08-30-2004, 05:15 AM | #1 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: NJ
|
Laser shoots down Mortar Rounds
Impressive bit of news about this system. Hopefully they will be able to enhance the capabilities and deploy it in the near future to protect our troops.
http://www.spacedaily.com/news/laser-04r.html Quote:
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant. |
|
08-30-2004, 08:22 PM | #3 (permalink) |
Future Bureaucrat
|
Wow, that's just awesome. Imagine using that during WWII, when troops rushed in to take a city their path of advance would have been much safer.
As for Iraq, we ought to employ it ASAP. Hear they get mortar attacks alot. I've also heard that Israel has been using something like this to destroy scuds aimed at them?? |
08-31-2004, 09:47 AM | #4 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: NJ
|
Quote:
Agree that it's awesome. The advances made even since the first Gulf War are incredible.
__________________
Strive to be more curious than ignorant. |
|
09-07-2004, 03:09 AM | #6 (permalink) |
Junkie
|
Ahem... yeah, yeah. thanks for wanting us to all get along. We'll get along just fine with anyone who isn't trying murdering us.
Now, about that laser AA. I wouldn't exoect to see it deployed for a decade, at least. There is a kick-ass mm wavelength radar system that tracks multiple bullet paths to identify where the shooter is located. It was developed to locate sniper and ambushers, particularly in urban areas. It works like a champ but has not been brought into the field. I first saw it about 6-7 years ago. Where does this great stuff go? Is it sitting next to the ark of the covenant?
__________________
+++++++++++Boom! |
09-07-2004, 09:16 AM | #7 (permalink) |
Banned
|
EDIT: The following no longer applies directly, as the post I am talking about has been removed pending an edit. This is good information regardless... Please stay on topic, people. This thread has just started and we're already wandering away from the main point here. If you want to muse about US, there are about 500 other threads on the US vs. the world's opinion of it- and they're pretty much all in Tilted Politics. Find one that fits you and post there, not in any random thread that appears. We get it, you have an opinion, put it where it belongs. Thank you. -analog. Last edited by analog; 09-07-2004 at 09:23 AM.. |
09-07-2004, 11:16 AM | #8 (permalink) |
BFG Builder
Location: University of Maryland
|
I wonder how portable it is? Ideally it should at least fit on a hummer or something smaller; anything larger would probably not work for the random-ambush nature of the current conflict. I also wonder how it does in less than ideal conditions... say in the middle of a city?
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, you must be having an orgasm. |
09-07-2004, 11:33 AM | #9 (permalink) |
A boy and his dog
Location: EU!
|
That's great news, but then again I can think of a problem. Mortars are used these days days mainly against the civilians. Sarajevo, Gaza Strip, Iraq - all of these places have shown how deadly mortar attacks on civilian targets can be. I'm sure the system will benefit the military in combat, but I can't fantom it beeing easily deployable so that it could protect major urban areas. I hope this will gu further and I hope this isn;t the last time in 10 years that we heard about this project.
|
09-07-2004, 02:09 PM | #10 (permalink) |
Junkie
|
The radar system would have fit into a half a garbage can stuck on top of a hummer. Of course, the display portion would be in the crew compartment.
Defense Update shows an artist's rendition of the system in something the size of a small semi (http://www.defense-update.com/news/MTHEL.htm). The test system pic I saw looks signifigantly smaller, but did not show the supporting equipment (power/control/cooling). More crap to cart around than a patriot battery, but nicer to have if you need to protect a large troop concentration or similar fixed-location target (airfield, hospital, schoolhouse).
__________________
+++++++++++Boom! |
09-23-2004, 03:07 AM | #12 (permalink) |
Junkie
|
You've never worked hills before, have you ;-)
There is still a minimum time requirement to acquire, aim and fire. Working in hills chops down the time between the round popping up and again dropping below your horizon. It's not an ideal system, though better than nothing. Also, fog, dust, rain, etc., would all degrade the operation of the laser, if not the radar.
__________________
+++++++++++Boom! |
09-23-2004, 06:58 AM | #13 (permalink) |
Tilted
Location: Indianapolis
|
Not to minimize the impact of this, but I seem to remember a lot of follow-up articles in the 80's and 90's exposing some strangness in the testing methods of the armed forces. It would be interesting to see some data that's a little more raw.
I wonder what it uses to generate and store energy, and what the cycle time of the laser is? Giant capacitors? You think it just heats up the round enough to destory it or somehow burns a hole in it?
__________________
From the day of his birth Gilgamesh was called by name. |
09-23-2004, 02:53 PM | #15 (permalink) |
Tilted
Location: Indianapolis
|
It looks like it heats up the target. I saw some pictures; it looks like a giant spotlight.
Here's some more information about it: A fire control radar positioned near the hostile zone scans for threats. Once detected, the target's trajectory is tracked and a pointer-tracker is locked onto the target. Once locked in, a high-energy deuterium-fluoride laser beam is trained upon the target. The beam is only a few inches in diameter, but can heat the rocket's steel shell until the missile or shell warhead explodes. The system uses replaceable chemical charges to provide the power; it costs approximately $3,000 to fire (making it much cheaper than other anti-missile systems).
__________________
From the day of his birth Gilgamesh was called by name. |
Tags |
laser, mortar, rounds, shoots |
|
|