Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Philosophy (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-philosophy/)
-   -   Did Jesus really exist? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-philosophy/177277-did-jesus-really-exist.html)

Mogwaithief 07-28-2011 10:11 AM

Did Jesus really exist?
 
Recently I met a cool guy who likes a lively debate an as such the topic of religion came up. I am agnostic, was raised in a secular family and I have come to believe that Jesus was not an actual historical person and that the Bible in general is a work of fiction.He was raised in a fundamentalist christian family and firmly believes that Jesus was real and while he maintains that the bible should not be taken literally he credits this as his main source for his believe in the historical Jesus. My counter argument to this is that I have never seen any other historical source for the existence of Jesus (though he claims he is able to provide some)and that I only have other people's word to go on that the bible in fact describes a real person. I showed him the first part of Zeitgeist to help strengthen my argument. He countered with 'do you believe that Socrates existed?', to which I replied yes, 'based on what?', to which I replied 'based on Plato's account of him'. He replied 'so you only have a secondary account of the real man?', to which I replied touche.

So now I wonder did Jesus really exist and what evidence can you cite for either argument? A heavy topic I know, but it's really bugging me now.

Ourcrazymodern? 07-30-2011 07:06 AM

Mogwaithief, all any of us have to go on regarding this is several times removed. Listen to "Jesus Christ Superstar." There are accounts of Jesus that satisfy non-believers as to his existence. I won't quote or link you any. YOU can find them. Even with the parables, to me, Jesus showed very little godhood. The idea of miracles makes me throw up a little. Can you content your own mind with the thoughts you are thinking without letting them crucify you? Touche.

Baraka_Guru 07-30-2011 08:08 AM

I think the jury is still out as to the existence of Jesus the man, this from a historical or an archaeological perspective.

So, as with most things "Jesus," it's a matter of belief.

I'm willing to believe Jesus existed as a man. I tend to view him as a philosopher who didn't write anything down, and so we're limited to the "dialogues."

I respect what Jesus ostensibly taught. It was a part of a long tradition that predates him. What's unfortunate is the turbulence, fragmentation, disparities, corruptions, contradictions, etc., that arose out of the growth of Christianity.

Strange Famous 07-30-2011 09:29 AM

Personally, I think it is as realistic to make this argument as it is to dipsute if Augustus or Julius Ceaser really existed.

Whether or not you Jesus was in any sense divine, I think can and should be debated. My own view is that Jesus was probably not an incarnation of God in a literal sense, but probably was a real or true prophet. But that is a religious view more than a historical one.

But there are quite a few accounts of him from people who were contemporary to him or nearly so (ie - during a time when people alive would have remembered him or their immediate family would have).

In relation to the OP, the historical writings of Josephus refer to Jesus (and his brother James) and there are numerous "gospels" which are not included in the bible. I dont mean to have a go at you, but it is quite a lazy thing to say that there are no historical sources about Jesus which are not in the bible. This is not something which requires any more than looking on Google or wikipedia to disprove.

Willravel 07-30-2011 11:40 AM

I chose, "No he is a work of fiction.", but I do have to say I'm not 100% certain of this opinion. It's possible that such an individual existed, but I find it to be extremely unlikely given what I've been able to read up about the historical evidence. The fact that his story so closely resembles those of mythological figures from before his supposed time combined with the fact that there are no references to the individual until many decades after his supposed ascension make me think that the evidence for Jesus is about the same as the evidence for Horus or Apollo. Perhaps there was a historical Horus upon which the legend was based, but stating today that he existed either as fact or as a reasonable possibility seems unfounded.

Strange Famous 07-30-2011 12:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willravel (Post 2918828)
I chose, "No he is a work of fiction.", but I do have to say I'm not 100% certain of this opinion. It's possible that such an individual existed, but I find it to be extremely unlikely given what I've been able to read up about the historical evidence. The fact that his story so closely resembles those of mythological figures from before his supposed time combined with the fact that there are no references to the individual until many decades after his supposed ascension make me think that the evidence for Jesus is about the same as the evidence for Horus or Apollo. Perhaps there was a historical Horus upon which the legend was based, but stating today that he existed either as fact or as a reasonable possibility seems unfounded.

so you think it is likely that no individual named Yeshua ben Josef was born round about 5/4BC and became a religious leader in rural communities around his home town for a couple of years before he was executed?

Disputing the Bible is not the same as saying that the person had no historical validity at all.

_

Was Josephus just writing fiction?

Where all of the gospels (even those written between 0-50 years after his death) just reworking of Greek mystery stories?

I think we should be clear whether we are arguing as to whether Jesus was the son or incarnation of God, or whether a person known as Jesus really walked the earth.

hunnychile 07-30-2011 12:32 PM

Then why do historians & all societies list dates as A.D. or B.C. ?

I feel 100% certain that Jesus lived. There are too many historical accounts that have existed and still exist to make me believe otherwise.

We're not debating his divinity, BTW.

The_Jazz 07-30-2011 12:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hunnychile (Post 2918838)
Then why do historians & all societies list dates as A.D. or B.C. ?

I feel 100% certain that Jesus lived. There are too many historical accounts that have existed and still exist to make me believe otherwise.

We're not debating his divinity, BTW.

Well, most modern historians don't use AD. They use CE, which stands for Current Era. BCE is now the standard and is BCE. They kept the same date. You're guilty of making a pretty Western-centric set of assumptions there.

And not all societies used BC/AD. The Chinese, for instance, along with Muslims did and do not. You're only speaking of Western societies that had the Julian calendar imposed upon them by the Romans. It wasn't until the 750's that they all adopted a common year based upon the birth of Christ. Prior to that, it was a nightmare to calculate years since each little nation-state would have their own start point.

He probably lived.

Ourcrazymodern? 07-30-2011 01:06 PM

I, too, feel certain he existed. If his philosophy, if delivered accurately, was his, it is that which changed the world. 1,978(?) years is too far behind us to know for certain-sure, & you can trace the stories through the time-line if you read through any condensed <Mythologies of the World>-type story book. It's the feelings the name engenders that cause controversy, isn't it?

Baraka_Guru 07-30-2011 01:13 PM

For those who haven't stumbled across it yet, there is an entire Wikipedia article on the idea of a historical Jesus, as opposed to Jesus as myth:

Historical Jesus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This stands outside of another starting point that looks at the historicity of Jesus, including both the idea of history and mythology:

Historicity of Jesus - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The first link is more closely related to the topic of the thread.

Willravel 07-30-2011 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Strange Famous (Post 2918834)
so you think it is likely that no individual named Yeshua ben Josef was born round about 5/4BC and became a religious leader in rural communities around his home town for a couple of years before he was executed?

It's my contention that the character/individual we now know as Jesus Christ likely never existed at all. I base that purely on both a lack of historical evidence and the fact that the character in the Bible and spoken of by theologians has many, many glaring similarities with mythological figures that predate Christianity and the supposed time Jesus was alive.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Strange Famous (Post 2918834)
Disputing the Bible is not the same as saying that the person had no historical validity at all.

I am doing both.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Strange Famous (Post 2918834)
Was Josephus just writing fiction?

The problem is that Josephus likely didn't write the Testimonium Flavianum. It appears to have been an addition some three centuries later by an apologist. And the James reference is clearly a reference to a different James.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Strange Famous (Post 2918834)
Where all of the gospels (even those written between 0-50 years after his death) just reworking of Greek mystery stories?

It's more like 40-80 years after his supposed death. There are no eyewitness accounts of Jesus in the Bible. Paul wrote a proto-gospel that was radically different than the story of Jesus we're familiar with very early on (possibly before the supposed lifetime of Jesus), then Mark wrote a gospel based on that in the 70s AD. Matthew and Luke each copied Mark's gospel and had their own takes on it in 80 and around 90 AD, respectively. John came late to the party and probably copied Luke, probably in the late 90s AD. The entire thing falls on Paul, and Paul speaks of Jesus as a sort of abstraction.

The thing you have to realize about most religions and myths is that they evolve over time, especially in their infancy. There was a massive change between Paul and Mark, I'd say they're entirely different religions the way that Islam is different from Christianity.
Quote:

Originally Posted by Strange Famous (Post 2918834)
I think we should be clear whether we are arguing as to whether Jesus was the son or incarnation of God, or whether a person known as Jesus really walked the earth.

I tried to be clear. I am highly skeptical of the existence of Jesus Christ, be he natural or supernatural.

---------- Post added at 02:33 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:31 PM ----------

Quote:

Originally Posted by The_Jazz (Post 2918847)
Well, most modern historians don't use AD. They use CE, which stands for Current Era. BCE is now the standard and is BCE. They kept the same date. You're guilty of making a pretty Western-centric set of assumptions there.

I really need to stop using AD and BC. It's a habit left over from school.

Baraka_Guru 07-30-2011 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Willravel (Post 2918867)
I really need to stop using AD and BC. It's a habit left over from school.

I was pretty excited when I first stumbled across BCE and CE in scholarly references. I was like, "Finally! A reference to dates that reflects my own beliefs!"

Strange Famous 07-30-2011 01:40 PM

So how many contemporary sources can you quote for the existence of Emporer Galba?

Baraka_Guru 07-30-2011 01:47 PM

Plutarch was a contemporary of Galba and wrote about his life.

Plutarch - Life of Galba

Modern scholars aren't concerned about whether Galba existed; they're unsatisfied with the accounts: there is more about Galba the man rather than Galba the leader.

Quote:

The evidence for the principate of Galba is unsatisfactory. The sources either concentrate on the personality of the man, thereby failing to offer a balanced account of his policies and a firm chronological base for his actions; or, they focus on the final two weeks of his life at the expense of the earlier part of his reign.[...]
Roman Emperors - DIR Galba

Strange Famous 07-30-2011 01:50 PM

Less contemporay sources than one could quote for the existence of Jesus I guess?

Baraka_Guru 07-30-2011 01:52 PM

Well, if you prefer unfair comparisions, then sure: there are fewer contemporary sources about one of the lesser known Roman emperors than there are about Jesus of fucking Nazareth.

Strange Famous 07-30-2011 01:54 PM

because they both were real people?

Willravel 07-30-2011 02:07 PM

No, because one was a footnote and the other was a demigod.

Baraka_Guru 07-30-2011 02:19 PM

You will find more contemporary sources on Jesus of Nazareth than you will on Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama.

I know people who have seen the latter in person. I've seen him on TV.

chinese crested 07-30-2011 10:55 PM

There was quite possibly a prophet who had the name Jesus. BUT. According to Deuteronomy, he should have been stoned to death. God did warn of the coming of false prophets like him and instructed stoning them to death. So, that means your good christian is just a bad jew who didnt follow the rules and instructions of the old testament.

---------- Post added at 10:55 PM ---------- Previous post was at 10:47 PM ----------

More probable?

Ourcrazymodern? 07-31-2011 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru (Post 2918871)
I was pretty excited when I first stumbled across BCE and CE in scholarly references. I was like, "Finally! A reference to dates that reflects my own beliefs!"

:thumbsup:

An obvious flaw in my thinking: I believe Jesus existed in large parts because we wouldn't be talking about him, otherwise. Ruh-roh! I dunno...

Baraka_Guru 07-31-2011 07:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chinese crested (Post 2918938)
There was quite possibly a prophet who had the name Jesus. BUT. According to Deuteronomy, he should have been stoned to death. God did warn of the coming of false prophets like him and instructed stoning them to death. So, that means your good christian is just a bad jew who didnt follow the rules and instructions of the old testament.

He should have produced his long-form virgin birth certificate.

roachboy 07-31-2011 09:10 AM

it's likely that someone named jesus of nazareth existed. there's no way to know the relation between his material and metaphorical lives. the sources are a hall of mirrors. but somewhere in there, it seems reasonable to assume that there was a someone who triggered the reflections. just as there is a source for ronald mcdonald, really.

Ourcrazymodern? 07-31-2011 09:53 AM

Except that Ronald McDonald probably won't be remembered two millennia hence?

roachboy 07-31-2011 12:26 PM

i like to imagine ronald mcdonald being excavated by archeologists a very long time from now and that they construct a theory about him that makes macdo into a temple, burgers into sacraments, high school kids in uniforms into a priesthood and ronald into a god.

Tully Mars 07-31-2011 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Baraka_Guru (Post 2918996)
He should have produced his long-form virgin birth certificate.


Most people don't believe Jesus made it to Arizona. Though the Mormons believe he did show up in "America" and spent some time with several native tribes shortly after the "resurrection."


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360