Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Politics (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/)
-   -   Obama orders stop to Abu Ghraib Photos part 2 (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/147569-obama-orders-stop-abu-ghraib-photos-part-2-a.html)

spectre 05-19-2009 07:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cynthetiq (Post 2637692)
No, I don't know if it shows worse behavior, those that have seen them indicate that it's not worse that what has already been released. If the point is prosecution, then prosecute. If there is not going to be be any prosecution, then what is the point of releasing them to the general public? But so far the idea here is to use the photos as a political football to dress down the previous administration and the people that worked within it.

You were on the train and then derailed. The point is to make sure that there is prosecution if it's warranted. This is all a political game right now, it's not about right and wrong. That's what releasing the photos will do, create the public outcry necessary to bring this back to what this is about, that what was done was wrong, plain and simple.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Cynthetiq (Post 2637692)
Yes, AVAILABLE to the prosecutors is not the same thing as printed in ever newspaper and shown on every 11pm news. We didn't get to see the photos for OJ Simpson's trial nor do we see them for all the murder and homicides.

You don't read many tabloids, otherwise you would've seen Nicole's head barely still attached. The photos were never officially released and there already was an outcry for justice, but they certainly fueled more pressure being put on the part of the prosecution.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cynthetiq (Post 2637692)
I've not ever said make the evidence unavailable for prosecution.

Technically, you weren't very clear either way, just saying to not show them, so I'll give you that one.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cynthetiq (Post 2637692)
Both you and willravel need to learn to read what I've written and not what you want it to say.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Cynthetiq (Post 2637988)
Oh right will you're right again.

He said he was recognized in the photo... I didn't see that published anywhere in the article he's quoted in, he said that once the photos were released his family ASKED him about it...

but I'm sure you knew about it... cuz you're absolutely right again!!! it's amazing you're like Kreskin!

I'd want the above quote to say something that isn't a troll. :)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cynthetiq (Post 2638005)
Well, I don't know about you but it seems that I'm in a discussion with someone who can see words that aren't in the article posted nor any other article or source.

So that means we're allowed to openly mock people who we feel aren't understanding what we're saying? When was this rule change put in place? Is this a staff only thing or site wide? If you disagree with anything I've said above, am I free to mock you as well?

Cynthetiq 05-19-2009 07:50 PM

I'm saying it with the utmost respect and sincerity because it's what he wants me to say. that he's right.

if you think it's a troll... feel free to press the REPORT post button.

spectre 05-19-2009 08:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cynthetiq (Post 2638015)
if you think it's a troll... feel free to press the REPORT post button.

You're right, that is the correct way to handle it. Thank you.

The_Jazz 05-20-2009 04:49 PM

EVERYONE is now going to make more liberal use of their back button, and everyone reading this thread is hereby deputized to use the Report Post Button (the red and white triangle with an exclamation point in the center beneath every poster's name) if they see anyone who is out of line.

Willravel 05-20-2009 05:06 PM

Anyway, it seems Obama is facing a split in his support on this issue. A lot of his core supporters are for releasing the photos, and a lot are against it. I find it interesting that this same split is mirrored in his own behavior, referencing the seeming flip flop.

I hate to characterize the issue in terms of locations on a theoretical political scale as it should be circling around issues like justice and closure, but judging by who is saying what on the issue, the more liberal you are the more likely you are to want the photos released. I doubt very much that it's a coincidence. Liberals—honest to goodness leftists—have been screaming over the past 8 years for our day in the sun, and now that we have more Democrats than we know what to do with, we (the liberal liberals) were kinda hoping it was time to bring justice to the guilty. Now, though, we're seeing that Obama can't for some reason be quite as optimistic and progressive as he was on the campaign trail. I understand that to a point, some of the promises he made will take a lot of time and a lot of work, but if these photographs aren't released soon, we may lose our window to get the public behind the idea of prosecutions.

Back when Clinton was in power, it always seemed like he was in turmoil between his true liberal feelings on the one side and his moderate feelings stemming from classic Democrat low self-assuredness on the other. I was only 10 when he was elected, so I wasn't really paying much attention, but by my understanding Clinton started out relatively liberal and then slowly slid right, especially after the sex scandal and Republican domination of congress. I don't want to see that happen again, because I'm worried we'll just end up going in circles between a far-right conservative the causes a mess and a gradually less liberal Democrat that has to clean it up. We'll never get anything done.

Derwood 05-28-2009 03:23 PM

Apparently the photos contain graphic depictions of torture and rape...

Report: Iraq abuse photos depict torture, rape - White House- msnbc.com

Willravel 05-28-2009 03:59 PM

So I guess we haven't seen the worst of them yet.

dippin 05-28-2009 04:25 PM

If the new pictures not being released are so much worse than what we've seen before, I can't even imagine how bad it will be. Because rape and so on were already depicted in the earlier pictures released:

Warning: 2 graphic pictures

at-Largely: Photos Obama won't release include images of rape...(warning, graphic)

at-Largely: Something I missed

Apparently, some of the photos not released include the rape of an Iraqi teenager.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360