![]() |
World Leaders Reaction to Bush Re-Election
The world weighs in:
Quote:
|
Did you compile this yourself or did you find it somewhere?
Very impressive if the former, very remiss if the latter. :) Mr Mephisto PS - You even included Ireland! |
I'm seeing a lot of positive things in there. I hope it stays that way and that we can rebuild and sustain the best possible diplomatic relationships with the rest of the world. I'm pleasantly surprised at the reactions of most world leaders, and neither surprised nor pleased with others.
|
Yes, I am happy to see how many countries who have been a little bitter with us the past year or two want to make up with Bush and start anew. I respect the maturity of such leaders, who can respect the voice of the American people when choosing their leader.
|
Quote:
I, personally, am extremely interested in how the rest of the world sees this election. Although I didn't exactly think they wanted his head on a pole, I fully appreciate the uproar Bush has caused around the world, and think repairing damaged alliances should be an extremely high priority for this new Bush Administration. |
Nice words, but I think it's just the "honeymoon period". The complaints will start in due time.
What are they going to say? .."Yea, well we still think he's an idiot". |
You also have to admit that not many countries are going to turn around and say "Goddamnit! We wish Kerry had won..."
There's a lot of policiting going on there too. :) Mr Mephisto PS - where did you get the time?! |
Quote:
For most of them it was all just words anyways. |
i think that Paul Martin is right and George W should reopen the border to Canadian Beef
|
Diplomacy is a nice thing isn't it. Perhaps President Bush will now give it a try.
Sorry, I am trying to be positive but come on...Most countries have grave concerns about US unilateralism and the Bush Doctrine. Rarely do rational countries overtly tell the US to go f*ck themselves. They are all hoping for improved relations and generally have good manners. |
Umm.... well, looks pretty good to me. Seems that the only countries that are expressing any malcontent are either pissed at at least half of the world anyway (Kenya, Jordan, Iran) or are extremely close to us and extremely progressive (Canada). I think that this says that Bush has kept decent relationships with key allies. What I think most of us fail to realize is that even though we are at war right now, our world is in a state of relative peace compared to what it was before 1948. International relationships are much more delicate now than they were even a century ago with the UN and NATO and all. Foriegn relationships can crumble in a matter of seconds. I think we made the right decision here, and we didn't let anybody fuck with our minds.
I like what Putin said in particular. It's kind of why I voted for Bush. He's got balls, like the majority of the country has. |
"He's got balls"?
Explain that to me please. Does he have balls because he can send soldiers to their deaths for his personal agenda? Does he have balls because he can take the lives of harmless children in Iraq? Does he have balls because he didn't fight for his country when it was his turn to serve? Maybe he has balls because he can bully a country that is weak and posed no previous threat to America. "Bring 'em on" Wow, he really does have massive balls. |
very nice work..
That said....What a big circle jerk..."Congratulations...Your'e great...We're great" Blah Blah Blah Oh and France and Germany...Suck ups Then Kofi Annan..leader of???? DUCKS(Delinquent underprivledged knights of sin) ..problem$ facing the UN [:| Gotta be the most evil and morally bankrupt organization on the planet. Sorry, I'm trying to be positive but some countries have grave concerns about losing the favor of the U.S. not because we might invade them but because we are large part of their economies as well. |
All I can say is that the presidents do not represent the feelings of their populace.
I don't know a single person who isn't cursing this morning and fearing for the future of the world. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
You think the UN is the most evil and morally bankrupt organization in the world?!! ROFL Yeah, the UN sure make those Al Queda guys look like pussy cats. Where is UNCLE when you need it? :ROLLS EYES Mr Mephisto |
Quote:
I mean not a day goes by that I don't eat a pound of canadian bacon or carve up a log of good ol' canadian softwood. And don't get me started on my whittling! Without Canadian lumber with what will I whittle?! O.K., all sarcasm aside, I actually have a friend who works at a lumber yard in Vancouver, so I am aware of the problems restrictions on Canadian lumber can cause (note: unlike us the majority of Canada is wilderness, so lumber is a big business in Canada that creates a lot of jobs). And I agree that US restrictions should be lifted, but Martin has got to realize that Bush has enough on his plate to worry about at the moment and Canadian lumber isn't going to be at the top of the pile. Great post by the way. Very interesting. I don't think there are too many surprises in the responses of world leaders. It is all about diplomacy after all. However, I do think that some country leaders ARE actually happy to have Bush re-elected. Note that I'm refering to the leaders themselves. AUSTRAILIA & BRITAIN: I think both Tony Blair & John Howard know where Bush stands and would rather have him in office than an unknown quantity like Kerry. CHINA: People sometimes forget just how much U.S. money is tied up in China. And as a result China has got to be the most capitalistic communist country ever. And they have had a much better relations with republican presidents than with democrats. IRAQ: Well, remember, I'm just talking about the leaders. And well Allawi is sort of prime minister (even if he's only the interim prime minister) because of Bush. ISRAEL: Although Sharon would probably be happy with Kerry too, I think he feels the Bush White house to be more forgiving when it comes down to Israel's military retaliation against Palestine. ITALY: Because Kerry once made fun of Italy's military. Okay, maybe not. But Italy does like to feel important. RUSSIA: Because Putin respects, well, loves force and military might. That and the ability to put away a lot of vodka. I'm suprised he hasn't aksed Bush to marry him. And lastly, SOUTH KOREA: 'Cause finally some one else figured out what they've know for some time: Kim Jong'il is a major asshole. |
Quote:
|
I wonder what Hungary thinks about this whole fiasco.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
BTW: While the political leader are diplomatic and tactful the press find more harsh words :
http://images.icnetwork.co.uk/upl/mi...BFB6FA0000.jpg |
hmm...
i've got to say, when you read these comments through the lense of diplomatic language... some of them are downright frigid. i would only take a few of these as being genuinely positive, most seem a bit apprehensive. |
Quote:
Not to diminish 9/11, or terrorism perse, but there are many other issues as important as the aforementioned that affect the lives of people all over the world on a daily basis that involves co-operation with the U.S.. For instance in my country Canada, it may not seem like a big deal to Americans, but the closed borders to softwood lumber and cattle exporting are hurting alot of people, not just those in the industry but also the ripple effect it has throughout the economy. Further threatening to close the Canada/U.S border if Canada doesn't do as it is told doesn't help public opinion and would cripple Canada if such a threat were to happen. The U.S has bitch slapped the world especially those who didn't support the war in Iraq. The world understands and would like to move on. The U.S can step up and respect it's influence respectfully and diplomatically and show the world it is the world leader or continue in the same brash, 'my way or the highway' or 'you are with us or against us' megalomaniacal tone. Now that the U.S has everyones attention, it's time for them to show leadership, not dictatorship. I like to think that is the message world leaders are sending. |
You know, I'm actually a little (eensy weensy) bit optimistic that Bush will modify his tone and approach.
Mr Mephisto |
You know I kept waiting for that article to naturally occur on CNN.com and it never came....nice post
|
Quote:
How's that working out all over africa? How is the UN helping out in the Sudan....How'd they do in Rwanda? Ethiopia? Nice job with that Oil for food program...How much did Kofi pocket from that scam? Congo...That is commendable....if you want to educate me, How 'bout France? Germany? China? It could go on....in another forum |
Educate you, i see no point with this kind of attitude. At least have fact, instead of reading US daily news flashes. Sorry :( Nofnway
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
- Helping out Africa, Sudan, Rwanda, Ethiopia? Actually, Rwanda was pretty good till US decided to bring in UN troops, and then actually send its own troops. But, after the helicopter crash and one of the dead US soldiers was draged through the streets, US quickly left. - Actually, all the countries listed do pay UN, and on-time vs US who owns over 11 billion to UN, pays nothing, but expects that UN will be carrying out all the orders. |
Quote:
|
yes, it was... I just got a bit angry in haste, but now I am good :D Thanks for correcting me, Charlatan
|
Didn't the US bring in more troops to support the oilfields? It this a myth or is the "movie" a myth?
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project