Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   Tilted Entertainment (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-entertainment/)
-   -   Where The Wild Things Are (https://thetfp.com/tfp/tilted-entertainment/149905-where-wild-things.html)

m0rpheus 07-30-2009 04:59 PM

Where The Wild Things Are
 
http://wherethewildthingsare.warnerb...er_1-large.jpg

Comes out on my birthday. Really Warner Bros. couldn't have given me a better present, I loved Where The Wild Things are as a kid and the trailer looks amazing.


I really really hope they get this right.

Punk.of.Ages 07-30-2009 05:06 PM

I've been looking forward to this for a while.

I'm quite excited!

wooÐs 07-30-2009 05:17 PM

Oh I didn't know about this! I must have read that book 5 x's a day as a kid. I'm all over the movie now. Looks very cool :).

cellophanedeity 07-30-2009 06:26 PM

And Karen O is doing the soundtrack! <3

I can't wait. The effects look brilliant.

Derwood 07-30-2009 06:43 PM

How do you make a full length movie out of a 20 page book that has like 50 words in it?

ratbastid 07-30-2009 07:01 PM

Well, it's "inspired by" the book. There's obviously a whole lot of stuff even just in the trailer that had no direct source in the book.

Baraka_Guru 07-30-2009 07:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Derwood (Post 2679290)
How do you make a full length movie out of a 20 page book that has like 50 words in it?

Good question.

So is this one: How do you make a 450,000 word novel fit into even 3 feature-length films (The Lord of the Rings)?

[The average American can read as many as 300 words per minute. That would mean the average American reading The Lord of the Rings would take at least 25 hours. Now imagine having to speak or act it aloud dramatically. :)]

How is this related?

Well, the point I'm making is that creating a film vs. creating even a picture book are two entirely different processes. You can't "make a book into a film" so much as "make a film out of a book."

I agree with you, though. There isn't much source material, so there will be much to be created for a film.

I'm more concerned about the special effects. I'm worried about losing my suspension of disbelief: "Dude, they're just guys in suits."

Fremen 07-30-2009 09:10 PM

I don't remember reading the book.

Would it be interesting to an adult?

FuglyStick 07-30-2009 09:28 PM

I will be in the minority, but I'm not really all that excited for this film.

achillesheel 07-31-2009 02:03 AM

As soon as I saw the trailer for this (I think it was when I saw "Away We Go") so much nostalgia came over me.

I'm so excited for this movie!

PonyPotato 07-31-2009 02:31 AM

I saw the trailer for this when I saw Harry Potter.

And yes, I want to see it. :)

Derwood 07-31-2009 07:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Fremen (Post 2679344)
I don't remember reading the book.

Would it be interesting to an adult?

next time you're at the library/book store, just grab it off the shelf and read it. It'll take you 2 minutes.

genuinegirly 07-31-2009 07:30 AM

Saw the trailer for it when we saw Harry Potter. I am excited for it - also excited about Cloudy with a Chance of Meetballs - did anyone else love that book as a kid?

Lasereth 07-31-2009 07:55 AM

I think I'm one of the few people that won't be conned into seeing this crap just because of the Nostalgia factor. The trailer looks boring and I'm not interested in it at all, and yes, I read and liked the book as a kid. Nostalgia != interest for me. It's gotta be more than that.

Redlemon 07-31-2009 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by genuinegirly (Post 2679491)
Saw the trailer for it when we saw Harry Potter. I am excited for it - also excited about Cloudy with a Chance of Meetballs - did anyone else love that book as a kid?

I didn't read Meatballs until I had a son; but, I LOVED it, and loved the preview. Wild Things, good book, but the preview, not so much.

mrklixx 07-31-2009 03:16 PM

Another beloved childhood book to movie that might be worth watching :


CinnamonGirl 08-15-2009 10:21 PM

Part of me is thinking, "yes! Let the wild rumpus begin!" The other part is saying, "damn it. Don't screw up a favorite childhood memory."

PulpMind 08-16-2009 03:26 AM

First off... if you didn't like the book, no one cares if you don't like the preview/movie. Go find your soul in some other story.

Meanwhile. For those who did love the book...
Here's some grand info - the author of Where the Wild Things Are, Maurice Sendak, worked closely with Spike Joneze on developing this movie and, in fact, gives a glowing seal of approval on this movie that is a creature all its own from the book.
Check it out in his own words: Apple - Movie Trailers - Where the Wild Things Are (click on "exclusive featurette").

I am super excited for the movie. An hour+ is a long time to fill, but there's lots of subtext in that book that didn't need to be explicitly stated but is simply understood by all children. I imagine lots of this will be manifested in the movie and make great filler aka character & plot development.

guy44 08-16-2009 07:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cellophanedeity (Post 2679281)
And Karen O is doing the soundtrack!

For real? Wow, now I'm even more excited than before to see it. This hasn't been a bad year for movies; Funny People and Drag Me To Hell were good, I'm looking forward to District 9 tonight, and now WTWTA looks to be even better than I thought...

PulpMind 08-16-2009 02:51 PM

I can't stop thinking about this movie!
Karen O is a good musical choice.
And finding this collab between her and Spike Jonze makes me really excited and not at all surprised they're doing WTWTA!

Though, when watching the first preview that came out, however cheesily spine tingling appropriate the music is, I couldn't help but think about how perfect Sigur Ros would be for this movie too. I mean, their music videos are so similar already!
The music of Gobbledigook came to mind immediately (maybe start the song halfway through if you want to watch with the WTWTA trailer hah!)

Bear Cub 08-16-2009 03:06 PM

Personally, I'm not a fan of the casting of Max. He doesn't have that snarky, troublemaking look to him that the book's character did.


Even still, I'm really looking forward to the movie.

m0rpheus 10-10-2009 09:23 PM

One week to go!

Jetée 10-10-2009 09:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lasereth
I think I'm one of the few people that won't be conned into seeing this crap just because of the Nostalgia factor. The trailer looks boring and I'm not interested in it at all, and yes, I read and liked the book as a kid. Nostalgia != interest for me. It's gotta be more than that.

Not to bluntly say I'm in the same boat, but to preface: I don't get hyped up for feature films or movies, never have and I still am very indifferent to what the media endorses to me; I know I'm in an even lower minority than those that don't care for this one movie, but I got to say, I don't care for a film until I sit through the entire thing and re-evaluate it thereafter, deciding later if it was a worthwhile endeavor or just a lazy waste of my computing intellect into a hinged plotline. I just don't feed the machine.

That said, even without owning a television, I have heard entirely too much advertisements for this film. It's absurd. I thought it would have premiered last week considering the sheer volume of commercials I've seen and heard offhand, but now, it's still not out? After all this time.. alright. People are excited, I understand. Word's got to get out. Minor annoyance I can avoid.

Also, not to be the resident 'debbie-downer', but the single most grating thing I have a problem with is that in the same repetitive commercial they keep cycling day and night, why does the kid propose a contest of 'imaginary warfare' amongst the beasts he encounters? That just kills the piece of mind that the wild things universe was a docile place of monsters, and because of the arrival of one small boy who has been fostered to enjoy cowboys and GI Joe, he turns the place where the wild things are into a consummate pandemonium of grotesque cannibals.

I don't think it'll be a bad film, though, I'm just making all sorts of leaps because I don't like the kid, especially when he talks.

Jetée 10-16-2009 01:13 PM

Here's the review(s), for those thinking of watching it this(?) weekend.

Weekend Movie Roundup - 10/16/09

filtherton 10-16-2009 05:27 PM

I saw it this afternoon. I thought it was pretty good, it captured the ups and downs of being a little boy nicely.

highthief 10-17-2009 03:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by FuglyStick (Post 2679348)
I will be in the minority, but I'm not really all that excited for this film.

I think it's one of those books parents like more than the kids do.

Personally, I got nada out of it.

Poppinjay 10-17-2009 03:51 AM

For the record, the book is ten sentences long. I loved it as a kid. I don't think my parents ever read it.

The movie is an entirely different animal (NPI). I think it sounds good, the AV Club gave it a good rating, and they're tougher than most.

The one thing that kind of annoys me is that Dave Eggers, who was the scriptwriter has turned around the story into a mid youth novel. Which immediately found a publisher because he owns a publishing company. So essentially it's self published - which I think is really bad form for an author. And the book has been panned so far.

The guy writes one successful book and thinks he can ape Sendak.

Manic_Skafe 10-17-2009 06:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poppinjay (Post 2717866)
The guy writes one successful book and thinks he can ape Sendak.

I really don't care to consider what constitutes success in the book world these days but I've been a Dave Eggers fan for quite some time and while I haven't (and probably won't ever) read his Wild Things adaptation, he's rather talented.

With that said, I caught a late thursday/early friday midnight showing and I thought it was pretty good. Nothing particularly groundbreaking. Nothing that'll stick to you unless you were into the book as a child but there was plenty of visual interest and I found that in almost every way that the movie could have been made better, would have taken it further away from the source material.

A pretty successful adaptation considering how poorly the original lends itself to the format. Probably would've been better as a short but all in all, it was enjoyable.

Poppinjay 10-17-2009 08:02 AM

I don't disagree he's talented. I loved his effort on MIGHT magazine. It's just that he's reached a point where he's into his own fandom.

Strange Famous 10-17-2009 09:41 AM

I cant wait for this to come out in the UK

One of the favourite books of my childhood.

Frosstbyte 10-17-2009 12:12 PM

Saw this last night with my wife. It was...interesting. We agreed that this movie is basically for those of us who are now adults (or at least teenagers) who read the book as a kid or had the book read to them as a kid. It's not horribly scary, but I feel like the movie is kind of out of reach for most kids of age for the book.

I'd give it a 6 or 7 out of ten. It's pretty visually incredible, but the plot (as might be expected) is...odd...at best. Spoiler: I like my wife's explanation of all the wild things representing aspects of his personalities and externalizations of some of his wants, desires and fears. The movie is very much a close look into the mind of a child, and is worth seeing for that and for nostalgia, but don't expect something revolutionary.

mrklixx 10-17-2009 06:00 PM

I was bored out of my skull.

Yes I read/liked the book as a small child. But any nostalgia factor was completely satiated by the previews alone, because the full movie didn't bring anything extra to the table.

And instead of a boy with an over-active imagination, max came off as an uber-needy little pussy.

Oh well, yet another flic that I totally disagree with the general consensus on.

m0rpheus 10-18-2009 11:35 AM

Went to see it on Friday, and I really enjoyed it. I thought it was good, not great but definetly good.

FuglyStick 10-18-2009 12:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poppinjay (Post 2717919)
I don't disagree he's talented. I loved his effort on MIGHT magazine. It's just that he's reached a point where he's into his own fandom.

I tend to agree with this. Eggers is very talented; unfortunately, he buys into his own reputation too readily.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:54 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360