WTF is a 'homicide bomber'?

[kutulu]

I try not to play the semantics games but this term really bugs me. I understand that the right started using this instead of suicide bomber because they want to take the emphasis off of martyrdom but this term is just plain retarded. Isn't homocide the desired result for virtually all bombers, regardless of what happens to the bomber? Therefore, unless the person is a 'dismemberment bomber' or a 'serious injury bomber' or maybe just a 'fleshwound bomber' they are ALL 'homocide bombers'. Therefore, if we want to be specific, any bomber that intends to blow themself up in order to ensure that someone doesn't notice the random package on the ground is by definition a 'suicide bomber'.

[xepherys]

Yeah, I agree. However, I think that homicide bomber is probably more semantically viable, as the intent is to commit homicide rather than suicide. If you want to off yourself, there are easier ways to do it then blowing yourself to bits. *shrug* If we could have a blanket turnover in use of terms, I'd go for homicide bomber anyhow, but since it's not bound to change so drastically, I agree that we should stick to what we've used.

[BigBen]

Ah, semantics, the last resort for Spin Doctors!

We could move this into Tilted Nonsense and ask people to post their new "Bomber" tag;

I prefer : Very-motivated-but-short-term-thinker-bomber.

Pro-Choice, Pro-Life;

People know what the issue is! Calling it "Homicide Bomber" will only cloud the issue, and do no good to solve the problem.

[kutulu]

Originally Posted by BigBen

People know what the issue is! Calling it "Homicide Bomber" will only cloud the issue, and do no good to solve the problem.

Exactly. Unless your intention is that your bomb does not kill anyone, you are a homocide bomber. If we are so worried about the martyr issue, why not just drop the prefix and call all of them bombers?

[Charlatan]

One should be careful who they call homicide bombers. Especially when your nation drops a lot of bombs. You could find your nation getting painted with the very same brush.

[Ustwo]

Why not just call them terrorists? I know international news organizations don't want to lable people who blow up civilians on purpose terroists, but hey its just words.

[Locobot]

Originally Posted by Charlatan

One should be careful who they call homicide bombers. Especially when your nation drops a lot of bombs. You could find your nation getting painted with the very same brush.

What? I thought ours were "smart" friendly bombs, like the kind you would use "surgically." Sure there's been some collateral disfriendburment, but I fail to see how OUR high explosives cause actual human death.

[kutulu]

Originally Posted by Charlatan

One should be careful who they call homicide bombers. Especially when your nation drops a lot of bombs. You could find your nation getting painted with the very same brush.

Yes, when our bomb hits a marketplace does that make the pilot a terrorist or a homocide bomber?

[cyrnel]

Heh. Took me a minute to figure out what this thread was about. The homicide Fox-ism bugged me long ago so I added a filter to my proxy that changes it back to 'suicide'. Weird phrasing variations get through on occassion but the mosquito is mostly banished.

For me the homicide wording is more confusing than helpful. I stop and think about the politics instead of the terrible act.

[dksuddeth]

i prefer the term 'murderers'. the look on their face must be hilarious when they realize that after killing numerous innocent people that they didn't arrive in paradise.

[Mojo_PeiPei]

Main Entry: ho·mi·cide
Pronunciation: 'hä-m&-"sId, 'hO-
Function: noun
Etymology: Latin homicidium, from homo human being + caedere to cut, kill
1 : a person who kills another
2 : the killing of one human being by another

bomber

n 1: a military aircraft that drops bombs during flight 2: a person who plants bombs 3: a large sandwich made of a long crusty roll split lengthwise and filled with meats and cheese (and tomato and onion and lettuce and condiments)

If the shoe fits wear it.

[Charlatan]

Main Entry: 1sui·cide
Pronunciation: 'sü-&-"sId
Function: noun
1 : the act or an instance of taking one's own life voluntarily and intentionally <the legalistic concept of suicide while of sound mind, which psychiatrically speaking is not possible —Year Book of Neurology, Psychiatry, & Neurosurgery>
2 : a person who commits or attempts suicide

Shoe? Meet foot.

[cyrnel]

Originally Posted by kutulu

Yes, when our bomb hits a marketplace does that make the pilot a terrorist or a homocide bomber?

It's called a fuck-up with terrible consequences. Terrorists do it intentionally. I haven 't seen anything credible stating members of our armed services routinely seek out and kill groups of Iraqi civilians.

Wasn't "homicide bomber" intended to be specific to suicide attacks? I seem to remember it being introduced two-three years ago during Rumsfeld press conferences.

[Charlatan]

Main Entry: suicide bomber
Part of Speech: noun
Definition: a person who deliberately kills themselves when detonating a bomb or commiting a terrorist act

suicide bomber
n : a terrorist who blows himself up in order to kill or injure other people

Suicide bomber is quite accurate AND it doesn't smell of the cleansers of righteousness that the right would choose to use with "homicide bomber"

[kutulu]

Originally Posted by Mojo_PeiPei

If the shoe fits wear it.

Yes well the shoe also fits for every other bomber out there. How does the term 'homocide bomber' differentiate between a person attacking valid military targets, a person who plants a device in a public place and detonates from a safe distance, and a person who blows themsef up to kill others?

If it doesn't matter, then why not avoid using a loaded term and just call them all bombers?

[Mojo_PeiPei]

Because they are MURDERERS if they KILL another person, therefore committing a homicide, an action which does not make them some self righteous Allah pleasing martyr.

Charlatan that is cute really, but it isn't merely a suicide when you blow yourself up in a place crowded with other people, again this is what is known as murder in the real world of morals, you know where we have black and white, not some establishment scoffing anti-bushworld hippie colored gray.

[Charlatan]

Originally Posted by Mojo_PeiPei

Charlatan that is cute really, but it isn't merely a suicide when you blow yourself up in a place crowded with other people, again this is what is known as murder in the real world of morals, you know where we have black and white, not some establishment scoffing anti-bushworld hippie colored gray.

Hence the term Suicide Bomber as noted above. The term works. The only reason the current Administration feels the need to change it is because they like to cleanse the language to suit their spin on things... sadly they have been quite successful with this tactic.

This has nothing to do with "establishment scoffing anti-bushworld hippie" rather it has to do with how our perception of events is controlled and focused on one thing rather than another.

[kutulu]

Originally Posted by Mojo_PeiPei

Because they are MURDERERS if they KILL another person, therefore committing a homicide, an action which does not make them some self righteous Allah pleasing martyr.

That's nice but you still haven't answered any questions. Now please explain the difference between someone who plants a device and detonates from a safe distance and somone who kills themself. By your definition, both would be homocide bombers. If there is no difference, then why not just call all of them bombers?

[Mojo_PeiPei]

I am confounded by your line of reasoning Kutulu. There is no difference between blowing yourself up while murdering others, or murdering others by blowing a bomb up safely. The outcome is the same though, murder, which equates a homicide.

Is it inconvienent(sp) to call them murderers? Is it unfair? Is it incorrect? I didn't think so. What's the disconnect here?

[kutulu]

Originally Posted by Mojo_PeiPei

I am confounded by your line of reasoning Kutulu. There is no difference between blowing yourself up while murdering others, or murdering others by blowing a bomb up safely. The outcome is the same though, murder, which equates a homicide.

Is it inconvienent(sp) to call them murderers? Is it unfair? Is it incorrect? I didn't think so. What's the disconnect here?

The disconnect is that we are not calling people who safely blow up others 'homicide bombers'. The term 'homocide bomber' is almost exclusively used by the right wing policitians and media to describe what everyone else calls a 'suicide bomber'. Bomber works well enough. It's not as if people will be confused and think that the person let off a stink bomb or anything.

[filtherton]

Originally Posted by Mojo_PeiPei

I am confounded by your line of reasoning Kutulu. There is no difference between blowing yourself up while murdering others, or murdering others by blowing a bomb up safely. The outcome is the same though, murder, which equates a homicide.

Is it inconvienent(sp) to call them murderers? Is it unfair? Is it incorrect? I didn't think so. What's the disconnect here?

It works the other way too:
Is it inconvenient to call them suicide bombers? Is it unfair? Is it incorrect? I don't think so. What exactly is the disconnect there?

[Mojo_PeiPei]

It is incorrect, they are not merely committing suicide, they are committing homicide. It is unfair, suicide would lend them some legitimacy and righteousness to what is a cowardly and reprehensible evil.

[Ustwo]

Why does the left want to call them suicide bombers?

Its obvious why the right wants to call them homocide bombers.

[filtherton]

Originally Posted by Mojo_PeiPei

It is incorrect, they are not merely committing suicide, they are committing homicide. It is unfair, suicide would lend them some legitimacy and righteousness to what is a cowardly and reprehensible evil.

How does the "suicide" aspect lend legitimacy to anything?

Originally Posted by Ustwo

Why does the left want to call them suicide bombers?

Its obvious why the right wants to call them homocide bombers.

It's probably something similar to the "happy holidays" versus "merry christmas" struggle.

I mostly prefer succint language, and suicide says more about what happened than homicide.

[Rekna]

a suicide bomber would be considered a homicide bomber but it is a more descriptive class. That is homicide bombers is a superclass containing suicide bombers along with other classes of bombers. Suicide bomber is the appropriate term, there is no reason to change it.

[kutulu]

Give me a break. As if anyone doesn't know that they are killing others also.

You already said that there is no difference between someone who kills themself and someone who detonates from a safe distance (who we just call a 'bomber') so how is the use of 'homocide bomber' not pure propaganda?

[Ustwo]

Originally Posted by kutulu

Give me a break. As if anyone doesn't know that they are killing others also.

You already said that there is no difference between someone who kills themself and someone who detonates from a safe distance (who we just call a 'bomber') so how is the use of 'homocide bomber' not pure propaganda?

One implies it is a cirminal act, the other doesn't. The fact it gets your panties in a bunch makes me think homicide bomber is on the right track

[kutulu]

Be honest, have you ever read 'suicide bomber' and wondered to yourself if they merely blew themself up at a form of protest (such as Budhist monks lighting themself on fire in protest) or if they blew up a bunch of others along with them?

The term DID work fine for DECADES. It was the Republicans that came along in the last few years and decided to change it for political purposes.

[kutulu]

Originally Posted by Ustwo

One implies it is a cirminal act, the other doesn't. The fact it gets your panties in a bunch makes me think homicide bomber is on the right track

Which act is not criminal? AFAIK suicide is still illegal just about everywhere. The fact that you can't come up with anything better makes me think you are talking out your ass.

[Ustwo]

Originally Posted by kutulu

Which act is not criminal? AFAIK suicide is still illegal just about everywhere. The fact that you can't come up with anything better makes me think you are talking out your ass.

Speaking of talking out ones ass, thats got to be the weakest argument I've heard for using the term suicide bomber.

The proper term for all these people is just simply TERRORIST.

[Lebell]

Gents Gents Gents,

Is this REALLY worth an argument?

And is it REALLY worth getting all pissy with each other?

[kutulu]

This coming from the one who posted such a gem as: "One implies it is a cirminal act, the other doesn't."

As if someone would be able to walk away free if the stood in a clear open area, notified people that they were about to kill themself, and their bomb malfunctioned and only blew a portion of their arm off... I'm sure we'd be like, "hey man, it's cool, here's some more c-4 so that you can get it done right. Want me to wire it for you?"

[Ustwo]

Originally Posted by filtherton

It's probably something similar to the "happy holidays" versus "merry christmas" struggle.

Now this is a better topic.

I mostly prefer succint language, and suicide says more about what happened than homicide.

Yes type of statement is what makes people on the right think the left cares more about the bomber than the victims.

[kutulu]

Originally Posted by Ustwo

Now this is a better topic.

Yes type of statement is what makes people on the right think the left cares more about the bomber than the victims.

That's total bullshit and you know it. The use of the add-on 'suicide' tells you instantly that the bomber is dead. 'homocide' only tells you that there were victims and is redundant.

[cyrnel]

Originally Posted by Ustwo

Yes type of statement is what makes people on the right think the left cares more about the bomber than the victims.

Being somewhat language anal, at least to my capacity, it bothers me more that people try to redefine common language. It draws attention away from the act. Anyway, we're mixing details with the politics. Both two-word combinations are less than specific. We're still missing:

Delivery (Car, pedestrian...), fatalities, injuries, target type & setting.
Then any political coloring.

As I recall, the White House originally stated they were using "homicide" in lieu of "suicide" in an attempt to de-martyr the perpetrators among Muslims. So it's semantics confused by motive. Some people want to punish or add meaning, some don't, some want to be accurate, others not. Regardless, every story has more than its tag line which is quickly forgotten once the details are known. IMO calling the assholes that took out the crowded wedding party "homicide bombers" lightens their crime by nature of the phrase's overuse on all target types. Edit: Being very clear here, I'm not saying attacks on military or police are justified in any way, just that many Iraqis may be torn on the specifics. Overusing loaded words dulls the sword in the sand.

Going back to the White House's stated goal, I'm curious if either version has significance in middle-eastern translations.

[rlbond86]

Originally Posted by Ustwo

Yes type of statement is what makes people on the right think the left cares more about the bomber than the victims.

Come on, don't be rediculous. Everyone knows that a suicide bomber is someone who blows themselves up to kill others. Nobody hears the phrase "suicide bomber" and equates it with someone who hanged himself.

The Unibomber was a homicide bomber.
The terrorists blowing themselves up in Iraq and Israel are suicide bombers.


In fact, can you name any sort of non-homicide bomber?
Let's face it, the word "bomber" implies "homicide." Thus "suicide bomber" implies "suicidal homicide bomber."

[Ustwo]

If its such a non-issue why would it bother anyone?

Its very much the same as the pro-life, pro-choice debate, and no one wants to be pro-abortion.

I like homocide bomber because it stresses the intent, to murder people.

I think the left likes suicide bomber because quite frankly I think the left at the very least feels sympathy for those doing this.

[filtherton]

Originally Posted by Ustwo

Yes type of statement is what makes people on the right think the left cares more about the bomber than the victims.

If this is all it takes for people on the right to question the location of my sympathies when it comes to suicide bombers then perhaps i have over estimated their intelligence.
As if a select few on the right required any kind of rational reason to manufacture disagreements with people on the left.
As if a select few on the right were consistent at all in their expressed sympathies towards casualties of war.

[Charlatan]

While I can appreciate your point of view on this ustwo I don't like the term because it is just another blatant example of this administration sanatizing the language used to describe a war.

Sanitizing so that we don't think about the reasons why people might be fighting back. You are right when you raise the "pro-abortion" issue. This is another example of trying to control the debate by controlling the language... we could also use terms like "collateral damage", "right sizing" or "friendly fire".

One person's liberating army is another invading army. One person's freedom fighter is another's terrorist. You don't have to sympathize with any side in order to recognize that the terms used to describe certain actions and people are politically loaded and used to control the terms of the larger discourse.

[Willravel]

In case anyone wants the link: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,108329,00.html

Homicide Bomber-Mom Kills Four at Gaza Border
Wednesday, January 14, 2004

JERUSALEM — A Palestinian homicide bomber -- and mother of two -- blew herself up Wednesday at the main crossing between Israel and the Gaza Strip (search), killing four people and injuring seven, emergency officials said.

Authorities believe this was the first mother to act as a homicide or suicide bomber. She was identified as Hamas member Reem Al-Reyashi, 22, of Gaza. Family members said she had a 3-year-old boy and 1-year-old girl.

Israel Radio reported that the four dead were Israelis. Four of the wounded were Palestinians, the army said.

The bomber set off the explosion shortly before 10 a.m. at the Erez Crossing (search), where 4,000 Palestinian laborers pass every day through a network of fences and security checks to go from the Gaza Strip to jobs in Israel.

Palestinian witnesses said the bomber was a woman waiting on line to pass through to the Israeli side.

A witness identifying herself as Amena, 42, said four Palestinian women went into a security office at the border crossing. The explosion occurred inside as she was waiting outside, she said.

"I heard soldiers screaming. The blast was very strong, and I saw one of the women, the last one who went into the room, bleeding from her legs," she said.

The bomber told soldiers at the crossing point that she would set off a metal detector, because she had an implant from surgery to repair a broken leg. She was then ushered to a special room for a security search, said Maj. Sharon Feingold, a military spokeswoman.

Another witness, who declined to be named, said a woman waiting with the laborers was walking strangely. When the witness offered to help the stranger, the woman brushed her off. The bomb went off shortly afterward.

Wednesday's homicide bombing was the first since a Christmas Day attack at a bus stop outside Tel Aviv that killed four.

The Islamic militant group Hamas and the Al Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades, linked to Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's Fatah movement, issued a joint claim of responsibility, according to Lebanon's Al-Manar satellite television station.

The two groups said they worked together to carry out this attack.

Hamas said it sent a woman for the first time because of growing Israeli security "obstacles" facing its male bombers, Reuters reported. Hamas spiritual leader Sheik Ahmed Yassin said the use of a female bomber was unique, but added that holy war "is an obligation of all Muslims, men and women."

Smiling at times in a videotape that showed her cradling a rifle, Al-Reyashi said she had dreamed since she was 13 of "becoming a martyr" and dying for her people.

"It was always my wish to turn my body into deadly shrapnel against the Zionists and to knock on the doors of heaven with the skulls of Zionists," said Reyashi, wearing combat fatigues with a Hamas sash across her chest.

"God gave me two children and I loved them so much. Only God knew how much I loved them," she said.

Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia didn't condemn the attack, saying that continued Israeli attacks and restrictions on the Palestinians are leading "to more escalation on both sides."

After the blast, soldiers forced everyone out and shut down the Gaza crossing, witnesses said. A government spokesman suggested the crossing would remain closed.

"Israel allows Palestinian workers to come into Israel. And the Palestinian terrorist organizations took this opportunity in order to kill as many people as possible," said Avi Pazner. "I presume that we will have to take measures in order to prevent that ... It's too early to say exactly what measures we will take."

The seven wounded people were being evacuated to hospitals, according to Moshe Vaaknin, an official with the Magen David Adom rescue services.

Erez has been the target of occasional attacks during the past three years of violence. On June 8, three Palestinian gunmen from different militant groups killed four Israeli soldiers in a coordinated attack there. Soldiers returned fire, killing the gunmen.

On Oct. 14, three American security guards were killed in the Gaza Strip just south of Erez when a Palestinian set off an explosive device at a passing diplomatic convoy.

The Gaza Strip is surrounded by an Israeli security barrier. In the past three years of fighting, only one of the more than 100 homicide bombers has infiltrated Israel from the Gaza Strip.

Islamic Jihad, the other main Islamic fundamentalist group leading attacks against Israelis, and the secular Al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigade have used women for homicide attacks in the past. But Hamas, the largest group, has until now stayed away from the tactic.

Israeli soldiers usually concentrate more on Palestinian men as potential attackers.

The violence follows a West Bank ambush late Tuesday in which Palestinian gunmen killed a Jewish settler in a car at the entrance to the Talmon settlement near the West Bank city of Ramallah. The 28-year-old victim was the father of five, including triplets born two months ago.

The Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades claimed responsibility.

Earlier Tuesday, Israeli troops killed a Palestinian gunmen in a firefight along the Gaza-Egypt border, the army said. The army said the soldiers were returning fire.

The Associated Press contributed to this report.

In reality she was a suicide bomber responsible for homicides.