Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Philosophy (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-philosophy/)
-   -   Laura Bush/Catholic Question (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-philosophy/57926-laura-bush-catholic-question.html)

MahlerIsGod 06-04-2004 11:18 AM

Laura Bush/Catholic Question
 
I address this question to those Catholic board members: George Bush was in Italy today talking to the Pope. His wife, Laura, was there but she had on a scarf (black lace) on her head? My question is why was she wearing this. Was it deference to the Pope? Just wondering and thanks.

Yakk 06-04-2004 12:52 PM

Any pictures?

ARTelevision 06-04-2004 02:41 PM

yes, deference to the pope - catholic women cover their heads in church for example.

SecretMethod70 06-04-2004 02:55 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ARTelevision
yes, deference to the pope - catholic women cover their heads in church for example.
50 years ago they did. Covering of the head is no longer part of the Catholic faith and hasn't been for a decently long time. This came as part of the implicit changes from Vatican II. While I'm sure that this was indeed the reason Laura Bush did this, she was obviously ill-informed (as could be expected I suppose since they aren't Catholic). Of course, it's not like it's insulting to do so, but as far as how the Catholic Church views it, there's absolutely no reason whatsoever for a person to cover their head in church, etc.

ARTelevision 06-04-2004 05:30 PM

Thanks for clearing that up SecretMethod. I think it wasn't quite that long ago everywhere but you are correct, sir.

SecretMethod70 06-04-2004 05:45 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ARTelevision
Thanks for clearing that up SecretMethod. I think it wasn't quite that long ago everywhere but you are correct, sir.
This is true, even today some still perform this act. However, that's a personal thing and not a Catholic thing. Take Mel Gibson for example - a person who's "Catholic" beliefs are very much NOT in line with much of Catholic teaching. He rejects all the changes made in Vatican II (which was around 1963, so, yes, it was more like 40 years ago, not 50), so I'm sure the people that go to the church he built probably do cover their heads.

Either way, I think the distinction between personal belief and Church belief is an important one to make.

MSD 06-04-2004 06:25 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by SecretMethod70
Take Mel Gibson for example - a person who's "Catholic" beliefs are very much NOT in line with much of Catholic teaching. He rejects all the changes made in Vatican II (which was around 1963, so, yes, it was more like 40 years ago, not 50)
I'd like to take this as an opportunity to mention that Mel's outdated beliefs include a stance that The Church was wise to reconsider: that the Jewish religion as a whole is and was entirely responsible for the death of Jesus. Is it any wonder that he had no qualms about leaving in parts of his movie that were seen as blatantly anti-semitic?

SecretMethod70 06-04-2004 11:31 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrSelfDestruct
I'd like to take this as an opportunity to mention that Mel's outdated beliefs include a stance that The Church was wise to reconsider: that the Jewish religion as a whole is and was entirely responsible for the death of Jesus. Is it any wonder that he had no qualms about leaving in parts of his movie that were seen as blatantly anti-semitic?
Yes, he believes a lot of things the Church was wise to reconsider. One of the reasons I refuse to see "The Passion" - the less publicity his brand of "Catholicism" gets, the better. He gives people a view of Catholics that I'm very glad is now far from true, but those who aren't involved in the present day Church and/or study it don't know this. Misinformation can be a very dangerous thing.

pan6467 06-05-2004 09:10 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by MrSelfDestruct
I'd like to take this as an opportunity to mention that Mel's outdated beliefs include a stance that The Church was wise to reconsider: that the Jewish religion as a whole is and was entirely responsible for the death of Jesus. Is it any wonder that he had no qualms about leaving in parts of his movie that were seen as blatantly anti-semitic?

I may be naive and for this I ask forgiveness, but I truly saw nothing anti-semitic in the Passion.

Nor did I see how it was this great revelation and affirmation of Christianity as practiced today (by the religious right who are the ones that as a whole went gaga over this movie.)

What I saw in the Passion was a man who held his beliefs and love of ALL mankind so strongly that he was willing to die for those beliefs and love. And as with many whom have held publicly views of love and belief in ALL men, those around him who did not understand were scared because of a loss of power over the people and sought to destroy him and his following before their power was questioned. To me it wasn't a question of what Jews or the Romans did to him, it was about those in power did to him. (And as we see with the "religious right" power and what they say does not equal the majority belief system.)

I cannot see how anyone who claims to be Christian can blame the Jewish faith as a whole or in any way for Christ's death. Christ, himself, I believe would shudder at the thought and tell us that is so far from truth and that it was distorted by those who want control and to spread fear and not what HE truly stood for.

First, it was meant to happen that he died for our sins so those who did kill him were doing so with Divine favor.

Secondly, there is corruption in ALL organized religion and those in power will do whatever it takes (even change tenets and canons of belief) to keep power.

Finally, I don't believe Christ himself would have blamed anyone for his death, but rather knew that man was not ready for his views of love and belief in mankind. He did however know that he sowed the seeds of love, kindness and compassion and helped explain them a little more and grow in man's heart a little more.

apeman 06-11-2004 01:40 PM

i guess it depends if it's blaming all Jews for the death of Jesus or just some Jews for the death of Jesus

the former is wrong, the latter is not


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:02 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360