![]() |
Some of the missing explosives may have been destroyed
http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/nat...home-headlines
Quote:
The whole missing explosives issue could be as simple as American troops doing their job. |
I saw that.
As usual, the story is more complex than 30 second sound bites. |
Quote:
Maybe you were referring to the quickly refutted "The Russians took it" sound bite. |
No, I was referring to the immediately siezed upon sound-bite that Bush did something wrong being used to make political hay when not all of the facts are known.
|
All of the facts will never be known. And even the facts that are known are still denied.
The facts remain: The administration knew there were tons of HMX and RDX explosives at this location. They existed before the war started. A large quantity, if not all, existed after the U.S. military arrived and after other munitions depots had been cleared. Today they are missing. Meanwhile, the oil fields were secured as a priority. |
I'm not sure what facts are "being denied", but I have jumped to conclusions before without knowing enough and I won't again.
In otherwords, it's too soon to say if Bush/Team dropped the ball on this or not. |
It looks like they were or were not there when the troops arrived.
It looks like our military did or did not destroy most of them. It looks like unorganized looters in red Toyota trucks could not have taken much of them. Kerry jumped on it without knowing all of the facts. Same with the NYTimes. If Bush was wrong to believe that WMDs were there, is it O.K. for Kerry to assume that these lesser weapons were there after the invasion without being able to prove it? When all of the facts are in, it may be that the admin. screwed up, maybe not. Either way, Kerry gets no points for his rush to judgment on this issue. |
Lebell -
This is exactly what I mean by "denying the facts". Quote:
And this new excuse is especially telling: Quote:
Of course, the explosives were there after the invasion. So the latter does not actually lend credence to the former, as you would have me believe. |
Quote:
Is there any circumstance where you believe Kerry has unfairly criticized the administration? or the military? If you believe Bush was wrong to believe WMDs were there, is it fair to back Kerry's statements on these explosives? Or do you believe Bush was right to believe that the WMDs were there? |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:32 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project