![]() |
Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes never had a baby
Doesn't it seem odd that we still haven't seen any kid named suri? Not one picture has been leaked. On top of that the birth certificate, that must be filed within 10 days of birth was supposedly filed in May, almost a month too late, but isn't dated until July 7.
Quote:
Quote:
http://img53.imageshack.us/img53/229...ificate6om.jpg Supporting the theory that suri doesn't exist is the fact that he did not father the children he had with nicole kidman. That and everyone knows he's gay. Just ask ustwo, or anyone in hollywood for that matter. |
Nevermind, I checked. Didn't know they were adopted... didn't care, I guess! :lol:
|
i thought the two kids he had were adopted.. not his bilogically... On E last night, i was flipping channels and there ws a new rumor that Katie was pregnant again...
but that's being denied.... |
the two kids he had with nicole kidman were definitely adopted.
hmm, maybe the papers are exaggerating and their close friends have seen the baby.. who knows? |
How is this paranoia? Tom's gay (AND INSANE), and Katie needs a career booster. No brainer.
|
Perhaps they lost the baby due to some weird Scientology delivery technique, and are trying to cover it up.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
There's a great conspiracy theory to be built here. Scientology is rabidly anti-gay, and Tom's their biggest celebrity paritioner. So to clean up the rumors, they conned Katie into marrying him, conned him into doing the sofa dance with Oprah (no not that sofa dance--he'd prefer Dr. Phil, anyway), and in-Vitroed up a baby for them. And then yeah, there's something wrong with the child or they lost it in delivery or something. But it would be anti-Scientology for there to be any (gasp) problems in their life, so the whole thing is being covered up... It's like Michael Jackson's nose--it just keeps getting worse and worse, and every attempt to repair the thing only exacerbates the problem until eventually your baby is held onto your face with gauze and putty. |
Hmmm I've heard none of this, but I don't read "People".
If there was an issue with the birth then we can be sure that in some months they will appear with a perfect baby girl with the right look, and genetically distinct from either parent. I would doubt that the pregnancy was faked, too much can go wrong there. The other possibility is that the nuttiness is at such a level they have become germ freaks and don't want anyone to see her lest she gets infected. I've known people this nutty. Or maybe they have her in a thetan free room to become the new messiah. I can feel the making of a bad fantasy novel right there, L. Ron would be proud. |
Ustwo's right: the baby's a Level 1 Preclear. They don't want to be seen in public with her.
|
yeah, that's a good point too..
|
Quote:
|
Steveo... your OP is worth of Host. Great research!
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Another quip from www.thesuperficial.com
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
naw man I think he just doesn't want to run his firstborn throught the media circus hoops. My 2c
|
It's my opinion that this is the sanest, most logically grounded thread in this forum. I'd been wondering what happened to Captain Jackass and his kid, but never put much thought into it.
The CoS is more than able and willing to cover up anything that could have gone wrong short of a nuclear attack on the hospital, and it looks like the coverup is in full swing. |
Quote:
|
I'm with BigLebowski on this one. I'm sure Katie appreciates getting out of the house on her own every now and again, and they're probably both against having their child absorbed in the drama of Hollywood tabloids. Better to keep people thinking it's imaginary than give up the one bit of privacy they've managed to claim.
|
http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/0....ap/index.html
Quote:
|
Interesting.... Remini opens with "She is a beaming baby."
not "She is beaming". Or, "She is beautiful.", no. "She is a beaming baby." In case maybe we wondered if she was perhaps a beaming screech owl. Or a beaming soldering iron. "Beaming" is a strange choice of words too. Beaming? What does that mean? How can a newborn POSSIBLY be beaminig? She can't focus her eyes more than ten inches from her face! And she won't have facial expressions for months. How could she be "beaming"? I think the real intent of Ms. Remini's statement becomes clear if you drop the clearly nonsensical word "beaming". What Ms. Remini wanted us to know was plain and simple: "She's a baby." Like, really, guys. She is. A baby. Totally a baby. I held 'er, no question about that--she's a baby. Yessiree. Baby. Baby baby baby. Don't doubt on that for a moment longer! Banish non-baby thoughts from your mind this instant, because I, Leah Remini, can personally assure you: BABY. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
Why is it so many of the Holly-wooders are Scientologists? To you have to be an actor to get in? Snicker, snicker. It seems like every time you turn around... there is one. Maybe you really have to be gay (not that there's anything wrong with that!) to get in? Oops...another theory being born? |
The only thing I can think of is that the baby may have a birthmark or some facial abnomality.(Clef lip etc) and being in the public eye they just want to take their time getting her ready for her debut.
|
Pinkett Smith: Suri Cruise a 'beauty'
Quote:
Fascinating really.. becuase this site... a few weeks earlier http://suicidegirls.com/news/tags/scientologist/ Quote:
|
Suri Cruise Makes Debut on Vanity Fair Cover
Suri's got a fringe on top. As spectacular first photos of the spawn of Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes show, 4 1/2-month-old Suri Cruise is clearly already one very pretty baby, with a thick thatch of dark hair just like her famous parents, and deep blue eyes to boot. The quirky couple finally posed for family photos for the new edition of Vanity Fair after months of what an obviously irked Holmes called "heartbreaking" rumors that their baby was everything from alien to imaginary when Suri failed to appear in public. "We were just living our lives, being a family" after the baby was born April 17, Holmes told the latest installment of the mag, which hits newsstands today. "Actually, we were taking our own photos and always planned to release those at the right time. Then all the craziness began. This 'Where is Suri?' controversy. Tom and I looked at each other and said, 'What's going on?' We weren't trying to hide anything." The 27-year-old cutie admitted that all the gossip about her and Cruise "eats away at me." She took a swipe at critics of her Scientologist beau, now infamous for using Oprah Winfrey's couch as a trampoline while professing his love for her. "To see how someone as caring and good as Tom is — to see how things can just get so twisted and turned around. I mean, where does it come from?" Holmes said. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ So the kid does exist after all.. Ok so now can people resume their lives now that they've seen a picture :D |
Quote:
That still isn't necissarily THEIR baby... it's A baby... not THEIR baby. |
this storyline already happened during the first season of "footballers' wives"
it is a great show if you like High Trash (and who doesnt from time to time?) and is worth watching for new fodder. as for tom cruise: the only thing that interests me at all about him is whether he knew he was being ridiculed from start to finish in "eyes wide shut"--which also has the WORST getting stoned sequence i have ever seen--kudos to nicole kidman on that. as for katie holmes: who? |
I'm reminded of Jeremy Piven's recent interview with Access Hollywood:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/...onth=08&day=29 Quote:
|
Clearly, the baby was born through a series of controlled detonations of military ordinance secretly implanted in Holmes and timed to go off at the end of her gestation cycle.
I'd say more but malevolent ghosts are breaking the tips off of my newly sharpened number two pencils inside my desk drawer and the television is ON! |
After seeing pictures of the so-called "baby" its obvious they bought an asian baby from somewhere else.
|
Quote:
|
http://www.anti-scientologie.ch/images5/Xenu.jpg
Maybe Lord Xenu stole their baby out of spite, forcing Tom & Katie buy one to cover it up. Or maybe the gods of mormonism are currently engaged in an intergalactic war with Xenu and his constituents, and the baby was the chosen one. Destined to bring balance to the infinite confusion that is Hollywood. |
Quote:
|
Yeah, there are no proof that we can give much credence to. Right now, we can all just assume that that is indeed their baby.
|
Why not assume that we didn't see the baby sooner than we did because they wanted to maintain their privacy? They're under no obligation to show their child in public just because they happen to be actors.
Quote:
Many people may suspect that he's gay, but that's a long way from everyone knowing it. Gilda |
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
Gilda |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:32 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project