Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   The War on Christmas (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/98702-war-christmas.html)

Bill O'Rights 12-13-2005 06:43 AM

The War on Christmas
 
Quote:

THE WASHINGTON POST

WASHINGTON - What's missing from the White House Christmas card? Christmas.This month, as in every December since he took office, President Bush sent out cards with a generic end-of-the-year message, wishing 1.4 million of his close friends and supporters a happy "holiday season."

Many people are thrilled to get a White House Christmas card, no matter what the greeting inside. But some conservative Christians are reacting as if Bush had stuck coal in their stockings.

Religious conservatives are miffed because they have been pressuring stores to advertise Christmas sales rather than "holiday specials" and urging schools to let students out for Christmas vacation rather than for "winter break." They celebrated when House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., insisted that the sparkling spectacle on the Capitol lawn should be called the Capitol Christmas tree, not a holiday spruce.

Then along comes a generic season's greeting from the White House, paid for by the Republican National Committee. The cover art is also secular, if not humanist: It shows the presidential pets - two dogs and a cat - frolicking on a snowy White House lawn.

"This clearly demonstrates that the Bush administration has suffered a loss of will and that they have capitulated to the worst elements in our culture," said William Donohue, president of the Catholic League for Religious and Civil Rights.

Bush "claims to be a born-again, evangelical Christian. But he sure doesn't act like one," said Joseph Farah, editor of the conservative Web site WorldNetDaily.com. "I threw out my White House card as soon as I got it."

Susan Whitson, Laura Bush's press secretary, defended the first family. "Certainly President and Mrs. Bush, because of their faith, celebrate Christmas," she said. "Their cards in recent years have included best wishes for a holiday season, rather than Christmas wishes, because they are sent to people of all faiths."

That is the same rationale offered by major retailers for generic holiday catalogs, and it is accepted by groups such as the National Council of Churches.

"I think it's more important to put Christ back into our war planning than into our Christmas cards," said the council's general secretary, the Rev. Bob Edgar, a former Democratic congressman.

But the White House's explanation does not satisfy groups that believe there is, in the words of the Heritage Foundation, a "war on Christmas" involving an "ever-stronger push toward a neutered holiday season so that non-Christians won't be even the slightest bit offended."

One of the generals on the pro-Christmas side is Tim Wildmon, president of the American Family Association in Tupelo, Miss.

"Sometimes it's hard to tell whether this is sinister - it's the purging of Christ from Christmas - or whether it's just political correctness run amok," he said. "I think in the case of the White House, it's just political correctness."

Wildmon does not give retailers the same benefit of the doubt. This year he has called for a consumer boycott of Target stores because the chain issued a holiday advertising circular that did not mention Christmas. Last year he aimed a similar boycott at Macy's Inc., which averted a repeat this December by proclaiming "Merry Christmas" in its advertising and in-store displays.

"It bothers me that the White House card leaves off any reference to Jesus, while we've got Ramadan celebrations in the White House," Wildmon said. "What's going on there?"

At the Catholic League, Donohue had just announced a boycott of the Lands' End catalog when he received his White House holiday card. True, he said, the Bushes included a verse from Psalm 28, but Psalms are in the Old Testament and do not mention Jesus' birth.

"They'd better address this, because they're no better than the retailers who have lost the will to say 'Merry Christmas,'" he said.

Donohue said that Wal-Mart, facing a threatened boycott, added a Christmas page to its Web site and fired a customer relations employee who wrote a letter linking Christmas to "Siberian shamanism." He was not mollified by a letter from Lands' End saying it "adopted the 'holiday' terminology as a way to comply with one of the basic freedoms granted to all Americans: freedom of religion."
What is so bad about saying "Happy Holidays"? I've used that phrase for years, and I'm certainly no soldier in the "War on Christmas". Let's face it, not everyone is Christian. And there are numerous holidays, celebrated by other religions, that coincide with this time of the year. Is it that big of a deal? I, for one, don't think so. But, I tend to not make such a big thing out of situations such as a simple "Happy Holidays". Are people really getting that thin skinned? Do some honestly feel that threatened by it, or are they just out for attention?

Charlatan 12-13-2005 06:53 AM

This is such a non-issue. What is it? Does Bill O'Reilly have nothing better to rail against this week?

Seriously. We in North America live in multicultural societies. At one point we were nations made up of predominantly one religion, Christianity (and it's various branches). This is no longer the case. Many other cultures and religions are part of the make up of our nations. Why wouldn't we make the effort to be more inclusive rather than the opposite?

Happy Holidays is an inclusive statement. It doesn't exclude Christmas or any other celebration. It embraces all at the expense of none.

Get over it already and pass the fricken egg nog.

Cynthetiq 12-13-2005 07:14 AM

Everyone that I've encountered in the whole world knows that Dec is Christmas, some know that Hannakuh comes too, from Singapore to Iceland.

In other countries that have dominating religions, everyone SHARES in the days and greets each other accordingly. No erasing the word to make someone else feel better since it's not that big of a deal anyways to most.

Depalvi in India is celebrated in Singapore but the Buddhists don't celebrate it, but the at least acknowledge their fellow countrymen celebrate it.

albania 12-13-2005 07:15 AM

Who cares anyway, Christmas is a made up holiday, it was originally a roman one to celebrate their god, the tree wasn't added until much later by Germans. And it actually being the birth of Jesus is highly speculative. Although i suppose it's better then just picking a day at random, but what I’m saying is if you're that into Christmas, you might want to look into its original meaning, less to do with Jesus more to do with pagans. So why care so much about a made up holiday, does it truly symbolize what people say it does, i don't think so. Almost everyone i know sees Christmas as the time of year you wait in line and receive/give craptacular gifts. So saying happy holidays not necessary from a secular standpoint if you can afford it why not say merry Christmas and a happy new year, too many words for some. Personally i couldn't care less. So I don’t think it’s a war on Christmas, it’s just a preference.

Ustwo 12-13-2005 07:26 AM

I think its gotten silly with the happy holidays. A better question is, is it offensive to wish someone a merry Chirstmas?

My wife does the Christmas card thing, and she got a box of 'happy holiday' cards for the non-Christian types, mostly Jewish. I told her to get some hanukkah cards instead.

So while I don't see saying happy holidays as a war on Christmas, I do see it as a cop out to the fear of being non-PC.

kutulu 12-13-2005 07:32 AM

The "War on Christmas" is funny for about a few days each year. It's just a bunch of egotistical christians that want everyone to conform to their will.

ratbastid 12-13-2005 07:43 AM

Both sides of this argument are patently ridiculous. This is a total non-issue. I can only speculate at the motives of the people who are making such a fuss about it.

I have many friends who are observant jews. To a one, when wished a merry Christmas, will smile and say, "Thanks!". Or maybe, "I don't celebrate Christmas, but thanks! Merry Christmas to you!" Guess what? Non-christians actually don't get offended when you make assumptions about their faith. They're used to it. Most of my jewish friends LOVE Christmas, and are happy to be taking part in our celebration of it. One of them was really excited to be able to come decorate our tree with us yesterday.

On the other hand, what the hell does it hurt to have a little sensitivity? It's NICE to be respectful of other people and their faith. Christmas is all ABOUT being nice to people (cf. Eben. Scrooge, et al). Being wished "Happy Holidays" doesn't detract from my Christmas observance in the slightest. Are Christians really so offended to be reminded that there are non-Christians in the world at this, their most holy shopping season?

What's REALLY an attack against Christmas is those damn card-carying atheists who are celebrating an evil sham of American Right-Wing Norman Rockwell Christmas. Look! ratbastid doesn't even believe in Christ! And he's got a Christmas tree up! And LOOK!! Stockings! Hung by the chimney with care! HEATHEN! BUUUURRRN!!!!

Charlatan 12-13-2005 07:45 AM

Quote:

What's REALLY an attack against Christmas is those damn card-carying atheists who are celebrating an evil sham of American Right-Wing Norman Rockwell Christmas. Look! ratbastid doesn't even believe in Christ! And he's got a Christmas tree up! And LOOK!! Stockings! Hung by the chimney with care! HEATHEN! BUUUURRRN!!!!
Guilty as charged... :lol:

maleficent 12-13-2005 07:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratbastid
Christmas is all ABOUT being nice to people

since when -- christmas is all about gimme gimme gimme gimme.. and being as rude as possible to people when out on the streets and in the malls...

bah humbug i say...

Cynthetiq 12-13-2005 07:53 AM

Quote:

O, HOLY FRIGHT
By MARLENE NAANES and ANDY GELLER

EXCLUSIVE
LINK
Ho, ho . . . no!!!!!
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v1...s121305003.jpg
Slay bells are ringing outside a $3 million brownstone on East 18th Street in Manhattan, where, rather than yourtypical jolly St. Nick, a skinny, bloody-bearded Santa holds a knife in his left hand and the severed head of a doll - blood gushing from its eye sockets - in the other.

This 'tis-the-season-to be-creepy display - which has drawn no small amount of community ire - can be found in thefront yard of Joel Krupnik, 58, and his wife, Mildred Castellanos, 43, who said they are protesting the commercialization of the Yule season.

In another touch of Christmas jeer, the Santa dummy is standing behind a tree whose bare branches are adorned with beheaded Barbie dolls.

"Christmas has religious origins. It's in the Bible. Santa is not in the Bible. He's not a religious symbol. Santa Claus has become a piece of Americana," Krupnik explained yesterday.

Krupnik, who dabbles in real estate, said if anyone was offended, they could simply cross the street. Some children have done just that.

Other people have called the cops - only to be told there was nothing they could do. And one woman chased Castellanos down the block, screaming epithets at her.

Outside the home - also decorated with gargoyles, lizards and dragons - there were many who accused the couple of dreaming of a fright Christmas.

"This is like a nightmare before Christmas. These people are possessed," fumed Laure Levinson, 50. "I thought it was very gory and bloody. Christmas is not supposed to be gory," said Jimmy Crevier, 9, who was passing by."It's bad," agreed Sean Conlon, 5. "Santa's face and hair are red - Santa shouldn't look like that."

His brother, Ryan, 9, chimed in, "Santa makes toys and he lives in the North Pole. He doesn't have a haunted house like that."

"It's weird," said Javin Bose, 7, who lives next door.

The Krupniks, who have three children and have owned their home for 16 years, are nonpracticing Jews who don't celebrate any holidays, but like putting up decorations for them.

"We definitely have holiday spirit," insisted daughter Darla, 16.

The couple introduced their kids to horror films at an early age - and Darla and her brothers, Ariel, 18, and Charleston, 20, love them.

In fact, Darla came up with the idea for the bloody Santa - basing it on the movie, "Silent Night, Deadly Night," inwhich a teenager goes on a murderous rampage dressed as Santa.

The beheaded dolls came from Castellanos, who has a collection.
at least it's a creative stand....

Charlatan 12-13-2005 07:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maleficent
since when -- christmas is all about gimme gimme gimme gimme.. and being as rude as possible to people when out on the streets and in the malls...

bah humbug i say...

That's not what it's about... that's what it has BECOME.

There is a difference.

Siege 12-13-2005 07:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratbastid
Christmas is all ABOUT being nice to people

In theory anyway

Quote:

Originally Posted by maleficent
christmas is all about gimme gimme gimme gimme.. and being as rude as possible to people when out on the streets and in the malls...

sounds about right :)

jwoody 12-13-2005 07:58 AM

I call it Xmas... or Crimbo.

If I was to wish a Buddhist a 'Merry Crimbo', then I'm just telling him that:

I had a productive summer, I've survived the worst of the winter and to celebrate I'm going to eat and drink heavily for several consecutive days and I wish for that person to have the means and the time to do the same.

How could anyone possibly be offended by that?



#edit#

P.S. Saying 'Happy Holidays' most definitely constitutes a war on Christmas.

Charlatan 12-13-2005 08:01 AM

The folks at Landover Baptist Church appear to agree with Krupnik and Castellanos. They believe Santa is Satan. Get behind me Santa!

LINK

Quote:

The Devil Is In Your Chimney!
Is Santa Claus, Satan? (A Special Report Concerning the Origin of Santa Claus)

Freehold, Iowa - Satan's evil plan has created jobs for hundreds of thousands of old lecherous pedophiles throughout this Godly country every December. These filthy homeless hobos just lay on their urine-stained cardboard beds 11 months out of the year, dreaming of Christmas when they can drunkenly traipse into the warmth of departments stores and have innocent little Christian children sit on their vermin-infested laps. Unwary parents happily snap pictures while Satan's obesely wheezing drunks ask their children whether they've been "bad" and whisper lewd suggestions in their angelic little ears with their filthy booze-breath and cigarette-discolored lips. How many unsuspecting tots have suffered a quick grope before Satan's little helper moves on to the next hopeful child in line?
http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news1299/santypic.gif
People think that Halloween is the time of year that Satan dresses up, but this is just flat-out wrong. See? The Devil will always try to fool you! Halloween is when Satan delights in watching humans dress in ways that will ensure them entry into the Devil's realm. But it is Christmas time that the Devil saves for himself! It is then when he puts on his most devious costume! And it takes no Sherlock Holmes to see that the Devil's annual disguise is none other than Santa! He even wears his favorite color -- demon red. Even his last name, "Claus," is Olde English for "hoof-claws." Lucifer may be the wiliest of all the deceitful demons that ever drew breath of fire in Hell, but he was pretty sloppy when he decided to try to spoil our Savior's birthday with this disguise. His big devil ego got the better of him when he decided to name his Christmas Anti-Christ after himself. He just moved around the letters in the name, "Satan," into a sonogram and got "Santa." Well, this is to put Prince of Darkness on notice: We are on to you Satan! And we unmask you and heartily rebuke you! Get thee hence from our Christ's birthday party!
http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news1299/santyclaus.gif
Satan once was God's favorite angel. But he tried a heavenly coup and God should have by all rights killed him right then and there. But God, being all that is good, gave him his very own place to rule and called it Hell. And even though God gave Satan free reign to tempt as many people as he wanted (even Christ Himself!) and lots of fabulous stuff to tempt them with (like eternal youth and Lincoln Continentals), Satan was still not satisfied. It made him jealous that Americans have made Christmas the most important retail event of the year, far overshadowing Satan's own holiday, Halloween. So Satan has tried to undermine Christmas by making Santa even more popular than Jesus!

You don't think so? Even the law of the land forbids a baby Jesus in the town square, but who is there instead? You guessed it! Santa! Every time a so-called Christian child asks Santa for something, he is praying to Satan. With each request fulfilled, parents are unwittingly making a pact with the Devil. They may as well be writing in blood, "Satan please distract our children from Jesus with all these shiny toys!" But you know what? When your little boys and girls have grown up and no longer believe that Santa is real, they will find out just how real Satan is when he comes to collect their souls in exchange for all those presents! And God will turn a deaf ear to their pathetic wails of desperation. God will say, "You were more interested in that fat demon who was giving you presents than my Son who was giving you salvation, so you can all rot in Hell for all I care."
http://www.landoverbaptist.org/news1299/santa4.gif
So talk to your children before it is too late! Tell them that Santa is no kindly old man; he is an evil demon. And next time your family sees some propped up gin-soaked vagrant in a Mall wearing a red suit with white furry cuffs, set a good example and witness for the other deluded people waiting in line. Loudly, rebuke him! Announce to all the children in the store "Not only is Santa a lie, he will ravage you sexually, drink your blood and drag your palpating carcasses down to Hell with him!" It is only through setting a good example that we can put the Christ back in Christmas.


maleficent 12-13-2005 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jwoody

How could anyone possibly be offended by that?

you'd be amazed at what people CHOOSE to be offended by... :)

I'm still bah humbugging ... :)

kutulu 12-13-2005 08:01 AM

Shit like this is what happens when parties let their fringe groups flap their lips too much. I'm so sick of extremists on both sides dominating debate. I'm just as sick of liberals who get their panties in a bunch over hearing the word Christmas as I am of conservatives that get all offended by the word Holidays.

Why can't we just round up those people on both sides, drop them off on a remote island with a shitload of weapons and let them fight it out? Once the victors in 'War on Christmas' have been decided we can nuke the island and forget about them once and for all. Yeah, you won but you're still dead!!!

Ustwo 12-13-2005 08:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratbastid
What's REALLY an attack against Christmas is those damn card-carying atheists who are celebrating an evil sham of American Right-Wing Norman Rockwell Christmas. Look! ratbastid doesn't even believe in Christ! And he's got a Christmas tree up! And LOOK!! Stockings! Hung by the chimney with care! HEATHEN! BUUUURRRN!!!!

At least you are consistant ratbastid :thumbsup:

Being an atheist I have a tree up but only to celebrate my pagan heritage.

All hail Dagda!

kutulu 12-13-2005 08:03 AM

you do know that Landover Baptist Church is a parody, right?

Charlatan 12-13-2005 08:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kutulu
Why can't we just round up those people on both sides, drop them off on a remote island with a shitload of weapons and let them fight it out? Once the victors in 'War on Christmas' have been decided we can nuke the island and forget about them once and for all. Yeah, you won but you're still dead!!!

Battle Royale... the Christmas sequel!

The reason why this will never happen is that it is these fringe elements that fill the ballot boxes.

kutulu 12-13-2005 08:07 AM

Well the Republicans are about to learn that you can't pander to extremists during the election year and then forget about them for the rest of the term. Democrats need to take note on this too.

Ustwo 12-13-2005 08:09 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlatan
The folks at Landover Baptist Church appear to agree with Krupnik and Castellanos. They believe Santa is Satan. Get behind me Santa!

The Landover Baptist Church is the only clear thinking religious organization in America.

Charlatan 12-13-2005 08:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kutulu
you do know that Landover Baptist Church is a parody, right?

Really? You're kidding!


/end sarcasm. :lol:

raeanna74 12-13-2005 08:37 AM

I was raised conservative, protestant, Christian. There were times that we had no tree, exchanged no gifts, and we NEVER pretended, or acknowledged Satan, I mean Santa, except with distain. We infact did not even wrap gifts with paper that had images of Santa on them.

As an adult, and parent, I took my daughter to see Santa. I will take my daughter to the Christmas program at church. There are many different religions and cultures who celebrate this time of year for many good reasons and I see no reason to throw out the whole celebration of a certain culture or religion simply because I don't agree with all of it.

I normally say Merry Christmas because that is what I grew up with and am most comfortable with. Even though Christ-Mass was considered a 'pagan' celebration by my religious peers. Protestants do not hold mass of any sort. But I celebrated it as a Christ centered holiday so called it by the most common name. I am not offended by someone saying Happy Holidays because it does acknowledge other celebrations as well and I am not going to take someone else's celebration from them simply because I don't PERSONALLY celebrate it.

The debate about having a Christmas tree here, I found interesting. A Christmas tree is not a purely 'Christian' image used in Christmas celebration. Christmas (as well as Halloween) has elements of many other religions. The Catholic church merged a few 'pagan' traditions into it's celebrations in hopes of making the pagans more comfortable with worshiping with the Catholic church.
Growing up my parents (in particular my mother) had a problem with putting up a tree of any kind and in the end allowed us to put one up so long as we did not put ANY gold or silver decorations on the tree. She based her belief on the reference in Jeremiah 10:2-5 where it refers to 'heathen' putting up a tree and worshiping it. "For the customs of the people are vain: for one cutteth a tree out of the forest, the work of the hands of the workman, with the axe. They deck it with silver and with gold; theyfasten it with nails and with hammers, that it move not." So in some areas of the protestant faith, people believe that a Christmas tree is an idol and image that us pagans 'worship'. I ask you - how many of you have bowed down to your Christmas tree lately or prayed to it??

Happy Holidays? - go ahead and say it but don't you dare complain if I still say "Merry Christmas".

Carno 12-13-2005 08:40 AM

I really don't give a crap. When I see arguments like these it really just reminds me how stupid and petty people are.

WHY DOES ANYONE CARE?

Coppertop 12-13-2005 08:46 AM

No, and it's pretty fucking retarded to say so.

Happy Saturnalia.

roachboy 12-13-2005 08:46 AM

yet another faux news non issue.
unlike most other such, this one is funny...the premise is an imperial daydream of universal christianity.....wall to wall, all the same....it should not be---- no-one who is not xtian and who finds themselves nevertheless participant in an xtian annual cycle should have the audacity to write or exchange seasonal greetings....why this is obviously an affront to xtians everywhere--presenting them with the fact that not everyone is like them during the time of year when dreaming about an xtian world is most appealing.

this is an evident index of angst amongst the folk who run the right media apparatus--alienation of the far right xtian base---this sad, tedious meme would bypass all contact with reality (again) and provide the far right xtian base with a reason to feel solidarity with a wider political context during those brief moments of reflection that punctuate sustained retail experiences.
like when you are standing in a line at a cash register waiting to pay.
while you read the information on the box of a computer game the main objective of which is to kill as many arabs as possible, say.
channel that irritation into something useful.
in this way, you see fox news trying to help.
yay faux news.
yay bill o'reilly.

abaya 12-13-2005 08:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ratbastid
What's REALLY an attack against Christmas is those damn card-carying atheists who are celebrating an evil sham of American Right-Wing Norman Rockwell Christmas. Look! ratbastid doesn't even believe in Christ! And he's got a Christmas tree up! And LOOK!! Stockings! Hung by the chimney with care! HEATHEN! BUUUURRRN!!!!

I love it. :lol: Carry on, heathen. :)

Eweser 12-13-2005 08:56 AM

It seems that people have started looking for anything to claim it offends them; "The War on Christmas" is just another one of these. I'm all for making sure that no one is offended, but it does seem to be getting ridiculous and petty.

Personally, I use "Merry Christmas" and "Happy Holidays". Sorry in advance if I do offend anyone. I really don't mean to.

ratbastid 12-13-2005 09:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
At least you are consistant ratbastid :thumbsup:

It is my hobgoblin.

Look, when O'Reilly is the main spewer of "war on christmas" rhetoric, you gotta admit there's a right-wing faction at work. It's a completely absurd thing, being used, I suspect, to opportunistically rile up the religious conservative base. The religious support of the conservative agenda has been slipping lately, and nothing works on that demographic quite like righteous indignation.

That's all I'm gonna say about that, because this thread is in General, not Politics.

Sultana 12-13-2005 09:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by raeanna74
I was raised conservative, protestant, Christian. There were times that we had no tree, exchanged no gifts, and we NEVER pretended, or acknowledged Satan, I mean Santa, except with distain. We infact did not even wrap gifts with paper that had images of Santa on them.

...Happy Holidays? - go ahead and say it but don't you dare complain if I still say "Merry Christmas".

Huh. I was raised in a very similar environment (mostly Conservative Southern Baptist). In the same way I never knew from one year to the next how we were going to be allowed to do anything from trees to santa to whatever. OK, Santa was never any part of our holiday, but if Mom found Santa wrapping paper on sale, we'd use that (on the premise that it'd be ripped up and destroyed anyways...oye). Same with Easter.

I don't worry about that stuff anymore at all. And I'll say just about any crazy thing, including Happy Holidays and Merry Christmas--whatever happens to pop out of my irreverent, sacreligious mind at that moment.

By the way raeanna74, I'm always interested in your point of view, seeing how similar our upbringing seems to have been, and the things you do/way you live now. :D

raveneye 12-13-2005 09:43 AM

To any kid (from 1 to 92), the phrase "Merry Christmas" has a whiff of thrill and magic to it that no other phrase in the English language can equal.

"Happy Holidays" is a lukewarm glass of water; "Happy Hannukah" or Kwanzaa don't do much for me either.

But Bill O'Reilly's war on Christmas? It's so laughable that my first reaction was: this can't be real, this is some sort of a parody?

If the Onion were to try to think up a parody of Bill whose purpose was to point out how ludicrous, petty, and obsessed he is, it's really hard to think of a better one than this.

warrrreagl 12-13-2005 09:55 AM

In my hometown, the local university lit up their "Holiday Tree" this year just like they have done every year for the past several years (BIG ceremony with singing and speeches and hot chocolate, etc.). And they've always called it a "Holiday Tree." However, this year they suddenly made it onto the hit list of the Christmas Soldiers and boycotts were threatened, letters written, television reports filed, and donations pulled back. Next year, they'll have a Christmas Tree, even though nobody really cared (or even noticed) until this year that it was a "Holiday Tree."

Weird.

Now, on the flip side of that, I'm disappointed in businesses that are afraid of the word "Christmas" and they've trained and threatened all their employees to avoid the word at all costs.

It's the same mistake as above, just on a different side of the river.

If a Jewish person made a remark about lighting a menorah, would you jump up his ass and tell him it's a "Holiday Candlestick Holder?" Therefore, if the non-Christians would lighten up a little bit, then the Christian weirdos wouldn't have anything to protest and boycott (in theory). Let Christians have Christmas, let Jews have Hannukah, let Africans have Kwanzaa, and let Muslims have Eid El Fitr.

People always get into trouble when they start trying to ban things that belong to other folks. But then again, some people live for that shit.

trickyy 12-13-2005 10:06 AM

yes, this issue is so unimportant it's unbelievable. i like holidays (general term) but i don't do a lot of well-wishing tied to specific days. unless it's "happy birthday."

i know people very concerned with whether target employees say MC or HH
HH is somewhat of a product of the PC culture, but it is also a fast way to say happy thanksgiving, merry christmas, happy new year...

i was wondering if "holidays" could be watered down some more
holy should not be acceptible with everyone. is anyone leading a war on holidays? bring on wintervale. it's an idea for next year, maybe.

i'd say christmas is safe. then again, the ACLU could sue to have the day stripped of it's status as a national holiday. that would be a great PR move on their part. meanwhile, we are free to run around buying stuff while fighting over semantics in the trenches of walmart entrances everywhere.

uncle phil 12-13-2005 10:18 AM

merry christmas, everybody...and happy new year, too...

vermin 12-13-2005 10:20 AM

Quote:

from the landover baptist church thing:
"...their vermin-infested laps."
I plead the fifth. :)

You don't have to be a christian to have a happy Dec. 25th. "War" seems a little extreme.

Poppinjay 12-13-2005 10:31 AM

The war on Christmas is a manufactured controversy that gives pundit gasbags something to talk about.

It started in earnest when O'Reilly, a Fox talk show host had on a guest, John Gibson, who wrote the book, "The War On Christmas: How the Liberal Plot to Ban the Sacred Christian Holiday Is Worse Than You Thought".

John Gibson is a Fox news host. Gee, isn't that a coincidence? So, TV and radio gasbags all o're the land are screaming about this topic. I helped produce a talk show on a day this was the topic. When a caller asked why we were talking about it, the host said, "uh, it's one of those things they say talk radio is talking about." Which pretty much puts it in a nutshell.

Have a happy nutsacking!-

maleficent 12-13-2005 10:33 AM

This seems to have been going on long before O'Reilly.. back when i was a wee one in my plaid skirt attending Most Blessed Sacrament.. the big push at Christmas came from the Knights of Columbus.. and that was the Keep Christ in Christmas campaign.. This was to counteract the people shortening Christmas to Xmas... or even happy holidays...

Poppinjay 12-13-2005 10:37 AM

I think that was really a whole other thing than this latest. People have been saying, "keep the Christ in Christmas" for decades. Some who are less than aware what the X in Xmas means (the Greek X, "chi" was a symbol for Christ) also railed against that for a while, but since then the symbol has become fairly common knowledge.

Charlatan 12-13-2005 10:38 AM

Yes, Mal is right, this has been a topic prior to O'Reilly. I can remember rumblings about it back when I was a kid; usually about the use of Xmas.

Mostly it was an effort to remember the Christ in Christmas which is always a good reminder.

The recent drivel from O'Reilly is just another example of him trying to create mountains out of molehills. If he can just stir up enough mud something will stick.

flstf 12-13-2005 11:41 AM

"Happy Holidays" (holy days) is being used instead of "Merry Christmas" in an effort to not offend anyone but we all know the reason for all the hoopla at this time of year is because of Christmas and has nothing to do with any other religion's holy days.

I see nothing wrong with wishing people Merry Hannakah , Happy Kwanza, etc.. but these celebrations have nothing to do with Christmas so why try and roll them all up together into a "Happy Holy Day" type greeting. Maybe we should all just celebrate winter and use "Season's Greetings".

I would suggest to the retailers that they continue to use "Merry Christmas" since Christmas is the reason for all the gift giving/buying at this time of year.

Mojo_PeiPei 12-13-2005 12:02 PM

I think the "war on christmas" might be a little over dramatic but there is something to it. So many double standards in the public realm, like the acknowledgement of holidays like Ramadan and Hannakah in schools, yet it is a violation of the "separation of church and state" if Christmas is mentioned. Sure flaunt the crescent moon, let's light the menorah, hey what's with that manger! You can't do that! Oh and you can't sing Christmas songs in school either, only secular ones. That is pretty lame. Again I don't see how the putting of a manger on government property, or at least acknowledging the fact that Christmas a federally recognized holiday, is about Jesus Christ. What is it with some people.

Here is a PC/parody of a famous "holiday" most of us should remember:
Quote:

'Twas the night before Solstice, and all through the land
the ACLU was watching to keep things in hand.
The children were nestled all snug in their beds,
while forces kept Christmas out of their heads.

When out on the lawn there arose such a clatter,
I sprang from my bed and heard desperate chatter.
Someone had seen my manger display,
And wailed very loudly - go away, go away.

How could I be so crass, so utterly wrong
So show the infant Jesus and sing him a song?

And then, in a twinkling, I heard on the roof
An ACLU lawyer, looking stern and aloof.
No manger! No caroling! he said with a snort,
And if you don't comply immediately, I'll take you to court!

He was chubby and plump, a right surly old elf,
And I laughed when I saw him in spite of myself.
He dallied no more, but went straight to his phone
Lamenting the manger, in a most pitiful moan.

But I in the spirit, said nothing unkind
Christmas is forgiveness whatever you find.
A wink of his eye and a twist of his head,
Soon gave me to know I had nothing to dread.

Christmas will survive, the folks will demand it,
Even if secular lawyers will not understand it.
Then I heard him exclaim, as he drove out of sight,
Happy Solstice to all, and to all a good night!

Mojo_PeiPei 12-13-2005 12:06 PM

Here's a pretty asinine interview that happened last year on the O' Reilly Factor, drives home what I was trying to say.

Quote:

BILL O'REILLY, HOST: In the Unresolved Problems segment tonight, the secular assault on Christmas continues all over the USA. Tomorrow night, we'll tell you about how the ACLU (search) is attacking Christmas in Colorado.

But tonight, the New York City school system is involved in a court case. Under current city policy, Jewish menorahs are allowed to be displayed for Hanukkah (search) and the Islamic star and crescent can be shown during Ramadan (search).

But the nativity scene (search) cannot be shown during the Christmas season. Now as you may know, Christmas is a federal holiday signed into law by President U.S. Grant (search). The day honors the philosophy of Jesus. With us now is Mark Green, former New York city public advocate who did run for mayor, maybe mayor some day here in the city.

All right, now look, the Thomas Moore Center (search) is suing the city. The city will not provide any spokespeople, including Mayor Bloomberg (search). They're all frightened to death, because they know they were on the wrong side of this issue.

MARK GREEN, FMR. NYC PUBLIC ADVOCATE: Glad to speak for Mayor Bloomberg in this one...

O'REILLY: All right. You got a menorah, you got the star and crescent, but you can't have a nativity scene on a federal holiday named Christmas. It's insane, right?

GREEN: The opposite of insane. They're not attacking Christianity, they're supporting the First Amendment. Bill, there's a time and a place for everything. And I happen to have friends who celebrate Christmas. What a holiday.

They have family dinners. The next morning under the tree, our presents. I don't remember that...

O'REILLY: All right.

GREEN: And so, if you're spending public money on public education, somebody has to draw a line, difficult as it is. So they decided -- they could be wrong -- let's have a...

O'REILLY: They could be wrong.

GREEN: ... let's have Christmas trees and Santas in schools because they're slightly religious but largely secular.

O'REILLY: Yes. Is it -- is it Santamas? Is it Christmas tree? What -- what's the name of the holiday, Mr. Green?

GREEN: Santa Goldberg.

O'REILLY: No. What's the name of holiday?

GREEN: Well...

O'REILLY: What's the name of the federal holiday, sir?

GREEN: Well, it's called Christmas.

O'REILLY: OK, thank you. That's where we want to start. And it's based upon the philosophy of Jesus Christ, correct? Am I wrong here? That's what the holiday celebrates, the birth of Jesus Christ.

GREEN: We should all celebrate all the holidays.

O'REILLY: No. Let's just walk through this. You just admitted the federal holiday was named Christmas. How could you not? It's based upon the birth of Jesus Christ, correct?

GREEN: Yes.

O'REILLY: So you cannot depict that birth, which a federal holiday is based on. That is insane, sir.

GREEN: Now would you consider it insane if you went to a public school that was 2 percent Jewish and 98 percent Christian and only Jewish symbols were shown, in effect proselytizing, you'd say, excuse me, wait a second. I don't want to be proselytized by another religion. And so there's a time and a place for everything, Bill.

O'REILLY: That's not what's happening here.

GREEN: Let me just finish. One second. One second.

O'REILLY: You have the Menorah...

GREEN: Adults...

O'REILLY: Whoa, whoa, whoa, whoa. You're going way off the point. You have a Menorah...

GREEN: Adults are different than children.

O'REILLY: No, no. You have a Menorah for Hanukkah.

GREEN: Right, right.

O'REILLY: I'm fine with it. You have a crescent and star, OK, for Ramadan. I'm fine with it.

GREEN: Right.

O'REILLY: You don't have the nativity scene which the Christmas holiday is based on and everybody gets off on the public school system. That is prejudiced against Christians, insane, and insulting to Christians, and every Christian should be outraged about it.

GREEN: Our country is 95 percent Christian.

O'REILLY: Yes.

GREEN: I was a city official, and I got a hundred thousand complaints over 10 years about all kinds of city services. Not one person said, you know, one of the biggest problems in New York is those Jews like Mayor Bloomberg and Joe Klein trying to trick 95 percent majority Christians into converting to Judaism. Bill, get a life. This is absolutely ludi -- I understand we have to have an interesting topic to talk about.

O'REILLY: They're going to lose this lawsuit.

GREEN: Well, one second. Would you agree that no -- nothing touching religious symbols should be -- so it should be equal. So...

O'REILLY: Look...

GREEN: One second. The...

O'REILLY: ... you don't have to believe -- no, no, no, no. No one second.

GREEN: Do you agree -- no Menorah, no nativity scene, no Christmas tree?

O'REILLY: If the federal holiday -- if the federal holiday is repealed, all right, then I'll say fine. It's the federal holiday of Christmas based on the birth of Christ. You can't show that birth. That's insane.

And you know what really bothers me about this?

GREEN: What, Bill?

O'REILLY: The Menorah is up. The crescent and star is up. And the nativity scene can be up because you can admire Jesus the philosopher without believing that he's God as millions of Americans do. It's insulting.

I'll give you the last word.

GREEN: Kids in school can pray. Kids in school can pray silently. They can pray any time they want. Except during classroom hours, they're supposed to learn history. You want to practice your religion, do it on your time in your own church, synagogue, or mosque.

O'REILLY: All right. Difference between a philosopher and a religious person.

GREEN: The ayatollahs of the Republican Party support your point of view...

O'REILLY: Oh, come on. He'll lose...

GREEN: ... and I support the Bill of Rights.

O'REILLY: All right. Mr. Green, thanks very much.

Grasshopper Green 12-13-2005 06:01 PM

It used to tickle me to no end to see all of the "Jesus is the reason for the season" signs up all over the place when I lived in the South, and then read the paper or watch the news the day after Black Friday and see the accounts of people punching/biting/attacking each other over the great sales at Walmart. My mom works at the military base exchange (like a mini mall) and has witnessed many accounts of unruly behavior during the holiday season. Merry Christmas indeed.

As for me, I usually say Merry Christmas, but it's only because it's a habit, and not because of any religious significance. You can count me in as one of those heathens who takes part in the festivities without reference to religion at all.

ktspktsp 12-13-2005 07:15 PM

I don't think there's a war on xmas. I think there is a war in xmas. On our ears. Using horrific remixes of xmas songs.

However:

My parents are legally muslim (dad) and christian (mom), though we had a mostly atheist home. The one holiday we celebrated was xmas though (tree and gifts and all). So xmas is a meaningful event to me, though it's always been secular in my mind.

Anyway, I enjoy being told happy <insert holiday name here> from someone celebrating that holiday, and certainly return the wishes.

maximusveritas 12-13-2005 07:26 PM

Mojo_PeiPei, thanks for posting that interview. It was a perfect example of how O'Reilly spins the issues to deceive and confuse his audience while simultaneously shouting down and diverting his guests so that they can't properly rebut his deceptions and lies.
New York City's policy was perfectly in line with prior precedent set by the Supreme Court. Schools are allowed to display secular items like Christmas trees and menorahs, but can't display overtly religious items like the nativity scene. That's the line they drew and while some may not completely agree with it, it's the law of the land. It's no wonder then that the Thomas More Center lost their lawsuit last year.
This whole thing is just a way for demagogues like O'Reilly and Gibson to make some more money by further dividing this country. It's good to see that most people here aren't buying into it.

Mojo_PeiPei 12-13-2005 08:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maximusveritas
Mojo_PeiPei, thanks for posting that interview. It was a perfect example of how O'Reilly spins the issues to deceive and confuse his audience while simultaneously shouting down and diverting his guests so that they can't properly rebut his deceptions and lies.
New York City's policy was perfectly in line with prior precedent set by the Supreme Court. Schools are allowed to display secular items like Christmas trees and menorahs, but can't display overtly religious items like the nativity scene. That's the line they drew and while some may not completely agree with it, it's the law of the land. It's no wonder then that the Thomas More Center lost their lawsuit last year.
This whole thing is just a way for demagogues like O'Reilly and Gibson to make some more money by further dividing this country. It's good to see that most people here aren't buying into it.

Since when is the Menorah or Crescent moon "secular", are you serious? The symbols that coincide with Religious holidays of hannkah and Ramadan are secular? No. That is the double standard that is perpetuated on Christians in this country for fear of not being PC. It is insulting to me as a christian that the country is too afraid to acknowledge in the public realm a federal holiday which celebrates the birth of Jesus Christ (don't argue the name sake for historical purposes, it's all the same). Even if you are not Christian you are a fugazee if you don't recognize as a philosopher and person of histroy he is the most influential man that has ever lived. So either live up to what you claim, or drop it entirely, I'm sick of the double standard.

Quote:

And Joseph went up from Galilee to Bethlehem with Mary, his espoused wife, who was great with child. And she brought forth a son and wrapped him in swaddling clothes and laid him in a manger because there was no room for them in the inn. And the angel of the Lord spoke to the shepherds and said, "I bring you tidings of great joy. Unto you is born a Savior, which is Christ the Lord."

"There's a problem with the angel, "said a Pharisee who happened to be strolling by. As he explained to Joseph, angels are widely regarded as religious symbols, and the stable was on public property where such symbols were not allowed to land or even hover. "And I have to tell you, this whole thing looks to me very much like a Nativity scene," he said sadly. "That's a no-no, too." Joseph had a bright idea. "What if I put a couple of reindeer over there near the ox and ass?" he said, eager to avoid sectarian strife. "That would definitely help," said the Pharisee, who knew as well as anyone that whenever a savior appeared, judges usually liked to be on the safe side and surround it with deer or woodland creatures of some sort. "Just to clinch it, throw in a candy cane and a couple of elves and snowmen, too," he said. "No court can resist that." Mary asked, "What does my son's birth have to do with snowmen?"

"Snowpersons," cried a young woman, changing the subject before it veered dangerously toward religion. Off to the side of the crowd, a Philistine was painting the Nativity scene. Mary complained that she and Joseph looked too tattered and worn in the picture. "Artistic license," he said. "I've got to show the plight of the haggard homeless in a greedy, uncaring society in winter," he quipped. "We're not haggard or homeless. The inn was just full," said Mary. "Whatever," said the painter.

Two women began to argue fiercely. One said she objected to Jesus' birth "because it privileged motherhood." The other scoffed at virgin births, but said that if they encouraged more attention to diversity in family forms and the rights of single mothers, well, then, she was all for them. "I'm not a single mother," Mary started to say, but she was cut off by a third woman who insisted that swaddling clothes are a form of child abuse, since they restrict the natural movement of babies.

With the arrival of 10 child advocates, all trained to spot infant abuse and manger rash, Mary and Joseph were pushed to the edge of the crowd, where arguments were breaking out over how many reindeer (or what mix of reindeer and seasonal sprites) had to be installed to compensate for the infant's unfortunate religious character. An older man bustled up, bowling over two merchants, who had been busy debating whether an elf is the same as a fairy and whether the elf/fairy should be shaking hands with Jesus in the crib or merely standing to the side, jumping around like a sports mascot. "I'd hold off on the reindeer," the man said, explaining that the use of asses and oxen as picturesque backdrops for Nativity scenes carries the subliminal message of human dominance. He passed out two leaflets, one denouncing manger births as invasions of animal space, the other arguing that stables are "penned environments" where animals are incarcerated against their will. He had no opinion about elves or candy canes.

Signs declaring "Free the Bethlehem 2" began to appear, referring to the obviously exploited ass and ox. Someone said the halo on Jesus' head was elitist. Mary was exasperated. "And what about you, old mother?" she said sharply to an elderly woman. "Are you here to attack the shepherds as prison guards for excluded species, maybe to complain that singing in Latin identifies us with our Roman oppressors, or just to say that I should have skipped patriarchal religiosity and joined some dumb new-age goddess religion?" "None of the above," said the woman, "I just wanted to tell you that the Magi are here."

Sure enough, the three wise men rode up. The crowd gasped, "They're all male!" And "Not very multicultural!" "Balthasar here is black," said one of the Magi. "Yes, but how many of you are gay or disabled?" someone shouted. A committee was quickly formed to find an impoverished lesbian wise-person among the halt and lame of Bethlehem. A calm voice said, "Be of good cheer, Mary, you have done well and your son will change the world." At last, a sane person, Mary thought. She turned to see a radiant and confident female face. The woman spoke again: "There is one thing, though. Religious holidays are important, but can't we learn to celebrate them in ways that unite, not divide? For instance, instead of all this business about 'Gloria in excelsis Deo,' why not just 'Season's Greetings'?" Mary said, "You mean my son has entered human history to deliver the message, 'Hello, it's winter'?" "That's harsh, Mary," said the woman. "Remember, your son could make it big in midwinter festivals, if he doesn't push the religion thing too far. Centuries from now, in nations yet unborn, people will give each other pricey gifts and have big office parties on his birthday. That's not chopped liver." "Let me get back to you," Mary said.

pan6467 12-13-2005 09:12 PM

Christmas is still very much about goodwill toward people. We just live in a commercialized world now, but people are pretty much the same individually. Now in groups, or places like here where anonymity is the thing people can say how they truly feel and get very little retribution for it.

With commercialism comes Politicall Correct terms and the destruction of the "Christmas"........ Stores do not want to offend their shoppers, thus they can't wish "Merry Christmas" for fear a needed sector of their market maybe lost.

Every time I go out people still say Merry Christmas, or Happy Holidays, people still donate heavily to the Salvation Army and good causes and people still get goose pimples watching "It's a Wonderful Life", some form of the many versions of "A Christmas Carol" and when they hear a Christmas song.......

But granted by the middle of December people get sick of it. After all the commercials and the stores start selling the season the day after Holloween.

But the hope, goodwill and beauty of the season are still there..... maybe harder to see because of all the commercialism but the major reason for the holiday still exists.

Which is wonderful because wouldn't the cold of Winter be even worse without the Holiday season and all the good and bad that goes with it?

Just look how from Jan. to Easter and the begingings of Spring are so blase and dreadful.

So whether or not Christmas and the Holiday Season is what is supposed to be, as long as people try and the monotony and just horridness of Winter is broken up by some stranger smiling and wishing me a "Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, Season's Greetings.... whatever" it makes this time of year more bearable........ at least to me.

Merry Christmas, Happy New Year, Happy Kwanzaa, Happy Hannakah, whatever it is to you have a great one

alansmithee 12-13-2005 09:25 PM

I think there is a slight anti-Christian effort in the changing of "Merry Christmas" to "Happy Holidays". But honestly, I couldn't care less. Christmas has become so secularized anyways that I don't care. I can't wait until the time I'm away from my family and can just ignore it. On Somethingawful, one of the writers discussed this very issue, and I really liked his idea of a generic winter holiday where you just do whatever the hell you want for fun. No stupid obligations, forced purchases to fuel retailer's profits, having to be around people you can't stand and wouldn't be bothered with for the other 364 days of the year, just a day to relax and do what pleases you. It's not like the date is probably correct anyways (I think the Birth of the Lord was more accurately dated to August, but historians disagree). From all I've heard, early on Christian leaders just made up the date to coincide with preexisting holidays (I've heard it was based off a Roman holiday celebrating Saturn, but that might be wrong). So I say bah humbug, and this whole holiday period can kiss my ass.

snowy 12-13-2005 10:13 PM

To me, it's the separation of two ideas I have about the holidays:

The "holidays", aka the secularized Christmas, other religious/non-religious holidays, and New Years, are a time to get together, be merry, and to make a lot of cookies and eat a lot of food. It's a time to buy gifts and give gifts, and to receive said gifts. It is a time to put up a decorated tree, lights around the house, and festive decorations. The "holidays" are largely secular--they are Santa Claus, Rudolph, Frosty, etc.

Christmas, to me...the actual HOLIDAY of Christmas, is about the birth of Christ. That piece is separate from the "holidays". It's about realizing what I have received through my faith. To me, it's a time for spiritual reflection and thanksgiving.

Not everyone celebrates Christmas in a religious manner, and that's fine. The fact is that we have to recognize that not everyone celebrates Christmas, religion or no, and as members of a multicultural society we have to find a middle ground. Personally, I don't care one way or another if someone wishes me Happy Holidays or Merry Christmas, because to me there's little distinguishment as the majority of the population means the secularized Christmas.

I'm sure this post didn't make a lot of sense...but in my heart Christmas and the celebration of it (in the religious/spiritual sense) is a deeply personal thing.

genuinegirly 12-13-2005 10:42 PM

It's a bunch of bull.
I'm all about saying "Happy Holidays". Not because it belittles Christmas, but because I live in a community with just as many Jews as Christians and I see no point in purchasing more than one style of Christmas card. On top of that, why single out Christmas when New Years is right around the corner.

If you're a stickler for "Merry Christmas" make sure your cards say it, and don't look down on the people who just don't want to say it back. Any intelligent individual wouldn't consider complaining over something as trivial as the wording on a holiday card. The whole concept is ludicrous.

mrklixx 12-13-2005 11:34 PM

There should be a war on all holidays. Period.

zz0011 12-14-2005 02:08 AM

Is there a war on Christmas? I think so.

Is "happy holidays" a major salvo in that war? Perhaps. I think it depends on who's saying it and why. I don't think it is for most who use the phrase.

And I agree with the sentiment expressed above about the personal nature of the holidays, especially when and where and how they are considered holy-days by a soul.

But for the life of me I have a hard time understanding those who demand tolerance but then won't tolerate me when I want to say "Merry Christmas" or even "Merry CHRISTmas."

But then I don't understand the reasoning of folks like that on several different issues...

Oh, and by the way, MERRY CHRISTMAS ;)

Yeah, I did that just to tweak those who are bugged by it. If THAT bugs you, seems to me you've got issues as much as those going apoplectic postal over "happy holidays" :icare:

Poppinjay 12-14-2005 06:24 AM

But do you know anybody that is offended by a Merry Christmas?

I like to hear it, I think it's fine. I just don't think there is a war on Christmas. It's just another way that pundits make money off of manufactured outrage.

Charlatan 12-14-2005 06:44 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Poppinjay
But do you know anybody that is offended by a Merry Christmas?

I like to hear it, I think it's fine. I just don't think there is a war on Christmas. It's just another way that pundits make money off of manufactured outrage.

Exactly what I was thinking. I can't think of a single person who is offended by Merry Christmas. I have had a few Jewish aquantences remind me that they don't celebrate Christmas when I've said it to them but it is always with either a laugh or a dramatic roll of the eyes... to which I say, Happy Chanukah.

I have to admit that I am a bit puzzled by the whole -- Menorah, Crescent, Nativity arguement...

Part of the big issue here is there are many different things at work here:

1) an increasingly diverse population
2) increased sensitivity to other cultures and religions
3) a largely secular aspect to the Holiday that crosses all cultures and religions
4) a few people who are "put out" by the term Holiday.


Here's what you do. Celebrate how you like to celebrate. Say the greeting you like to say and let other say what they want.

If you want a Nativity scene in your school... take it up with the Supreme court.

zz0011 12-14-2005 11:50 AM

I do know of folks who get extremely outraged over "Merry Christmas."

If you don't, great.

They are also people who often cry "tolerance" but apparently it's only a word which means "you let me do / say what I want but don't expect the same from me."

I'm glad not everyone is like that, but some few are making progress LEGALLY on those fronts and that's the part which scares me.

Conform or die! LOL...

Oh well. MERRY CHRISTMAS.

maleficent 12-14-2005 11:57 AM

Repeat after me...

BAH HUMBUG!!! It's all purpose and well... it fits the season...!

stevie667 12-14-2005 01:29 PM

I say we burn the politically correct.

Western society is christian by design, our legal and moral system is based on christianism. If you don't like that, i hear antartica is nice this time of year, you have to be careful though, all that snow could be constituted as offensive to bush-men.

Someone fetch me my sword, my horse and my armour, i fancy leading a crusade or three against political correctness. Sign and print on the dotted line if you agree.


...........................................................................................................


I mean honestly, who gets offended by someone saying merry christmas? In case people hadn't noticed, christmas is about presents, not jesus. Anyone who thinks otherwise needs to be introduced to the idea of the department store.

Coppertop 12-14-2005 02:13 PM

nevermind...

Rekna 12-14-2005 02:43 PM

well "happy holidays" is not a war on christmas changing everything that says christmas to holiday seems to me like it is at least an attack if not a war. Holiday tree? Give me a break, can we rename the candles for honikah to Holiday candels too?

There are two groups of people that annoy me 1) is the group of people that have to be in your face christians and make sure everyone knows they are christian and try to force it on everyone else and 2) is the group of in your face athiests that try to make sure that no one else can worship God without feeling like an idiot or like they are infringing on other peoples rights.

What is next? Do we remove the star or angel from the top of christmas trees? Do we rename easter to happy bunny day?

Case in point. Out here in Utah there is a huge stink by athiests who are upset by crosses that are along the highways. These crosses are memorials for fallen highway patrol men and are placed around where they died. These crosses are a memorial to these officers lives. None of the families of these officers have complained about the memorials. Now Utah is special because 60% of our population is mormon. The mormon church does not like the cross and do not believe in displaying crosses but not a single mormon has come out against these crosses because they realize it is a memorial honoring the sacrifice that these men made. The constitution guarentees people the right of religious freedom (atheism included) but does not guarentee the right to shit on everyone elses religion.

Coppertop 12-14-2005 02:51 PM

War on drugs.
War on terror.
War on Christmas.

Methinks some would like the meaning of the word "war" to be diluted, and thus more readily accepted by the masses.

Poppinjay 12-15-2005 12:35 PM

The Onion pretty much sums my opinion of this matter, with a nice sense of sarcasm.

Charlatan 12-15-2005 01:09 PM

Count on the Onion to get to the heart of the matter. :thumbsup:

maximusveritas 12-15-2005 02:14 PM

Democratic Congressman John Dingell from Michigan has weighed in with a poem that he read on the House floor in response to Republican efforts to push some ridiculous "War on Christmas" bill.
Read it here:
http://www.house.gov/dingell/documen...12-14-05_2.htm

Here's a bit of it:
Quote:

We can pretend that Christmas is under attack

Hold a vote to save it--- then pat ourselves on the back;

Silent Night, First Noel, Away in the Manger

Wake up Congress, they’re in no danger!

This time of year we see Christmas every where we go,

From churches, to homes, to schools, and yes…even Costco;

What we have is an attempt to divide and destroy,

When this is the season to unite us with joy

At Christmas time we’re taught to unite,

We don’t need a made-up reason to fight

So on O’Reilly, on Hannity, on Coulter, and those right wing blogs;

You should just sit back, relax…have a few egg nogs!

‘Tis the holiday season: enjoy it a pinch

With all our real problems, do we honestly need another Grinch?

So to my friends and my colleagues I say with delight,

A merry Christmas to all,

and to Bill O’Reilly…Happy Holidays.

Bill O'Rights 12-15-2005 04:07 PM

Quote:

So to my friends and my colleagues I say with delight,

A merry Christmas to all,

and to Bill O’Reilly…Happy Holidays.
:lol: I love it!!

The local online rag, that I read, The Omaha World Herald Online, ran a similar poll. The results were the exact opposite of what I'm seeing here. Those that believed that there is truly a "War on Christmas" ran away with it, by about 1700 to 400 that did not believe there was an attack on Christmas. I wish I could access it, but alas...I cannot. I confess to being a little taken aback, realizing of course, just how conservative this area really is, at just how seriously some people are taking this.

To those who do take this so-called War on Christmas seriously, know this. I, a self avowed atheist, in no way, shape or form, want to take the spirituality away from your holiday. All I ask is that you allow me, and the rest of my ilk, to enjoy the secular aspects of it, in relative peace, harmony and goodwill. Isn't that, after all, what it's supposed to be all about? That said, I'm gonna go listen to Chestnuts Roasting On An Open Fire, Winter Wonderland, White Christmas, and a few other secular Christmas songs. And I may even listen to a little Silent Night, or Away in A Manger...just 'cause I like 'em. I'm gonna sip me some mulled wine, stare at my Christmas tree, and basically celebrate the holiday...my way.

Merry Christmas, all.

pan6467 12-15-2005 05:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bill O'Rights
:lol: I love it!!

The local online rag, that I read, The Omaha World Herald Online, ran a similar poll. The results were the exact opposite of what I'm seeing here. Those that believed that there is truly a "War on Christmas" ran away with it, by about 1700 to 400 that did not believe there was an attack on Christmas. I wish I could access it, but alas...I cannot. I confess to being a little taken aback, realizing of course, just how conservative this area really is, at just how seriously some people are taking this.

To those who do take this so-called War on Christmas seriously, know this. I, a self avowed atheist, in no way, shape or form, want to take the spirituality away from your holiday. All I ask is that you allow me, and the rest of my ilk, to enjoy the secular aspects of it, in relative peace, harmony and goodwill. Isn't that, after all, what it's supposed to be all about? That said, I'm gonna go listen to Chestnuts Roasting On An Open Fire, Winter Wonderland, White Christmas, and a few other secular Christmas songs. And I may even listen to a little Silent Night, or Away in A Manger...just 'cause I like 'em. I'm gonna sip me some mulled wine, stare at my Christmas tree, and basically celebrate the holiday...my way.

Merry Christmas, all.


I think you'll see more of a difference in the Bible Belt. Those are the places where "the War on Christmas" is probably more believed.

To me, Christmas is just a time of year that is supposed to unite, but it truly doesn't matter what you want to call it or when it is, if you truly have the spirit of Christ/Buddha/ any great Master and their teachings within you.

Why?

Because you would have that spirit within you every day and every season.

Guess to the Christian Right though, Christmas is the end all and be all to everything. Another lost message from Christ that they just don't care about. Guess that this is the only time of year they feel they should truly worship Christ.

Celebrate Christ every day not just Christmas.

My religious and spiritual belief is that Easter should be far more important because that was when Christ made the ultimate sacrifice.... and yet this "Great Christian Nation" the Religious Right tries to sell us into believing we are..... barely even recognizes it as anything more than the beginning of Spring.

Guess I'm just whacky, for believing someone's dying to save me from whatever death holds, is more important than celebrating his birth.

Bagezio2 12-15-2005 06:19 PM

Happy Festivus everybody!

pan6467 12-15-2005 06:38 PM

BTW..... I know Atheists that take Christmas far more seriously than some so called Christians.

You can believe in Christ's teachings but not believe in God or the Judeo/Christian/Muslim version.

Gilda 12-17-2005 02:56 PM

The Grinch and the War on Christmas

Gilda

Ustwo 12-17-2005 05:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Gilda

Heh, I'm glad to see the term 'moonbat' outside of LGF :D

Cynthetiq 12-18-2005 05:40 AM

interesting...

I was thinking about the OP on this the other day and thought, the Bush Administration is damned if you do damned if you don't in this situation. If they put Merry Christmas they be lambasted as promoting a religion, they put Happy Holidays, and they get tossed as the opening salvo to the War on Xmas. Well this newsbit got me thinking just how stupid this whole thing is and how people seem to "romanticize" aspects of life and demand that it be a particular was for them and the rest of the world.

Quote:

Group Fights Wal-Mart on 'Happy Holidays'
LINK
SACRAMENTO, Calif. (Dec. 18) - A group of religious protesters demonstrated outside a Wal-Mart superstore Saturday, hoping to turn away customers by calling attention to the retailer's decision to use "Happy Holidays" rather than "Merry Christmas" in its seasonal advertising.

But even shoppers who agreed with the protesters weren't willing to interrupt their quest for holiday deals.

"I believe in Christ, and I don't like the use of 'xmas' or the use of 'happy holidays,"' said Steven Van Noy, 39, as he left the store loaded down with packages. "The bottom line is that they had what I needed at Wal-Mart, so I went to Wal-Mart to buy it."

Controversy over the secularization of Christmas is nothing new, but this year religious groups are publicly taking on retailers who have decided to tone down the religious aspects of the holiday in their store decorations and promotional material.

In an online petition, the American Family Association recently gathered more than 500,000 signatures asking Target to include Christmas in its promotions. Stores such as Sears and Wal-Mart are facing boycotts.

Wal-Mart spokeswoman Amy Wyatt said the company has made no effort to remove Christmas from its holiday ads. She said a promotion set to run from mid-November to early January was simply misunderstood: its slogan is "home for the holidays."

"It was a matter of choosing a slogan that carries through the entire season," Wyatt said. "The signs went up before Thanksgiving and won't be taken down until after New Year's. The idea was to focus on the family."

About 50 protesters took part in Saturday's demonstration, organized by religious leaders. Dick Otterstad of the Church of the Divide donned a Santa Claus costume and greeted shoppers with the message: Don't forget about the meaning of Christmas.

"It is insulting that Wal-Mart has chosen to ignore the reason for the season," Otterstad said. "Taking the word 'Christmas' out of the holiday implies there's something sinful about it. ... This is a part of our culture."


pan6467 12-18-2005 06:43 AM

So this is what the fuss is all about
A "war on Christmas" sponsored in part by the Right and Pat Robertson no doubt

While across the nation kids get toys
Iraq claims more of our boys

While parents credit covers their cost
We turned blind eyes to what in New Orleans so many lost

So this is the Christmas spirit the Right says is missing
As on our rights George Bush is pissing

So let's keep up this pseudo war
Let's forget all else, we know the score

Let's not focus on what really does matter
Let Wal*Mart, Oil barons and banks make their wallets fatter

Christmas is greed and greed is good
For Christ himself if he were here say it he would

So down with the Left, the Santa and Season's greetings
We need to take the heat off Bush's secret meetings

So a Bah Humbug and a give me mine fuck you
And while we're at it scrape the Constitution off W's shoe......

(sorry couldn't help myself.... move to wherever you deem proper)

pig 12-18-2005 07:53 AM

Happy Chrismahannakwanzakah to you...

Xazy 12-18-2005 10:17 AM

As someone Jewish, I do not expect a happy hannukah, merry christmas, or anything specific from others. You can say whatever you desire, and I will accept the wishes that is behind the statement

I try to wish friends who I know, according to their belief, but a happy holidays is safe, "P.C." if you would, but the intentions is what counts. I find it funny that people would get upset, that there is no 'norm.' Would these groups be ok, if there was a president who celebrated Kwanza or Hannukah and they sent out cards wishing a holidays greeting in regards to those holidays?!?

Honestly if I heard the president sent out a chrismtas card, i would not care, if he sent out a hannukah one i still would not care. People just need something better to do with their time!

ratbastid 12-18-2005 10:22 AM

This is such a tempest in a teapot.

Look: in past years, those SAME PEOPLE have been bitching about the commercialization and co-option of Christmas. "Too much shopping in Christmas", they cried. "Reason for the season!" Remember when "Remember the reason for the season" meant "Don't get carried away with the commercial aspects of Christmas"?

Now there's not enough Christmas in shopping!

Will they ever be satisfied? No! Because they're happiest doing what they're doing right now: bitching.

I don't understand why people think everybody else thinks like them. It's like: I believe in Christ, so all 500 million of you need to say this particular two-word phrase. Control freak much?

Gilda 12-18-2005 11:11 AM

Bah. What about those of us who don't celebrate any of them?

Why isn't anyone wishing me a Happy Festivus? I was generous enough to get something for all of you:

http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y59...k/festivus.jpg

Gilda

Coppertop 12-18-2005 11:14 AM

Well, I wished you a happy Saturnalia. Is that not good enough?

pig 12-18-2005 11:57 AM

Yeah, I can just almost remember a day when I was happy to just sort of get any greeting around this time of year (god forbid I say Holiday greeting!!!); now, of course, I feel obliged to rip the thorasic cavity out of anyone without the proper homage to the proper deity. I really seem to recall that when I was younger, there was virtually no difference between the various phrases you can throw out. It was like you had a choice. I'm glad they buckled down.

Happy Diwali everyone...except Gilda. You, I'll be meeting in the feats of strength and the airing of grievances :)

ratbastid 12-18-2005 03:19 PM

THIS is a great article, from today's NYT:

http://aolsvc.news.aol.com/news/arti...00010000000001

Quote:

Updated: 04:04 PM EST
Good Will Took a Holiday, Whatever You Call It
By PAUL VITELLO, The New York Times

At a Christmas tree lighting ceremony recently in Manhasset, N.Y., a crowd of 200 gasped at the intemperate words uttered by a public official who was angry at a priest for an invocation the official considered too religious.

Holiday displays all over the country are drawing criticism. Some are being called too religious while others are said to be too secular.


In Huntington in nearby Suffolk County, people are still fuming about the lawsuit filed last week to remove the crèche and the menorah displayed on the village green.

In Florida, rather than a complaint about too much religion, conservative Christian lawyers brought suits recently against two towns whose holiday displays on public property the lawyers considered too secular.

The suits demanded that Nativity scenes be placed there, and they were.

If nothing quite says holiday spirit to you like family tension and the perennial rehashing of old scores, then this might be your kind of holiday season.

With a new aggressiveness, some conservative Christian groups have declared war this year against what they see as an attack of secularization on Christmas, using boycotts and lawsuits to invoke the baby Jesus and the words "Merry Christmas" with an unusual fervor.

At the same time, members of other religious groups and civil libertarians have mounted a resistance to what they see as a creeping imposition of religion on public and commercial places, in a few cases filing suits of their own.

But in the vast middle - in that central core of the population where people shop and the Chipmunks sing, and contradictory notions live in peace, and the Festival of Lights shares deep and undisputed psychic space with the glittering Christmas tree - there is a sense of impending loss.

If the bellicose atmosphere of national politics can infect even this season of childhood and enchantment, as this thinking goes, we are all in some kind of big trouble.

"It's like everybody's going crazy," said Liseanne Altmann, a Nassau County legislator from Great Neck, the town next to Manhasset. "I wish they would all chill out a little. At this time of year, the overarching theme should be coming together, not division."

Jim Ellis, an advertising executive strolling past the Christmas-wreathed light poles of downtown Huntington, a minute's sleigh ride from the town's recently contested Nativity scene and menorah display, said such disputes at a time like this were a kind of self-indulgence.

"With all that's going on, I mean kids are dying every day in the war," he said, "and this is what we're worried about? People have too much time on their hands."

It is hardly the first contentious holiday season. In recent decades, civic quarrels over the placement of religious holiday symbols in taxpayer-owned space have resulted in various court decisions, most sanctioning the use of such symbols as long as they are displayed in a sort of panoply of the religious and the secular - a crèche beside a menorah beside a Santa and a Kwanzaa kinara, for example.

But in the uncharted territory of a conflict whose terms are as often unspoken as they are openly discussed, there can be surprises like the one that happened in Manhasset on Dec. 2, when the Rev. Nick Zientarski invoked "Jesus Christ, our Lord" in blessing the Christmas tree at a public ceremony across the street from the North Hempstead Town Hall.

Town Supervisor Jon Kaiman, who had presided at the ceremony, was heard muttering angrily during the blessing. After Father Zientarski finished, Mr. Kaiman stood up and addressed the crowd of about 200.

"This is inappropriate," the supervisor said of the invocation. "I just want to make it clear that this is in no way a religious ceremony."

Mr. Kaiman's response was considered rude by an overwhelming majority of several hundred people who e-mailed or phoned his office afterward to complain.

"Manhasset is a predominantly Christian town and a conservative town," one of Father Zientarski's parishioners told Newsday.

A prominent local citizen, the Fox News commentator Bill O'Reilly, who has made what he calls the "war on Christmas" a regular feature of "The O'Reilly Factor," scolded Mr. Kaiman on the air.

"It never occurred to me that I was stepping into this national discussion," Mr. Kaiman said in a telephone interview on Thursday. "The depth of the passion people feel about this issue was really eye-opening."

In several letters and opinion articles published in local newspapers, and in a series of meetings with residents, Mr. Kaiman has apologized for what he conceded was the rudeness of his response.

Similar waves of condemnation befell Mitchell Pashkin after he filed suit on Dec. 7 to force Huntington to dismantle its traditional holiday display of a Nativity scene and a menorah in a public park. He said they violated the First Amendment's establishment clause, but later agreed to a compromise wherein the symbols were accompanied by signs explaining their provenance - the crèche from a Catholic group, the menorah from a synagogue.

"It's not about Christmas," said Mr. Pashkin, a town resident and a lawyer, who received dozens of angry phone calls after his suit was publicized. "It's about whether religious symbols should be displayed on public property at all. The government should not be seen as endorsing anybody's religion."

The same religious holiday display had been put up in the same park for years, and had offended him all along, but what made him file the suit this year was hard for him to identify.

"I just thought it was time to do it," Mr. Pashkin said.

The Rev. Barry W. Lynn, executive director of Americans United for the Separation of Church and State, suggested that civil libertarians everywhere were on heightened alert, consciously or not, because of the Rev. Jerry Falwell's widely publicized "Friend or Foe" Christmas campaign, an effort to counter perceived attacks against Christmas.

The Falwell campaign, which was announced soon after Thanksgiving, threatened boycotts against the retailers Wal-Mart, Target and Lowe's for using the term "holiday" instead of "Christmas" in advertising.

An affiliated group, Liberty Counsel, brought suit to force the Florida towns of Neptune Beach and Wellington to include Nativity scenes in displays that previously featured only a Christmas tree and a menorah. The group threatened to sue an elementary school in Dodgeville, Wis., where in a school play about a homeless family, the lyric of the song "Silent Night" was changed to eliminate religious references.

"This campaign has never been so aggressive as it is now," Mr. Lynn said. "They have 1,500 lawyers standing by, ready to promote this idea they have, what I call this Christian triumphalism, anywhere they can gin up some case."

Mathew D. Staver, president and general counsel of Liberty Counsel, said the campaign only sought "to make sure that Christmas is not censored from the holiday season."

"We have a national holiday called Christmas," Mr. Staver said in an interview, "and the central meaning of Christmas is the birth of Jesus."

In Manhasset the other day, a woman passing the Christmas tree that started the angry tensions was asked what she made of it all.

"I am French," said the woman, Gigi Anderson, a real estate agent in Manhasset for more than 30 years. "I maybe have a different view than most Americans, but in France we do not make so much of religious matters. They are private matters."

Patricia Sciortino, shopping bags in each hand and the cold weather's rouge in both cheeks, voiced a more common American view of religious observance. It is a shared experience, she said, something akin to the block party, where everyone brings a dish.

"I think we should all celebrate everything," said Mrs. Sciortino, who was interviewed in Manhasset. "We should have Christmas, we should have Hanukkah and whatever people have. I think we should all learn to respect each other. Everyone should have the right to be who they are. That's what the country is all about."

"Have a nice day," she added.

flstf 12-18-2005 03:49 PM

I read in the local paper today that several large Christian churches are cancelling their Christmas services this year that fall on a Sunday. Something about too few people available for the service because they prefer to stay home and celebrate with the kids. Sounds like they have their own war against Christmas going on. :)

ShaniFaye 12-19-2005 05:00 AM

Happy Holidays just doesnt do it for me, Merry Christmas is what I want to hear!!!

true story....with all the "crap" going around about this, I decided to "try" not to offend anyone and on our message board when you walk in our office I used the magnetic letters to spell out happy holidays. When I came into work the next morning, the letters were on my desk with a note...."Try again, its MERRY CHRISTMAS" hehehe, I gotta just love the people I work with hehehehehe

ShaniFaye 12-19-2005 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flstf
I read in the local paper today that several large Christian churches are cancelling their Christmas services this year that fall on a Sunday. Something about too few people available for the service because they prefer to stay home and celebrate with the kids. Sounds like they have their own war against Christmas going on. :)


My church has always done this....they have a christmas eve service for those that want to attend, and the church is open on christmas day, but there is no "church" service that morning

Ustwo 12-19-2005 06:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by flstf
I read in the local paper today that several large Christian churches are cancelling their Christmas services this year that fall on a Sunday. Something about too few people available for the service because they prefer to stay home and celebrate with the kids. Sounds like they have their own war against Christmas going on. :)

The one thing I don't recall from the New Testimont, is where it said to go to church on Sundays.

Though I may well have missed it.

flstf 12-19-2005 08:00 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShaniFaye
My church has always done this....they have a christmas eve service for those that want to attend, and the church is open on christmas day, but there is no "church" service that morning

I wasn't trying to be serious but thought the reports were rather funny. :)
Megachurches Cancel Christmas
Quote:

Megachurches Cancel Christmas
Compiled by Ted Olsen | posted 12/07/2005 09:30 a.m.

Megachurches won't hold Sunday services December 25
While Christian groups are warring to make sure that business and government workers say "Merry Christmas" instead of "Happy Holidays," one place you won't hear either greeting this December 25 is at many of the largest churches in the country.

That's because, the Lexington Herald-Leader and Chicago Tribune report, the churches won't be open that day. Now, in most years, that wouldn't be terribly surprising: Protestant church offices have closed Christmas day since the time of the Puritans (who closed churches that day both to distinguish themselves from Roman Catholics and in protest of the bacchanal that Christmas celebrations had become in the early 18th century).

But this year, Christmas falls on a Sunday, the day when most churches (excepting those of Sabbatarians and a few others) hold services. Not this year.

Willow Creek Community Church (near Chicago), Southland Christian Church (near Lexington, Ky.), Mars Hill Bible Church (near Grand Rapids, Michigan), North Point Community Church (in Alpharetta, Ga.), and Fellowship Church (near Dallas) are among the churches hanging up a "closed" sign after their many Christmas Eve services. The five churches have a combined weekly attendance of more than 64,500.

And, yes, it's a conspiracy. "Megachurch officials around the country consulted with each other before deciding to take the day off," reports the Herald-Leader.

The reason?

"It's more than being family-friendly," Willow Creek spokeswoman Cally Parkinson told the Herald-Leader. It's being lifestyle-friendly for people who are just very, very busy."

Not offering services on a day that almost everyone has off is lifestyle-friendly how? They're so busy trying to fit in church that the solution is to cancel church? Parkinson explained further to the Chicago Tribune: "Christmas tends to be the one time of year when lots of those unchurched people show up at Willow; why not give them a gift?"

"So hang on," says the Chicagoist blog (not a Christian blog): "You reward people for coming to church by … not making them come to church?"

Let's try another Willow spokesperson.

"At first glance it does sound contrarian," Willow Creek senior pastor Gene Appel told the Tribune. "We don't see it as not having church on Christmas. We see it as decentralizing the church on Christmas—hundreds of thousands of experiences going on around Christmas trees. The best way to honor the birth of Jesus is for families to have a more personal experience on that day."

But if that holds true for Christmas, doesn't it hold true for every other Sunday? Why not decentralize the church every week by telling families "to have a more personal experience on that day"?
--snip--

kutulu 12-19-2005 08:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ShaniFaye
My church has always done this....they have a christmas eve service for those that want to attend, and the church is open on christmas day, but there is no "church" service that morning

Why didn't that ever happen to me as a kid? Christmas and Easter masses were the worst. Not only were they longer but they were so damn crowded.

Christmas was always best on a Sunday because that meant you didn't have to go to church a second time that weel

maleficent 12-19-2005 08:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by kutulu
Christmas was always best on a Sunday because that meant you didn't have to go to church a second time that weel

Saturday Christmasses were my favorite - could go to midnight mass on saturday and you're covered for sunday and for christmas...

easter was a hateful service- -never any seats and too danged long... :) all the good little heathens put on their sunday best and trotted out for sunday mass when they never saw the inside of the church since last easter... :)

aKula 12-19-2005 08:55 AM

The consumerism promoted by comercial interests being linked to christmas is in my opinion a larger threat to christmas.

Charlatan 12-19-2005 09:19 AM

I can remember having to go to the midnight service as a kid... I remember the heat and the crush of people and then having to exit to go throw up. I was convinced I was evil because church made me barf.

tecoyah 12-19-2005 09:24 AM

Wednesday is the Solstice.....we will celebrate it as we always do....no church, just family, no Wars, just love, no long service, just a short ritual of thanks, no heated debate, just a few minutes of silent devotion, no plasic trucks, just cookies hung on the trees for the fairies (squirrels), no fire and brimstone, Just a few candles to represent the light of coming spring.
I always look forward to this celebration, as it reminds me to be happy, and rekindles the warmth of family in my soul.

Happy Solstice Everyone

kutulu 12-19-2005 10:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by maleficent
Saturday Christmasses were my favorite - could go to midnight mass on saturday and you're covered for sunday and for christmas...

easter was a hateful service- -never any seats and too danged long... :) all the good little heathens put on their sunday best and trotted out for sunday mass when they never saw the inside of the church since last easter... :)

The worst thing about Easter Mass was that there was one Mass in particular that would have a lot of baptisms for new converts. It would easily add a half hour to the Mass. My family learned to avoid that Mass like the plague.

snowy 12-19-2005 10:58 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charlatan
I can remember having to go to the midnight service as a kid... I remember the heat and the crush of people and then having to exit to go throw up. I was convinced I was evil because church made me barf.

Boy, that's not at all like what I remember from childhood...poor Charlatan.

We would always have the Christmas pageant Christmas Eve, about 8pm or so. Following the pageant there would be cookies in the fellowship hall, and after cookies, the candlelight Christmas Eve service would start. My church was a big old-fashioned one with enormous stained glass windows running down either side and an elaborate altar with a giant portrait of Jesus hanging above it. The candlelight turned an already beautiful church into a magnificent, magical place--those Christmas Eve services will always live on in my memory.

Easters were also good--the church would always be packed, there would be lively music, and it was generally a celebratory, joyful time.

Now I am hundreds of miles away from my childhood church, and I've yet to find anything that remotely comes close, but I'm trying.

Here is a picture of the altar from the church (I still think it's beautiful):
http://www.oregonstate.edu/~jansenli/altar.jpg

redsfan11 12-20-2005 03:03 AM

Totally agree- this is such a non-issue. I saw Merry Christmas, but I happen to like Christmas. If I happen to know that someone celebrates a different holiday, then I recognize it - otherwise, I just stick to Christmas. I don't think I am being insensitive. It's not like I;m asking them to convert or anything.

edwhit 12-20-2005 06:32 AM

I don't think anyone but extremist are ever offended by what Holiday term people use.

I'm a Christian, and I've never been offended when someone says Happy Xmas, Happy Hannakuh, Happy Winter Solstice, Kwanzi (spelling?) or whatever holiday they celebrate. On the contrary!

I am not a jew but have no problem at all wishing someone that is a Happy Hannakuh.


There are Christians upset that Christmas is actually a peagan Holiday, and there are atheist upset that a Christian Holiday is being forced on them. Idiots.

The holidays are what you make them. Regardless of the term you use, Christmas has become, for me anyway, a family and friends holiday. A time to honor your friends and family and show appreciation towards them. To me that has nothing to do with my religion and everything to do with being a good person.

People complaining about the terms are just bitter little people imo and need to just go back to bed and leave everyone else alone.

There is NO ISSUE!

ratbastid 12-20-2005 06:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
The one thing I don't recall from the New Testimont, is where it said to go to church on Sundays.

Though I may well have missed it.

That practice is from a lot further back than the New Testament! Second Commandment: "Remember the Sabbath and keep it holy." Church services are how Jews and Christians have kept that commandment since the days of Moses.

I think it's a little ridiculous that they'd cancel Christmas Day services. Christmas is quite literally the one day of the year I might be at all interested in attending a service.

Xazy 12-21-2005 09:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ustwo
The one thing I don't recall from the New Testimont, is where it said to go to church on Sundays.

Though I may well have missed it.

I thought the old testimont says on the seventh day you shall rest. How did that become day one?

Cynthetiq 12-21-2005 09:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xazy
I thought the old testimont says on the seventh day you shall rest. How did that become day one?

depended on the ruler who decided the calendar :)

macmanmike6100 12-21-2005 09:23 AM

look, "happy holidays" is said out of respect for those who don't celebrate Christmas per se...how can being respectful be an "act of war"?

ShaniFaye 12-21-2005 09:28 AM

The jews (which is what people in the old testement were) observed the sabbath on Saturday, not sunday (actually sundown on friday to sundown on saturday)

which would be the 7th day on our present calendar

Poppinjay 12-21-2005 09:50 AM

Who benefits from the non-War On Christmas? Look at Bill O'Reilly's topic list from foxnews.com:


Merry Christmas, Maybe...
November 29, 2005

Three Victories For Christmas Traditionalists
November 30, 2005

What Would Jesus Do?
December 01, 2005

The Yuletide Has Turned...
December 05, 2005

Christmas Humbugs Strike Back
December 06, 2005

What Christmas Controversy?
December 07, 2005

Sears and Target see the Christmas Light
December 12, 2005

Christmas and the Media...
December 14, 2005

War on Christmas!
December 14, 2005 - yes, that's right, two topics about Christmas on the same show

Is the American Catholic Church Running Away from the Christmas Controversy?
December 15, 2005

The American Catholic Church and the Christmas Controversy
December 20, 2005

Plano, Texas and the War on Christmas
December 21, 2005

And my favorite:

Is O'Reilly Talking Too Much About The War On Christmas?
December 13, 2005

Notice the absence of topics on anything going on at the oval office. Shock and awe. Shock and awe.

Val_1 12-22-2005 05:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xazy
I thought the old testimont says on the seventh day you shall rest. How did that become day one?

All is explained here
The article is quite long, but the section titled "Why and When the Weekly Sabbath was Moved" more directly talks about this.

Tophat665 12-22-2005 07:58 PM

Silly Christians insisting it has something to do with a long deceased liberal Jew rather than the winter solstice or a fat house-breaker in a red suit constitute a war on Christmas. Have some sense folks. Leave well enough alone. Happy holidays, y'all, and a Merry Cristmas to boot.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:45 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360