Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > The Academy > Tilted Politics


View Poll Results: Should the US be audited for weapons by the United Nations?
Yes, I think they should. 44 61.97%
No, they should not 27 38.03%
Voters: 71. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-31-2003, 09:35 AM   #121 (permalink)
Banned
 
Quote:
Originally posted by prosequence
I pick Canada. Thanks for asking.
WHICH do YOU think I should take? Do I have an option now?
WOW so many people avoid answering the question....
Food Eater Lad is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 12:39 AM   #122 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: Melbourne, Australia
UN is pretty much American. The search would never happen. Ever. Although it should, but... well... you know what I mean.
Sunrise is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 06:27 AM   #123 (permalink)
Banned
 
WHy should it? Again, what treaty did we sign? Are we searching China? Russia? France? Can you please name the treaty we signed that says we are to be searched?
Food Eater Lad is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 10:10 AM   #124 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: YOUR MOM!!
Why do yo need a treaty?
__________________
And now here I stand because of you, Mister Anderson, because of you I'm no longer an agent of the system, because of you I've changed...
prosequence is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 11:26 AM   #125 (permalink)
Banned
 
So other nations have the authority to make rules and regulations in other nations? I say we pass a law that says the French have to shut the hell up.
Food Eater Lad is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 09:56 PM   #126 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: YOUR MOM!!
Hopefully no one passes a law against ignorance.

Anyways, back on topic... I truly think it would be healthy for all countries to be subject to inspectiions of their weapons facilities. No harm could come from it.
__________________
And now here I stand because of you, Mister Anderson, because of you I'm no longer an agent of the system, because of you I've changed...
prosequence is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 10:01 PM   #127 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
There is no reason why the USA should have to infringe on its own sovereignity to appease some bureaucratic fucks that would like to see a weaker US.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
Old 11-01-2003, 10:52 PM   #128 (permalink)
Banned
 
Lots of harm would come of it. Lets show other nations our military secrets. That s a real smart idea....
Food Eater Lad is offline  
Old 11-03-2003, 12:11 PM   #129 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: YOUR MOM!!
The US already has enough weapons to destroy the world umpteen times over... what the hell, it ain't no secret!!!!!
It would not make a weaker country, just cooperative.
__________________
And now here I stand because of you, Mister Anderson, because of you I'm no longer an agent of the system, because of you I've changed...
prosequence is offline  
Old 11-03-2003, 12:45 PM   #130 (permalink)
Sarge of Blood Gulch Red Outpost Number One
 
archer2371's Avatar
 
Location: On the front lines against our very enemy
It's not just the power of the nukes that we're concerned about, because, that, as you pointed out, is quite public. The other things we are concerned about is how we wire the missiles, what our technology is exactly capable of, things like that. It's pretty sensitive stuff.
Remember the Spy Plane incident with China? Those guys on the plane had to dump pretty much every electronic device into the ocean before they could even land.
People know that we can do it, they just don't know how, and that comes in handy if ever we get into a war, because those rockets that deliver those nuclear payloads can be refitted for just normal explosive warheads.
I still maintain that our compliance with the NPT, and regular incremental disarmament with the Russian Federation works quite well, and that the UN doesn't need to step in.
__________________
"This ain't no Ice Cream Social!"

"Hey Grif, Chupathingy...how bout that? I like it...got a ring to it."

"I have no earthly idea what it is I just saw, or what this place is, or where in the hell O'Malley is! My only choice is to blame Grif for coming up with such a flawed plan. Stupid, stupid Grif."
archer2371 is offline  
Old 11-03-2003, 03:23 PM   #131 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: YOUR MOM!!
I see your point but really, if you already have major weapons, why develop more? Who cares if someone finds out how you wire one.... it's still gonna blow them up, won't it?
__________________
And now here I stand because of you, Mister Anderson, because of you I'm no longer an agent of the system, because of you I've changed...
prosequence is offline  
Old 11-03-2003, 03:54 PM   #132 (permalink)
Kiss of Death
 
Location: Perpetual wind and sorrow
We aren't developing more... We are getting rid of solid amounts in periodic incriments.
__________________
To win a war you must serve no master but your ambition.
Mojo_PeiPei is offline  
Old 11-03-2003, 04:01 PM   #133 (permalink)
Banned
 
Location: norway
Quote:
Originally posted by Food Eater Lad
WOW so many people avoid answering the question....
FEL: OK either you agree with me (option 1), or you choose option 2 which make you look like an idiot
Someone else: I choose my own option, #3, which is more accurate and less moronic.
FEL: WHY U DODGE MY QUESTION????

Do you ever get tired of that formula? I do, see, and I might not be the only one.
eple is offline  
Old 11-03-2003, 04:39 PM   #134 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Originally posted by Mojo_PeiPei
We aren't developing more... We are getting rid of solid amounts in periodic incriments.
Except for the dod's plan to develop and test newer "low yield" nuclear devices for use in the new swifterfaster us military. Which are, by the way, a violation of the nonproliferation treaty.
filtherton is offline  
Old 11-03-2003, 05:09 PM   #135 (permalink)
Sarge of Blood Gulch Red Outpost Number One
 
archer2371's Avatar
 
Location: On the front lines against our very enemy
Quote:
Except for the dod's plan to develop and test newer "low yield" nuclear devices for use in the new swifterfaster us military. Which are, by the way, a violation of the nonproliferation treaty.
Is that so? Because it says nothing in here about not being able to develop such weapons as written down, the NPT mostly applies to Non-Nuclear-States (NNS), restricting their ability to obtain nuclear materials, and asking the Nuclear States to not proliferate such materials to NNS. There has never, ever been a treaty to ban nuclear weapons, only to limit them.

And now for the Treaty itself:

Quote:
Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons
Signed at Washington, London, and Moscow July 1, 1968
Ratification advised by U.S. Senate March 13, 1969
Ratified by U.S. President November 24, 1969
U.S. ratification deposited at Washington, London, and Moscow March 5, 1970
Proclaimed by U.S. President March 5, 1970
Entered into force March 5, 1970

The States concluding this Treaty, hereinafter referred to as the "Parties to the Treaty",

Considering the devastation that would be visited upon all mankind by a nuclear war and the consequent need to make every effort to avert the danger of such a war and to take measures to safeguard the security of peoples,

Believing that the proliferation of nuclear weapons would seriously enhance the danger of nuclear war,

In conformity with resolutions of the United Nations General Assembly calling for the conclusion of an agreement on the prevention of wider dissemination of nuclear weapons,

Undertaking to cooperate in facilitating the application of International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards on peaceful nuclear activities,

Expressing their support for research, development and other efforts to further the application, within the framework of the International Atomic Energy Agency safeguards system, of the principle of safeguarding effectively the flow of source and special fissionable materials by use of instruments and other techniques at certain strategic points,

Affirming the principle that the benefits of peaceful applications of nuclear technology, including any technological by-products which may be derived by nuclear-weapon States from the development of nuclear explosive devices, should be available for peaceful purposes to all Parties of the Treaty, whether nuclear-weapon or non-nuclear weapon States,

Convinced that, in furtherance of this principle, all Parties to the Treaty are entitled to participate in the fullest possible exchange of scientific information for, and to contribute alone or in cooperation with other States to, the further development of the applications of atomic energy for peaceful purposes,

Declaring their intention to achieve at the earliest possible date the cessation of the nuclear arms race and to undertake effective measures in the direction of nuclear disarmament,

Urging the cooperation of all States in the attainment of this objective,

Recalling the determination expressed by the Parties to the 1963 Treaty banning nuclear weapon tests in the atmosphere, in outer space and under water in its Preamble to seek to achieve the discontinuance of all test explosions of nuclear weapons for all time and to continue negotiations to this end,

Desiring to further the easing of international tension and the strengthening of trust between States in order to facilitate the cessation of the manufacture of nuclear weapons, the liquidation of all their existing stockpiles, and the elimination from national arsenals of nuclear weapons and the means of their delivery pursuant to a Treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control,

Recalling that, in accordance with the Charter of the United Nations, States must refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations, and that the establishment and maintenance of international peace and security are to be promoted with the least diversion for armaments of the worlds human and economic resources,

Have agreed as follows:


Article I
Each nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to transfer to any recipient whatsoever nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; and not in any way to assist, encourage, or induce any non-nuclear weapon State to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices, or control over such weapons or explosive devices.


Article II
Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to receive the transfer from any transferor whatsoever of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices or of control over such weapons or explosive devices directly, or indirectly; not to manufacture or otherwise acquire nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices; and not to seek or receive any assistance in the manufacture of nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices.


Article III
1. Each non-nuclear-weapon State Party to the Treaty undertakes to accept safeguards, as set forth in an agreement to be negotiated and concluded with the International Atomic Energy Agency in accordance with the Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency and the Agencys safeguards system, for the exclusive purpose of verification of the fulfillment of its obligations assumed under this Treaty with a view to preventing diversion of nuclear energy from peaceful uses to nuclear weapons or other nuclear explosive devices. Procedures for the safeguards required by this article shall be followed with respect to source or special fissionable material whether it is being produced, processed or used in any principal nuclear facility or is outside any such facility. The safeguards required by this article shall be applied to all source or special fissionable material in all peaceful nuclear activities within the territory of such State, under its jurisdiction, or carried out under its control anywhere.

2. Each State Party to the Treaty undertakes not to provide: (a) source or special fissionable material, or (b) equipment or material especially designed or prepared for the processing, use or production of special fissionable material, to any non-nuclear-weapon State for peaceful purposes, unless the source or special fissionable material shall be subject to the safeguards required by this article.

3. The safeguards required by this article shall be implemented in a manner designed to comply with article IV of this Treaty, and to avoid hampering the economic or technological development of the Parties or international cooperation in the field of peaceful nuclear activities, including the international exchange of nuclear material and equipment for the processing, use or production of nuclear material for peaceful purposes in accordance with the provisions of this article and the principle of safeguarding set forth in the Preamble of the Treaty.

4. Non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty shall conclude agreements with the International Atomic Energy Agency to meet the requirements of this article either individually or together with other States in accordance with the Statute of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Negotiation of such agreements shall commence within 180 days from the original entry into force of this Treaty. For States depositing their instruments of ratification or accession after the 180-day period, negotiation of such agreements shall commence not later than the date of such deposit. Such agreements shall enter into force not later than eighteen months after the date of initiation of negotiations.


Article IV
1. Nothing in this Treaty shall be interpreted as affecting the inalienable right of all the Parties to the Treaty to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination and in conformity with articles I and II of this Treaty.

2. All the Parties to the Treaty undertake to facilitate, and have the right to participate in, the fullest possible exchange of equipment, materials and scientific and technological information for the peaceful uses of nuclear energy. Parties to the Treaty in a position to do so shall also cooperate in contributing alone or together with other States or international organizations to the further development of the applications of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes, especially in the territories of non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty, with due consideration for the needs of the developing areas of the world.


Article V
Each party to the Treaty undertakes to take appropriate measures to ensure that, in accordance with this Treaty, under appropriate international observation and through appropriate international procedures, potential benefits from any peaceful applications of nuclear explosions will be made available to non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty on a nondiscriminatory basis and that the charge to such Parties for the explosive devices used will be as low as possible and exclude any charge for research and development. Non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty shall be able to obtain such benefits, pursuant to a special international agreement or agreements, through an appropriate international body with adequate representation of non-nuclear-weapon States. Negotiations on this subject shall commence as soon as possible after the Treaty enters into force. Non-nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty so desiring may also obtain such benefits pursuant to bilateral agreements.


Article VI
Each of the Parties to the Treaty undertakes to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a Treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control.


Article VII
Nothing in this Treaty affects the right of any group of States to conclude regional treaties in order to assure the total absence of nuclear weapons in their respective territories.


Article VIII
1. Any Party to the Treaty may propose amendments to this Treaty. The text of any proposed amendment shall be submitted to the Depositary Governments which shall circulate it to all Parties to the Treaty. Thereupon, if requested to do so by one-third or more of the Parties to the Treaty, the Depositary Governments shall convene a conference, to which they shall invite all the Parties to the Treaty, to consider such an amendment.

2. Any amendment to this Treaty must be approved by a majority of the votes of all the Parties to the Treaty, including the votes of all nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty and all other Parties which, on the date the amendment is circulated, are members of the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency. The amendment shall enter into force for each Party that deposits its instrument of ratification of the amendment upon the deposit of such instruments of ratification by a majority of all the Parties, including the instruments of ratification of all nuclear-weapon States Party to the Treaty and all other Parties which, on the date the amendment is circulated, are members of the Board of Governors of the International Atomic Energy Agency. Thereafter, it shall enter into force for any other Party upon the deposit of its instrument of ratification of the amendment.

3. Five years after the entry into force of this Treaty, a conference of Parties to the Treaty shall be held in Geneva, Switzerland, in order to review the operation of this Treaty with a view to assuring that the purposes of the Preamble and the provisions of the Treaty are being realized. At intervals of five years thereafter, a majority of the Parties to the Treaty may obtain, by submitting a proposal to this effect to the Depositary Governments, the convening of further conferences with the same objective of reviewing the operation of the Treaty.


Article IX
1. This Treaty shall be open to all States for signature. Any State which does not sign the Treaty before its entry into force in accordance with paragraph 3 of this article may accede to it at any time.

2. This Treaty shall be subject to ratification by signatory States. Instruments of ratification and instruments of accession shall be deposited with the Governments of the United States of America, the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, which are hereby designated the Depositary Governments.

3. This Treaty shall enter into force after its ratification by the States, the Governments of which are designated Depositaries of the Treaty, and forty other States signatory to this Treaty and the deposit of their instruments of ratification. For the purposes of this Treaty, a nuclear-weapon State is one which has manufactured and exploded a nuclear weapon or other nuclear explosive device prior to January 1, 1967.

4. For States whose instruments of ratification or accession are deposited subsequent to the entry into force of this Treaty, it shall enter into force on the date of the deposit of their instruments of ratification or accession.

5. The Depositary Governments shall promptly inform all signatory and acceding States of the date of each signature, the date of deposit of each instrument of ratification or of accession, the date of the entry into force of this Treaty, and the date of receipt of any requests for convening a conference or other notices.

6. This Treaty shall be registered by the Depositary Governments pursuant to article 102 of the Charter of the United Nations.


Article X
1. Each Party shall in exercising its national sovereignty have the right to withdraw from the Treaty if it decides that extraordinary events, related to the subject matter of this Treaty, have jeopardized the supreme interests of its country. It shall give notice of such withdrawal to all other Parties to the Treaty and to the United Nations Security Council three months in advance. Such notice shall include a statement of the extraordinary events it regards as having jeopardized its supreme interests.

2. Twenty-five years after the entry into force of the Treaty, a conference shall be convened to decide whether the Treaty shall continue in force indefinitely, or shall be extended for an additional fixed period or periods. This decision shall be taken by a majority of the Parties to the Treaty.


Article XI
This Treaty, the English, Russian, French, Spanish and Chinese texts of which are equally authentic, shall be deposited in the archives of the Depositary Governments. Duly certified copies of this Treaty shall be transmitted by the Depositary Governments to the Governments of the signatory and acceding States.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF the undersigned, duly authorized, have signed this Treaty.

DONE in triplicate, at the cities of Washington, London and Moscow, this first day of July one thousand nine hundred sixty-eight.
__________________
"This ain't no Ice Cream Social!"

"Hey Grif, Chupathingy...how bout that? I like it...got a ring to it."

"I have no earthly idea what it is I just saw, or what this place is, or where in the hell O'Malley is! My only choice is to blame Grif for coming up with such a flawed plan. Stupid, stupid Grif."

Last edited by archer2371; 11-03-2003 at 05:11 PM..
archer2371 is offline  
Old 11-03-2003, 06:28 PM   #136 (permalink)
Psycho
 
Location: YOUR MOM!!
Now's a good as time as any.
__________________
And now here I stand because of you, Mister Anderson, because of you I'm no longer an agent of the system, because of you I've changed...
prosequence is offline  
Old 11-03-2003, 09:53 PM   #137 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Location: EU
Quote:
Originally posted by Food Eater Lad
WHy should it? Again, what treaty did we sign? Are we searching China? Russia? France? Can you please name the treaty we signed that says we are to be searched?
Actually all of these countries together with the US have shown cooperation with the UN on this issue, the real problem isn't weapons inspections - the real problem is why one would think that any nation is above international law on this issue, including the US.
damił is offline  
Old 11-03-2003, 09:58 PM   #138 (permalink)
Junkie
 
filtherton's Avatar
 
Location: In the land of ice and snow.
Quote:
Believing that the proliferation of nuclear weapons would seriously enhance the danger of nuclear war,
Quote:
Declaring their intention to achieve at the earliest possible date the cessation of the nuclear arms race and to undertake effective measures in the direction of nuclear disarmament,
Quote:
Article VI
Each of the Parties to the Treaty undertakes to pursue negotiations in good faith on effective measures relating to cessation of the nuclear arms race at an early date and to nuclear disarmament, and on a Treaty on general and complete disarmament under strict and effective international control.
You're right, nowhere in here does it specifically prohibit anyone from creating low yield nuclear devices. On the other hand i fail to see how developing new nuclear bombs is going to conform to the intent of the NPT, which, as the title states, is nonproliferation.
Who else is going to want their low yield nukes if the u.s. ends up developing and deploying them against that might be an nns? Surely our european allies will end up with some of our hot, low yield action. Israel is fo sho get some of that sweet shit. Sounds like them nukes is gon' be repliferatin all over the place.

It seems like priorities are misplaced when the u.s. gets it panties in a bunch because a rogue state might have nukes, yet in the same breath is attempting to develop newer, more effective wmds for rogue nations to eventually get their hands on.
filtherton is offline  
 

Tags
destruction, mass, weapons


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:28 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360