losses. Anything less than full attendance is a loss of potential earnings. Those "facts" were likely based on some bs logic like that. Actual losses are when your income is less then your expenditures, it's highly doubtfull that Selig was talking about that. If that were the truth, and they really were actually losing millions, they would have happily shown the players their books. Instead they resisted.

I like a luxury tax system. But to have it really work, you have to force cheap owners to spend the money they need to compete.
kutulu is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360