Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Politics (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/)
-   -   Why is the US trying to dump toxic waste in my country? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/35845-why-us-trying-dump-toxic-waste-my-country.html)

John Henry 11-15-2003 07:21 AM

Why is the US trying to dump toxic waste in my country?
 
A fleet of so-called 'ghost ships' have arrived in the UK from the US. These ships contain toxic chemicals, including fifty tonnes of asbestos, and have been sent to Hartlepool to be dismantled and disposed of. The firm in charge of dismantling the ships, Able UK say that the toxic waste on board can be disposed of safely. If this is so, why have they not been dismantled in the US?

There is a brief article on the matter here

BigGov 11-15-2003 07:26 AM

Because the UK agreed to do it...

John Henry 11-15-2003 07:33 AM

In fact, the UK did not agree to do it. I did not agree to do it, the Environment Agency (the government body responsible for allowing or disallowing such things) did not agree to it and there is to be a legal hearing on the matter before the dismantling is allowed to go ahead. Able UK are an independent company, not a national body. They and the US Navy made this agreement, apperently without even the slightest concern for British law or popular opinion.

Shauk 11-15-2003 07:33 AM

"The plan was thrown into chaos last week when the High Court ordered the company not to begin breaking up the decrepit ships until the end of legal hearings next month."

sounds like the firm agreed to do it, but the government/court there says otherwise, at least till the trial is done.

that sucks, they need to dismantle that shit somewhere else. the UK is too cool to risk with abestos crap all over the place.

Arc101 11-15-2003 08:19 AM

I would prefer these ships to be dismantled here in the UK as the stuff can be disposed of without causing environmental / health problems to people. The UK has sent ships to India to be disposed of, and the workers there do not wear protective clothing and are exposed to mercury, lead and arsenic. In fact one report I read said that up to 1 in 4 of these workers who earn 65p a day will die of cancer.

Arc101 11-15-2003 08:24 AM

Ok just found a story about my last post:


Quote:

SCANDAL: BRITAIN SENDS TOXIC WASTE TO INDIA

Nov 15 2003
By Rosa Prince

THIS is the proof of Britain's dirty maritime secret - a fleet of rusting ghost ships spreading their poison across a beach in India.

As protest rages in this country over 13 American toxic ships due to be decommissioned in Hartlepool, an even deadlier fleet pollutes the seas thousands of miles away.

For Britain has an equally infamous record for off-loading toxic vessels in third world countries.

Last week, the Genova Bridge, a cargo ship used by the Ministry of Defence in the run-up to the Gulf War, docked in Alang, a port in Gujarat on the north west coast of India and home to the world's largest ship-breaking yard.

Because it carries toxic materials, campaigners claim the Genova Bridge's owners and the UK Government are in breach of international law by not disposing of it in this country. Built in Poland in 1980, the 18,000-ton ship was managed until now by London-based V Ships Commercial, one of the world's largest shipping operators.

Under the complicated international maritime system, the ship is owned by a Ukranian-Liberian firm but sails under a St Vincent and Grenadines flag. Ten other British ships have been dumped at Alang so far this year.

And local people, including dozens of children who play amid the ship graveyard, are left exposed to the hazardous waste on board. Cancer-causing asbestos is stripped by impoverished locals using their bare hands and left to dry in the sun before being sold.

Workers, who do not wear protective clothing, are also exposed to mercury, lead, arsenic and chromium poisoning. One in four of the 40,000 workers, on 65p a day, will die of cancer.

Despite our own shameful record, the British Government opposes the plan by Hartlepool firm Able UK to dismantle the 13 US Navy ships.

Environment Secretary Margaret Beckett said: "The proposed shipment of these vessels to Hartlepool for dismantling cannot be completed consistent with international rules."

But Greenpeace spokesman Ramapati Kumar said: "This is a classic case of double standards.

"While the UK authorities don't want US waste in their backyard they are happy to illegally dump their own elsewhere.

"They fail to ensure safe removal of toxic substances and safe conditions for the workers."
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/allnews...name_page.html

Liquor Dealer 11-15-2003 04:19 PM

I am guessing that an English firm contracted to dismantle the ships based upon competitive bids. It is a business arrangement - not some deep plot to spread toxic materials. Asbetos, like any other material that has been declared toxic, etc, can be disposed of without harming anything if it is done properly - it is improper disposal or the illegal dumping of such materials that causes the major agony - it this instance that quite obviously wasn't the case. Oh yeah! and by the way John Henry - I think your avatar is really neat!

nirol 11-16-2003 02:11 PM

Free Trade anyone?

Do you believe popular opinion should be solicited for every business contract? The UK company is not exempt from UK (and EU?) environmental laws, it would be no different if the ships had been built in Glasgow and under a UK flag.

irateplatypus 11-17-2003 10:26 PM

yeah, i would hardly consider asbestos to be "toxic" in the sense that it is dangerous to dispose of.

there is always a good reason why this stuff happens, and that reason is the almighty dollar (pound?). you can bet that officials on both sides of the pond knew about it, but enough palms were greased or loopholes found to make it acceptable.

sorry, i'm often cynical... can't help it.

Dilbert1234567 11-18-2003 12:17 AM

because we dont want it and were bigger then you


(tipical american dumb ass)

onetime2 11-18-2003 04:46 AM

Oooh scary asbestos. Asbestos is dangerous when the dust is airborne and you're breathing it in without repirators. How far do you think the airborne particles will get from the scrap yard (especially given the fact that they will be wetting it down and probably sealing the rooms being cleaned)?

jwoody 11-18-2003 07:37 AM

This entire protest is completely absurd. The dock in Hartlepool was designed for the sole purpose of dismantling ships and has been doing so for decades.

It is a valuable source of employment in one of the most deprived areas of the country.

I would much rather they were dismantled in my back yard by professionals than some fucking unlucky kids in India (see article posted by Arc101).

mml 11-18-2003 03:30 PM

Arc,jwoody and L.D. have got this thing right. The ships were taken there because Hartlepool is an appropriate location to do this demolition and an apparently legal contract between two groups was reached. If, in fact, some laws are being broken, I am sure these ships will be moved on to another facility, unfortunately, that facility might not be as good. Welcome to international business and the global village.

User Name 11-18-2003 07:31 PM

Re: Why is the US trying to dump toxic waste in my country?
 
Quote:

Originally posted by John Henry
A fleet of so-called 'ghost ships' have arrived in the UK from the US. These ships contain toxic chemicals, including fifty tonnes of asbestos, and have been sent to Hartlepool to be dismantled and disposed of. The firm in charge of dismantling the ships, Able UK say that the toxic waste on board can be disposed of safely. If this is so, why have they not been dismantled in the US?

There is a brief article on the matter here

Because the American government paid a lot of money to this firm. As you know, it pays taxes, which go to the federal and local governments, which, in theory benefit the people. This firm also provides jobs. As a private corporation, it is free to do whatever it wishes, as long as the government gave all the proper permits. If the UK government was against it, it shouldn't have given the firm the permits.

Jesus Pimp 11-20-2003 08:38 PM

People will do anything for money including accepting waste from another country.

supafly 11-21-2003 11:34 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Jesus Pimp
People will do anything for money including accepting waste from another country.
I agree this is probably some sort of deal between USA and England. There is always money involved.

John Henry 12-05-2003 12:31 PM

I absolutely agree that it's better for the stuff to be dismantled here than somewhere where the workers would be more at risk and I see the point about free trade. The point is that America is technologically at least on a par with if not further ahead than Britain. While America has a stronger economy than Britain, we have a falsely inflated economy due to lots of low interest lending. Consequently a lot of stuff over here is more expensive. Given this, it would surely be cheaper for the ships to be hauled to somewhere well kitted out in the states and have it done there, rather than drag them all the way over here to do the same job. The only conclusion I could come to is that there is some legislation which stops the ships being dismantled in the US that we don't have over here. For such legislation to exist in the first place, there would surely have to be some good reason. That's what worries me.

The title of this thread is a bit badly phrased, but I was using tabloid tactics to get people to look. Sorry. It's really not meant in UK vs US way, just in a wtf?! way.

Dwarf020 12-07-2003 09:49 AM

obviously, they're doing this because it was a lot cheaper to dispose of these ships using the UK company then any US company which is also capable. it's not the US doing something evil to the UK, it's just the way the world works w/free trade.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:13 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54