View Single Post
Old 03-13-2004, 02:09 PM   #45 (permalink)
lordjeebus
この印篭が目に入らぬか
 
Location: College
Quote:
Originally posted by Lebell
I can't recall about that.

I'm talking about the implosion type weapons that were being assembled in August. (Which I read about in "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" by Richard Rhodes.)
Here's what I was thinking about (Thanks to LexisNexis -- all I remembered was that I read this in the summer of 1995):

Quote:
The Washington Post
July 16, 1995
A SECTION; Pg. A01
HEADLINE: Truman Didn't Hesitate to Drop Atomic Bomb on Japan

BYLINE: Walter Pincus, Washington Post Staff Writer

BODY:
Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Blasted by U.S. atomic bombs 50 years ago, the Japanese cities today instantly call to mind images of terrible devastation and the unique horror of history's only nuclear attacks.

In 1945, though, they were merely the first two targets in a series of atomic bombings approved by President Harry S. Truman and his advisers in a calculated effort to use the extraordinary new weapon to drive Tokyo to surrender unconditionally.

On July 24 of that year, Truman enthusiastically approved a schedule drawn up by military and scientific advisers to drop two atomic bombs on Japan in August, three per month in September, October and November, and possibly seven in December.

At the same time, assuming the bombs alone might not be sufficient to end the war, the military was going forward with a plan, approved by Truman in June, for a November invasion of Japan's southernmost island of Kyushu using more than 765,000 U.S. troops. A big concern in Washington was that the new weapons, never tested under wartime conditions, might prove to be duds.

As the 50th anniversary approaches of the atomic bombings, a debate has revived over whether Truman was justified in using the bomb. Some historians have said he erred and set a dangerous precedent because Japan would have surrendered even had the bomb not been dropped.

Others have charged that Truman used the bomb less to end the war with Japan than to intimidate the Soviet Union at the Cold War's outset. Another suggestion is that a "warning" bomb should have been exploded somewhere as a demonstration, to give Japan a chance to surrender. There is a theory that Truman's advisers insisted on using the bombs to justify the $ 2 billion spent to develop them.

But the issues that concerned Truman and his advisers at the time, and the debates within the administration, point to motives and judgments that are very different from some ascribed by subsequent critics, according to a three-month study of archival records and the published literature on the subject.

While historians with benefit of hindsight long will ponder what else besides the bomb might have forced Japan's surrender, the evidence is abundant that Truman used the weapon at the time because his paramount goal was to win World War II as quickly as possible on U.S. terms.

A key factor in White House thinking was that the public was weary of fighting, in the wake of Allied victory in Europe in May 1945 and following more than 3 1/2 years of bloodshed. By early July, total U.S. losses in the Army and Navy were more than 1 million, including 290,000 killed, 630,000 wounded, and the remainder either missing or prisoners of war.

Top officials were worried about growing domestic discontent highlighted by strikes and other labor unrest. At a May 22, 1945, meeting of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Fred M. Vinson, then head of domestic mobilization and later a Supreme Court justice, said he was "afraid of unrest in the country. He never saw the people in their present frame of mind before," according to notes of the session.

Vinson talked of widespread concerns about food rationing and shortages. People were angry that older men were being pulled out of nonmilitary jobs and drafted, and that some soldiers who had already served in Europe were being transferred to the Pacific theater for the expected invasion of Japan.

Truman recorded in his diary, and said in a radio address after Nagasaki, that he hoped the atomic bombings would make the invasion unnecessary. It seemed certain to cost high American casualties, judging by the toll of 18,000 dead in the recent U.S. conquests of the islands of Iwo Jima and Okinawa.

Against that background, the dropping of the two atomic bombs in three days achieved the goal of a rapid surrender on acceptable terms. In the Aug. 15 announcement in Japan, six days after the Nagasaki bombing, Emperor Hirohito cited America's "outrageous bomb," which "slaughtered untold numbers of innocent people" and created "incalculable" damage.

Critics of Truman, including some at the time, have asked whether the bombings were moral. The blasts killed a total of 100,000 or more civilians in two instants at Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Days afterward, thousands of people who appeared to have survived began to fall ill from radiation sickness and later died. While the final figure remains uncertain, the eventual death toll from both blasts is generally believed to exceed 200,000.

However, numbers that seem appalling by today's standards were not disturbing at the time to most Americans. They saw the Japanese as hated, cruel enemies who had brought the United States into the war with a sneak attack on the U.S. naval fleet in Pearl Harbor and slaughtered Chinese, Filipinos and others in their years of conquest.

When the Truman administration was preparing to use nuclear weapons, the United States already had been heavily bombing enemy cities with large civilian populations. On March 9, 1945, for instance, 334 B-29s dropped firebombs over Tokyo, wiping out nearly 16 square miles of the city and killing more than 100,000 Japanese. Army Air Force Chief of Staff Gen. Henry A. "Hap" Arnold sent congratulations to Gen. Curtis LeMay, who ordered the raid, and over the next nine days additional B-29 raids burned out an additional 32 square miles in Japan's four largest cities, leaving 150,000 more fatalities.

On April 12, when he became president after Franklin D. Roosevelt died, Truman inherited the bombing policy. Months later, in the speech broadcast to the nation after Nagasaki, Truman provided a typically blunt account of why he used the new nuclear weapons.

"Having found the bomb we have used it . . . ," Truman said. "We have used it in order to shorten the agony of war, in order to save the lives of thousands and thousands of young Americans. We shall continue to use it until we completely destroy Japan's power to make war."

(there's a lot more article but I'll stop here)

Last edited by lordjeebus; 03-13-2004 at 02:13 PM..
lordjeebus is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360