|
As others have said, she was found guilty because the evidence proved to the jurors she was guilty. She wasn't found guilty of insider trading but of lying to cover up the actions of her investment "team".
The jury was picked from a pool of potential jurors and the defense had an opportunity to uncover any misgivings about their intentions or biases.
I just want her to get what is typical of the crime. No more and no less. I don't know what others being convicted of the same thing have gotten but her punishment should be in line with them.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant.
|