Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Politics (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/)
-   -   Who are the classic France haters? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/94739-who-classic-france-haters.html)

Meridae'n 09-12-2005 11:47 PM

Who are the classic France haters?
 
Didn't quite know where to put this one... this place seems appropriate.

Me and a few of the boys were discussing this over poker the other night whilst half-cut, and we couldn't quite work out who hates the french the most (a little TIC). We came up with these options:

1. The English - hated them first, so to speak. But then again that is long ago and they have been allies for a long time. Question: Do the English really hate anyone or is it all just some sort of "rivarly between gentlemen"?

2. The Germans - created a nation state based on hating France and invaded France several times, sometimes even purely for the sake of doing so. Have however recently been seen being very friendly towards the French. Question: Genuine change or Plan B?

3. The Americans - currently most vocal France haters, but still fairly new in the hating France business. Owe their nation to the French. Question: Do they even know what France is?

4. The French themselves - reelected Jacques Chirac with 82%. Question redundant.

Daniel_ 09-13-2005 02:48 AM

Clearly it's the English.

We've hated the French for a thousand years or more.

Pacifier 09-13-2005 03:46 AM

I think the fact that so many Americans hate the french is some kind of funny.
The Germans and English have at least fought many wars against them.
The Americans have not, their hate seem to be more of the "we want to hate them too" side. Pointless but amusing.

Ustwo 09-13-2005 04:02 AM

Is there a nation that doesn't hate the French?

(besides Iraq's last government)

Though to answer I think the French themselves seems the best answer.

Lebell 09-13-2005 06:15 AM

I find it interesting that within France, you also have Parisians vs. the rest of the Country.

Go Figure.

Anyway, I went with the English. That's a long, deep divide.

alansmithee 09-13-2005 06:38 AM

I had to go with Germans. Everyone else talks about hating France, but only Germany has actually done anything about it.

Ustwo 09-13-2005 06:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alansmithee
I had to go with Germans. Everyone else talks about hating France, but only Germany has actually done anything about it.

Ok that did make me laugh out loud, but the English did it to the French for far longer, even if it hasn't been in living memory.

Seaver 09-13-2005 08:46 AM

Quote:

The Americans have not, their hate seem to be more of the "we want to hate them too" side. Pointless but amusing.
Well the French haven't liked us since the DeGaulle Period when we asked them to give up their colonies (then turned around to help them). Since then the resentment has been growing.

Of course we rub in WWII in their face every chance we get, but it's been a two way street. To say we're just trying to have someone to dislike it's not giving the French their half of the credit.

alansmithee 09-13-2005 08:51 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
Ok that did make me laugh out loud, but the English did it to the French for far longer, even if it hasn't been in living memory.

Well, the English never took over France (although I will admit that they've bene in the France-hating business longer than Germany, since they were anti-France before there was a "Germany" [although I don't know if the English can really hate anyone, in general they seem a bit too refined for that]).

Also, why are there so many trees on the Champs Elysees?
...
...
...
Because Germans love marching in the shade! *rimshot*

martinguerre 09-13-2005 09:15 AM

oh, the English did something about it. They took over about the same percent at the Germans did (do recall that Vichy was still a state unto it's own), and even claimed the royal crown. They put down Napoleon, raided the countryside every summer for the Hundred Year's war... I'll quote some choice Henry the Fifth, because no greater work of theater has been produced to make English patriotism seem so right, so heroic, and just downright godly.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Henry the Fifth
Proclaim it Westmoreland, through my host,
That he which hath no stomach to this fight,
Let him depart; his passport shall be made,
And crowns for convoy put in his purse:
We would not die in that mans company,
That fears his fellowship to die with us,
This day call'd the feast of Crispian:
He that outlives this day, and comes safe home,
Will stand a tip-toe when this day is named,
And rouse him at the name of Crispian.
He that shall live this day, and see old age,
Will yearly on the vigil feast his neighbors,
And say 'To-morrow is Saint Crispian':
Then will he strip his sleeve and show his scars,
And say, 'These wounds I had on Saint Crispians day.'
Old men forget; yet all shall be forgot,
But he'll remember with advantages,
What feats he did that day; then shall our names,
Familliar in his mouth as household words,
Harry the King, Bedford and Exeter,
Warwick and Talbot, Salisbury and Gloucester,
Be in their flowing cups freshly remember'd.
This story shall the good man teach his son;
And Crispian Crispian shall ne'er go by,
From this day to the ending of the world,
But we in it shall be remembered:
We few we, happy few, we band of brothers;
For he to-day that sheds his blood with me
Shall be my brother: be he ne'er so vile,
This day shall gentle his condition;
And Gentlemen in England now abed
Shall think themselves accursed they were not here,
And hold their manhoods cheap whiles any speaks
That fought with us upon Saint Crispians day.


Seaver 09-13-2005 09:26 AM

Quote:

raided the countryside every summer for the Hundred Year's war...
Well according to the English, that was THEIR territory the French were occupying. It was a land dispute, it wasnt as if they just simply marched on France for no reason.

Meridae'n 09-13-2005 11:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pacifier
Pointless but amusing.

This is now my motto.

StanT 09-13-2005 11:38 AM

I'll go with the British as the "classic" French haters, they've been at it longer than anyone else.

Americans are more like "modern" French haters or even French haters "lite". I think at some subconcious level, Americans are happy that there is another country out there that the rest of the world dislikes.

samcol 09-13-2005 01:40 PM

I've never been to France, but I do like them as far as what they've done for America as a country. They helped us win our independence and donated the statue of liberty. I picked the English as classic French haters.

djtestudo 09-13-2005 02:02 PM

We paid France back for them helping us by helping them get their country back :D

I'll say the Americans NOW, but historically, the English.

I think the thing with Americans has to to with the long-standing stories about how much the French hate Americans, so why should they get any love back?

superiorrain 09-13-2005 02:02 PM

This is a fun thread, being both English and German i find it ever so hard to decide... throwing in a French Surname due to french blood of yester year it throws me into a quandary. After much thought however, the English seem to be reif with contempt for their fellow neighbours and this has built up over too many years to leave sleeping dogs lie. So they must be the classic haters. The Germans do not hate, they may try but underneath it all they know that to hate ultimately means failure, which is something they fear (hate) more than the French.

*just a side note, i'm a converted. I like lots of French people, very nice people and you should travel down to one of their beaches, WOW!! Now there's some nice ladies to be seen.

martinguerre 09-13-2005 02:43 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seaver
Well according to the English, that was THEIR territory the French were occupying. It was a land dispute, it wasnt as if they just simply marched on France for no reason.

The claim was thin, and the English knew it...it's not like anyone thought of the south of france as Britain. they just thought they could get away with claiming it.

then again, really any talk of nationality is a little anachronistic. But i think the way the story of the 100 year's war gets retold by Shakespeare, and is used to help produce the rivalry that peaks in the Napoleonic wars...

That, i think makes this rivalry the classic one. That, and i'm a student of this era, and not of Franco-Germanic relations. Go figure.

Seaver 09-13-2005 03:10 PM

Quote:

The claim was thin, and the English knew it...it's not like anyone thought of the south of france as Britain. they just thought they could get away with claiming it.
Um... Might want to review your history. It was inherited when Henry I (I think, could have been the II) married Elanore of Aquitain. They already ruled Normandy, thus they owned everything basically from Normandy to the South border of Spain.

During a dispute with the King of France their land was "revolked". This was illegal in the French system, and England was more powerful than France at the time so had no military means of supporting it. So war was on.

Coppertop 09-13-2005 03:27 PM

The English, duh. Followed closely by the Republicans.

Coppertop 09-13-2005 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alansmithee
Well, the English never took over France (although I will admit that they've bene in the France-hating business longer than Germany, since they were anti-France before there was a "Germany"

You might want to read up a bit on this part of history before you post any more. Or just read the comments others have made here.

Ever wonder where giving someone the finger came from? Ask any Englishman.

Grasshopper Green 09-13-2005 03:57 PM

I had to say the English as well. I immediately thought of the 100 years war; it only seemed fitting.

martinguerre 09-13-2005 05:13 PM

seaver, the issue isn't just the loss of Guienne...though you're right that that's the issue that touches it all off. Edward the 3rd decided to address that matter by claiming kingship. The problem is that his claim goes through a woman, which isn't allowed under french law at the time. Yes, Phillip the 4th has a shaky claim to the throne too, but it was technically legal. Edward had not made the claim to the throne previously, did not contest it in a timely fashion...the Capatian dynasty had no legal heirs, and that includes Edward the 3rd. There's a reason Phillip the 4th is the start of the Valois line...he's not a claimant to the Capatian line, but a next best thing thrown in to the throne by his peers.

That's why i say the English knew the claim wasn't really valid. It was an excuse to take out anger over the loss of territory...but in the end, it was the English who lacked the military capability to enforce the claim...not the house of Valois.

I really don't mean to quibble, but i think my interpretation of this history is at least reasonable.

alansmithee 09-13-2005 05:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coppertop
You might want to read up a bit on this part of history before you post any more. Or just read the comments others have made here.

Ever wonder where giving someone the finger came from? Ask any Englishman.

It was my understanding that France was never fully taken over. The French royals retreated to Bourges, where they held SW France until they were able to marshal enough resistance to drive out the English. Whereas in WWII, Germany held all of France, and it was essentially a German territory.

But I will admit my knowledge on this period isn't my strong suit.

Markboy 09-13-2005 06:53 PM

Well, New Zealand are still the only country to have had a terrorist act committed by France on their soil.

In 1985, French Secret Service bombed a Greenpeace boat, the Rainbow Warrior, in Auckland harbour.

I don't think New Zealanders will ever forgive France for that one.

spongy 09-13-2005 06:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Markboy
Well, New Zealand are still the only country to have had a terrorist act committed by France on their soil.

In 1985, French Secret Service bombed a Greenpeace boat, the Rainbow Warrior, in Auckland harbour.

I don't think New Zealanders will ever forgive France for that one.

Nor should they. Alas, NZ was not an option.

And that was the ONLY terrorist act committed by the French outside of France?Not questioning you so much as thinking they must have done something else somewhere else.

Markboy 09-13-2005 07:13 PM

Perhaps that was the only one for which they were caught. I can't think of any others outside of war-time, and if you consider war-time, what does and doesnt count as terrorism becomes tenuous...

Meridae'n 09-14-2005 12:07 AM

I was going to start a 'classic New Zealand' haters but there was only 20 options.

Boom boom.

Markboy 09-14-2005 01:47 AM

ah well, you always hate what you envy :p :icare:

splck 09-14-2005 04:52 PM

It doesn't matter what country they're from. Intolerant, ignorant bigots tend to be the classic haters.

irateplatypus 09-14-2005 05:36 PM

gotta go with the english... so much history involved.

i don't think Americans really hate the french, i would classify it as a mixture of bafflement/annoyance/amusement in equal parts. we can't sustain a long enough attention span to get any kind of hate going.

Ustwo 09-14-2005 09:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by irateplatypus
we can't sustain a long enough attention span to get any kind of hate going.

:lol:

Its funny because its true.

Meridae'n 09-14-2005 11:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splck
It doesn't matter what country they're from. Intolerant, ignorant bigots tend to be the classic haters.

Hang on... guilty!

Marvelous Marv 09-15-2005 02:39 AM

I didn't see a choice for "soap, deodorant, and ladies' razor manufacturers."

energus 09-15-2005 10:03 AM

You forgot Poland.
But the English only hate them cause it is land they lost during the past 1000 years. The Germans hate them cause, wel they hate anyone. And since both are bidding for most hated country/people in the world they are in a deadly duel for top spot. As for the Americans they should keep themselves busy with the idea that they are about to dislodge the top 2 for their topspot of most hated people (I kid).

And there are so many more nations that have a grudge against the French. A few countries in Afrika as well as in Europe. Though the English have the longest grudge match against them the Germans had probably just as many bouts with them. The Franch ruled over vast pieces of real estate when Napoleon was there, so make a longer list or stop trying.

reconmike 09-15-2005 11:24 AM

I went with the Britons, seeing the centuries of bickering, but.........

Why are the streets of Paris lined with trees?....

Because the germans like to march in the shade :)

hrandani 09-15-2005 12:22 PM

The French Aristocracy under William the Conquerer (Norman =(Viking Ancestry )) took over England and remained there until present day. A short while later the Norman Aristocracy in rule of England turned around and invaded France, only leaving when French forces under Joan De'Arc forced them out. Who then turned over Joan to the "English".

There's all kinds of neat tidbits remaining from these affairs, e.g. the saxon / norman divide of the english language (piss/shit/fuck v urinate/defecate/copulate)

So I imagine you would be forced to say that yes, the French actually hate themselves more than anybody else has a right to. Especially considering the attitudes of some of the French journalists in Iraq re: Chiraq and Saddam.

It's all the same.

smooth 09-16-2005 06:09 AM

http://img364.imageshack.us/img364/5...veadamn2nu.gif

alansmithee 09-16-2005 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by reconmike
I went with the Britons, seeing the centuries of bickering, but.........

Why are the streets of Paris lined with trees?....

Because the germans like to march in the shade :)

I used that same joke in post 9 :p

stevie667 09-19-2005 08:25 AM

Might be raising a slightly deceased thread, but i can't resist a chance to chime in with my English anti-french ideals.

The English hate the french, the french hate the English, plain and simple, it's always been the way. Yeh we may have pretended to be friends here and there, but we're still better, and they know it :p

Amaras 09-19-2005 10:58 AM

How about the Algerians, or any of the other Countries they invaded and attempted to colonize (i.e. their part of the Congo, the original inhabitants of Quebec/Louisiana, etc.)?

xepherys 09-20-2005 01:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lebell
I find it interesting that within France, you also have Parisians vs. the rest of the Country.

Go Figure.

Anyway, I went with the English. That's a long, deep divide.


Is the like Quebeceres(?) vs. the rest of Canada?

Lebell 09-20-2005 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xepherys
Is the like Quebeceres(?) vs. the rest of Canada?

Very similiar.

splck 09-20-2005 09:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lebell
Very similiar.

I'd say it's more like toronto vs the rest of Canada.;)

iblade 10-17-2005 05:06 PM

There's a saying that goes "We love France, but we hate the French." France is still the most popular country in the world, in terms of number of tourists...

albania 10-17-2005 05:17 PM

The english, there is way more history there.

aswo 10-18-2005 02:05 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iblade
There's a saying that goes "We love France, but we hate the French." France is still the most popular country in the world, in terms of number of tourists...

so true so very very true

biznatch 10-18-2005 03:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by alansmithee
It was my understanding that France was never fully taken over. The French royals retreated to Bourges, where they held SW France until they were able to marshal enough resistance to drive out the English. Whereas in WWII, Germany held all of France, and it was essentially a German territory.

But I will admit my knowledge on this period isn't my strong suit.

Actually, during WW2, there was the occupied zone(North) and an un-occupied zone (South).

biznatch 10-18-2005 03:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by xepherys
Is the like Quebeceres(?) vs. the rest of Canada?

I disagree. Its not the same. As a frenchman, who has also visited Canada, and Quebec several times, its a different thing.
Canada is totally different from Quebec; the culture, the language, the behaviour.. So I think peeps from Quebec are sort of estranged from the "USA junior" type of Canadians living outside of Quebec...
Parisians(and not all), mostly the rich, anal, high class ones have some sort of disdain from the rest, especially non urban areas. But then again, its like New Yorkers vs. what they consider Rednecks.

djtestudo 10-18-2005 04:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biznatch
Actually, during WW2, there was the occupied zone(North) and an un-occupied zone (South).

Unless I'm misunderstanding what I know on the subject, the southern part was essentially a German puppet state during the war.

Turbotom 10-19-2005 03:00 PM

Best thread ever...

Zyr 10-20-2005 02:21 AM

I went with the English, cause NZ wasn't an option, but the American's are probably the best at it. Sure, the English and Germans beat them up, but the Americans took every reference to their country and replaced it with the word Freedom. Hatred.

biznatch 10-20-2005 04:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zyr
Sure, the English and Germans beat them up, but the Americans took every reference to their country and replaced it with the word Freedom. Hatred.

hahaha, its true, that is pretty extreme :lol:. Although I found it a bit ridiculous, it is weird to think some people would seriously take the word "french fries" out of their vocabulary, and annoy people in the same restaurant who would use the original term...

Pip 10-21-2005 05:17 AM

It's Trafalgar Day today!

So, I think the English are the classicist French haters, while the Germans are the romantic French haters, the Americans the post-colonial and the French as the... uh, deconstructionalist? *shrugs*

Coppertop 10-21-2005 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biznatch
hahaha, its true, that is pretty extreme :lol:. Although I found it a bit ridiculous, it is weird to think some people would seriously take the word "french fries" out of their vocabulary, and annoy people in the same restaurant who would use the original term...

When that stupid Freedom Fries thing came up there was a restaurant in Santa Cruz with Impeach Bush Fries on its menu. :thumbsup:

james t kirk 11-02-2005 02:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by splck
I'd say it's more like toronto vs the rest of Canada.;)

No, Toronto doesn't pay much attention to the rest of the country really.

The rest of the country hates Toronto, but Toronto loves everyone. We just want to go out for dinner at a nice restaurant. And no, Red Lobster is not a nice restaurant.

Charlatan 11-30-2005 01:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by james t kirk
No, Toronto doesn't pay much attention to the rest of the country really.

The rest of the country hates Toronto, but Toronto loves everyone. We just want to go out for dinner at a nice restaurant. And no, Red Lobster is not a nice restaurant.

This is exactly right on all counts (especially the restaurtant :lol: )

Willravel 11-30-2005 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coppertop
When that stupid Freedom Fries thing came up there was a restaurant in Santa Cruz with Impeach Bush Fries on its menu. :thumbsup:

Yes!!! Santa Cruz's Saturn Cafe featured "Impeach George W. Bush fries" on their menu. http://www.saturncafe.com/

Charlatan 11-30-2005 03:42 PM

French Fries originate in Belgium.... silly Americans. :lol:

Mauser 12-12-2005 07:24 PM

I always found it ironic how much the US has hated the french since WWII. The french pretty well handed the US their independance in the 1770's plus the statue of liberty and other goodies.

France had been fighting off invaders for hundreds of years, so what if they couldn't defeat germany in WWII.

Coppertop 12-13-2005 09:01 AM

The US has hated France since WW2? That's news to me. I don't hate anybody.

aceventura3 12-13-2005 09:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coppertop
The US has hated France since WW2? That's news to me. I don't hate anybody.

I agree.

Other than my wife wanting to go there, (for what reason I don't know - and she can't really explain other than to say it seems like a good thing to do), why should I ever think about France. They are not a military power, not an economic power, not a cultural power, and you can get better wine in California.

I think most Americans are indifferent towards France. I suppose indifference could be worse than hatered because they are not even worth an emotional investment.

biznatch 12-13-2005 04:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aceventura3
They are not a military power, not an economic power, not a cultural power, and you can get better wine in California.

I agree with most of what yoy say...except for the "cultural power". If France is the most visited country in the world, there's a reason. Paris in itself is a center of culture..The Louvre is one of the largest and most culturally diverse in the world. I think France is a cultural power.

drewg 12-13-2005 06:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aceventura3
They are not a military power, not an economic power, not a cultural power, and you can get better wine in California.

Well, they are the 5th largest economy in the world (after the US, Japan, Germany and the UK) and the has the 3rd largest (46.2b$, second only to the US' 455.1b$ and the UK's 47.4b$)1 defence budget. France is one of the most powerfull countries in the European Union, but compared to the US their economic and military power is indeed a lot less. As biznatch pointed out, France is also a cultural power, but they no longer hold the strong cultural position they held from the time around King Louis XIV until the first half of the 20th century. English is now undoubtably the most common lingua franca, and American cultural influence can be felt in every corner of the world. Again, France is a world power, but they are not a superpower.

Anyway. I'd have to go with the English as the classic French haters. They've fought countless wars with each other, with the balance of power tilting back and fourth over the centuries. They are true historical rivals. The US has never fought France, and has been their allies in at least 3 major conflicts. However, both the French and the Americans tend to pride themselves with being the founders of the modern democratic state, which is a source of conflict.

Me, being a Norwegian dislike both France and the US (actually, we dislike everyone larger than us, which is actually most countries in the world), but not nearly as much as hate Sweden. Darn Swedes :p

aceventura3 12-14-2005 08:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by biznatch
I agree with most of what yoy say...except for the "cultural power". If France is the most visited country in the world, there's a reason. Paris in itself is a center of culture..The Louvre is one of the largest and most culturally diverse in the world. I think France is a cultural power.

I talked to my wife to get a better understanding of what her interest in France is. She wants to look at old buildings, old art, drive in the big circle, take a romantic picture somewhere at a bridge and another one at the Eiffel Tower. I said what about Vegas, she said :thumbsup: :thumbsup:

aceventura3 12-14-2005 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drewg
Well, they are the 5th largest economy in the world (after the US, Japan, Germany and the UK) and the has the 3rd largest (46.2b$, second only to the US' 455.1b$ and the UK's 47.4b$)1 defence budget. France is one of the most powerfull countries in the European Union, but compared to the US their economic and military power is indeed a lot less. :p

That surprised me. I thought France's economy was
whithering away like an unharvested grape on the vine.

But then again, I don't really think about France.

drewg 12-14-2005 10:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aceventura3
That surprised me. I thought France's economy was
whithering away like an unharvested grape on the vine.

Well, they're not doing too good and neither is Germany, but they are still significant. Oh, and BBC informed me this morning: China has passed France and the UK, and are now the 4th larges economy in the world behind the US, Japan and Germany.

Seer666 12-15-2005 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pacifier
I think the fact that so many Americans hate the french is some kind of funny.
The Germans and English have at least fought many wars against them.
The Americans have not, their hate seem to be more of the "we want to hate them too" side. Pointless but amusing.

No,we have pleanty of reason to hate them. Politicaly, they claim to be our friends and allies, but have you ever noticed every time a country desides they hate us and want to kill americans, the french are the first in line to start selling them weapons? Take a look at the USS Stark. Hit by an Exocet missle. Who gave the Iraqies that missle to shot at us? yup. The french. With friends like them, who needs enemies? Ah well, one of these days we will cripple their military completly by blowing up their white flag factory.

sailor 12-16-2005 12:09 PM

Break it up into periods of history. Middle ages? England, without a doubt, especially since there was no Germany--100 years war, anyone?. Imperial ages up through WW2? Germans, without a doubt--Franco-Prussian war? World War 1? The Germans hated France for a long time, they felt like France was laughing at them behind their backs. Now? Americans, for stupid reasons. I mean, it's OK to make fun of them sometimes, but seriously thinking the French suck? Ignorant and immature. Most of the people saying things like that are the same people that have never been out of the state, much less the country.

james t kirk 12-31-2005 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aceventura3
I agree.

Other than my wife wanting to go there, (for what reason I don't know - and she can't really explain other than to say it seems like a good thing to do), why should I ever think about France. They are not a military power, not an economic power, not a cultural power, and you can get better wine in California.

I think most Americans are indifferent towards France. I suppose indifference could be worse than hatered because they are not even worth an emotional investment.

Actually, in terms of a military, the French are something like third in the world.

Economically, they are the largest foreign investor in the USA.

Culture, surely you jest. France has nothing but a cultural history. The USA has McDonalds.

guyy 12-31-2005 08:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by james t kirk
Culture, surely you jest. France has nothing but a cultural history. The USA has McDonalds.

Culture is culture, be it Whitman, Melville, the spiritual, jazz, rock-n-roll, the Broadway musical, Elvis, Hollywood, McDonalds, or Tim Hortons, Glenn Gould, & NFB films. Surely Canadians are aware of the immense cultural power of their neighbour to the South.

Back to the issue of French and the US culture: France and the US have shared quite a bit, too. Academic postmodernism would have been unthinkable without either the American academy or all those French intellectuals hanging out at SUNY-Whatever and UC-Whatnot. So, for about 20 years, there was a certain convergence of French and American culture at the level of philosophy. Philosophy isn't everything, but it's not nothing either.

Marvelous Marv 01-02-2006 03:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drewg
Well, they are the 5th largest economy in the world (after the US, Japan, Germany and the UK) and the has the 3rd largest (46.2b$, second only to the US' 455.1b$ and the UK's 47.4b$;

Don't hate me because I didn't do current research on this, but the last time I looked, CALIFORNIA had the 5th largest economy in the world.

Just to keep it in perspective.

aceventura3 01-03-2006 08:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by james t kirk
Actually, in terms of a military, the French are something like third in the world.

Economically, they are the largest foreign investor in the USA.

Culture, surely you jest. France has nothing but a cultural history. The USA has McDonalds.

I love McDonalds. :D

What makes France's culture better? :hmm:

If I had to pick a culture to live in as an average person I prefer many of the native American cultures to western European cultures. :thumbsup:

braindamage351 02-26-2006 09:15 PM

Quote:

I agree with most of what yoy say...except for the "cultural power". If France is the most visited country in the world, there's a reason. Paris in itself is a center of culture..The Louvre is one of the largest and most culturally diverse in the world. I think France is a cultural power.
The Louvre is actually a good example of what France is culturally these days. A place filled with people trying to take credit for stuff that was done by others 100 years ago. And they stuck their crappy modernist glass pyramid on top of it all. The most famous painting in it is by an Italian and the most famous sculpture in it is by a Greek. People didn't come there because they like the country, they came because the stuff was in France and there was no other way to get to it.

What do the Eiffel Tower, the Arc de Triomphe, the Notre Dame cathedral, Les Miserables, Madame Bovary, 20000 Leagues Under the Sea, and champagne have in common? Their creators are all long dead, and yet the French still want to take credit for them.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:42 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73