"Cuddling"
 

Would this work?

Intimate cuddling, in the sense that, you lie cuddling your girlfriend, in the spooning position, (Side by side) with your cock deep inside her while watching tv etc? But not actually having sex, because no movement, accept the odd time where you move to keep yourself hard? :)

If you two are up for it, why would this not work? It's her you should be asking, not us.

And why would this be anonymous?

I don't really get. This.

Just wasn't sure how normal it would be i guess,

If you're inside her, it's sex. Can't call it anything else.

As normal as people asking about strap-ons, foot licking, dick sizes, erection pill recommendations, pregnancies from fingering, STDs, how many partners is too many, fetishes, position advice and the finer points of 69.

I suspect you'll quickly find that without 'stimulation' from thrusting or other movement, you'll lose your erection within a few minutes. In vaguely similar situations, I've had that happen, anyway.

"Would this work" how? Like is it physically possible, or is it enjoyable, or would it be considered sex?... Not understanding the question.

Sounds basically like Tantric sex, without the meditation....

I've wondered about this too. Does it feel good for the woman? It sounds like something fun to try.


The only recommendation I can come up with to help is to try Viagra and don't orgasm for a few days prior to trying this.

It can be done, essentially you have to have some stimulation as mentioned above, or it all stops happening.

I'm sorry, this strikes me as funny.

You want to call this cuddling why exactly?

Do you not enjoy cuddling and need a way for both of you to be happy with doing it?

This is a combination of sex and cuddling. I think it would be difficult to keep up for the simple reason that without stimulus your hard-on might not last as long as she'd like to cuddle.

Worth trying though. Whatever works for you both.

I would find this really odd. you either have sex or you snuggle (naked) doing what you describe for more then a minute or so would just awkward and weird.

actually, on occasion my sig other and i like to do this. it's comforting to me. i don't feel like it's intercourse at all! he will move around to keep himself hard but that does not bother me. although, most of the time it ends up turning into us making love with one another. but then again, it is most enjoyable to lie there next to you'r partner feeling a different kind of connection vs just cuddling aka "spooning".

i'd prefer to call this fuckling

If we could call that cuddling, I'm going to ask if I could cuddle with some dear lady friends of mine... w00t!

depends whats on TV

Yoy my friend have given me the ultimate pick up line.

penis inside vagina pretty much equals intercourse.
you can cuddle while you're doing it and it'll "work" but it
doesn't really fall into the "cuddling" category.
except maybe "Xtreme cuddling".

Maybe call it "cuddicking" or something? *shrug*

Hmmm...sounds like we have a war of words brewing.

I like both, mostly because they both mean the same thing, and that sounds good to me. :thumbsup: Worth a try, at any rate.

starts as just putting it in there and always turns into fucking.

Whatever gets your foot in the door, so to speak.

I wanna know why you didn't post this as yourself?



You're asking if this is normal. Why? Are you embarrassed that you want to be intimate with someone? I got a blow job while doing dishes yesterday. Is that normal?

I have tried doing this, because I wanted to fall asleep with him inside me. He can't help but start thrusting once it's in there.

Any time spent with my penis in her vagina cannot be called odd. :p

This combination of "cuddling + copulation" is sex no matter what you call it. And yes, it is quite possible. As a guy, I can attest to the fact that maintaining an erection without the "usual" thrusting is not all that difficult. Also, believe it or not, guys, we can have intercourse without the goal of ejaculating (gasp! what a concept!). It's a nice way to fall asleep, too, as mentioned previously.

It's a Pavlovian thing.