Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Politics (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/)
-   -   Eliot Spitzer (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-politics/132403-eliot-spitzer.html)

loquitur 03-10-2008 02:22 PM

Eliot Spitzer
 
I don't think prostitution should be illegal, and I did vote for Eliot Spitzer for governor back in 11/06. Nevertheless, I thought this was the funniest headline I have seen in weeks. And I wouldn't have expected that from The Economist.

mixedmedia 03-10-2008 02:34 PM

Well, we all know economists love to get their freak on. :p

This is probably the best time for a lesser politician to become embroiled in a sex scandal - election year. He should consider himself lucky.

And yeah, I don't care if he sees prostitutes, what's more I think it's none of my business. His wife may feel differently. :)

loquitur 03-10-2008 02:37 PM

"economists love to get their freak on"????

Next thing you know they'll be having parties with the actuaries and accountants.............

mixedmedia 03-10-2008 02:42 PM

maybe it's just the British ones...

n0nsensical 03-10-2008 02:55 PM

Witty headlines are The Economist's trademark. I love this story. Yet another arbiter of morality proven to be a Grade A hypocrite. When are people gonna wake up and stop expecting anything else?

powerclown 03-10-2008 03:01 PM

Yeah let me rephrase that: Poor Judgement.
I agree, he should resign. He's got a bunch of daughters too, sadly.
You (poster #7) want to turn this into an indictment of Bush - some how, some way - color me unsurprised.

host 03-10-2008 03:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by powerclown
2 words: Ha. Ha.

Nice contribution, I learned ....what? From it? I started a new thread related to this, because....what is there to discuss about Spitzer's situation. He's a hypocrite, he should resign.

That however, IMO, is not what should be examined and discussed. What are the investigative priorities of the FBI, during a never ending domestic, "Code orange alert" period?

The_Jazz 03-10-2008 04:11 PM

Why should he resign? Apparently he's not going to, but Clinton didn't resign. Granted, he didn't pay for it, but I don't see this as being a particularly heinous crime.

As AG, Spitzer showed light on some pretty unsavory business practices. Unfortunately, one of those involved a friend of mine who's not out of the woods yet, but he'll be the first to tell you that he did what he did.

He should finish his term. This doesn't change any of his accomplishments, although it probably kills his White House aspirations, at least for now.

host 03-10-2008 05:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Jazz
Why should he resign? Apparently he's not going to, but Clinton didn't resign. Granted, he didn't pay for it, but I don't see this as being a particularly heinous crime.

As AG, Spitzer showed light on some pretty unsavory business practices. Unfortunately, one of those involved a friend of mine who's not out of the woods yet, but he'll be the first to tell you that he did what he did.

He should finish his term. This doesn't change any of his accomplishments, although it probably kills his White House aspirations, at least for now.

Okay, The_Jazz....bingo!!!! Now, it fucking stinks.....

Spitzer comes from a very wealthy family...why would the feds be monitoring his financial transactions looking for "bribes", unless it is because of "pay back"...officially sactioned politically motivated revenge..... or other political expediency?

Quote:

http://abcnews.go.com/Blotter/story?id=4424507&page=1
The federal investigation of a New York prostitution ring was triggered by Gov. Eliot Spitzer's suspicious money transfers, initially leading agents to believe Spitzer was hiding bribes, according to federal officials.
It was only months later that the IRS and the FBI determined that Spitzer wasn't hiding bribes but payments to a company called QAT, what prosecutors say is a prostitution operation operating under the name of the Emperors Club. …

The suspicious financial activity was initially reported by a bank to the IRS which, under direction from the Justice Department, brought in the FBI's Public Corruption Squad.

"We had no interest at all in the prostitution ring until the thing with Spitzer led us to learn about it," said one Justice Department official

Quote:

Originally Posted by powerclown
Yeah let me rephrase that: Poor Judgement.
I agree, he should resign. He's got a bunch of daughters too, sadly.
You (poster #7) want to turn this into an indictment of Bush - some how, some way - color me unsurprised.

Can you say partisan witch hunt, using the DOJ to intimidate and crush political opponents? Sheesh,....hasn't everyone learned yet....not to expect anything less from the Bush junta? These are thugs...what will it take to suspect and be skeptical of everything connected to them?

Can you even consider that this is setting an example for all other democrats who now are on notice that the police state is watching everything they do, too? Can you comprehend that the gutting of FISA was for the purposes of consolidating the politcal power of these thugs? No judge to oversee their snooping gives them the untraceable means to turn their intelligence collection against anyone for any reason.....

Ustwo 03-10-2008 05:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by host
Can you say partisan witch hunt, using the DOJ to intimidate and crush political opponents? Sheesh,....hasn't everyone learned yet....not to expect anything less from the Bush junta? These are thugs...what will it take to suspect and be skeptical of everything connected to them?

So you are saying its not the FBI's job to investigate public officials committing crimes and if they are a Democrat then its just a witch hunt even when it turns out its true?

Spank my ass and call me Ishmael but I think you are doing the white whale thing again.

host 03-10-2008 05:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
So you are saying its not the FBI's job to investigate public officials committing crimes and if they are a Democrat then its just a witch hunt even when it turns out its true?

Spank my ass and call me Ishmael but I think you are doing the white whale thing again.

I've shown on the other thread, that FBI referrals for prosecution are down 40 percent, Secret Service down 58 percent. Spitzer is a wealthy man of impeccable reputation, embroiled in bitter partisan politics in his own state, and he brought down Richard Grasso of the NYSE and Hank Greenberg of AIG, but Ustwo sees nothing out of the ordianry about the feds monitoring his financial transactions....

WTF?

Update...Spitzer paid cash.... if he wasn't Spitzer democratic governor, do you think he would be noticed or publicly named?
Quote:

http://www.silive.com/newsflash/inde...rylist=simetro

.....The business promised clients they could pay with a wire transfer that would show up on records as QAT Consulting to make it appear to be a business transaction.

"Client 9" insisted on paying in cash.

host 03-10-2008 05:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
So you are saying its not the FBI's job to investigate public officials committing crimes and if they are a Democrat then its just a witch hunt even when it turns out its true?

I'm sure Governor Ryan would like a word with you.

Spank my ass and call me Ishmael but I think you are doing the white whale thing again.

You are reacting the same way you did to the deliberate outing of Valerie Plame's ID and employment? You don't even see it.

Ustwo 03-10-2008 05:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by host
I've shown on the other thread, that FBI referrals for prosecution are down 40 percent, Secret Service down 58 percent. Spitzer is a wealthy man of impeccable reputation, embroiled in bitter partisan politics in his own state, and he brought down Richard Grasso of the NYSE and Hank Greenberg of AIG, but Ustwo sees nothing out of the ordianry about the feds monitoring his financial transactions....

Of course how could I miss the obvious connection. Its obviously a politically biased investigation, much like the one that destroyed the Republican party in Illinois. Oh wait....



Quote:

Update...Spitzer paid cash.... if he wasn't Spitzer democratic governor, do you think he would be noticed or publicly named?
There is your key word, otherwise you just end up on the police blotter, but the same goes for any crime with a public offical.

MuadDib 03-10-2008 06:07 PM

Frankly, I couldn't care less about what a politician does in the sack, whether they paid for it or not. Like my Grandfather always said, "A stiff prick has no conscience."

Problem here is that he is a high profile character in violation of a federal law (granted the Mann Act is archaic, but it's still on the books). The Justice Department has to go after the guy with all they've got or risk losing credibility by not prosecuting the big fish. The irony of him being a former attorney general, assistant district attorney, and huge anti-crime governor only adds to the necessity of prosecuting.

host 03-10-2008 06:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
Of course how could I miss the obvious connection. Its obviously a politically biased investigation, much like the one that destroyed the Republican party in Illinois. Oh wait....





There is your key word, otherwise you just end up on the police blotter, but the same goes for any crime with a public offical.

Ustwo, how many times would I have to hold you down and rape you anally before you started trembling just from seeing my car turning into your driveway? You're a smart man, how come you feign no understanding of what I am talking about?

Ustwo, this statement turned out to be misleading enough to charecterize as a lie...why would they lie like that?
Quote:

http://www.algop.org/News/Read.aspx?ID=7168
Sunday, February 24, 2008
ALGOP Statement Regarding Jill Simpson's Accusations to Air on 60 Minutes

Statement by Alabama Republican Party Chairman Mike Hubbard on the Dana Jill Simpson Accusations Aired by CBS’ 60 Minutes

....“Our staff has done an exhaustive search of Alabama Republican Party records going back several years, and we can find not one instance of Dana Jill Simpson volunteering or working on behalf of the Alabama Republican Party – as stated by 60 Minutes reporter Scott Pelley. Nor can we find anyone within the Republican Party leadership in Alabama who has ever so much as heard of Dana Jill Simpson until she made her first wave of accusations last summer in an affidavit originally released only to the New York Times..

Quote:

http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/nation/5566317.html
Feb. 24, 2008, 8:22PM
Alabama GOP disputes ex-campaign worker's claims

By BEN EVANS
Associated Press
Comments (8) Recommend
WASHINGTON — A former Republican campaign volunteer in Alabama told CBS's 60 Minutes of what she viewed as a secret five-year campaign to ruin former Democratic Gov. Don Siegelman, a claim aired Sunday that was denounced as a fabrication by the state GOP.

....Alabama Republican Party officials said Simpson was fabricating her stories.

"We can find not one instance of (Simpson) volunteering or working on behalf of the Alabama Republican Party," state GOP chairman Mike Hubbard said in a written statement. "Nor can we find anyone within the Republican Party leadership in Alabama who has ever so much as heard of (Simpson) until she made her first wave of accusations."

Simpson's attorney, Priscilla Duncan, disputed that account and said Simpson could provide details of fundraisers and other activities she helped arrange....

....Siegelman's bribery conviction stemmed from his appointment of former HealthSouth CEO Richard Scrushy to an influential hospital regulatory board in exchange for Scrushy arranging contributions to Siegelman's campaign for a state lottery.

The Justice Department — as well as the career prosecutors who handled the case — have insisted that politics played no role in the case, emphasizing that Siegelman was convicted by a jury.

Congressional Democrats, however, have been looking into the case as part of a broader investigation into possible political meddling by the White House at the Justice Department.

Also, about 50 former attorneys general — most of them Democrats, but including some Republicans — have asked for a congressional investigation into the case.

"I haven't seen a case with this many red flags on it that pointed towards a real injustice being done," Grant Woods, a former Republican attorney general of Arizona, said on the 60 Minutes segment. "I personally believe that what happened here is that they targeted Don Siegelman because they could not beat him fair and square. This was a Republican state and he was the one Democrat they could never get rid of."....
Quote:

http://www.al.com/news/mobileregiste...950.xml&coll=3
Siegelman treatment standard?
Yes, say experts; but some surprised judge didn't allow voluntary surrender
Sunday, March 09, 2008
By BRIAN LYMAN
Capital Bureau

...Still, it was "stunning" to one well-regarded Washington lawyer that the situation involved a white-collar criminal. "I've only heard it happening on one other occasion," said Michele Roberts, who practices at Akin, Gump, Strauss Hauer & Feld.

The scene -- noted in a recent "60 Minutes" report -- has been invoked by Siegelman's supporters, who contend that his conviction on bribery and obstruction of justice charges was politically motivated.

The defendants were not allowed to say goodbye to their families, noted Siegelman defense attorney David McDonald last week.

"Governor Siegelman could have driven there (the prison in Louisiana) from his home and voluntarily surrendered," McDonald said. "Instead, he was jerked off right away and sent to maximum security prison in Atlanta, then carted all over the country."

Some other politicians caught up in criminal prosecutions have received voluntary surrender dates. Former U.S. Rep. Bob Ney, R-Ohio, who pleaded guilty in October 2006 to corruption charges, was sentenced to 30 months on Jan. 19, 2007, and reported to prison March 1, 2007.

"Unless the court is convinced there was a real risk of flight, it sounds more like a situation where the court wanted to start the punishment," William Lawler, one of Ney's attorneys, said of the Siegelman/Scrushy case....
How many opposition politicians does the Bush DOJ have to single out for "special treatment" before questioning everything they tell us becomes acceptable to you, Ustwo......one governor....two.....three?

silent_jay 03-10-2008 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by host
Ustwo, how many times would I have to hold you down and rape you anally before you started trembling just from seeing my car turning into your driveway?

This may well be the greatest line that has ever graced TFP, fuckin hilarious.

powerclown 03-10-2008 06:22 PM

Haha...you're off your frickin' rocker, man.

host 03-10-2008 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MuadDib
Frankly, I couldn't care less about what a politician does in the sack, whether they paid for it or not. Like my Grandfather always said, "A stiff prick has no conscience."

Problem here is that he is a high profile character in violation of a federal law (granted the Mann Act is archaic, but it's still on the books). The Justice Department has to go after the guy with all they've got or risk losing credibility by not prosecuting the big fish. The irony of him being a former attorney general, assistant district attorney, and huge anti-crime governor only adds to the necessity of prosecuting.

They haven't charged Spitzer, and they were investigating him BEFORE they found out about the prostitution ring.

How many times do you think the IRS gets forms from banks documenting cash transactions over $10k or groups of closely sequenced cash transactions adding up to over $10, and refer them to the FBI for investigation and the FBI quickly dismisses the inquiry, if it is true that FBI referals for prosecution on all crimes are down 39 percent since 1987?

Why is it reasonable that the FBI would pursue a full blown investigation of a wealthy man like Spitzer, over such relatively small, considering his wealth, amount cash transactions? He apparently was removing cash from an account, not putting it in.....hardly evidence to trigger a legitimate bribe taking investigation....he also was in a bitter political feud with republican legislative opponent, Joseph Bruno.

It is not the first recent democratic government that this partisanized DOJ had set it's sites on.....

reconmike 03-10-2008 06:40 PM

Your right Host they nailed McGreevy too, oh wait that was Israeli soldier.

Anyway here is a man who prosecuted hookers, but can dabble in them himself, as Ralph Kramden said he is the hippiest crit of them all.

Shame though becuase if this was a republican, Host you would be having a field day posting 4 pages of links.

loquitur 03-10-2008 06:45 PM

actually, if it was a Republican it wouldn't be a female escort, it would likely be a gay boy in a public restroom.

Ustwo 03-10-2008 10:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by host
Ustwo, how many times would I have to hold you down and rape you anally before you started trembling just from seeing my car turning into your driveway? You're a smart man, how come you feign no understanding of what I am talking about?

While generally I'm against what I see as the overuse of medications for mental instability, I do think there are exceptions.

Get help, you have a problem.

host 03-10-2008 11:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
While generally I'm against what I see as the overuse of medications for mental instability, I do think there are exceptions.

Get help, you have a problem.

I'm not the one who has consistently supported what is documented here:

http://www.tfproject.org/tfp/showpos...9&postcount=15

Or the destruction of a sovereign foreign nation, hundreds of thousands of it's inhabitants dead, and nearly 4000 of out own soldiers dead, justified by what will be described in this coming report, quashed for four long years:
Quote:

http://www.santafenewmexican.com/Nat...-briefs-031008
New Mexican wire services |

3/9/2008 -

Report vets prewar White House claims

WASHINGTON — After an acrimonious investigation that spanned four years, the Senate Intelligence Committee is preparing to release a detailed critique of the Bush administration's claims in the build-up to war with Iraq, congressional officials said.

The long-delayed document catalogs dozens of prewar assertions by President Bush and other administration officials that proved to be wildly inaccurate about Iraq's alleged stockpiles of banned weapons and pursuit of nuclear arms.

But officials said the report reaches a mixed verdict on the key question of whether the White House misused intelligence to make the case for war.

The document criticizes White House officials for making assertions that failed to reflect disagreements or uncertainties in the underlying intelligence on Iraq, officials said. But the report acknowledges that many claims were consistent with intelligence assessments in circulation at the time.....
...and no, Robb-Silberman was a "white wash" that was ordered by the president to avoid examining what he knew, vs. what he said to justify ordering the invasion of Iraq:
Quote:

http://www.wmd.gov/report/report.html

http://www.wmd.gov/commissioners.html

.....Finally, we emphasize two points about the scope of this Commission's charter, particularly with respect to the Iraq question. First, we were not asked to determine whether Saddam Hussein had weapons of mass destruction. That was the mandate of the Iraq Survey Group; our mission is to investigate the reasons why the Intelligence Community's pre-war assessments were so different from what the Iraq Survey Group found after the war. <h3>Second, we were not authorized to investigate how policymakers used the intelligence assessments they received from the Intelligence Community. Accordingly, while we interviewed a host of current and former policymakers during the course of our investigation, the purpose of those interviews was to learn about how the Intelligence Community reached and communicated its judgments about Iraq's weapons programs--not to review how policymakers subsequently used that information.</h3>

LOOKING BACK:
CASE STUDIES IN FAILURE AND SUCCESS

The_Jazz 03-11-2008 05:10 AM

Host, if this was a Republican who had committed a crime (and I agree that it was a crime, I just think it was a victimless one), you would have a completely different set of posts.

Mine would be pretty much the same, although I might express some glee for the right official.

At least I'm consistent. You? Not so much, except with the Bush bashing.

loquitur 03-11-2008 06:59 AM

Sorry, but I keep getting laughs from this Spitzer situation. It's so hilariously outrageous. I especially loved this one:
Quote:

Eliot Spitzer Vows To Crack Down On Excess Prostitute Pay
Posted by John Carney, Mar 10, 2008, 5:33pm

Discovering that the exclusive international ring of prostitutes known as the "Emperor's Club" charged up to $5,500 an hour for their services, New York governor Eliot Spitzer vowed to put an end to this price gouging practice.

Four people alleged to have run the "Emperor's Club" were charged with conspiracy to violate federal prostitution statutes, while two of them were also charged with laundering more than $1 million in illegal proceeds.

"That kind of excessive compensation is simply outrageous. Prostitution is allegedly a victimless crime,” Spitzer said in a press conference that took place only in our imaginations. “But now we see that its customers can become its victims.”

Spitzer added it was especially shameful that one of the most trusted names in prostitution had engaged in this shocking betrayal and rank greed.

Jinn 03-11-2008 07:40 AM

I guess I'm unique in thinking that whatever non-felony crimes a person commits while not in the line of duty should have no bearing on their on-the-job ability.

Then again, I think it would've been A-OK for Clinton to get a blowjob if he had done it anywhere but work. I think he would've been a scum and his wife would have a right to divorce him, but I don't think it reflected on him at all as a President.

Maybe I'm just a fan of keeping personal lives personal, unless they're grievously criminal (most felonies).

loquitur 03-11-2008 08:21 AM

Jinn, I agree with you, except that Spitzer was quite emphatic about prosecuting prostitution rings when he was State AG, and was pretty moralistic about it in his press conferences. So this has a bit of "what goes around comes around" about it. He was very very "holier than thou," ostentatiously so.

He also was taking steps to hide the money transfers he had to make in order to pay for the women's time. That's how he got caught: banks monitor wire transfers and report suspicious movements to the feds. So it wasn't the prostitution that sunk him, it was the skulking around, which skated close to the money laundering laws. I don't know whether the technical terms of the money laundering statutes were violated, but I believe what he did is called "structuring" - doing money transfers in bits for the purpose of disguising their purpose. Structuring is a crime. We'll see what the feds do.

QuasiMondo 03-11-2008 08:35 AM

I find this funny that peple will lament this as some kind of witch hunt.

What some people apparently don't remember is that the very same things they are accusing the federal government of doing was done by Spitzer's office himself when he used the State Police to monitor the activities of state senate majority leader Joseph Bruno.

Stop it with this bullshit act of persecution. If he didn't want to be paraded out before the public in such an embarrasing fashion, he shouldn't have been meeting with hookers on out-of-town business trips.

This is all the more disappointing for me because I voted for him.

The_Jazz 03-11-2008 08:41 AM

Spitzer is a special case; he pissed off many of the business elite. He got Hank Greenberg, who's a billionaire, fired from his own company (AIG). In the process, he did a lot of good and curtailed a lot of nasty business practices, but he stepped on a lot of toes to do it.

I think it's becoming more obvious why this came to light. Thanks for the additional info, loquitur.

QuasiMondo 03-11-2008 09:09 AM

If the motivations behind the federal investigation are true, then being a prosecutor himself, he should've known better than to commit acts that are embarrassing to his family and to his office.

Jinn 03-11-2008 09:19 AM

If you're prepared to fuck a total stranger while married, I guess you should be prepared for that total stranger to fuck you (and not in the same way).

loquitur 03-11-2008 09:51 AM

For what it's worth, here is a post at one of the legal blogs I like to follow (it's a collection of law professors).
Quote:

How Spitzer Was Caught:
Of all the ironic aspects of the Elliot Spitzer scandal, I think the most remarkable is how he got caught. Based on stories like this and this, it looks like Spitzer got caught because the prostitutes he hired were so expensive that he needed to shuffle several thousands of dollars around each time. Spitzer knew that banks report suspicious money transfers to the IRS to combat financial frauds and money laundering, so he tried to structure his money transfers to avoid suspicion. But the banks thought his activity was still suspicious, so they reported him and the IRS opened an investigation under the assumption that Spitzer was trying to launder money he had obtained from bribes. But he wasn't laundering money — he was paying prostitutes. So Elliot Spitzer, aggressive former white collar crime prosecutor, was brought down because he couldn't outsmart banks looking for evidence of white collar crimes.
If you're a wonk like I am, you may find the comments entertaining and interesting, too. My favorite comment:
Quote:

Is anyone going to help us out here with a link to pictures of this "Kristen" who is supposedly worth $4300 per night? I need to be fully informed before reaching any conclusions on this issue.

dc_dux 03-11-2008 09:53 AM

If you're a different kind of wonk, it just means one less super delegate for Hillary.

Ustwo 03-11-2008 09:54 AM

This chick better be HOT.

The_Jazz 03-11-2008 09:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
This chick better be HOT.

and flexible.

Ustwo 03-11-2008 10:56 AM

Whats the over/under for her Playboy shoot date?

I'd say June.

The_Jazz 03-11-2008 10:59 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
Whats the over/under for her Playboy shoot date?

I'd say June.

Shoot date of June with it being on shelves in September but the teaser pics hitting the internet in August.

And posted by Loquitur on the Titty Board on, say, 8/15/08. Place your bets.

Xazy 03-11-2008 11:02 AM

I am surprised that the picture is not out there yet of her.

loquitur 03-11-2008 11:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Jazz
Shoot date of June with it being on shelves in September but the teaser pics hitting the internet in August.

And posted by Loquitur on the Titty Board on, say, 8/15/08. Place your bets.

Isn't it important for the public to be informed? :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

The_Jazz 03-11-2008 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xazy
I am surprised that the picture is not out there yet of her.

Give it time. Her profile from the web will hit The Smoking Gun in 4, 3, 2...

I just finished a phone conversation with a friend who lurks here (fucking post already, dude) about this, and I thought I would recount parts of it. Note for those paying attention: most of these aren't my original thoughts.

My earlier analogy to Clinton is appropriate. They basically got caught cheating on their wives in unsavory ways (Spitzer paid a hot prostitute and Clinton got a hummer from a fatty). The difference is in the individuals.

Clinton was and is a walking party. If you've ever been in the same room with him, you get the vibe quickly. I have friends like him that, if they ever went into politics, would use their office to screw anything that moved. It's just the way they are. With Clinton, you know he wants to sleep with your wife. And if she wants to you may do it. You'll end up being cheated on, but he'll come out of the bedroom, slap you on the back and say, "C'mon man. She's hot and she wanted it. She's a great lady." All in that southern accent. Then he'd make you an ambassador. My point is that you saw it coming.

Elliot Spitzer doesn't just have a stick up his ass. He has a redwood. He's the guy that would arrest you for charging $200 in tickets to a Yankees game and didn't talk any business. Unlike Clinton, he'd more likely have you arrested and sent to prison and then make a move on your wife. It's very interesting that NO ONE came to his defense. Not one single prominent Democrat. They don't like him. There's not much to like. He's holier-than-thou, and he's in love with himself.

There have been scenarios mentioned on how this came to light. Maybe it was part of a DoJ smear campaign on all Democrats. If it wasn't Spitzer, I'd be a lot more inclined to believe that. Since it is and he has so many enemies I give credibility to two theories. The first is exactly how the government's laid it out - the banks saw questionable transactions and notified them properly. It's very plausible. The other is that one of the girls (the latest I've seen is that he used this particular service at least 6 times) had another client or friend who she mentioned this to. That client/friend was either someone in power or knew someone in power with an axe to grind. They went to the Feds and told them where to look. And there is a LOOOOONG line of those folks.

Figuring that Spitzer is a workaholic (which is apparently true), he's just thrown away about 100,000 hours of work from his years as governor and AG for a 20 second orgasm.

Hanxter 03-11-2008 05:40 PM

on a lighter side...

i used to run book for years, and having talked to a couple of good goombas today, word on the street is that the hooker ring was in fact run but the Gambino's and Genovese's... pay back is a bitch... how could he not know that if it's true... talk about stoopid...

Alan Dershobag stated "This is a uniquely American story. If this took place in Europe, it wouldn't even hit the papers," Dershowitz says. Still, "No matter how smart a man is, when he does his thinking with an organ other than his brain, it almost always comes out wrong."

uuuuuh... ya think???

i smell a book deal...

The_Jazz 03-11-2008 06:18 PM

Shit, Hank, if that's true, it might be the biggest karmic bitchslap I've ever seen.

mixedmedia 03-11-2008 06:24 PM

I still don't care.

Tully Mars 03-11-2008 06:36 PM

If it's not me or someone I'm seeing then I don't see where it's my concern.

I find it ironic that this guy prosecuted prostitution as a DA and sold himself as squeaky clean. How come the people who scream the loudest (see Haggard et el) end up being the biggest freaks?

I read an article tonight that said he may have spent up to 80k over the past year or so with this escort service. If it turns out it's tax payer money I'll have a little different take on the subject. Since I don't pay taxes in NY it will be a very little different take.

ngdawg 03-11-2008 06:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by host
Spitzer is a wealthy man of impeccable reputation,

BWAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!

Troopergate anyone?
Spitzer was and IS an arrogant SOB who thought he was above the law. Period. Paid cash or not, it wasn't HIS cash, hence the wiretapping.

Bet you stood up for McGreevey too.....

Best line I heard on this morning's news radio broadcast from a bystander: "I guess now his wife will be running for president in four years."

Tully Mars 03-11-2008 07:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ngdawg
Bet you stood up for McGreevey too.....

My problem with McGreevey is he hired a lover to be in charge of his states security. The lover it turns out knew nothing about security, state or otherwise. I'd be surprised to find out he knew how to operate his homes' alarm system.

I felt sorry for his wife, but figured she had to know something. I mean if he's gay his sex drive with her had to be limited at best. Some things you just can't fake, well at least men can't.

In a small way I felt sorry for him. Being openly gay takes a lot courage, IMO. If it were up to me being gay wouldn't be any different then being straight.

ngdawg 03-11-2008 07:29 PM

There are similarities between the two govs....both were known to be as they were "discovered" to be. McGreevey's sexual orientation was no secret when he was mayor of Woodbridge-he went to gay bars, was never seen dating women until he met and married the former Mrs.
Spitzer was a known arrogant liar and twister of law to suit his own needs.
The surprise is not that either was disgraced by their actions, but that it took this long and they got that far before being found out.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Rudy Giuliani
... after being in a room with Spitzer, "I feel like I need a shower."

Read good article here

Tully Mars 03-11-2008 08:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ngdawg
There are similarities between the two govs....both were known to be as they were "discovered" to be. McGreevey's sexual orientation was no secret when he was mayor of Woodbridge-he went to gay bars, was never seen dating women until he met and married the former Mrs.
Spitzer was a known arrogant liar and twister of law to suit his own needs.
The surprise is not that either was disgraced by their actions, but that it took this long and they got that far before being found out.

Read good article here

Well if the Weekly Standard says he's a bad guy then case closed.

QuasiMondo 03-12-2008 04:36 AM

And like Rudy should be anybody to talk about dirty officials.

The_Jazz 03-12-2008 04:37 AM

ng, I'm shocked (shocked, I say) that you would disparage Spitzer like that. Don't you know that he's holier than you?

Personally I think that the most interesting thing of the story is the sound of the crickets coming from the rest of prominent Democrats. Even when Barney Frank got in trouble back in the 80's there were folks that came to his defense, which was brave considering the times.

Something else to think about - Spitzer is a superdelegate pledged to Clinton. Will he get seated now?

ngdawg 03-12-2008 04:40 AM

The article as it stands points out the man's MO regardless of the leanings(which are probably right of center).
But no worries, I'm sure Host will justify every point.....
Ironically, except for the fact that there doesn't seem to be any criminality on Daddy's part, Spitzer is action for action, no better and now, worse, than McCain. At least so far, McCain hasn't been pointed out as a user of the very acts he's tried to shoot down. Yet.
I love irony....

Tully Mars 03-12-2008 06:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Jazz
ng, I'm shocked (shocked, I say) that you would disparage Spitzer like that. Don't you know that he's holier than you?

Personally I think that the most interesting thing of the story is the sound of the crickets coming from the rest of prominent Democrats. Even when Barney Frank got in trouble back in the 80's there were folks that came to his defense, which was brave considering the times.

Something else to think about - Spitzer is a superdelegate pledged to Clinton. Will he get seated now?


This morning on Morning Joe, MSNBC, seemed to think there wouldn't be a replacement superdelegate. The number would simply be 794 instead of 795.

Doesn't that mean it's possible for a tie?

Jinn 03-12-2008 07:58 AM

Quote:


I'd say June.

Shoot date of June with it being on shelves in September but the teaser pics hitting the internet in August.

And posted by Loquitur on the Titty Board on, say, 8/15/08. Place your bets.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/0...-_n_90768.html

"Teaser" screengrabs of everyone but "Kristen" it seems..

QuasiMondo 03-12-2008 08:00 AM

For $80,000 'Kristen' better be a looker.

Tully Mars 03-12-2008 08:06 AM

31k a day for some ladies. Maybe he didn't do this as often as I thought.

31K to get laid, might as well get married. Oh yeah, I forgot. Getting married to get laid is like buying an airline for the free peanuts.

Jinn 03-12-2008 08:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Quasimondo
For $80,000 'Kristen' better be a looker.

Whaa? Last I heard it wasn't even $10,000.. where'd you read $80,000?

roachboy 03-12-2008 08:07 AM

i dont find anything interesting about this--spitzer's just another sanctimonious shithead hoisted by his own petard.

the jokes are too easy.

QuasiMondo 03-12-2008 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JinnKai
Whaa? Last I heard it wasn't even $10,000.. where'd you read $80,000?

It's all over the AP newswire.

http://www.bostonherald.com/news/nat...icleid=1079507

I sure hope he didn't pull any kinky Marv Albert shit.

loquitur 03-12-2008 08:52 AM

It's hardly uncommon for powerful people to believe their own bullshit and conclude that the rules don't apply to them. Spitzer is just the latest in a long line. His particular partisan preference is irrelevant.

He also managed to piss off a lot of people along the way. He got the reputation of being an arrogant, hot-headed, unscrupulous, power-hungry SOB. You'll notice that pretty much no one in either party has spoken up in his defense (except some of the partisan posters on this board).

And yes, I voted for him for governor. I thought we needed an SOB to clean up Albany. Little did I know.

Redlemon 03-12-2008 09:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JinnKai
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/0...-_n_90768.html

"Teaser" screengrabs of everyone but "Kristen" it seems..

And now, from the same site, possibly Kristen...
http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/627/originallj0.jpg

The_Jazz 03-12-2008 10:24 AM

Not my first choice on the Emporers website, but not bad.

Jinn 03-12-2008 10:28 AM

Nor mine, and there don't seem to exist any non-redacted versions. Right now she looks like the witch that melts in the rain after Hurricane Katrina..

My face is meeeeeeeeeelttttttttingggggggg...

QuasiMondo 03-12-2008 10:45 AM

Well, she doesn't look as bad as Monica Lewinsky, so that's a start.

percy 03-12-2008 11:09 AM

The worst part of it all was seeing Alan Dershowitz on CNN. Does any one take this guy seriously anymore. Seems with the advent of plastic surgery, hopefully doctors can add several mouths to his head so that he doesn't have to keep contradicting himself using the one he has.

And Spitzer is an idiot. Given his knowledge he should have known well better.

We'll see his story about a year from now when it hits the book stands. Should be a best seller. He'll probably get a tv show too.

loquitur 03-12-2008 11:16 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by percy
We'll see his story about a year from now when it hits the book stands. Should be a best seller. He'll probably get a tv show too.

Will the book be illustrated? :lol:

powerclown 03-12-2008 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuasiMondo
Well, she doesn't look as bad as Monica Lewinsky, so that's a start.

Haha.

Ustwo 03-12-2008 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuasiMondo
Well, she doesn't look as bad as Monica Lewinsky, so that's a start.

Hey but Monica didn't even charge for taking her dress to the cleaners.

Tully Mars 03-12-2008 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
Hey but Monica didn't even charge for taking her dress to the cleaners.

I'd be willing to bet Hillary would have paid that tab herself.

Cynthetiq 03-12-2008 12:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loquitur
It's hardly uncommon for powerful people to believe their own bullshit and conclude that the rules don't apply to them. Spitzer is just the latest in a long line. His particular partisan preference is irrelevant.

He also managed to piss off a lot of people along the way. He got the reputation of being an arrogant, hot-headed, unscrupulous, power-hungry SOB. You'll notice that pretty much no one in either party has spoken up in his defense (except some of the partisan posters on this board).

And yes, I voted for him for governor. I thought we needed an SOB to clean up Albany. Little did I know.

Exactly... There are some neighbors that are in tight with Sheldon Silver. I'm waiting to hear some of the gossip from that source. There will be some interesting things I'm quite sure of it.

Speculation from the government sources is wondering where the state troopers were during these trysts since they are supposed to be "guarding" him, and that there's more heads to roll.

Ustwo 03-12-2008 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
Speculation from the government sources is wondering where the state troopers were during these trysts since they are supposed to be "guarding" him, and that there's more heads to roll.

Well we NEED to protect public officials as a rule, I don't think thats a bad thing.

But I think there needs to be a 'don't ask don't tell' type of policy for those protecting.

People should be allowed to lead some sort of private life while serving office.

Yes it gets tricky, and even SNL did a skit of cops as Arkansas troopers lying to Hilary Clinton as Bill got it on, but I don't want to see the guards to be anything besides guards. Lets leave the minders to the north Koreans.

powerclown 03-12-2008 01:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
Hey but Monica didn't even charge for taking her dress to the cleaners.

Cmon now...if money was no object (and you were that kinda guy) who would you pick: Monica Lewinsky or "Kristen"?

Cynthetiq 03-12-2008 01:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by powerclown
Cmon now...if money was no object (and you were that kinda guy) who would you pick: Monica Lewinsky or "Kristen"?

I thought Bill liked'em juicy.

percy 03-12-2008 01:23 PM

It might be my imagination but there is a clip of Silda Spitzer giving a speech at the end of January '08 and she looks 15 years younger than she did in the apology/I am a shithead press conference her husband gave.


Makes me wonder if she hardened (made herself look older) to soften the blow to her prick of a husband. Wouldn't doubt it. Or to be the victim to collect more come settlement time. Either way.

The heartless prick probably gets tingly feelings looking at his daughters and their friends making him want to fuck the young'uns.

Now if he would just declare war on Canada, Clinton and Obama would be competing for the V.P job.

Tully Mars 03-12-2008 01:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cynthetiq
I thought Bill liked'em juicy.

I think you're thinking about his choice in burgers and ribs.

When it comes to women I don't think he turns anyone down. I mean look at Paula Jones sans nose job.

loquitur 03-12-2008 01:43 PM

<br><br><IMG SRC="http://images.cafepress.com/jitcrunch.aspx?bG9hZD1ibGFuayxibGFuazo5MF9GLmpwZ3xsb2FkPUwwLGh0dHA6Ly9pbWFnZXMuY2FmZXByZXNzLmNvbS9pbWFnZS8yNjYwMjk3OF80MDB4NDAwLnBuZ3x8c2NhbGU9TDAsNDIwLDE0MCxXaGl0ZXxjb21wb3NlPWJsYW5rLEwwLEFkZCwzMCwxNzB8bG9hZD1tYXNrLGJsYW5rOjkwX0ZfbWFzay5qcGd8Y29tcG9zZT1ibGFuayxtYXNrLE1hc2ssMCwwfGNwPXJlc3VsdCxibGFua3xzY2FsZT1yZXN1bHQsMCw0ODAsV2hpdGV8Y29tcHJlc3Npb249OTV8">

The_Jazz 03-12-2008 01:45 PM

I'm pretty sure Bill would fuck anything with tits and a heartbeat. And he might be negotiable on the heartbeat.

Ustwo 03-12-2008 01:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by powerclown
Cmon now...if money was no object (and you were that kinda guy) who would you pick: Monica Lewinsky or "Kristen"?

Honestly I'd pick Monica.

Not on looks obviously, and most likely not on 'skill' but I'd always rather have the one thats turned on by me and not the 4 grand sitting on the table.

SirSeymour 03-12-2008 02:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
Honestly I'd pick Monica.

Not on looks obviously, and most likely not on 'skill' but I'd always rather have the one thats turned on by me and not the 4 grand sitting on the table.

Not sure she liked Bill for Bill either. Power is often more of an aphrodisiac then money...

Hanxter 03-12-2008 02:12 PM

does she come with pizza?

loquitur 03-12-2008 02:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hanxter
does she come with pizza?

There are so many ways to read that, Hanxter........ Where to start?

QuasiMondo 03-12-2008 02:17 PM

From the Home Office in Grand Rapids, Michigan, here's Dave Letterman's Top Ten Reasons Why Eliot Spitzer Did It With A Hooker:

10 Oh come on, like you were never involved in a prostitution ring

9 Hookers is fun

8 Just trying to help the economy

7 Have you ever been to Albany?

6 It's part of my new MTV prank show "Spitz'd"

5 Haven't been myself since Roy Schieder died

4 Uh, tainted beef?

3 Whether it's a hooker or your wife, you're always paying for it -- you married fellas know what I'm talking about

2 Wanted to be known as the Charlie Sheen of politics

1 I thought Bill Clinton legalized this years ago

powerclown 03-12-2008 03:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
Honestly I'd pick Monica.

Not on looks obviously, and most likely not on 'skill' but I'd always rather have the one thats turned on by me and not the 4 grand sitting on the table.

True true...

A good woman > mercenary, ftw.

Hanxter 03-12-2008 05:50 PM

How to use your tax rebate...

As you may have heard the Bush Administration said each and every one of us would now get a nice rebate. If we spend that money at Wal-Mart, all the money will go to China. If we spend it on gasoline it will all go to the Arabs, if we purchase a computer it will all go to India, if we purchase fruit and vegetables it will all go to Mexico, Honduras, and Guatamala, if we purchase a good car it will all go to Japan, if we purchase useless crap it will all go to Taiwan and none of it will help the American economy.

We need to keep that money here in America, so the only way to keep that money here at home is to buy prostitutes and beer, since those are the only businesses still in the US

hokieian 03-12-2008 07:15 PM

Here's her myspace page:
http://www.myspace.com/ninavenetta

http://a473.ac-images.myspacecdn.com...f6b51ea930.jpg

And here's more information about her. I'm betting we'll be seeing more of her in Playboy in the near future

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/03/13/ny...d-kristen.html

n0nsensical 03-13-2008 12:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hanxter
How to use your tax rebate...

As you may have heard the Bush Administration said each and every one of us would now get a nice rebate. If we spend that money at Wal-Mart, all the money will go to China. If we spend it on gasoline it will all go to the Arabs, if we purchase a computer it will all go to India, if we purchase fruit and vegetables it will all go to Mexico, Honduras, and Guatamala, if we purchase a good car it will all go to Japan, if we purchase useless crap it will all go to Taiwan and none of it will help the American economy.

We need to keep that money here in America, so the only way to keep that money here at home is to buy prostitutes and beer, since those are the only businesses still in the US

Beautiful...

Tully Mars 03-13-2008 06:06 AM

client #6
 
http://www.nydailynews.com/img/2008/..._grosvenor.jpg

I wondered how long it was going to take for us to start to find out who were clients 1-8. This morning they're saying that this guy, The Duke of Westminster- Gerald Cavendish Grosvenor, was client #6. Apparently he's the wealthiest man in Great Britain. And despite his wealth he's reported to have haggled with a young lady over the cost of his "date."

If she spoke with him by phone I could see her reducing her price, if they met face to face I'm thinking he's paying full price.

QuasiMondo 03-13-2008 07:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Tully Mars
http://www.nydailynews.com/img/2008/..._grosvenor.jpg...And despite his wealth he's reported to have haggled with a young lady over the cost of his "date"...

Well, how else do you think the rich folks hold on to their money?

Kirsten certainly is a looker. If he didn't get caught she would've certainly been money well spent.

Ustwo 03-13-2008 07:21 AM

No lay is worth 4-5 grand.

If you are putting that kind of money down on hookers, do it the old fashioned way. Put them up in an apartment and have a mistress.

QuasiMondo 03-13-2008 08:14 AM

Mistresses are dangerous. Just ask Barry Bonds.

SirSeymour 03-13-2008 08:19 AM

Apparently the story about the Duke of Westminster is being pulled this morning under threat of libel suite (reported to be much easier to prove in the UK than in the US) and his lawyers are saying that they have proof he was not even in London at the time of the supposed tryst.

It is, however, noteworthy that Grosvenor has a history with the working girls. Reports of this sort of activity have already cost him a position in the Defense Department.

mixedmedia 03-13-2008 08:41 AM

Are you boys being bad? I hear you're being bad. :p

Quote:

Originally Posted by QuasiMondo
Well, how else do you think the rich folks hold on to their money?

Kirsten certainly is a looker. If he didn't get caught she would've certainly been money well spent.

Are you fucking kidding me? Money well spent?

Excuse me while I go throw up.

loquitur 03-13-2008 08:57 AM

As I said in the OP, I don't think prostitution should be illegal. But since it is, I suspect that this Kristen/Ashley will turn this, um, affair into all sorts of opportunities for herself - as she should. She's now getting the downside from the whole series of events, she should get the upside too.

SirSeymour 03-13-2008 09:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by loquitur
She's now getting the downside from the whole series of events, she should get the upside too.

Hmmmm, so there should be an "upside" for an offender who gets caught at an illegal act?

Jinn 03-13-2008 09:20 AM

He's talking about Kristin.

SirSeymour 03-13-2008 09:38 AM

Right. Is prostitution currently not just as illegal for the prostitute as it is for the john?

QuasiMondo 03-13-2008 09:41 AM

Speaking of which, isn't it ironic that Spitzer signed a bill into law that increased the penalties for those caught soliciting the servicies of a prostitute?

loquitur 03-13-2008 09:50 AM

I doubt she'll be prosecuted. The feds appear to be going after the people who ran the operation, not the girls who were the product.

SirSeymour 03-13-2008 10:01 AM

Whether or not she is prosecuted does answer the question about if she deserves an "upside" for having broken the law. Not that I would in anyway excuse Spitzer in this as his actions speak for themselves but it could be argued that if she (and others like her) did not have their services for sale in the first place he would not have had opportunity to break the law. And yet she stands to gain not once but twice...once for having been paid a huge sum of money on at least one occasion for what one has to assume was a few hours effort at most and then again by trading on the celebrity achieved when her client was publicly taken down.

loquitur 03-13-2008 10:43 AM

yes, and dealing with the current downside - shame, exposure, legal jeopardy. I think the woman deserves some upside.

pan6467 03-13-2008 10:57 AM

Ok, 5 grand an hour...... let's see, this time frame and if she is worth it:


I arrive to the apartment about a minute: 59 mins left

She takes her time answering the door 2 mins: 57 left

we have a few drinks and talk 15 mins: 43 left

I go to bathroom pace saying I can't believe this is happening 10 mins: 33 left

The pacing has made me go limp so now 15 mins to get it hard before I can go back out: 18 mins left

Have a couple more drinks 15 mins: 3 mins left

She grabs me MR willy winkie and I prematurely get happy 1 min : 2 mins left

I get dressed talk to her about setting up the next appointment and leave

Go to the club with the rest of my super rich friends, discuss how I just had sex for an hour with some hot chick that makes my tongue hard just thinking about her....

Yep, worth every penny.

QuasiMondo 03-13-2008 11:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SirSeymour
Whether or not she is prosecuted does answer the question about if she deserves an "upside" for having broken the law. Not that I would in anyway excuse Spitzer in this as his actions speak for themselves but it could be argued that if she (and others like her) did not have their services for sale in the first place he would not have had opportunity to break the law. And yet she stands to gain not once but twice...once for having been paid a huge sum of money on at least one occasion for what one has to assume was a few hours effort at most and then again by trading on the celebrity achieved when her client was publicly taken down.

If she didn't offer her services, somebody else would've. In the end, Spitzer shouldn't have solicited their services to begin with.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:54 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76