Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Politics (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/)
-   -   New Australian Political Party - The Sex Party (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/142639-new-australian-political-party-sex-party.html)

ASU2003 11-16-2008 10:39 PM

New Australian Political Party - The Sex Party
 
The Australian Sex Party set to launch

I like their platform and I would vote for them. The Sex Party just doesn't sound right though, maybe the Love Party would be better. Are there any Aussies on the board that want to run for office?

It's too bad Paris Hilton can't run for office down under. Maybe she can start this political party in the United States.

Halx 11-17-2008 09:03 AM

I think they need a few more facets than just.. pro-sex. I'm sure they should be concerned about the economy and such...

SabrinaFair 11-17-2008 10:45 AM

Aye. While I agree with most of what the party advocates, I'm not sure its enough to base a party platform on. Then again, I'm so inundated by American politics, I'm sure I'm looking at this through a biased lens.

dlish 11-17-2008 11:47 AM

Dlish for Party Leader dammit!

although i'd lead it, id probably vote for someone else though. couldnt possibly take these guys seriously with a name like that and policies to match.

spindles 11-17-2008 01:51 PM

Actually, the internet filter *is* a big issue. The government are talking about a mandatory filter of certain content and an opt-out filter for other things. Most experts are suggesting that this will slow down our already slow internet + block content with false positives. Dlish was worried about losing his tfp where he is now, but it becomes quite a possibility in Australia if this filter is introduced. The government is asking ISPs to take part in a trial so they can see the viability. Hopefully, it will be atrociously slow, badly implemented and ultimately canned.

ASU2003 11-17-2008 06:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx (Post 2561711)
I think they need a few more facets than just.. pro-sex. I'm sure they should be concerned about the economy and such...

You know, if I were getting sex on a regular basis, I could care less about the economy. :)

I know the internet filter is a big issue. Hopefully it will spur the development of a Linux live CD that will encrypt all of your internet traffic through a foreign proxy server. Don't worry about it too much, they try and stop things and it just makes it harder on them in the end.

OCT 11-20-2008 04:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by spindles (Post 2561867)
The government are talking about a mandatory filter of certain content and an opt-out filter for other things. Most experts are suggesting that this will slow down our already slow internet + block content with false positives.
...
Hopefully, it will be atrociously slow, badly implemented and ultimately canned.

The internet filter might not be such a bad thing, but it really will depend on how it's implemented. I think it'd be safe to say that a large percentage of the public would be silently outraged if their favourite TGP or Torrent site was banned, but I'm not sure that's what will be targeted.

There is a lot of material out there on the net that should be banned. Kiddie porn and rape are at the top of that list, and as long as false positives aren't generated too often, I'm more than happy to have my internet filtered.

Not considering the political side of it though, technically it'd be a nightmare to introduce any kind of country-wide filtering system. It would have to be on an ISP-by-ISP basis, and the processing power required by heuristic analysis of all information passing through any gateway would be immense. Most ISPs have enough trouble filtering spam, so checking every HTTP request alone would be an incredible undertaking. And that'd still leave the P2P traffic which accounts for the largest share of bandwidth by far, and is more often than not encrypted anyway.

Hyacinthe 11-21-2008 02:02 AM

Hmm I know a few people who are going to the Sexpo - might have to ask them about this.

I think this party has alot of good ideas but I would want more details about their actual policies in regards to alot of other things before I could bring myself to support them. I do wonder whether their party name is going to be "the sex party" though, seems somewhat doubtful.

Many areas of Aus are very backwards in their approach to sex (Perth being the worst offender city wise) so some forwards steps in regards to the public acknowledgement of sex would be great.

Also education as to what exatly ir rape and what is not being included in generalsex education would be good - recent survey here of teen males showed that over 65% of them thought it was ok to "force" a girl to have sex. That's higher then the percentage that thought it was ok to physically abuse a partner. I think the inclusion of rape in physical abuse and a correlation being made between the two would obviously be good for Australian teen males.

Then there's the fact that over 20% of Australian teens are apparently not even getting a birds and bees talk from their parents and are receiving insuffucuent information about STI's.

The sex talk non-existent for 20 per cent of teens: Survey

Like I said I'll be interested to see how sucessful this party is and their approach to non sexual issues.

connyosis 11-21-2008 02:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by OCT (Post 2563373)
The internet filter might not be such a bad thing, but it really will depend on how it's implemented. I think it'd be safe to say that a large percentage of the public would be silently outraged if their favourite TGP or Torrent site was banned, but I'm not sure that's what will be targeted.

There is a lot of material out there on the net that should be banned. Kiddie porn and rape are at the top of that list, and as long as false positives aren't generated too often, I'm more than happy to have my internet filtered.

Not considering the political side of it though, technically it'd be a nightmare to introduce any kind of country-wide filtering system. It would have to be on an ISP-by-ISP basis, and the processing power required by heuristic analysis of all information passing through any gateway would be immense. Most ISPs have enough trouble filtering spam, so checking every HTTP request alone would be an incredible undertaking. And that'd still leave the P2P traffic which accounts for the largest share of bandwidth by far, and is more often than not encrypted anyway.

Censorship has no place in a free society. Here in Sweden we have a child porn filter which I'm against. Now let me make it perfectly clear that I am not in favor of child porn. Like any sane person I find it repulsive, but censorship is just not right. Blocking these sites will not stop child porn. It will just hide it and we can all pretend we've done something good.
This filter is also ridiculously simple to get through. Just use a DNS server outside of Sweden and you can surf to whatever site you want.

The right thing IMHO is to find the people responsible for producing/hosting things like child porn and throw them in jail for life, not trying to censor the internet.


Oh, and a sex party, awesome.

Nimetic 11-21-2008 03:48 AM

To be honest... I'm not sure what they are proposing. I find it hard to get too worried. If anything major disappears then the blockage will be reversed soon enough.

And if it people from movies at maximum speed from OS - I won't be shedding many tears over that either.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360