Thread: Time
View Single Post
Old 03-12-2004, 02:27 PM   #27 (permalink)
synic213
Crazy
 
Location: Sunny San Diego
Quote:
Originally posted by FleaCircus
But time is more than just a ruler. It is actually a physical dimension. By physical, I suppose I mean existential, in that it exists independently of any particular perception of it. But it's not a spatial dimension, in the way we think of left-right or up-down.

That, and time really isn't constant. The faster you go, the more time slows down. Think about this:

Two twins synchronize their super-accurate watches. One kicks back here on earth, drinking margaritas and watching T.V. The other climbs into a spacecraft and zips around the galaxy for what he thinks is a year. The only catch: he does it at close to the speed of light.

He gets back when his watch says he's been gone a year. But when he sees his twin, his twin's watch says he's been gone fifty years. And yet both of them are correct.

The closer you get to the speed of light, the greater the differential. The further you are from the speed of light, the lesser the differential. But what this does mean is that time passes more slowly for someone on top of Mount Everest (faster velocity due to the rotation of the earth) than it does for someone at sea level.

It's just a negligible difference, so no one notices. Read the relativity section of Brian Greene's "The Elegant Universe" for more.

I know I gave a physics answer in a philosophy forum, but there you go.
Forgive my ignorance, but I could never quite grasp this concept and perhaps someone here can explain it to me better than a textbook. If time is only just a marker created by humans to map changing events, how can this rate at which time occurs change with the spped at which an object is moving? Has any one ever done an experiment were two identical, extrememly accurate watches were created and placed a two spots on the Earth, one at sea level and one on the top of Mt. Everest, and time at the tip of Mt. Everest was proven to "move" more slowly? Or is this difference in time just too small to measure with modern technology? It seems like spatially, a person standing on Mt. Everest has travelled a greater distance (due to the Earth's rotation) in a the same amount of time as a person standing at sea level, but the point is, the same increment of time has passed.
synic213 is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360