Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Life (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-life/)
-   -   $9,000 - best way to invest? (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-life/51575-9-000-best-way-invest.html)

Spherion 04-06-2004 01:43 PM

$9,000 - best way to invest?
 
So for reasons I won't go into, I've recently been able to pay off all my debt. Car loans, and charge cards. I now have about $9,000 left and was wondering what the best use of this money would be. I'd like to try to use it to generate some more and break into the whole "you gotta have money to make money" revolving door.

eribrav 04-06-2004 02:44 PM

You said you have paid off all your debt. That's a huge step.

Have you also squirreled away a little safety fund for yourself yet? Like maybe enough money to get you through 2 or 3 months if an unexpected hardship came up? That might be something to do first, if you haven't already.

Spherion 04-07-2004 12:26 PM

I'm looking moreso into how to use this money to make more. Investments and the such. I've though about starting with vehicles, buy one for a good price, cash, then turn it over for a $500-$1000 profit. Then do it again.

Cynthetiq 04-07-2004 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spherion
I'm looking moreso into how to use this money to make more. Investments and the such. I've though about starting with vehicles, buy one for a good price, cash, then turn it over for a $500-$1000 profit. Then do it again.
vehicles depreciate ....

real estate.
I bought my first condo for 6k down, it's rented and I make a tidy sum every month I go to the mailbox. It's also appreciated over 25k in the 5 years I've had it.

beaten every other investment I've got.

micah67 04-07-2004 03:57 PM

If you haven't already, open a Roth IRA. You can still deposit your max ($3k) for 2003 (have to deposit before April 15). Plus deposit $3k for 2004. Interest-free retirement!

With the remaining $3k, get yourself something nice. It sounds like you deserve it.

But if you're set on the making money now thing, I'd avoid cars like Cynthetiq says; they seldom make money. Real Estate is the way to go.

Aletheia 04-07-2004 04:37 PM

Land will almost never lose value so like Cyn and micah67 said, invest in some real estate.

NoSoup 04-07-2004 08:29 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Aletheia
Land will almost never lose value so like Cyn and micah67 said, invest in some real estate.
Well, true - However, if he were to purchase just land with no building on it, generally it has a negative cash flow, as few people are going to rent a chunk of land from you with rent high enough to pay the taxes on it each year.

I also agree with real estate, unless by chance you are skilled in fixing vehicles, doing body work, or have dealer hookups and can purchase them for ultra cheap at an auction.

clavus 04-07-2004 09:09 PM

Plastic

Spherion 04-08-2004 03:37 AM

Well, the reason I suggested cars, is because I know them. Not really versed in real estate,....yet. I've made at least $1,000 on every vehicle I've ever sold, and of the three vehicles I currently own, I purchased ALL for 75% or less of the loan/market value.

Bill O'Rights 04-08-2004 04:20 AM

One word...


Casino! :)


J/K ;)

Cynthetiq 04-08-2004 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Spherion
Well, the reason I suggested cars, is because I know them. Not really versed in real estate,....yet. I've made at least $1,000 on every vehicle I've ever sold, and of the three vehicles I currently own, I purchased ALL for 75% or less of the loan/market value.
there comes a certain time when you cannot do that anymore because you will have to register as a dealer.

being a property owner has that same limit, except a single sale of property can net you the same amount of $$$ as selling 20 cars.

look around your area for condos, small 1-2 bedroom homes.

http://www.homes.com/index.cfm

or

http://www.realtor.com

stevie667 04-08-2004 12:24 PM

put 3k aside for a rainy day/month (thats my advise to everyone, always have something to fall back on, because you'll be fucking glad it's there to get you out of a hole) in an account with nice interest, then like said before, see if theres some real estate you can look into, or just stick the rest in accounts and just live happy that you have a lot more dispossable income each month:)

HamiC 04-09-2004 05:45 AM

I vote for the Roth IRA.

beerman 04-09-2004 07:59 AM

The problem with real estate right now is that it is a sellers' market. With interest rates so low right now and looking to climb, it may not be the right time to invest. (Keep this in mind, buy investment Real Estate when the rates are high and soon to drop, not the other way around) Rental rates are high right now, and those rates have also been factored into the price of investment property.

I would say the stock market is the way to go, mutual funds if you don't have that much experience. As far as the Roth is concerned, I would say that doesn't quite match your needs. If you are looking to start making money with money, can we assume that you want this extra cash to increase you standard of living? A Roth will only increase your standard of retirement. On the other hand, if you are planning to buy your first house in the next few years, the Roth would be a good idea, since the investments will grow tax free, and you can use them for that purchase without penalty.

Finally, look for new Mutual Funds that have high dividends, with the new dividend tax rates, it might be perfect for an added income plan.

gar1976 04-09-2004 10:15 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by HamiC
I vote for the Roth IRA.
If you can, do a regular IRA waaay before you consider a roth.

Regular IRA - tax break now. You can figure out your tax savings.

Roth - tax break....when? Who knows what the tax laws will be in 30 years. Look how much they've changed in the last 30.

Plus, a dollar in tax savings now is worth well more than a dollar in tax savings in 30 years.

Third option - porn. And lots of it. Think of the money you'd save by not going out on dates. In fact, this option would easily pay for itself in 2-3 weeks. What a rate of return!

Dilbert1234567 04-10-2004 01:56 PM

i'd go with the mayo jar in the ground.

HamiC 04-11-2004 06:53 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by gar1976
If you can, do a regular IRA waaay before you consider a roth.

Regular IRA - tax break now. You can figure out your tax savings.

Roth - tax break....when? Who knows what the tax laws will be in 30 years. Look how much they've changed in the last 30.

Plus, a dollar in tax savings now is worth well more than a dollar in tax savings in 30 years.

Good point about considering a Regular IRA...

But, the decision should also be based on whether you have a 401(k).....income level.....desire to potentially withdraw a portion in the not-to-distant future....and several other factors that you can explore on most financial websites (Motley Fool comes to mind).

Best of luck regardless of what you do. We're all pulling for you.

Cynthetiq 04-12-2004 06:58 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Dilbert1234567
i'd go with the mayo jar in the ground.
problem with the mayo jar is that when you pull out the money from the ground 20 years later you only have the amount that you have, which with inflation has less buying power than when you started.

I think though... the first poster needs to say when he's going to need this money. IRA's are a nice way to invest but if he wants to use the money in the next few years, he won't be able to without substantial penalty'

Bill O'Rights 04-12-2004 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cynthetiq
problem with the mayo jar is that when you pull out the money from the ground 20 years later you only have the amount that you have, which with inflation has less buying power than when you started.
Hmmm...you should've seen my 401K statement from 2002. I'd have been better off putting my money in a mayonaise jar, that year. Except wouldn't it make the dollar bills smell bad, after awhile?

hari 04-12-2004 05:37 PM

Make sure you have an emergency fund first.

Between a regular and Roth IRA, I'd go for the Roth.

The tax break for a regular IRA isn't huge, and what's worse, you'll have to file a form every year to keep track of the proportion of IRA money that has been taxed vs. not taxed.

I'm slowly converting all of my regular IRAs to Roths ... I still have 30 years to retirement, and I can quit filing those 8606 forms.

Just get in the habit of saving. It will pile up, slowly but surely.

DDDDave 04-14-2004 08:34 AM

Try this....

Retirement Plan
If you had purchased $1000.00 of Nortel stock one year ago, it would now be worth $49.00.

With Enron, you would have $16.50 left of the original $1,000.00.

With WorldCom, you would have less than $5.00 left.

But, if you had purchased $1,000.00 worth of Beer one year ago, drank all the beer, then turned in the cans for the aluminum recycling price, you would have $214.00.

Based on the above, current investment advice is to drink heavily and recycle.

It's called the 401-Keg Plan

:) :)

Cynthetiq 04-14-2004 09:03 AM

I just got back from the mortgage broker... she told me some great news... that buying a rental property would be excellent since they will take consideration of a rental property income into your income to offset the mortgage liability.

YMMV but that's where I'm moving my free 20k...I'll have a nice monthly positive cashflow.

iccky 04-14-2004 04:13 PM

I don't really know anything about this beyond reading the business section, but I have been reading a lot lately about the overvalued real estate market (see articel below, yes it was on fark yesterday). I'm sure its usually a wonderful investment but you might worry now about buying at the top of the market.

Quote:

Why Housing Is About to Go "Pop!"
Too many red alerts are flashing for investors and the Fed to remain in denial when so much is at stake. If this bubble bursts, watch out By Mark Weisbrot

Updated: 8:00 p.m. ET April 12, 2004If you still need proof that a bubble is building in the housing market take a look at the findings of my economist colleague Dean Baker at the Center for Economic Policy & Research in Washington, D.C. He has tracked national housing prices going back to 1951. Prices pretty much track the rate of inflation up until 1995. But since then, average prices on new and existing homes have soared more than 35 percentage points beyond the overall rate of inflation. Is that unusual? You bet it is.

advertisement

This sudden increase has no plausible explanation other than a bubble, in my view. Part of the bubble's expansion is explained by the enormous wealth the stock market generated in the late '90s, which spilled over into real estate, as happened in Japan during the '80s. Even after the stock market crashed in 2000-02, financial "experts" -- the same ones who mistakenly counseled unfortunate 401[k] investors that there was "no way" anyone investing in the stock market for the long run could lose -- recommended housing as the next big thing.

Of course, that's exactly what a bubble is -- people buy an asset because its price is rising, and that pulls more buyers into the market. Prices rise further, and the cycle continues, without regard to the real value of the asset -- whether it's stocks, housing, or tulip bulbs in the 17th century.

JAPAN'S LESSON. All bubbles must eventually burst, although it's very difficult to predict the timing. The stock market bubble could conceivably have continued for years longer than it did. To see an example of what that would have looked like, consider Japan: In 1989, their Nikkei stock index hit a bubble peak at 39,000. Today, more than 14 years later, it's less than 12,000. Imagine the Dow dropping to less than a third of its peak value and still sitting there 14 years later.

We do know that the longer a bubble persists and the bigger it grows, the more likely it is to burst sooner rather than later. In the case of the housing bubble, I think the signs are that it's getting close to breaking. One is the large divergence between the rise in rental prices vs. home prices. This can't persist for long, because people can choose whether to buy or rent.

Over the last year, housing prices increased by 8%, while rental prices rose by only about 2%. In some of the bubble areas, such as Seattle and San Francisco, rents are actually falling. And rental vacancy rates are at a record high nationally. These are indications that the bubble's end is near.

INDIFFERENT FED. A rise in long-term interest rates, which would push up mortgage rates, could collapse the housing bubble faster than anything else. Even after the recent jump in interest rates -- from 3.65% to 4.20% on the 10-year Treasury note -- long-term rates are still very low by historical standards. But inflation has been rising: The consumer price index is now running at a 3.7% compound annual rate over the past three months, as compared to 1.7% over the last year.

And the dollar's decline portends more inflation in the near future, especially as the greenback remains historically quite overvalued [another bubble] -- as witness the U.S. current-account deficit, which stands at more than 5% of gross domestic product.

The Federal Reserve Board has been uncharacteristically indifferent to the prospects of increasing inflation. It has not only kept short-term rates at a 46-year low of 1% but in its last statement, the Fed's rate-setting committee said the risk of "an unwelcome fall in inflation" now "appears almost equal to that of a rise in inflation." Chairman Alan Greenspan has also denied the existence of the housing bubble. It's hard to imagine that he really believes either of those two things.

OUNCE OF PREVENTION. Surely, Greenspan would like to minimize the impact of a housing bubble bursting. But look at what he did when he discerned signs of a stock market bubble: After a brief comment about "irrational exuberance" at the end of 1996, he retreated and allowed that bubble to expand enormously, with the Dow growing by 80% and the Nasdaq nearly quadrupling before the crash.

I think Greenspan could have prevented the stock market bubble from reaching its distended proportions, simply by explaining the basic arithmetic to the public. A number of political leaders from either party presumably could have done the same.

The collapse of the equity bubble caused a recession in 2001, followed by a recovery of unprecedented weakness in the labor market. The U.S. is still experiencing the fallout, which included a corporate crime wave that contiues to work its way through the courts. Millions lost much of their retirement savings. The government's latest household survey of employment report last week showed that people over 55 accounted for an incredible 103% of jobs gained over the last year. Many have no choice: They can no longer afford to retire as planned.

IN DENIAL Economists at the International Monetary Fund -- which to its credit has been warning about America's housing bubble for some time -- have estimated that a collapse could have as much as twice the negative impact on the U.S. economy as did the stock market crash in 2000-02.

It makes no sense to remain in denial when so much is at stake. Even from the most libertarian, "free-market" approach to policy, there's a public interest in disseminating accurate information so that markets can function efficiently. Bubbles are not examples of markets operating efficiently. In fact, they're the opposite. And the bigger they grow, the harder they burst.

Dilbert1234567 05-24-2004 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by Cynthetiq
problem with the mayo jar is that when you pull out the money from the ground 20 years later you only have the amount that you have, which with inflation has less buying power than when you started.

I think though... the first poster needs to say when he's going to need this money. IRA's are a nice way to invest but if he wants to use the money in the next few years, he won't be able to without substantial penalty'

heh i was kidding about the mayo jar, but it has been doing better then some of my stocks lately. it does not beat inflation and would be safer in a bank (fdic and no moles)

yippiekiyeh 06-22-2004 01:05 AM

Rental property at this point in time does seem like a good investment, but I always wonder about, repairs and damages etc etc... bad tenants etc etc... If anyone would like to enlighten me I'd be happy to listen!

Flyguy 07-03-2004 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally posted by DDDDave
Try this....

Retirement Plan
If you had purchased $1000.00 of Nortel stock one year ago, it would now be worth $49.00.

With Enron, you would have $16.50 left of the original $1,000.00.

With WorldCom, you would have less than $5.00 left.

But, if you had purchased $1,000.00 worth of Beer one year ago, drank all the beer, then turned in the cans for the aluminum recycling price, you would have $214.00.

Based on the above, current investment advice is to drink heavily and recycle.

It's called the 401-Keg Plan

:) :)



nice!

Flyguy 07-03-2004 10:56 AM

yippiekiyeh, my wife and I are pondering buying some investment property. Like a duplex with us living in one half and the tenant living in the other and we charge them enough so that they end up paying something like 75% of the mortgage or something like that. Just don't know if I really want to be a landlord dealing with bad tenants, damage, etc.

Merlocke 07-03-2004 03:53 PM

Hey man,

Honestly, I'd go with a combination of two choices had I been put in your shoes.

1) Do the real estate thing - small downpayment - rent it. There's a reason why they made that Game - "Monopoly". More millionaires have been created out of real estate than anything else. Just do yourself a favour and read up a hell of a lot on it first. Or find someone you trust that can do a good job and doesn't ask for too much in return.

2) Foreign Exchange. They've deregulated foreign exchange markets and have opened them up to the public. It's super easy trading because you can never really "lose" as long as you don't automate stuff. I've got a buddy making around 5k extra a month doing that stuff. You could easily turn what's left of your 9k (after buying a place) into another 9k all over again. Drop me a line (PM)if you want info on it.

teethman 07-20-2004 10:15 PM

if i wanted to start with real estate, wheres the first place to look it up?

ZZubius 07-22-2004 02:30 PM

teethman...if your interested in investment properties or just kicking the idea around, let me know. I'm a real estate appraiser, 3.5 years exp. in high rise condos, multi units, single family and commercial, in the chicagoland area. I may have some usefull information, especially where the highest returns are.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:32 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360