Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   Man arrested after rescuing swimmer (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/91606-man-arrested-after-rescuing-swimmer.html)

Ishmal 07-05-2005 06:00 PM

Man arrested after rescuing swimmer
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Azcentral.com
SAN MARCOS, Texas - A man who rescued a swimmer caught in swirling river currents found himself in trouble soon afterward when he was arrested by authorities who claimed he was interfering.

Dave Newman, 48, disobeyed repeated orders by emergency personnel to leave the water, police said. He was charged with interfering with public duties.

"I was amazed," Newman said Monday after his release on $2,000 bail. "I had a very uncomfortable night after saving that guy's life. He thanked me for it in front of the police, and then they took me to jail."

Abed Duamni, 35, of Houston, said he had just finished eating at a restaurant Sunday when he decided to go for a swim in a nearby river. Duamni said he didn't see any signs warning swimmers of dangerous currents.

Newman said he pulled Duamni out of the water, swimming under a waterfall and over to the shore opposite from the restaurant. He could hear law enforcement personnel telling him to come back to the other side.

According to police, Newman smirked and seemed annoyed by officers' requests. He stood in the water for about 15 seconds before swimming downstream.

"When he came across the river, the officer stuck out his hand like he's going to help him out of the water, and he put cuffs on him," said John Parnell, pastor of St. Augustine Old Roman Catholic Church in Fort Worth.

what the hell???

i think this is bloody stupid...

he saved a guys life only to spend the night in jail for it.

Charlatan 07-05-2005 06:29 PM

Clearly we don't have the whole story but on the surface the most they should have done (considering he just saved the guy) was give him a stern talking to...

Jail seems a little out of line.

feelgood 07-05-2005 07:03 PM

The world is just senstive these days. When a 10 years old girl jaywalks, she'll be arrested. This is just another case of it.

JStrider 07-05-2005 07:04 PM

i can kinda see where they are coming from...

if the Newman guy had ended up not being a strong enough swimmer to save the other guy then the police would have had to rescue 2 people instead of just one...

but i dont think they shoulda arrested the guy...

kramus 07-05-2005 07:09 PM

He made them look bad I guess - some uniform types are like that. And when they feel dissed, well, most anything can be found to be against some law. And the law was probably written by a committee.

ForgottenKnight 07-05-2005 07:17 PM

He endangered his life to save another. It's the most selfless act anyone can do. He saved the guy's life. Going to jail for it is the stupidest thing I've ever heard of happening to someone.

MexicanOnABike 07-05-2005 10:42 PM

fuck i'm glad I dont live in the USA when i read shit like this!!! wow.... i would SUE the police station for putting me in jail for saving someone....

guthmund 07-06-2005 05:05 AM

Quote:

"When he came across the river, the officer stuck out his hand like he's going to help him out of the water, and he put cuffs on him," said John Parnell, pastor of St. Augustine Old Roman Catholic Church in Fort Worth.
That really says it all right there doesn't it? What a bunch of dicks. Like Kramus pointed out, the guy made the uniforms look like a bunch of idiots. Of course, the natural progression in such cases is from "idiot" to "dick" so this story doesn't at all surprise me much.

sapiens 07-06-2005 05:14 AM

I heard something on the radio about this incident. There is a lot of debate about swimming in that area of the San Marcos river. The current is strong and there's a weak dam nearby. The guy who was arrested was an activist in favor of allowing swimming in that area. So, the police knew the guy. I'll see if I can find a source.

pan6467 07-06-2005 06:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JStrider
i can kinda see where they are coming from...

if the Newman guy had ended up not being a strong enough swimmer to save the other guy then the police would have had to rescue 2 people instead of just one...

but i dont think they shoulda arrested the guy...

If he is impeding the job of the true rescuers whose job it is and they had things under control before he butted in...... then it's an obstruction. Is it jail worthy? Depends on his attitude.

It's the same as if a fire breaks out and some guy starts running in and endangers firefighters lives because he is trying to be a hero.

Now if noone is there helping, and he chooses to do something, then cool. But it sounds like he took it upon himself to interfere, and while the deed was noble it could seriously have had negative repercussions.

joecool 07-06-2005 06:36 AM

Yeah But.......
 
I believe the police when telling him to stop, where considering the likelihood that instead of saving 1 person they would soon be facing the situation of saving both men, thus endangering the life’s of the real emergency crews twice as much. Jail time, a little harsh but its all based on this guys attitude, assholes who break the law (no matter how insignificant) don’t catch breaks from the police. I would love to hear the 'whole' story here.

rsl12 07-08-2005 12:39 PM

I agree with joecool et al. It's great that he saved the guy, but what if he hadn't? Then the rescue team would have an even tricker situation to handle, trying to save two lives, endangering the safety of the *rescue team* even more. Besides that, there the issue that the guy ignored police orders--orders that were there for two reasons: 1. to ensure that other people's safety are not compromised, and 2. to ensure that the police are able to do their job. You say, what's the big deal if one person crosses a police line? Well then, what's the big deal if one spectator walks into the basketball court, out of the way of players, during the Big Game? It's the same thing.

Not that it matters, but I'm an EMT, and his arrest makes perfect sense to me.

Aladdin Sane 07-08-2005 09:57 PM

I live in San Marcos, two mnutes drive from this area of the river.
People drown or almost drown at that site frequently. There's a waterfall. People jump into it and get sucked under. In the summer, people have to be rescued at that spot more times than I know. It's very dangerous there. I swim just below the falls every weekend. I was there when this incident occurred. The fire rescue squad knows exactly what must be done to rescue swimmers at that place. They don't need some nucklehead getting in the way, and perhaps drowning himself. Trained rescuers can't go in the water while someone else is there who might pose a threat to them. It happens all the time that a panicked swimmer will drown someone who is trying to save him. The guy who saved the drowning man is no hero. This time he got lucky. He could've caused something worse to have happened.

Aladdin Sane 07-09-2005 07:08 AM

I just found out that since April the rescue squad has been called to the falls 7 times. Six times they came away with a warm body. One time they recovered a corpse.

In other news, the "hero" of this story has published a letter in the San Marcos Daily Record. He makes a good case for his actions, and he doesn't seem like he's on an ego trip.

I'm beginning to think this one depends on which side of the river you were standing on. Or if you happened to be in the water...

Astrocloud 07-09-2005 10:03 AM

I personally think that the cops are the ones with the ego's here. If they tell you that 2 and 2 is 3 then you are supposed to smile and nod and agree whole heartedly.

Saving the guys life seemed obvious to the guy doing the saving -but the cops undoubtedly wanted to tell him what was possible and what wasn't. "Oh you don't agree that 2 and 2 is 3? -Well then, you are under arrest."

From the San Marcos Record

http://www.sanmarcosrecord.com/conte...ront/photo.jpg

Here is the only quote I could find on the defendent's letter to the editor:

Quote:

"Had there been divers in the area, ready to take over, I would have gladly moved aside, yet I saw no rescue divers present at the scene, nor any rescue personnel at large, who even got their feet wet that day," Newman said in a letter to the Daily Record. "... I knew and hoped that maybe I had a chance there to help him, and I stand by the decision that I made that day."
http://www.sanmarcosrecord.com/artic...news/news2.txt

jalora 07-09-2005 06:55 PM

The bottom line is always the same: Police officers are not your friends.

fhqwhgads 07-09-2005 07:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jalora
The bottom line is always the same: Police officers are not your friends.

*sigh* This is why sometimes I hate my job...

Ok, I felt the need to elaborate:

Quote:

Dave Newman, 48, disobeyed repeated orders by emergency personnel to leave the water, police said.
I'm sure that the guys intentions were good, but if he was told repeatedly not to interfere with the rescue effort, and he made the concious decision to disobey, then he can face the consequences. If the rescuers wanted his help, and he was indeed helping, I doubt that they would have had a problem with his efforts. If he was "getting in the way" or otherwise making their rescue effort more difficult, then he deserved to get locked up.

I was handling a traffic accident one day, directing traffic, and a guy didn't like the way I was handling it, so he took it upon himself and started to direct traffic himself. He almost caused a serious accident. I'm sure that his intentions were good, but he ended up creating more problems.

If this guy had been told several times not to get in the way, and he ended up drowning, we'd all be calling him a dumbass. Do the ends justify the means?

ngdawg 07-09-2005 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jalora
The bottom line is always the same: Police officers are not your friends.

Some of mine are. I sincerely hope that one day you don't have to make a call that requires their area of expertise. Call a friend instead.
/me steps off soapbox.

Bill O'Rights 07-09-2005 09:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jalora
The bottom line is always the same: Police officers are not your friends.

Not so. I still have several very good friends that are police officers. I would trust my life to them, and did...day, after day, after day...for about five years. Until I hung up my gun belt for good.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fhqwhgads
If this guy had been told several times not to get in the way, and he ended up drowning, we'd all be calling him a dumbass.

And that pretty much sums up the whole damn thing.

Elphaba 07-09-2005 09:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jalora
The bottom line is always the same: Police officers are not your friends.

This post deeply troubles me. I have never had a problem with any form of law enforcement unless I deserved it. (Speeding, not wearing seatbeat, etc.)

I HAVE been "protected and served" many times. Some of the homicide detectives went above and beyond the call of duty to protect us. They were not our "friends" in terms of a personal relationship.

Jalora, please explain your meaning when you claim that "police officers are not your friends." :hmm:

jorgelito 07-10-2005 09:45 AM

It may be different if you're a minority. I live in LA and unfortunately, cops aren't your "freind" here. It's a city where you call 9-11 and either get a busy signal, no answer, or voice-mail. It's a city where the cops are severely understaffed. For some reason, LA is a "unfriendly" place. I've had to call the cops many, many times. Mostly, they don't show up. (Our store was held up by gub oint - the cops took two hours to come). The next time we were robbed, I had the white girl in our store call the cops and tell them the robber wsa black and last seen headed for Beverly Hills. The cops arrived in less than 5 minutes.

So it depend on your experience whether or not cops are perceived to be your "friend" or not.

Aladdin Sane 07-10-2005 12:02 PM

The charges were dropped against the rescuer yesterday. The cops say they were correct in arresting him but in light of the circumstances they have dropped the charges.

I've flipped and flopped on this one, but in light of an eye witness account published in this morning's local paper, I think the university police botched this one good.

In any case, charges have been dropped.

End of case.

Blackthorn 07-10-2005 12:31 PM

Quote:

He was charged with interfering with public duties.
Well what public duties were being interfered with? If there is a group of people standing around not doing something to rescue someone who is in danger of drowning (who is also arguably a dumbass) then what choice did he have? Were they waiting to take a vote on who was going in after this ass-clown who couldn't swim? Sounds to me like the police folk got their feelings hurt by being shown up by someone more willing to take action. At least common sense prevailed and they dropped the charges.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:59 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360