Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Politics (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/)
-   -   Fiorina says Palin not ready (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/140402-fiorina-says-palin-not-ready.html)

Baraka_Guru 09-17-2008 07:07 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ottopilot (Post 2526016)
gibberish translation: check his attendance and voting records (IL state senate and US Senate), time spent on actually writing legislation vs. memoirs written... all public record, I'm not going to litigate my point. Time he actually showed up for the job, poor responsibility and effectiveness to his constituents, etc. Prime target to get fired in the real world. He's brilliant, but he doesn't do his job. He doesn't serve the people.

Votes missed:

Obama:
http://www.govtrack.us/data/us/110/r...tes-400629.png

McCain:
http://www.govtrack.us/data/us/110/r...tes-300071.png

The lower dotted line is the median; the upper dotted line is the 90th percentile.

I'm guessing the recent absentees are related to campaigning.

So what are you saying, exactly? Are both candidates not up for the job because they're both too busy running around trying to be presidents? I'd blame your electoral system before I'd blame individuals for not serving the public. Or do you have something more specific besides attendance you'd like to point out? Can you put more substance in your claims?

roachboy 09-17-2008 07:09 AM

i think what otto is saying is a retread of the usual pablum about people with ivy league educations being somehow problematic in "the real world" which of course does not include such institutions.

in other words, there's no there there.
again.

aceventura3 09-17-2008 07:18 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlatan (Post 2525752)
That's funny, I don't see the Democrat's message as being one of Doom and Gloom but rather one of hope and trust in America's ability to change the things that need changing.

I guess we are listening to different messages.

For example, I think our economy is in fact fundamentally strong. We are in a crisis, but I think it will pass. I look at the 94% of Americans working. I look at the 98% of the home not in default. I look at GDP continuing to grow. I look at exports increasing. I look at the fact it still takes 1/2 hour wait at local restaurants for dinner on the weekend. I look at people buying big screen TV's, cell phones and $500 purses. I look at electricity flowing to my home, my garbage getting picked up, roads being built and repaired. Then I hear Obama say the economy is broken. It is not.


Quote:

I agree that the competency thing is a distraction. That said, I find it interesting that your vote for McCain is tipped in his favour by the choice of Palin as his running mate. Do you really feel that the VP has that much of an effect on the core business of the oval office?
For example, McCain, in my view rightfully says the fundamentals of the economy are strong, then rather than defending his statement he backs off. I don't think Palin would. Palin gives me hope for the future. I want her to succeed. I want more people with her "fight" in Washington. I don't think she is perfect and she has weaknesses, but who doesn't?
-----Added 17/9/2008 at 11 : 25 : 05-----
Quote:

Originally Posted by ratbastid (Post 2525761)
My god! Perspectives are SUCH interesting things!

I can't FATHOM how you could find the GOP message positive and optimistic. It sounds cynical and paranoid to me. And I can't imagine how you can hear "hope" as doom and gloom. The cognitive dissonance for me in reading this paragraph is nothing short of stunning.

I'll also note that, in the question of "is the country on the right track?" you're in a marked minority. You're entitled to that opinion, of course. But you're nuts. ;)

Direction of Country

Here are the most recent numbers (from a GfK Roper poll Sept. 5-10):

For example - I think our initial invasion and strategy in Iraq was correct, our enemy adapted and for a period got the upper hand. Then we adapted and now have the upper hand. I think there are ebbs and flows to war. Regardless of your position on us going to war, once we were at war I think the focus needs to be on winning it. Democrats seem to have difficulty with the fact that we at one point had the upper hand and now have the upper hand. I think we can accomplish our goals with Iraq. Democrats don't think it is possible. I think the war is currently on the right track, Democrats don't.

ratbastid 09-17-2008 07:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aceventura3 (Post 2526055)
For example - I think our initial invasion and strategy in Iraq was correct, our enemy adapted and for a period got the upper hand. Then we adapted and now have the upper hand. I think there are ebbs and flows to war. Regardless of your position on us going to war, once we were at war I think the focus needs to be on winning it. Democrats seem to have difficulty with the fact that we at one point had the upper hand and now have the upper hand. I think we can accomplish our goals with Iraq. Democrats don't think it is possible. I think the war is currently on the right track, Democrats don't.

There are rumblings that all is not as rosy as reported in Iraq at the moment, but even setting that aside: How about the economy? Health care? Energy? Food prices?

The war is a waning issue in this campaign. It's still there, but people's wallets are screaming at them right now, and that's always going to come first. I don't think any of the four I mentioned are winner issues for the Republican ticket at the moment. Which is why the McCain campaign isn't running on issues, it's running on personality. Which is the only world the Palin choice makes any sense.

You (the generic "you", not "YOU", ace) can "la-di-da" about the problems facing the country right now if your politics demand that of you, but before long the rest of the world just sees your ostrich head in the sand.

aceventura3 09-17-2008 07:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratbastid (Post 2526093)
How about the economy? Health care? Energy? Food prices?

Again, in all of those areas I can see a lot of positives. Not perfection, perhaps some areas needing attention, but certainly not totally broken.

asaris 09-17-2008 08:21 AM

Post deleted -- obsolete.

ratbastid 09-17-2008 09:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by aceventura3 (Post 2526101)
Again, in all of those areas I can see a lot of positives. Not perfection, perhaps some areas needing attention, but certainly not totally broken.

Well, again, you're entitled to your opinion, but 70% of America disagrees with you. That alone doesn't make them right and you wrong, but it's still a pretty big polling trend.

filtherton 09-17-2008 01:06 PM

Well, to be fair, Bush was demonstrably bad at running corporations and that didn't stop him from having one of the most successful presidencies in the history of our great nation.

Rekna 09-17-2008 01:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by filtherton (Post 2526460)
Well, to be fair, Bush was demonstrably bad at running corporations and that didn't stop him from having one of the most successful presidencies in the history of our great nation.

We need a sarcasm tag for statements like this.

djtestudo 09-17-2008 02:23 PM

Who was the last president to:

1) Run a business of any real size (not necessarily Fortune 500, but bigger than, say, a law firm)?

2) Have enough business experience to be qualified at any reasonable management level at a major corporation?

Obviously the Bushes. Maybe Reagan (president of the SAG). Beyond that, you probably have to go back a ways to find one.

That just means that it is a different kind of job that requires different types of skills.

A good CEO needs to be a good manager, but a president needs to be a good leader. Each job needs some of both skills, but much more of one.

Tully Mars 09-17-2008 02:43 PM

Jimmy Carter ran a successful agricultural business prior to entering politics. A lot people referred to Carter as "that peanut farmer from Georgia." But it was much more then a peanut farm, including a cotton gin and agricultural supplies sales. I'm not sure of the numbers but I'd bet he made more money doing that then any of the business ventures Bush Jr. ran.

djtestudo 09-17-2008 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tully Mars (Post 2526537)
Jimmy Carter ran a successful agricultural business prior to entering politics. A lot people referred to Carter as "that peanut farmer from Georgia." But it was much more then a peanut farm, including a cotton gin and agricultural supplies sales. I'm not sure of the numbers but I'd bet he made more money doing that then any of the business ventures Bush Jr. ran.

I was going to put Carter in there, but I wasn't sure how big his operation was.

ratbastid 09-18-2008 04:31 AM

Bush Pére was an oilman too. He founded Zapata Petrolium and was an oil millionaire by the time he was 40.

Tully Mars 09-18-2008 04:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratbastid (Post 2526901)
Bush Pére was an oilman too. He founded Zapata Petrolium and was an oil millionaire by the time he was 40.


Yeah, sometimes it's good to have friends... and family.

Zapata Corporation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You know there's a difference between hitting a triple and being born on third base.

Paq 09-18-2008 07:40 AM

GOP senator: A 'stretch' to say Palin is qualified - Yahoo! News

Quote:

WASHINGTON - Nebraska Republican Sen. Chuck Hagel said his party's vice presidential nominee, Sarah Palin, lacks foreign policy experience and called it a "stretch" to say she's qualified to be president.
ADVERTISEMENT

"She doesn't have any foreign policy credentials," Hagel said in an interview published Thursday by the Omaha World-Herald. "You get a passport for the first time in your life last year? I mean, I don't know what you can say. You can't say anything."

Could Palin lead the country if GOP presidential nominee John McCain could not?

"I think it's a stretch to, in any way, to say that she's got the experience to be president of the United States," Hagel said.

McCain and other Republicans have defended Palin's qualifications, citing Alaska's proximity to Russia. Palin told ABC News, "They're our next-door neighbors and you can actually see Russia from land here in Alaska, from an island in Alaska."

Hagel took issue with that argument. "I think they ought to be just honest about it and stop the nonsense about, 'I look out my window and I see Russia and so therefore I know something about Russia,'" he said. "That kind of thing is insulting to the American people."

Hagel, a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, has been a vocal critic of the Bush administration since the 2003 invasion of Iraq.

In July, Hagel traveled to Iraq and Afghanistan with Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama. Though he didn't expect to be asked, Hagel had said he would have considered serving as Obama's running mate.

Palin was mayor of Wasilla, Alaska, population 6,500, before becoming Alaska's governor in December 2006.

Palin visited soldiers in Kuwait and Germany last year and said in an interview with ABC News that her only other foreign travel had been to Mexico and Canada. She also said she had never met a foreign head of state.

Hagel told the newspaper that other governors have been elected to serve in the White House without experience in Washington. He said judgment and character were also important for the job.

"But I do think in a world that is so complicated, so interconnected and so combustible, you really got to have some people in charge that have some sense of the bigger scope of the world," Hagel said. "I think that's just a requirement."
I agree, it's insulting to the people and it's misleading and i'm SURE they could find something else to focus on instead of this...

aceventura3 09-18-2008 08:19 AM

Deleted. I got it.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:43 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360