![]() |
Posthumous Pardons
Maid pardoned 60 years after execution
Quote:
|
I think the time spent on this was more for precident than for anything to benefit the one previously convicted. It's purpose is probably intended to prevent more unjust decisions in the future.
|
It's not the family who benefits -it's the state of Georgia. See they aren't racist anymore -they got the pardon to prove it.
|
I don't think it has to be an "either-or" choice. Clearing the innocent who are still alive is, of course, important, but so is the gesture of pardoning people who have already died. It doesn't just benefit the family, but as raeanna pointed out, it sets a precedent. I won't say that it's never too late to get justice, but at least this is a token of progress on the part of the state in recognizing and rectifying its past mistakes.
|
Since this is a pardon, rather than an aquital, I don't see the point. She's still guilty; but we forgive her. I might see the point of an aquital where the state says "Gee, I guess we were wrong, she didn't do it after all".
I'd rather focus on the living. |
I voted "Yes, clearing a person's name is important for the family", simply because if the state has the stones to undertake the responsibility of putting people to death, then it also should have the stones to pony up to a "mistake". This isn't something that you can just look at the facts and say; "Oops...our bad."
As an aside, incidents such as this, is one of the many reasons that I went from being a staunch supporter of the death penalty, to doing a complete 180 degree reversal in opinion. That's for another thread, however. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:46 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project