Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community - View Single Post - When Swords are Outlawed only Outlaws will have Swords...

The_Dunedan · 03-14-2004, 09:06 AM

Self-defense is a law of nature, and that includes defending one's dwelling. When one lion invades another lion's territory, the resident lion defends it.
Secondly, it was too dark for Martin to be able to tell the ethnicity of the perp, as he stated at his trial, so this cannot have been a racially-based incident.
Thirdly, your "Admired Hitler" defense appeared in only one source that I'm aware of; the Daily Mirror, the National Enquirer of the British press.
Fourthly, your "Majority of the British people..." nonsense. If this is true, then why was over 5,000,000 Pounds Sterling collected for Martin's defense fund in less than a week?
Fifthly, the difference between Subject and Citizen is quite profound. If you don't understand how, allow me to educate you. As a Subject, you are a chattel of the Crown, and may be disposed of in any way, according to Her Majesty's Pleasure, or that of any of Her deputies, such as Parliment. You have no Rights beyond what Her Majesty ( or Parliment ) see fit to give you, and these rights can be stripped at any time, for any reason or no reason at all. Examine the situation in The North of Ireland for some truly sickening examples of this. As a Citizen, I have certain rights which may NOT be legally infringed upon. I have the absolute Franchise, Right To Counsel, etc etc etc. More importantly, I have the right to remove, by whatever means nessescary, any official who violates those rights. If that means voting, as it usually does, then so be it. If that means parting their hair with a rifle bullet, so be that as well. We havn't had to resort to the rifle bullet in over 200 years, thankfully....since we left this British Subject nonsense behind the first time, actually.

03-14-2004, 09:06 AM	#47 (permalink)
The_Dunedan Junkie	Self-defense is a law of nature, and that includes defending one's dwelling. When one lion invades another lion's territory, the resident lion defends it. Secondly, it was too dark for Martin to be able to tell the ethnicity of the perp, as he stated at his trial, so this cannot have been a racially-based incident. Thirdly, your "Admired Hitler" defense appeared in only one source that I'm aware of; the Daily Mirror, the National Enquirer of the British press. Fourthly, your "Majority of the British people..." nonsense. If this is true, then why was over 5,000,000 Pounds Sterling collected for Martin's defense fund in less than a week? Fifthly, the difference between Subject and Citizen is quite profound. If you don't understand how, allow me to educate you. As a Subject, you are a chattel of the Crown, and may be disposed of in any way, according to Her Majesty's Pleasure, or that of any of Her deputies, such as Parliment. You have no Rights beyond what Her Majesty ( or Parliment ) see fit to give you, and these rights can be stripped at any time, for any reason or no reason at all. Examine the situation in The North of Ireland for some truly sickening examples of this. As a Citizen, I have certain rights which may NOT be legally infringed upon. I have the absolute Franchise, Right To Counsel, etc etc etc. More importantly, I have the right to remove, by whatever means nessescary, any official who violates those rights. If that means voting, as it usually does, then so be it. If that means parting their hair with a rifle bullet, so be that as well. We havn't had to resort to the rifle bullet in over 200 years, thankfully....since we left this British Subject nonsense behind the first time, actually. __________________ "I personally think that America's interests would be well served if after or at the time these clowns begin their revolting little hate crime the local police come in and cart them off on some trumped up charges or other. It is necessary in my opinion that America makes an example of them to the world." --Strange Famous, advocating the use of falsified charges in order to shut people up.