Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Sports (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-sports/)
-   -   2004 MLB Free Agent Class (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-sports/74771-2004-mlb-free-agent-class.html)

dylanmarsh 11-03-2004 09:05 AM

2004 MLB Free Agent Class
 
Now that I've come out of the haze of the Red Sox World Series Championship, it occured to me that the 2004 free agent class is one of the deepest in recent memory. Here is the list of the bigger names out there:

Adrian Beltre (signed with Seattle: 5yrs/$64M)
Roger Clemens
Carl Pavano (signed with NYY: 4 yrs/$40M) :|
J.D. Drew (signed with Los Angeles: 5yrs/$55M)
Jeff Kent (signed with the Dodgers: 2yrs/$17M)
Jason Varitek (re-signed: 4yrs/$40M) :thumbsup:
Troy Glaus (signed with Arizona: 4yrs/$45M)
Pedro Martinez (signed with NYM: 4yrs/$54M) :lol:
Odalis Perez
Carlos Beltran
Nomar Garciaparra (re-signed: 1yr/$8M)
Carlos Delgado
Edgar Renteria (signed with Boston: 4yrs/$40M) :thumbsup:
Magglio Ordonez
Eric Milton (signed with Cincinnati: 3yrs/$25.5M)
Brad Radke (re-signed: 2yrs/$18M)
Richie Sexson (signed with Seattle: 4yrs/$48M)
Orlando Cabrera (signed with Anaheim: 4yrs/$32M)

Aside from the free agents, Sammy Sosa, Kevin Brown, Javier Vasquez, Randy Johnson, et al, might also be on the move.

So, any thoughts as to where some of these guys might end up? I would be absolutely shocked if Varitek left Boston or if the Yanks didn't over pay for a middle of the road starting pitcher.

wrongfullyaccuzd 11-03-2004 09:26 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dylanmarsh
I would be absolutely shocked if Varitek left Boston or if the Yanks didn't over pay for a middle of the road starting pitcher.

No...we don't want Pedro. :thumbsup:

Nobody will be surprised if Steinbrenner takes his pick from this deep free agent class. He is expected to seriously pursue Carlos Beltran, as well as, of course, pitching. I would expect Pavano and Milton or Russ Ortiz to be on his list, not to mention trading for Randy Johnson.

You know who is going to have the best offseason of anyone? Scott Boras. According to ESPN, he represents Beltran, Beltre, Drew, Mags, Varitek, Lowe, and Kevin Millwood. Good God.

djtestudo 11-03-2004 10:02 AM

I hear a lot of things around Baltimore, especially about Carlos Delgado wanting to come here. Also rumors about Glaus willing to move to first base for a team to sign him.

There are also stories about Beltran not wanting to go to the Yankees, so we'll see on that (he'd look nice in center in OPACY, that's for sure :p).

One thing on Ordonez: supposedly Boras is not allowing any team to examine his injured knee before signing him.

runtuff 11-03-2004 11:20 AM

You have to think the George S. is smarting from losing to the Red Sox. He is going to go shopping that is for sure, and he is sure to start with the pitching.

dylanmarsh 11-03-2004 11:27 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djtestudo
There are also stories about Beltran not wanting to go to the Yankees, so we'll see on that (he'd look nice in center in OPACY, that's for sure :p).


In a Peter Gammons' chat on Boston.com, he said that Beltran is deeply religious and would feel more comfortable in an area which suits those attributes. In other words, working for Satan and living in NYC doesn't really seem to fit his desires. I think he'll probably stay in Houston and take Kent's money to pad his own contract.

kutulu 11-03-2004 11:57 AM

I don't understand the obsession with Pavano. I see him as somewhere between fool's gold and high risk/high reward. The guy has had exactly one good season. Why does that make him so coveted? Before this year, here are his ERA and IP:

1998 134.2 4.21
1999 104.0 5.63
2000 97.0 3.06
2001 42.2 6.33
2002 136.0 5.16
2003 201.0 4.30

Look at his record. What is there in his history that indicates he will build on this year?

Milton is another enigma to me. Sure, he went 14-6, but he had a 4.75 ERA. It was no off year for him either, he has a 4.76 CAREER ERA. The only way for a pitcher like that to win is to have a very good offensive team when he pitches.

I'd take a chance on Javier Vazquez but not Kevin Brown. Vazquez did so bad in NY that a good GM might be able to get the Yanks to pay off half of his salary for the right player.

Clement could be a nice #2 starter. He's been fairly consistant the last three years. Since people put so much stock in records, his 9-13 record might turn some teams off and drop his value. I'd love to see the DBacks make a push for him.

Russ Ortiz is also a free agent. Although he's no ace, he's a consistant #3 guy. You know what to expect from him, lots of innings and a high 3's - low 4's ERA.

JD Drew had one HELL of a career year at the perfect time. I'd love to have him on my team. He always has a high OBP (.391 career OBP!) and fairly good slg% (31HR is a bit of a fluke for him though).

Glendon Rusch also gets my interest. He had a great year but has never been good at all. If he could sign for cheap I'd take a chance.

I'm a DBacks fan and many think we need a new SS. I don't necessarily agree. Sure, there are great names like Rentaria and Nomar but those guys are out of out price range. We keep hearing about Larkin and Royce Clayton. I hope the talk radio guys are joking. I'd rather we hope Alex Cintron can rebound and hit well next year than take one of two over the hill players.

djtestudo 11-03-2004 12:22 PM

The problem with Carl Pavano is that he has an alter ego named Sidney Ponson.

Underacheiving most of their careers, with an okay year and a great year in the last two before FA.

Of course, Pavano will get WAY more then Ponson got.

Halx 11-03-2004 01:21 PM

Dodgers are gonna try their hardest to get Beltre back. I think he enjoyed the team chemistry last year and will return.

Blu2e354 11-03-2004 02:53 PM

If beltre doesn't return you will have the same anemic offense you had a year ago. Pavano is overated. I hope Nomar goes to Yankeeville because I don't want him in chitown. Milton is way overated too, but u can count on the Yanks overbidding a ton for everybody. Varitek is solid, it would be a big blow to boston if they can't resign him.

jasonresno 11-03-2004 07:53 PM

I've heard alot of places that Beltran would love to play for new york, since his idol plays there too. Bernie basically tought Carlos what he knows about the game and he says he'd love to play alongside him.

And if it goes to a bidding war....

well nuff said.

I also heard the A's are tryign to deal one of the big three and I've been hearing that a posada/gordon/prospects deal for Hudson could be made, that is if the Yankees eat some of Jorges contract.

dylanmarsh 11-04-2004 05:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jasonresno
I also heard the A's are tryign to deal one of the big three and I've been hearing that a posada/gordon/prospects deal for Hudson could be made, that is if the Yankees eat some of Jorges contract.

This deal makes absolutely no sense from the A's standpoint. Hudson is only going to make $6M next year. And for their slightly above average talent, Gordon and Posada make an obscene amount of money ($12M total in 2004). Jermaine Dye was the highest paid Athletic last year with $11.6M and the A's declined his 2005 option. Billy Beane is not going to make this deal unless he wants to destroy the A's and hand the AL pennant to the MFYs. Also, what prospects could the MFYs send in a trade that anyone would be interested in? Their farm system is bare.

The A's would do better to unload Zito (Arizona?) and keep the Hudson-Mulder duo.

canuckguy 11-04-2004 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dylanmarsh
This deal makes absolutely no sense from the A's standpoint. Hudson is only going to make $6M next year. And for their slightly above average talent, Gordon and Posada make an obscene amount of money ($12M total in 2004). Jermaine Dye was the highest paid Athletic last year with $11.6M and the A's declined his 2005 option. Billy Beane is not going to make this deal unless he wants to destroy the A's and hand the AL pennant to the MFYs. Also, what prospects could the MFYs send in a trade that anyone would be interested in? Their farm system is bare.

The A's would do better to unload Zito (Arizona?) and keep the Hudson-Mulder duo.


I keep waiting like everyone else to see Zito put it together like he did during his cy year. I would be scared to trade him as he could win 10 games or 22 next year. wish i had his curve.

kutulu 11-05-2004 09:19 AM

So Borass came out and said Beltran wants a 10 year deal. Any team that does that deserves the future torment that they would recieve for it.

whiplash13 11-05-2004 08:53 PM

Supposedly Manny may be on the move as well. He would look great in a Mets uniform :)

Lefty04 11-11-2004 10:52 AM

Please let someone make an offer for Sammy, so the Cubs can give a wad of dough to Beltran. Am I just dreaming?

pan6467 11-12-2004 01:19 PM

My take on where these guys go:

Adrian Beltre: Cubs or LA

Roger Clemens: back to Houston (but maybe the surprise of the offseason and sign with.......... BOSTON)

Carl Pavano: Indians say they are going to chase Clement but I think Pavano will be more affordable

J.D. Drew: Houston or REDS

Jeff Kent: Cubs

Jason Varitek: White Sox with Omar Vizquel

Troy Glaus: Stays on WC San Francisco

Pedro Martinez: goes cheaply to Baltimore

Odalis Perez: another Cleveland possibility but Red Sox

Carlos Beltran: Rangers

Nomar Garciaparra: A's

Carlos Delgado: NY Yankees over priced

Edgar Renteria: stays with St. Louis

Magglio Ordonez: My opinion best offensive FA LA

Brad Radke: St. Louis

Percival: Cubs

Benitez: INDIANS

Clement: back to the REDS

Wickman: Orioles or retires

My take.... I might have 1 right......

Esen 11-12-2004 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pan6467
My take on where these guys go:

Adrian Beltre: Cubs or LA

Roger Clemens: back to Houston (but maybe the surprise of the offseason and sign with.......... BOSTON)

Carl Pavano: Indians say they are going to chase Clement but I think Pavano will be more affordable

J.D. Drew: Houston or REDS

Jeff Kent: Cubs

Jason Varitek: White Sox with Omar Vizquel

Troy Glaus: Stays on WC San Francisco

Pedro Martinez: goes cheaply to Baltimore

Odalis Perez: another Cleveland possibility but Red Sox

Carlos Beltran: Rangers

Nomar Garciaparra: A's

Carlos Delgado: NY Yankees over priced

Edgar Renteria: stays with St. Louis

Magglio Ordonez: My opinion best offensive FA LA

Brad Radke: St. Louis

Percival: Cubs

Benitez: INDIANS

Clement: back to the REDS

Wickman: Orioles or retires

My take.... I might have 1 right......

I think you may be way odd, Pedro will not go cheaply, he did good in post season

dylanmarsh 11-14-2004 05:02 PM

According to ESPNews, Omar Vizquel signed a 3 year deal with the Giants today. More pressure for the BoSox to get off their ass and sign a solid SS.

canuckguy 11-14-2004 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dylanmarsh
According to ESPNews, Omar Vizquel signed a 3 year deal with the Giants today. More pressure for the BoSox to get off their ass and sign a solid SS.


get off there asses? did the free agent period just start on friday!

pan6467 11-14-2004 06:59 PM

SF gave a 37 yr old Vizquel too many years ..... 3 yrs for a SS with bad knees? I love Omar but couldn't believe it when I heard about the new contract.

Either SF is stupid or this is going to be a very HUGE spending F/A off season by some teams.

I have heard Boston is looking at Barry Larkin...... I find that hard to believe.... could see Larkin going to the Indians though

lpj8 11-14-2004 08:49 PM

I heard from ESPN that Delgado may go to the Marlins, which makes no sense because the Marlins probably can't afford him. But, they definately could use the offense.
I see Beltre staying with the Dodgers. He had one heck of a year (Good for my fantasy baseball tearm), but it was just that, one year. I think that he won't get as much as he may be worth, and he'll stay a dodger.
Pavano is a good location pitcher, but he's not lights out. It's amazing that he won 18 games with the Marlins and their offense. I see him going to the Orioles.

Anyways, I'm sure most of you have seen this, but here is ESPN's top 50 Free Agents, and their prediction as to where they are going.
ESPN Free Agents

dylanmarsh 11-14-2004 08:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian1975
get off there asses? did the free agent period just start on friday!


Let's see... the Sox didn't waste any time last year when Schilling and Foulke were available and we all saw how that turned out. SS is a huge position to fill, especially with the terrifying thought of Pokey Reese taking Cabrera's place in the everyday line-up. So, yes, they need to get off their asses and get the stability back.

canuckguy 11-15-2004 05:34 AM

As a jays fan I really do like delgado but I see him as wanting the money and not caring about winning. Which is terrible since the guy has been one of the highest paid players for years so he has tons in the bank. I hope we can resign him (doubt it!) as he is a fan fav, and does loads for the community, but I think he'll end up in LA with his friend green, or in baltimore with rafi at dh.

kutulu 11-15-2004 09:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lpj8
Anyways, I'm sure most of you have seen this, but here is ESPN's top 50 Free Agents, and their prediction as to where they are going.
ESPN Free Agents

I don't belive much that ESPN writes. If they get 10% of their predictions right they had a good year.

dylanmarsh 11-16-2004 06:07 AM

And the FA list expands: Al Leiter. (http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1923626)

The Mets didn't feel that his $10M option for next year was worth it. Screw Pavano and Radke, I'll take Pedro and Leiter as the BoSox two and three starters.

kutulu 11-16-2004 09:11 AM

The Mets made a good choice. Leiter is too old to make that kind of money. He had a great season last year but at his age the likelyhood of him repeating it is not good. A fine #3 starter though...

kutulu 11-16-2004 03:09 PM

Lidle signed with the Phils today. Guzman and Castilla signed with the Expos.

Lidle was not on the top 50. Guzman was predicted to stay with the Twins and Castilla was predicted to go to the Reds.

ESPN is now 0-3.

dylanmarsh 11-16-2004 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kutulu
Lidle signed with the Phils today. Guzman and Castilla signed with the Expos.

Lidle was not on the top 50. Guzman was predicted to stay with the Twins and Castilla was predicted to go to the Reds.

ESPN is now 0-3.

Ummmm, don't the Expos know that Castilla is the epitome of suckiness when he plays anywhere but Coors Field? I wouldn't pay him $5.00 let alone the $6.2M the Expos are now stuck with for the next two years. What a joke.

ESPN is never right, btw. Last year they picked 9 out of 50 free agent destinations correctly, with only three actually changing teams (Sheffield, Ponson and Pettitte).

lpj8 11-16-2004 08:55 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kutulu
I don't belive much that ESPN writes. If they get 10% of their predictions right they had a good year.

Thats pretty interesting, I've never really checked up on their predictions much. I guess I assumed they knew what they were talking about. I still hope that Delgado goes to the Marlins as they predicted, they could really use the offense.

dylanmarsh 11-17-2004 06:40 PM

Troy Percival signed with Tigers for some stupid reason today. 2 years for $12M. Wait, I just figured out why he signed there.

pan6467 11-17-2004 08:02 PM

Omar for 3 years 12 mill, Percival for 2 years 12 mil? Can anyone say over paying over their prime players?

It looks like another free spending year. The Indians are done, lol. Reds are probably done.

goddfather40 11-17-2004 09:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pan6467
Omar for 3 years 12 mill, Percival for 2 years 12 mil? Can anyone say over paying over their prime players?

It looks like another free spending year. The Indians are done, lol. Reds are probably done.

I could've seen 1yr/6mil for Percy. He has probably one solid year left before his arm falls off. The one year he'll give you will be solid though, he's money for 35 saves. It's very hard to see him go, he's from my hometown, and I'm a huge Angel fan. But, alas, it's time for K-Rod to take the closer reins, just like Percy did from Lee Smith.

dylanmarsh 11-19-2004 12:27 PM

Adios Guillen
 
Well Halx and Goddfather, looks like you guys got rid of some of your Angel clubhouse cancer today:

From FoxSports

Quote:

The Expos have made their third significant acquisition of the week, acquiring outfielder Jose Guillen from the Angels for outfielder Juan Rivera and shortstop Maicer Izturis.
I believe Maicer Izturis is the little brother of Caesar Izturis, the Dodgers' SS.

kutulu 11-19-2004 04:06 PM

nice trade for both teams (esp the angels)

djtestudo 11-19-2004 07:37 PM

Maybe the Expos can sign Raul Mondasi, Milton (the Game) Bradley, and Albert (I SAID don't $&^@ing call me JOEY!) Belle too.

Then when it gets to midseason and the Washington fans realize that the Wizards playing baseball would be better to watch and stop coming, they can have promotions like four-way steel cage matches.

pan6467 11-19-2004 11:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djtestudo
Maybe the Expos can sign Raul Mondasi, Milton (the Game) Bradley, and Albert (I SAID don't $&^@ing call me JOEY!) Belle too.

Then when it gets to midseason and the Washington fans realize that the Wizards playing baseball would be better to watch and stop coming, they can have promotions like four-way steel cage matches.

Don't forget Carl Everett and managing they can have Bob Boone.

Jadey 11-22-2004 01:39 AM

I really don't understand what Detroit was trying to do with the Percival signing when they already picked up the option for Urbina, who is 5 or 6 years younger. Urbina did have a bit of a down year, but Percival is on the back side of his career and has had trouble staying healthy. It seems to me Detroit has a number of other needs beyond Closer. Though bullpen depth is always a plus, a decent setup man could've been had for much less I think. There are guys out there that would've come alot cheaper is your are looking to add depth in the pen -- Kline, Fox, Mercker, Medoza, etc.

dylanmarsh 11-22-2004 05:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jadey
I really don't understand what Detroit was trying to do with the Percival signing when they already picked up the option for Urbina, who is 5 or 6 years younger. Urbina did have a bit of a down year, but Percival is on the back side of his career and has had trouble staying healthy.

Urbina is a huge question mark for next season; he is still in South America trying to get his mother released from her kidnappers. If he does come back, having a bullpen with two guys like this is not a such a bad thing. Case in point: Tom Gordon and Mariano Rivera.

Jadey 11-28-2004 12:16 AM

Oh, I didn't realize the situation with his mother was still unresolved.

dylanmarsh 11-30-2004 05:12 PM

Armando Benitez, formerly of the Florida Marlins, signed with the G-Men: http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1935338

This should greatly displease Halx.

Quote:

Giants pay up for much-needed closer

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Associated Press

SAN FRANCISCO -- Free agent Armando Benitez and the San Francisco Giants agreed to a three-year contract Tuesday, a move that stabilizes the club's closer role that's been in flux since Robb Nen got injured two years ago.

The Giants announced the deal after Benitez took a physical in Florida on Tuesday. Agent Mike Powers would not say how much the deal would be worth, but the San Francisco Chronicle reported that it would be for about $21 million.

Benitez bounced back from a subpar 2003 season to save 47 games and post a 1.29 ERA for the Florida Marlins this year. His signing would fill one of the Giants' biggest offseason needs.

Since Nen was sidelined with a serious shoulder injury following the 2002 World Series, the Giants have pieced together their bullpen. Tim Worrell closed in 2003 before leaving for Philadelphia as a free agent and San Francisco struggled at the end of games last season.

Matt Herges started the year as closer before being replaced by Dustin Hermanson in August. Hermanson saved 17 games but couldn't hold a three-run lead on the final Saturday of the season against Los Angeles, helping cost San Francisco a playoff berth.

Hermanson is a free agent and the Giants have talked about bringing him back, but it could possibly be in a setup role.

Benitez is an intimidating presence on the mound and is one of the game's most overpowering pitchers, striking out 826 batters in 654 innings.

But while Benitez has been one of the game's top closers in the regular season with 244 saves in 283 chances in an 11-year career, his postseason history is spotty.

He has blown six of 10 postseason save opportunities -- a major-league record -- with Baltimore and the New York Mets, including the opener of the 2000 World Series against the Yankees and Game 2 of a first-round playoff series that year against San Francisco.

He also gave up three game-winning hits in the 1997 ALCS for Baltimore against Cleveland and gave up the infamous Jeffrey Maier home run in the opener of the 1996 ALCS against the Yankees. In that game, a 12-year-old boy reached over the wall to get a drive by Derek Jeter. The Yankees beat Baltimore that afternoon and in the series.

Despite his postseason troubles, pitching for a team that is in contention every year was a big attraction for Benitez.

"You look at places where you see you can get an opportunity to pitch in big games. They fit the bill," Powers said. "I can't fathom how they could not be in postseason running."

djtestudo 11-30-2004 05:17 PM

Actually it should greatly PLEASE Halx, because he couldn't win a big game if he was playing in the Little League World Series.

kutulu 12-07-2004 03:48 PM

Nomar is staying with the Cubs. $8M plus incentives for one year. A steal for the Cubs. This makes ESPN somehting like 1-7 in their predictions so far. The only one they got right was Benson staying with the Mets...

pan6467 12-07-2004 06:54 PM

Looks like Clement will be an Angel. According to WTAM 1100AM in Cleveland Clement's agent is claiming his client has narrowed the choices to Cleveland and Anaheim.

We all know that is so the Angels will up their bid a few pennies more and Cleveland can say they couldn't afford him.

Clement IMO is better than Pavano, Radke, or Odalis Perez, and on the same plane as Benson and Milton (perhaps better), so IF the Tribe do get Matt, I think they may have landed a pretty good starter.

Speaking of the AL Central, word going around the Cleveland media is there are 2 reason Ilitch has money to spend on the Tigers and make them a contender, those reasons:

1) Money unspent on his Redwings.

2) He is building up the Tigers to sell them.

While 1 to me sounds kind of ridiculous (the NHL owners lose money if there is no season, right?) 2 sounds more believable. I do hope it is 2 and Ilitch finds a buyer fast, Dolan sees this and does the same to the Indians.

thrsn0730 12-07-2004 09:03 PM

As a Phillies phan, I can confirm that Clement is certainly better than Milton. While Milton was the Phils' best pitcher this year, he had terrific run support and seemed to get rocked at least every other start. I'd gladly lose Milton for Clement, though that looks next to impossible now.

Edit: Didn't want to double post, so here's a late FA add:

The latest from the FA front has the Yankees adding Tony Womack and Jaret Wright:

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1940995

You'd think that sooner or later teams would realize not to go anywhere near a pitcher that the Braves let a pitcher go.

dylanmarsh 12-07-2004 09:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kutulu
Nomar is staying with the Cubs. $8M plus incentives for one year. A steal for the Cubs. This makes ESPN somehting like 1-7 in their predictions so far. The only one they got right was Benson staying with the Mets...

It'll be a steal if Nomie can keep his gimpy heel healthy. This deal makes me wonder what sort of money/years Cabrera and Renteria are looking to get. I would think this leaves the Cubs searching for a SS next off-season, as well.

BTW, ESPN.com never gets anything right. Here's my not-so-bold predictions for the remaining SS: Cabrera to the Angels, Renteria stays in St. Louis, Jose Valentin and Placido Polanco both head to beantown.

dylanmarsh 12-07-2004 09:21 PM

LMAO

The Yankees decided to open the flood gates tonight and signed 35 year old Tony Womack to a 2-year contract (nice one, George). They're also supposedly close to signing Milton and Jaret Wright.

Also, Radke is back with the Twinkies for the next two years.

pan6467 12-07-2004 09:36 PM

Actually seeing the Yankees signing Wright and Milton shows they are money stupid and I seriously doubt they will sign Martinez now.

Wright is NOT Yankee material, unless something in him has changed greatly, he'll more than likely end up a NY nightlife casualty. The talent that kid had when he first came to Cleveland and pissed away in the Flats.

As for Milton, again nothing in his stats or from what I have seen of him makes me think he is going to help the Yankees pass the BoSox. But we'll see.

I am very surprised at the Yankees choices. Clement and Benson were my 2 big pitchers this FA season. Of course the Yankees also went with Womack???? Is Cashman trying to sabotage the Yankees, he couldn't do a better job at it. Going after Lieber and Orlando Hernandez???? ESPN is either smoking something or King George is having his yes men sell him piles of bullshit. I'd take Odalis Perez over either of them.

Martinez I think with all his talk and selfishness, he'll be back in Boston.

djtestudo 12-07-2004 09:40 PM

Milton makes some sense, because Yankee Stadium is a little better then most places for a lefty pitcher, especially since the Yankees don't have one.

Wright, in New York, with that contract, is going to make Sidney Ponson with his contract look like Walter Johnson.

Joe Morgan at his age is probably a better option then Tony Womack at his age. Especially since Cairo was servicable for them.

What a dumb team.

dylanmarsh 12-08-2004 05:55 AM

The thing with the Womack signing is that for a little bit more money, they coulda had Placido Polanco who was been one of the more productive middle infielders in recent years and he isn't even 30:

2003 - .289/.352/.447/.799
2004 - .298/.345/.441/.786

I could see Milton succeeding but not 20 wins or even 15. He'll be the Jon Leiber of this team; 14 wins or less.

Wright will be the 2005 version of Jeff Weaver in pinstripes. 3 years at $21M is completely ridiculous for Wright. This is Cashman's final year -- maybe on earth.

(I'm beginning to love the Yankees' front office. There has to be a Sox fan in there somewhere.)

kutulu 12-08-2004 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dylanmarsh
(I'm beginning to love the Yankees' front office. There has to be a Sox fan in there somewhere.)

Me too. 21M for Wright. What a joke. The first two rules for signing free agents:

1) Don't sign a hitter that sucked, went to Colorado for a year and kicked ass. They will regress (a lot).

2) Don't sign a pitcher that sucked, went to the Braves for a year or two and 'resurrected' his career. He will regress.

The guys at Sabernomics concluded that Leo Mazzone has a 0.55-0.85 effect on a pitcher's ERA. That is one hell of an effect:

Quote:

So, what's the veridict? Leo Mazzone is a damn good coach! Working with Leo is shaves off between .55 and .85 points of a pitcher's ERA. And I promise you, the results are not some artifact of some manipulation of the numbers to prove a point. In fact, my bias when I started this project was that Leo was a bit overrated. To put this in perspective, the standard deviation of ERA for pitchers in the sample was 1.36. Leo's boys gain about half of a standard deviation on their ERA. I think Schuerholz ought to take this number into arbitration hearings with pitchers. Also interesting is the fact that the effect seems to go away when pitchers leave. This may be because Mazzone imparts useful everyday help, not just new knowledge to fix an old problem, or maybe the Braves know when to dump guys. In any event I think it's clear Rob Neyer was not exaggerating when he suggested Leo Mazzone ought be in the Hall of Fame.
Milton is bad for a #3 starter and good for a #4 starter. Somehow (*cough* run support *cough*) he won a bunch of games last year. Sadly, he'll get paid like a #2 starter.

I think Clement was the one of the best free agent pitchers on the market this year if you consider age, IP, 2004 ERA, career ERA, likeliness to sign with a new club, and expected competition from other clubs. I wish the DBakcs would have made him their #1 FA pitcher target. Instead, they are going after Russ Ortiz (see Mazzone rant above) and will probably give him more money than Clement will sign for.

pan6467 12-08-2004 12:41 PM

Clement's offer in Cleveland is being reported at between 21-24 million for 3 years.

He's also a very very close friend of CC Sabathia (so they report) and if he signs CC would have been a major reason he even considered us to begin with. (Got to love the way the press sometimes build up athletes.)

I see Clement (if Cleveland truly wants him coming in for 4 years and 27 million). Not bad this day and age, and for the best FA pitcher out there not named Martinez it may really help Cleveland.

dylanmarsh 12-08-2004 01:26 PM

Another huge and horrible contract:

Jon Leiber: 3yrs, $21M with the Phillies

Also, Al Leiter signed with the Marlins for one-year.

And my beloved Red Sox (better known as God's Team), signed Matt Mantei to a one-year, $750K contract.

At this rate, Pedro and Pavano will probably get $50M a piece. I'm amazed at the contracts these middle of the road pitchers get in this day and age.

pan6467 12-08-2004 01:39 PM

I still don't see anything in Pavano's past that is any indicater he is a great pitcher. He had 1 ONE good year...... where are these "he's right behind Pedro in attractiveness" stats. Sounds more like a one year wonder who in contract year went out and tried.

Before I'd give him a great contract I'd want to see him string together 2-3 more seasons IN A ROW like last season. THEN I'd consider him a #1 starter.


#45 Carl Pavano Florida Marlins | Roster | Statistics | MLB Index

Age: 28
Height: 6-5
Weight: 241 lbs.
Bats: Right
Throws: Right
Pos: SP


PITCHING STATISTICS
CAREER: BATTING | PITCHING | FIELDING
Season TM G GS CG SHO IP H R ER HR BB SO W L ERA
1998 Mon 24 23 0 0 134.2 130 70 63 18 43 83 6 9 -- 4.21
1999 Mon 19 18 1 1 104.0 117 66 65 8 35 70 6 8 -- 5.63
2000 Mon 15 15 0 0 97.0 89 40 33 8 34 64 8 4 -- 3.06
2001 Mon 8 8 0 0 42.2 59 33 30 7 16 36 1 6 -- 6.33
2002 Mon 15 14 0 0 74.1 98 55 52 14 31 51 3 8 -- 6.30
2002 Fla 22 8 0 0 61.2 76 33 26 5 14 41 3 2 -- 3.80
2002 -- 37 22 0 0 136.0 174 88 78 19 45 92 6 10 -- 5.16
2003 Fla 33 32 2 0 201.0 204 99 96 19 49 133 12 13 -- 4.30
2004 Fla 31 31 2 2 222.1 212 80 74 16 49 139 18 8 -- 3.00
Total -- 167 149 5 3 937.2 985 476 439 95 271 617 57 58 -- 4.21

dylanmarsh 12-08-2004 01:47 PM

Pavano's has shown a workhorse mentality the past few years. He's physically built like Schilling and Clemens and his BB/K ratio has been pretty consistent. I'd pay him in the $30M range but he scares me like Neagle and Hampton did when they got their huge contracts. Some team will take the risk. I'm guessing the Tigers will scoop up either Pavano or Lowe.

jasonresno 12-08-2004 06:42 PM

Pavano=Overrated.

I think the "yankee hate mentality" really takes some credit out of some posters posts.

dylanmarsh 12-08-2004 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jasonresno
I think the "yankee hate mentality" really takes some credit out of some posters posts.

Then refute it.

Steinbrenner is running the team into the ground with bad contracts and over-rated players. Jaret Wright is not worth $21M just as Kevin Brown wasn't worth the cost of dental insurance last season.

djtestudo 12-08-2004 09:08 PM

Carl Pavano:
Code:

Year Ag Tm  Lg  W  L  G  GS  CG SHO  GF SV  IP    H    R  ER  HR  BB  SO  HBP  WP  BFP  ERA *lgERA *ERA+
+--------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+------+----+----+----+---+----+----+---+---+-----+-----+-----+----+
 1998 22 MON NL  6  9  24  23  0  0  0  0  134.7  130  70  63  18  43  83  8  1  580  4.21  4.11  98
 1999 23 MON NL  6  8  19  18  1  1  0  0  104.0  117  66  65  8  35  70  4  1  457  5.62  4.70  84
 2000 24 MON NL  8  4  15  15  0  0  0  0  97.0  89  40  33  8  34  64  8  1  408  3.06  4.64  151
 2001 25 MON NL  1  6  8  8  0  0  0  0  42.7  59  33  30  7  16  36  2  0  199  6.33  4.62  73
 2002 26 MON NL  3  8  15  14  0  0  0  0  74.3  98  55  52  14  31  51  7  2  350  6.30  4.16  66
        FLA NL  3  2  22  8  0  0  2  0  61.7  76  33  26  5  14  41  3  1  269  3.79  3.99  105
        TOT NL  6  10  37  22  0  0  2  0  136.0  174  88  78  19  45  92  10  3  619  5.16  4.08  79
 2003 27 FLA NL  12  13  33  32  2  0  1  0  201.0  204  99  96  19  49  133  7  3  846  4.30  4.03  94
 2004 28 FLA NL  18  8  31  31  2  2  0  0  222.3  212  80  74  16  49  139  11  2  909  3.00  4.10  137
+--------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+------+----+----+----+---+----+----+---+---+-----+-----+-----+----+
  7 Yr WL% .496  57  58 167 149  5  3  3  0  937.7  985  476  439  95  271  617  50  11  4018  4.21  4.23  100
+--------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+------+----+----+----+---+----+----+---+---+-----+-----+-----+----+
 162 Game Avg    12  12  35  32  1  0  0  0  201.7  211  102  94  20  58  132  10  2  864  4.21  4.23  100
 Career High    18  13  37  32  2  2  2  0  222.3  212  99  96  19  49  139  11  3  909  3.00  4.71  152

Sidney Ponson:
Code:

Year Ag Tm  Lg  W  L  G  GS  CG SHO  GF SV  IP    H    R  ER  HR  BB  SO  HBP  WP  BFP  ERA *lgERA *ERA+
+--------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+------+----+----+----+---+----+----+---+---+-----+-----+-----+----+
 1998 21 BAL AL  8  9  31  20  0  0  5  1  135.0  157  82  79  19  42  85  3  4  588  5.27  4.52  86
 1999 22 BAL AL  12  12  32  32  6  0  0  0  210.0  227  118  110  35  80  112  1  4  897  4.71  4.82  102
 2000 23 BAL AL  9  13  32  32  6  1  0  0  222.0  223  125  119  30  83  152  1  5  953  4.82  4.72  98
 2001 24 BAL AL  5  10  23  23  3  1  0  0  138.3  161  83  76  21  37  84  6  2  605  4.94  4.21  85
 2002 25 BAL AL  7  9  28  28  3  0  0  0  176.0  172  84  80  26  63  120  2  3  736  4.09  4.38  107
 2003 26 BAL AL  14  6  21  21  4  0  0  0  148.0  147  65  62  10  43  100  4  6  622  3.77  4.35  115
        SFG NL  3  6  10  10  0  0  0  0  68.0  64  29  28  6  18  34  1  3  276  3.71  4.29  116
        TOT    17  12  31  31  4  0  0  0  216.0  211  94  90  16  61  134  5  9  898  3.75  4.33  115
 2004 27 BAL AL  11  15  33  33  5  2  0  0  215.7  265  136  127  23  69  115  8  8  954  5.30  4.78  90
+--------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+------+----+----+----+---+----+----+---+---+-----+-----+-----+----+
  7 Yr WL% .463  69  80 210 199  27  4  5  1 1313.0 1416  722  681 170  435  802  26  35  5631  4.67  4.56  98
+--------------+---+---+---+---+---+---+---+--+------+----+----+----+---+----+----+---+---+-----+-----+-----+----+
 162 Game Avg    11  13  34  33  4  0  0  0  218.0  235  120  113  28  72  133  4  5  936  4.67  4.56  98
 Career High    17  15  33  33  6  2  5  1  222.0  265  136  127  35  83  152  8  9  954  3.74  4.82  115

Notice how similar their career paths are: both had several years of inconsistant potential, a decent year, and a great contract year.

Ponson got $22.5 million last year, and promptly had one of the worst first-halves of a pitcher in the last ten years (though he pitched well later in the season).

Pavano will likely get at least 4 years, $40 million.

Risky pick.

dylanmarsh 12-08-2004 09:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djtestudo
Notice how similar their career paths are: both had several years of inconsistant potential, a decent year, and a great contract year.

Ponson got $22.5 million last year, and promptly had one of the worst first-halves of a pitcher in the last ten years (though he pitched well later in the season).

Pavano will likely get at least 4 years, $40 million.

Risky pick.

There is one glaring thing that is left out of your analysis: Ponson weighs 500 lbs. I definitely agree, however, that Sid and Carl have gone down similar career paths. Ponson fluctuating weight has to be a factor when discussing them, though. I think if Pavano is smart and goes to Boston, he could learn quite a bit from Schilling and perhaps continue the upward trend of his career. Of course, Pavano might also benefit from a vet like Mussina, if George breaks the bank.

Pavano will get a minimum of $40M and possibly more if teams get desperate.

dylanmarsh 12-09-2004 07:43 AM

Troy Glaus signed a 4 year, $45M contract today with the Diamondbacks. I can think of worse places to spend the next four years than beautiful and sunny Arizona.

thrsn0730 12-09-2004 08:31 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dylanmarsh
Troy Glaus signed a 4 year, $45M contract today with the Diamondbacks. I can think of worse places to spend the next four years than beautiful and sunny Arizona.

True ... as long as you don't mind playing for a team that loses around 100 games a year. And where in the world did they find that kind of coin? I thought the reason they were going to trade Randy Johnson and not bring back Sexson was they were in such bad financial shape.

thrsn0730 12-09-2004 08:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dylanmarsh
The thing with the Womack signing is that for a little bit more money, they coulda had Placido Polanco who was been one of the more productive middle infielders in recent years and he isn't even 30:

2003 - .289/.352/.447/.799
2004 - .298/.345/.441/.786

I could see Milton succeeding but not 20 wins or even 15. He'll be the Jon Leiber of this team; 14 wins or less.

Wright will be the 2005 version of Jeff Weaver in pinstripes. 3 years at $21M is completely ridiculous for Wright. This is Cashman's final year -- maybe on earth.

(I'm beginning to love the Yankees' front office. There has to be a Sox fan in there somewhere.)

The only thing I can figure on the Polanco front is they were scared off by the Phillies offering arbitration. Of course, when have the Yankees ever worried about losing a draft pick or two?

djtestudo 12-09-2004 08:37 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dylanmarsh
There is one glaring thing that is left out of your analysis: Ponson weighs 500 lbs. I definitely agree, however, that Sid and Carl have gone down similar career paths. Ponson fluctuating weight has to be a factor when discussing them, though. I think if Pavano is smart and goes to Boston, he could learn quite a bit from Schilling and perhaps continue the upward trend of his career. Of course, Pavano might also benefit from a vet like Mussina, if George breaks the bank.

Pavano will get a minimum of $40M and possibly more if teams get desperate.

Pavano - 241
Ponson - 266

Not a severe difference there.

dylanmarsh 12-09-2004 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djtestudo
Pavano - 241
Ponson - 266

Not a severe difference there.

http://espn.go.com/i/mlb/profiles/players/5945.jpg

6'5" and 241 lbs. = 3.13 lbs/inch

http://espn.go.com/i/mlb/profiles/players/5984.jpg

6'1" and 266 lbs. = 3.64 lbs/inch

If Ponson was Pavano's height, he would weigh 280lbs. If Pavano was Ponson's height, he would weigh 228.5 lbs. So, yes, there is a pretty large difference. Just look at the pics! Ponson is a house! ;)

thrsn0730 12-09-2004 09:17 AM

The only thing about Ponson's weight is this: He's listed at 266. Having seen him pitch a couple of times late last year, either the camera adds 30 pounds or he's at least 280.

kutulu 12-09-2004 09:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dylanmarsh
And my beloved Red Sox (better known as God's Team), signed Matt Mantei to a one-year, $750K contract.

Nobody commented on that signing, but I LOVE that deal for the Red Sox. It has the potential to be the best bullpend aquisitions in the offseason. If he stays healthy (BIG if) he will be just as good as or better than Foulke.

Quote:

Originally Posted by thrsn0730
True ... as long as you don't mind playing for a team that loses around 100 games a year. And where in the world did they find that kind of coin? I thought the reason they were going to trade Randy Johnson and not bring back Sexson was they were in such bad financial shape.

First of all, the 110 losses was an arberation. Take a team and remove a 40HR slugger, destroy the LF'ers throwing arm (which fucks his offensive game up too), trade away one of the top CF's in the game, and then add injuries to both catchers, your 2B, two starting pitchers and replace all of those guys with AAA and AA players and see if any team can avoid that record. It was train wreck after train wreck last year. This year could be totally different.

Finding that money was no problem. We have three players under contract for 2005 (RJ-16, Gonzo-10, Webb-about 2) and lots of young pre-arbitration players that can make big contributions. That is 28M and we plan on having a payroll of about 75M.

We've tried out hardest to resign Sexson to a fair contract for both sides. We offered 3yr/30M but we tied some of the first two years' money to him staying healthy. He wouldn't take it. We did offer arbitration to Richie but I doubt he'll take it. If he did we'd have one hell of a middle of the lineup.

The only word on trading RJ came from RJ himself. He wants out and the team wants to keep him. We told him we'd try to accomidate him so we've tried to make deals. Basically we set the price so high that nobody will take it, therefore he'll probably stay which is fine with the management.

I have mixed feelings about the Glaus signing. Although we can afford him, we have somewhere around $150M in deferred salaries that we owe. There is loads of talent in the farm system (superstar types) that are going to make an impact by 2007. I would have been fine with staying in last place for two years and getting rid of the deferred money ASAP.

thrsn0730 12-09-2004 10:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kutulu
I have mixed feelings about the Glaus signing. Although we can afford him, we have somewhere around $150M in deferred salaries that we owe. There is loads of talent in the farm system (superstar types) that are going to make an impact by 2007. I would have been fine with staying in last place for two years and getting rid of the deferred money ASAP.

Wow, that's a lot of deferred money. I guess the Glaus signing just blew my mind because it looked like the kind of signing you make when you think you're just a player away from doing something big and not coming off a 100-loss season.

Of course, it doesn't take much any more for a team to go from last to first.

djtestudo 12-09-2004 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thrsn0730
The only thing about Ponson's weight is this: He's listed at 266. Having seen him pitch a couple of times late last year, either the camera adds 30 pounds or he's at least 280.

Hey now, there's a LOT of cameras at a baseball game :p

Seriously though, I could (and have in the past elsewhere) post a list of pitchers who are around/over Ponson's weight and pitch well. For example: Cleveland Browns offensive lineman...I mean, Cleveland Indians starting pitcher C.C Sabathia, at 6-7 290, or 3.67 ibs/inch.

Weight means very little.

dylanmarsh 12-09-2004 12:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djtestudo
Weight means very little.

You're right, we should be talking about Body Fat% versus Muscle. :D

djtestudo 12-09-2004 12:45 PM

Bastard...;)

Seriously, though, apparently the Orioles are deep in discussions for Tim Hudson, so I'm worried about that right now :)

kutulu 12-09-2004 12:51 PM

Look at Curt Schilling and Bartolo Colon. Both have had weight issues but Curt and to a lesser extent, Colon, have not been affected by their weight. I do see the similarity between the career paths of Ponson and Pavano. Pavano would be a fine #3 starter but a team would be insane to rely on him to be their ace. I'd also be cautious of having him be my second best pitcher. Don't forget that he pitched in a pretty good pitchers park also.

He also isn't the workhorse people make him out to be. He's only hit 200 inning twice last year. And really, 200 innings isn't that great. All it means is that you didn't get hurt and were effective enought to go at least 6 innings with the occasional 7, 8 or complete game. I compare him to Miguel Batista last season. He's had his ups and downs over the years but in his contract year he put up career numbers. The only real difference is 4 years (which can be a big deal depending on your view of aging). Batista got a 3yr/13M deal. It really shows the difference between this years market adn last years market. Everybody is overpaying for sightly above average talent this year.

dylanmarsh 12-09-2004 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by djtestudo
Bastard...;)

Seriously, though, apparently the Orioles are deep in discussions for Tim Hudson, so I'm worried about that right now :)

You know, Hudson does kinda worry me. He's not built all that well, I think he weighs like 160 or something, and I wonder if he might run into the Pedro syndrome where he can't go beyond 7 innings or 100 pitches. In fact, Pedro has him by 25 lbs. I think that could be one of the concerns/reasons why the A's are trying to unload him and not someone else like Zito.

*edit*

Jeff Kent signed with the Dodgers.

Steve Finley with the Angels and Russ Ortiz with the D-Backs also inked deals.

djtestudo 12-11-2004 04:19 PM

Pavano to Yankees; four years, $44 million.

http://sports.espn.go.com/espn/wire?...mlb&id=1944227

Jeez, if they wanted Sidney Ponson THAT bad, I'm sure they could have worked out a deal with the Orioles :p

jasonresno 12-12-2004 10:06 AM

Yankees and Pavano have come to terms on a 4 year 39 million dollar contract with an option for a fifth year. Sweet.


EDIT:
It was 44 million?

thrsn0730 12-12-2004 01:18 PM

As to Hudson, his former pitching coach Rick Peterson (sp?) has concerns about his delivery. Apparently as part of their pre-hab, Hudson had his delivery checked out by computer in Alabama. System said the force produced by his hips was off the charts and could lead to back problems in the future.

Take it FWIW, obviously.

dylanmarsh 12-13-2004 12:37 PM

Looks like Richie Sexson is escaping Arizona for the M's and, in turn, is solidifying one of the worst trades made in the history of baseball. The D-Backs gave up Spivey, Overbay, Counsel, Moeller, Capanuano, de la Rosa and cash for a couple of minor leaguers and two months of Richie Sexson.

kutulu 12-13-2004 01:43 PM

The only thing that bugs me about Sexson leaving was his crap line about wanting to play for a winner. The M's are no more of a winner than the DBacks.

Esen 12-13-2004 05:18 PM

Well it looks like Seson and Delgado might both wind up with the M's
and I can't believe iy, but there is actually a realistic chance that Pedro will wind up with the MEts.
I would say at this point it is like a 90% chance he will be a met. of course until all is signed and done a 10% margin is still huge.
We will see.
Now if they were able to ditch piazza and get soem money up for Beltran that would be nice!

Honestly with Pedro as a met, there pitching staff is not really that bad.
1) Pedro
2) Glavine
3) Trachel
4) Benson
5) Zambrano

Now a lot of people may rag on both Benson ans Zambrano. but as 4th and 5th spot pitchers that is incredible! really you got to step back and say for 4th and 5th spot pitchers that is really nice.

On many teams they would be forced to be 2 and 3 pitchers. so you got to give the mets credit.

And even if Glavine and Traschel leave within 2 years, they will still have Martinez, Benson and Zambrano. that is a nice core to build around.

I dispise Boston but I am proud of the Mets if they pick up Pedro.
I mean shoot he is only 34. Even as a Hard thrower I think he can give them Mets for good years.

Also it would be rad to see him batting against the Yankees in an interleague game , can anyone say the most hit pitcher of all time.

I think for that chance alone the Yankees should help pay part of his contract. just so they can throw at him when he is batting.

I wonder if he thought about that?

If the Mets really want to make this the real deal they will go out and make ther relief pitching the strongest in all of baseball and go and make Pedro a 6 inning only pitcher.

pan6467 12-13-2004 05:44 PM

Benson isn't a bad pitcher. In fact I truly believe he will be an ace very soon. Zambrano is young and getting better every year great k potential in both of them.

Glavine still has some life, Pedro is Pedro and you never truly know how long he'll pitch before injury, but as far as K power pitchers go he's in his prime.

The only pitcher I don't like on the Mets staff is Trachsel. I think he's overrated but as a 4th or 5th he's damn good.... as a 1, 2 or 3 SP he sucks.

I love my Indians and I love my Reds, who are far too quiet this year "LIDNER SPEND SOME FUCKING MONEY YOU HAVE A DECENT TEAM THAT CAN COMPETE, JUST GET A STARTER YA TIGHTWAD." But it does my heart good to see the Yankees take chumps like Pavano while the Mets grab up Pedro....

guy44 12-14-2004 09:09 AM

At best it is a solid rotation. Pedro is, of course, a legitimate ace. Depending on which Glavine shows up, they may have a real #2. But Benson (overrated), Zambrano (WAY overrated), and Trachsel are not #3s. It is solid, yes. Better than last year. But not equal to the A's, the Yanks, the Red Sox, the Cubs, and probably some other teams depending on how the rest of the winter shakes out.

godxzilla 12-15-2004 06:44 AM

blah - im behind. had something to add then lost it after reading the whole thread :)

Just update the main list with the latest signs.

dylanmarsh 12-15-2004 09:39 AM

There are conflicting reports this morning of where Renteria is heading: St. Louis and Boston.

Supposedly, Renteria would take $8M less to stay in St. Louis:

Bos: 4 yrs/$40M
StL: 4 yrs/$32M

thrsn0730 12-15-2004 09:47 AM

If you believe the Boston Globe, it's the Sox:

http://www.boston.com/sports/basebal...our_years_40m/

dylanmarsh 12-15-2004 10:31 AM

It looks official, now: http://boston.redsox.mlb.com/NASApp/..._mlb&fext=.jsp

Renteria to the BoSox for $40M

canuckguy 12-15-2004 04:27 PM

how can Renteria be worth that much, just comparing caberra and Renteria's numbers they look very similar. don't know much about renteria, but why would boston give up a clutch perform for him? crazy money for a guy who it like 290 with 10 bombs.

jasonresno 12-15-2004 05:34 PM

Yeah the Renteria signing was horrible, I mean for the amount of cash. He is a good glove, but no power at all.

dylanmarsh 12-15-2004 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by brian1975
how can Renteria be worth that much, just comparing caberra and Renteria's numbers they look very similar. don't know much about renteria, but why would boston give up a clutch perform for him? crazy money for a guy who it like 290 with 10 bombs.


I stopped questioning Sox management since Theo and Co. took over. :hmm: From what I have heard, Cabrera wanted 5 or 6 years and the Sox weren't interested. I don't know what Theo was thinking giving him this much money, but Renteria was one of John Henry's boys back in the Florida days, just like Mantei.

I think this deal sets the mark, though, for the rest of the good, not superstar, free agents.

canuckguy 12-16-2004 04:24 AM

i like that mantei guy, does he not throw like 100mph? when not injuried i guess. He was a pretty good closer before and should be a nice addition. things are not looking good for my blue jays.......

thrsn0730 12-16-2004 11:40 AM

Blue Jays fan? Ouch. Being in a division with the Yankees, Red Sox and Orioles is a killer. Of course, since your boys broke my heart in 93, I can't feel too sorry for you.

dylanmarsh 12-16-2004 12:48 PM

Man, what a weird off-season. The M's reportedly have just signed Adrian Beltre to a 5 year, $64M deal. :crazy:


Tim Hudson is a Brave. The A's received a couple of minor leaguers and OF Charlie Thomas.

canuckguy 12-16-2004 04:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by thrsn0730
Blue Jays fan? Ouch. Being in a division with the Yankees, Red Sox and Orioles is a killer. Of course, since your boys broke my heart in 93, I can't feel too sorry for you.



:D my condolenses, although i love my jays, i am more of a fan of the game itself, i usually cheer for the underdog in any matchup outside of the jays. although i hate the yankee's not because of there spending, but more for there attitude. baltimore will never win with the fool owner running the show, and well boston, i do like alot of the players, but now that they've won it, i hope they lose since i was cheering for them most of the year after my jays when in the tank again.... i get my winning feeling from my fav hockey team (when they play!!) the red wings.

dylanmarsh 12-22-2004 07:57 AM

I realize the Astros are trying to save their pennies for Beltran, but why on earth would they non-tender a talent like Wade Miller? I know he had shoulder problem but with his contract valued at less than $4M, I would think the Astros would try to keep him to set-up Lidge. I guess some other team got an early Christmas present.

BTW, looks like the Dodgers wrapped up JD Drew: $55M over 5 years.

kutulu 12-22-2004 09:20 AM

I think his shoulder must be really messed up. However, if I were a GM I'd try to get Miller to sign an incentive-laden backloaded deal with money escalators that become guaranteed once he demonstrates he's healthy (200 innings).

dylanmarsh 12-22-2004 02:33 PM

Well, that didn't take long: Wade Miller to the Red Sox, 1yr/$1.5 with $3M in incentives

This is could be either the steal of the FA season or just a meaningless signing.

*edit* Varitek just re-signed with the Red Sox: $4yrs/$40M. Merry X-Mas, RSN. :thumbsup:

*edit, again* Eric Milton signed with the Reds for $25.5M over 3 years


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:50 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73