![]() |
Has McCain gone too far?
|
Has Biden gone to far given his latest gaffe?
Quote:
|
|
Quote:
Carter had the Iran militants takeover of the US embassy. Reagan had the terrorist bombing of the marine barracks in Beirut. Bush 41 had the Iraq invasion of Kuwait and the first Gulf war. Clinton had Bosnia and Somalia. The next president will have an international crisis...it may not be in the first six months, but the president will be tested on international affairs. I prefer a thoughtful person who seeks the input of those around him and considers the consequences of acting before dismissing options over a hot tempered reactionary who thinks he knows it all and rarely listens to dissenting opinions. |
"Terrorists" do care who they hurt. That's kinda the point.
|
Sorry, I forgot the rule about starting the discussion.
I think it's one thing for McCain to allow Palin to throw the "pals around with terrorists" line out at her rallies (though I think it's pretty low), but to have an organized mailing that portrays an airplane and a ransom note styled font, etc. is really over the line. This makes Swift Boat and "McCain has a black baby" look like nothing. McCain promised he'd run his campaign on the high road, but he's become the dirtiest player of all. When questioned about it, he says "well, it's a tough campaign, but if Obama had just done the town hall meetings...." Pathetic. When will Americans say "enough is enough" with this level of campaigning? |
Has McCain gone too far?
Yes, of course he has gone too far. He and his surrogates are using a McCarthyite campaign of red-baiting innuendo together with Nixonian racism. They've been playing to the know-nothing faction of the American right. Look at Michelle Bachmann. She didn't even have the courage to say that Obama or anyone else was un-American, she "merely suggested" that it might be the case. Disgusting. McCain distanced himself from racist supporters in Minnesota -- in a cleverly racist way that allows him to continue to benefit from the whispering campaign. Here's what he said: "No, ma'am. He's a decent family man [and] citizen that I just happen to have disagreements with on fundamental issues and that's what this campaign's all about. He's not [an Arab]." If he truly wished to disavow the racist elements of his supporters, he needed to say something like Colin Powell did on Sunday. People say he's not a racist, but what do you call a person who allows these statements to be made in his name and says nothing to stop it? It's an odd choice of strategies. As if Obama weren't enough, he's motivating African-Americans like never before. The racism of his campaign is killing him in places like NM and Colorado. He's losing the Hispanic vote by about 70 - 20, and that's not going to improve. Bush did much better with Hispanics. |
Quote:
Quote:
Based on Biden's October 18th speech where he asks the crowd to "gird their "loins" and "mark his words" because Obama will be tested by a "generated threat" within the first 6 months of his presidency, it sounds more like they've been "briefed" on plausible scenarios. Interesting. |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Shouldn't that be "Mccainavillain". :D |
it wouldn't necessarily be surprising were something to happen because, thanks to the bush administration and to it alone, the united states is in an extremely weak position politically. anyone who thinks about this would reach the same conclusion.
so the surprise is that the mc-cain campaign actually touched this issue, not to mention tried to turn it to some imaginary advantage. i would like to see mc-cain say **something** to distance himself from the racist horseshit that's been circulating in the context of his campaign concerning muslims in general, arabs in particular. but i'm not holding my breath. |
I absolutely love Biden's "gaffe"...but not as much as I love the right's full throated chomping at the bait.
Every time they latch on to his supposed off-message, the conversation immediately turns to discussion over Powell's endorsement. If there was any evidence of effective campaigning by Obama, I'd say it was intentional...oh, erm... |
Quote:
|
I don't really see the big deal. There are two plausible readings of Biden's statement:
1. Someone out there is going to see a new president as a good opportunity to try something funny. I don't really see why this is implausible. 2. The right-wing media is going to, through spin, manufacture a crisis for Obama to 'fail'. This is perhaps a bit sillier than the first reading, but not really all that silly. The right-wing/Palin spin, that Biden is somehow calling Obama inexperienced and not ready, I really don't see in the statement at all. |
Word of the week: post-turtle
A 75-year-old Texas rancher recently explained this term to a country doctor. The conversation turned to the US election, and Sarah Palin's vice-presidential candidacy, and the old rancher observed: “Well, ya know, Palin is a "post-turtle". The bemused doctor asked what a post-turtle was, and the old man replied: When you're driving down a country road and you come across a fence post with a turtle balanced on top, that's a post-turtle. The rancher continued: You know she didn't get up there by herself, she doesn't belong up there, she doesn't know what to do while she is up there, and you just wonder what kind of dumb ass put her up there to begin with". |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project