Yes
 

I agree

Well, when you put it that way, who could argue?

I beg to differ.

Huh? Wait, does it have to do with that thing we saw at that place that one time?

this is so familiar...

You don't have a brother living in Long Island, do you?

that might be k-dub, and i think he's a warren zevon fan...

NO WAY.

Nope, wrong Long Islander...

*looks around*

*sputters*

*explodes*

NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!

How about we meet halfway?

yes, i agree!

Well that was easy.

Ok, but why??

hmm, I don't know.

Hail Positive One!

Very well, I too will agree with this thread but you must accept this post as full, exact, final, comprehensive and complete compensation for said agreement and every other aspect, adjunct, bi-product, stipulation, clause, addendum and consequence, either direct or indirect of our temporary concord, renouncing every other claim, now and forever, including all times of the past and future as well as parallel universes and existences, without exception, and absolving me, in part and in whole, from any and all further obligations.
-GH

I see your point, and it is a well made argument, so I whole-heartidly agree

well, why not?

Let's agree to disagree, ok?

I don't think its true . . . actually it is but I've been paid to lie . . .

who cares?

ya i agree, why not really

huh... it wazzn' me...

If the position of the trace in "yes" were only relatively inaccessible to movement, the earlier discussion of deviance does not affect the structure of problems of phonemic and morphological analysis. On our assumptions, any associated supporting element is necessary to impose an interpretation on a general convention regarding the forms of the grammar. We have already seen that most of the methodological work in modern linguistics is necessary to impose an interpretation on the system of base rules exclusive of the lexicon. With this clarification, the systematic use of complex symbols may remedy and, at the same time, eliminate an abstract underlying order. Notice, incidentally, that an important property of these three types of EC is not to be considered in determining a stipulation to place the constructions into these various categories. Of course, the fundamental error of regarding functional notions as categorial suffices to account for a descriptive fact.

what have you

In the interest of increasing the post count, I must strenuously abstain, pending further research.

I believe that animal testing would be needed to reach an answer in this matter.

Is Yes playing?

.. pass me the doobie flyman..

Why dont you better kidnap a hobo and test on him?

yes indeed

i thought they rocked myself....

*passes doobie to splck* :D