![]() |
[Calculus] It didn't take me long to forget how to Integrate..
It's been about a year since I had Calc. II and I simply cannot integrate this:
((2xe)^-x)^2 Parenthesis added for ease of reading, that's 2xe being raised to the x which is raised to the 2 power. I was thinking substitution but its still just been too long, and I never got the 'by parts' thing down ;) Thanks :) |
you may find the problem easier if you rearrange a little:
(2xe)^-2x dx (I assume there's a dx somewhere in there...) |
Yeah sorry.
That looks much easier but I dont see how you can do that... You're saying that the power -x^2 is the same as the power -2x? |
No it's not, but the notation: ((2xe)^-x)^2 simplyfies to (2xe)^(-2x) not (2xe)^(-x^2)
i.e. (x^n)^m = x^(nm) != x^(n^m) I'm not sure but someone once told me that you cannot integrate x^x. Are you sure that the question is possible? (The derivative of x^x I can do though :)). |
you can't X^x can only be done numerically, anyway, are you sure you did the () right. because if that there was no X^x term then it might be possible any way i'm looking at it right now and i don't see a clear way to do it. Search for "mathematica and integrating online" there should be a website which intergrates for you, this way you can at least know if there is a solution.
|
Christ,
I got straight A's in all my math through diffQ and I don't have a friggin clue. Course, that was a few years ago... |
hmm, this site(http://integrals.wolfram.com/) says:
x^2/8xe^2 I haven't got the cares to check it right now, and I can't find a formula that explains it in my differentials notes, but check it out |
It's been three years since I did Calculus, and even longer since I did Algebra -- but I think Integration by Parts DOES solve it. (It's different than Wolfram's Solution, however..)
http://img445.imageshack.us/img445/3263/right0il.jpg |
That would work if it's 2xe^(-2x), but it looks like it's (2xe)^(-2x).
ps. dunno how blizzak got his answer--i tried that site and came up with no answer. (looks like a neat site though!) I also wonder if this is possible without numerical methods. |
There's no analytic integral for (2xe)^(-2x). If this is a class, I think the original poster used parentheses incorrectly. 2x e^(-2x) is much more reasonable.
|
You can't seperate an exponential from its exponent with parentheses..
Quote:
|
hmmm jinnkai we must follow different schools of notation. looks OK to me. ever hear the expression 'please excuse my dear aunt sally?'
|
I think we all just ought to wait until the question is restated in a different way by the original poster. Clear it up for us...
|
Ack, REALLY sorry! It was my fault the parenthesis are used incorrectly. I should have just left them off completely.
2xe^-x^2 Again, my apologies :( |
Using substitution I have the integral of:
e^-u du If I remember correctly, is that just e^-u = e^-x^2? |
Letting u=x^2 gives du=2x dx, and hence the integrand is now e^(-u) which integrates to -e^(-u) + C. Note the minus sign in front of exp.
|
gotcha! thanks :)
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:04 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project