![]() |
Incidents In London...again
Quote:
I know not much news to go on.....but I wanted to share whats being said so far. |
Quote:
|
I just saw this as I turned to get a soda at the pantry. I thought initially that the incident was just a rehash of what happened 2 weeks ago.
damn. I didn't like realizing it was a live feed. I'm not turning on my TV well at least not the news, maybe today is a Lilo and Stitch day. |
As wierd as this sounds...I hope they didnt do this to divert emergency people from somewhere else. All of this sounds kind of fishy to me.....
|
The current thought is copy cat, or hasty lash up.
|
here's the guardian newsblog
Quote:
|
hmmm well here in NYC now everyone is on edge. They are saying police will do random backpack searches to people going into subways.
... gee that will help make it safer. |
yeah and flying tomorrow should be real fun
|
ya i think this could be work of a copy-cat(s)
who knows but what realistic are random backpack checks going to do.... if im a sucicidal crazy terrorist dont you think that i would realize that there will be random backpack checks and maybe use something else i hate people living in fear |
Quote:
The chances of *anything* happening while you are flying, especially in the continental US, are exceedingly remote. |
funny how the wheels of paranoia turn, isn't it?
|
well i didnt mean anything bad was gonna happen....I just meant security is prob gonna be a pain in the ass
|
ya, i love how even any random event no matter how small now gets people so worked up and paranioa sets in huge, and people start going nutz and start building bomb shelters and stuff(well maybe not that far...yet)
but you have to remember that this happened in london not in the US so i agree the chances of something happening here is very slim |
should I qualify my statement even more by saying pres bush is going to be here in the morning...he lands right before I take off
|
I'm concerned this is all going to lend towards a sudden surge in paranoia here in the United States. I'm afraid our leaders are going to overlook certain inalienable rights all for the pursuit of a perceived sense of safety rather than freedom. The Patriot Act may put some people at ease, but it makes me weary of the police state that could emerge from it.
|
Quote:
I agree with you, Cicero. There are better ways to secure our country. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
- Our borders remain vulnerable - TSA is non-effectual unless they get points for being a nuisance - We still don't have a common database for all security institutions - Our high profile industries remain inadequately protected - Our ports remain inadequately protected - Our transportation systems remain inadequately protected - Chemical and nuclear plants remain inadequately protected - Homeland security funds are disproportionately expended But, hey... the Patriot Act sure locks down our libraries for anyone reading suspected works. Does that suffice as a starter? |
Quote:
While we could very well spend billions trying to seal off the boarders, and maybe create no-mans land around every major industry, we could also spend very little monitoring possible terrorists. Of course that requires ....bah bum... the Patriot Act! |
As always, cute...very cute.
|
Those dang librarians can be so fussy:
________________________________________________________________________ House Poised to Reauthorize USA Patriot Act By Alan Elsner Reuters Thursday 21 July 2005 Washington - The House of Representatives, ignoring protests from civil liberties groups and some conservatives, moved on Thursday to renew the USA Patriot Act giving the government unprecedented powers to investigate suspected terrorists. Sixteen provisions of the 2001 law, hastily enacted in response to the Sept. 11 attacks on New York and Washington, are due to expire at the end of this year unless renewed by Congress. President Bush has repeatedly called on lawmakers to make the entire law permanent. The House was poised to reauthorize the act with some minor changes designed to increase judicial and political oversight of some of its most controversial provisions. Republicans said the latest explosions in London showed how urgent and important it was to renew the law. The act allowed expanded surveillance of terror suspects and gave the government the ability to go to a secret court to seize the personal records of suspects from bookstores, libraries, businesses, hospitals and other organizations - the so-called "library clause." House Republicans agreed last week that this clause and another allowing so-called roving wiretaps, which permits the government to eavesdrop on suspects as they switch from phone to phone, would be renewed for only 10 years instead of being made permanent. The Senate judiciary committee was working on its own version of the act on Thursday, which included only four-year renewals of these two clauses. "Since its enactment, there have been zero, and I repeat zero verified instances of civil liberty abuses," said Georgia Republican Phil Gingrey, opening debate in the House. 'Many Abuses' But New York Democrat Louise Slaughter said many provisions of the act had resulted in many abuses, although she gave no examples. She and other Democrats complained that the Republican leadership refused to allow debate on several of their key amendments and seemed determined to ram the law through on a party-line vote. "This is an abuse of power by the Republican majority which has deliberately and purposely chosen to stifle a full debate," said Maryland Democrat Steny Hoyer. A coalition of liberal and conservative civil liberties groups, formed to oppose reauthorization of the law in its current form, this week called on lawmakers not to rush to reauthorize the bill without further debate. "Certain sections of the law extend far beyond the mission of protecting Americans from terrorism and violate ordinary citizens' constitutional rights, especially the right to privacy," said former Republican Rep. Bob Barr. Leading opposition from the left, the American Civil Liberties Union said the bill gave the FBI extraordinary power to obtain personal records, search individuals' homes or offices without their knowledge and to use a secret court to obtain personal date on ordinary Americans. |
Okay kids, this isn't the Politics forum, this is a posting about the incidents in London. Let's try to stay on topic in here. If you want to get into it over libraries and the Patriot act, start a new thread, then ring the bell. Otherwise, back to your corners and back on topic.
/end threadjack |
Quote:
Darn tootin'! More bombs, more terrorists, when will our damned government just start kicking people out or throwing them in jail already? Jeez! It's like we have a small collection of potted flowers making law these days. |
Update
Early this morning (I guess late this morning GMT,) police confronted a suspicious man wearing a puffy jacket. He refused to stop, jumped a turnstile, tripped, and was shot and killed when he got back up to start running again. |
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:09 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project