Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   Terrorism (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/88324-terrorism.html)

Aedin 05-02-2005 04:05 PM

Terrorism
 
I was watching the news couple days ago and heard that Iran has recently gained the knowledge of how to create an EMP bomb that could fry the united states electricity. My first reaction to that was yeah right because Iran from my view doesnt possess the technology to make something that big. I am not even sure if the US has the technology to produce something of that scale. Has anyone else heard of this?

JamesB 05-02-2005 05:35 PM

EMP bombs are almost exceedingly easy to make (in theory). The idea is that you create a very powerful electromagnet and immediately stop the magnetic field by blowing up the source. Apparently the faster the "fall time" the more effective the pulse.

Still - I'd just throw chains into sub-stations .. far easier to topple power grids that way.

ironmaiden7o7 05-02-2005 09:14 PM

I'm sorry but these topics and ideas make my skin crawl.

mokle 05-02-2005 10:52 PM

Who cares. You saw it on the news, so it's probably BS.

I wouldn't worry about it.

flamingdog 05-03-2005 05:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ironmaiden7o7
I'm sorry but these topics and ideas make my skin crawl.

So they shouldn't be discussed?

stingc 05-03-2005 05:35 AM

The most effective EMP weapon is a standard nuclear warhead. If detonated in the upper atmosphere, a reasonably sized H-bomb can destroy electronics for several hundred miles (or more) in all directions.

Non-nuclear EMP devices would affect a MUCH smaller area. Although probably very useful for an army to have, it could not be used to cripple a country.

ObieX 05-03-2005 05:56 AM

Even if Iran had one they would never be able to deploy it against the US so there's no need to worry.

doncalypso 05-03-2005 06:03 AM

Even if Iran developed EMP bombs they wouldn't have a delivery system capable of making those warheads reach the United States.

People need to realize that to date North Korea, Iran, Lybia, or other such "rogue states" do not have the capacity to build missiles with the kind of range to effectively hit the United States.

Phage 05-03-2005 10:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doncalypso
Even if Iran developed EMP bombs they wouldn't have a delivery system capable of making those warheads reach the United States.

People need to realize that to date North Korea, Iran, Lybia, or other such "rogue states" do not have the capacity to build missiles with the kind of range to effectively hit the United States.

Of course, this is not to say that they will never have that capacity. Therefore I think it is clear we should be hard at work on our missile defense system; how some people are against it I cannot fathom.

EMP is not very hard at all to shield against, and one of the few examples of where a tin-foil hat works wonders. Grounded chicken wire can be used to protect entire structures and if you do a search on "Faraday cages" you will come up with a ton of info.

Pragma 05-03-2005 10:38 AM

The key is that you don't need a long-range missile to deliver an EMP blast to a city - it wouldn't be terribly difficult to smuggle the materials in (or simply buy them). I don't believe that the requisite materials are that complicated, though I could be wrong.

Even a small-scale EMP blast, properly placed, could cause lots of damage. Imagine taking out the electronics at an airport, stock market, or hospital. This isn't meant to cause irrational panic, but simply to discourage people from saying "They don't have ICBMs, we're safe."

Cuatela 05-03-2005 12:02 PM

It really isn't hard for terrorists to attack. Anyone properly brainwashed could be convinced to set off an EMP somewhere. A lot of the terrorism control focuses on certain groups of people.

Charlatan 05-03-2005 12:09 PM

Some might set off an EMP just for fun.

d*d 05-04-2005 03:03 AM

EMP?! where did that come from, I'm getting a strange feeling of deja-vu, can't you see that the media is just creating another 'justifiable' reason to bomb another country, if you're worried about an EMP threat, think how Iranians are feeling about a US missile attack

F-18_Driver 05-04-2005 05:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by doncalypso
Even if Iran developed EMP bombs they wouldn't have a delivery system capable of making those warheads reach the United States.

People need to realize that to date North Korea, Iran, Lybia, or other such "rogue states" do not have the capacity to build missiles with the kind of range to effectively hit the United States.

Ummmm, why do they need a missile to deliver one?

All they'd have to do is sneak it across the border. After that, you could drop the nuke out of a Piper Cub.

hulk 05-05-2005 03:09 AM

Sure, if that Cub has afterburners. Ain't anything without four engines and a bomb bay lifting a nuke.

ObieX 05-05-2005 03:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by d*d
EMP?! where did that come from, I'm getting a strange feeling of deja-vu, can't you see that the media is just creating another 'justifiable' reason to bomb another country, if you're worried about an EMP threat, think how Iranians are feeling about a US missile attack

What made me worry is within the past few days the chairman of the joint Chiefs of Staff came forward with (from CNN) -
Quote:

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- The chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff has issued a report to Congress that said the conflicts in Iraq and Afghanistan could hamstring the U.S. ability to fight other wars, a senior military official told CNN.
http://www.cnn.com/2005/POLITICS/05/03/myers.report/index.html

What other wars are we planing on getting ourselves into so soon? We're having a big enough pain in the ass trying to deal with the stuff we're in now. Any more and we'll be drafting. The way it comes off is that someone is pushing to try to get us into another conflict to the point where this guy had to come forward and state to the public that if we do we'll be in some trouble. Like before the Afghanistan and Iraq invasions the propoganda machine is churning and the governmnt is trying to pump the country up for military action. This guy probably saw it all going down and is trying to push us away from that.

stingc 05-05-2005 05:40 AM

That statement look pretty innocent to me. It probably just means that we couldn't defend ourselves very well if attacked right now.

MSD 05-05-2005 09:14 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aedin
I was watching the news couple days ago and heard that Iran has recently gained the knowledge of how to create an EMP bomb that could fry the united states electricity. My first reaction to that was yeah right because Iran from my view doesnt possess the technology to make something that big. I am not even sure if the US has the technology to produce something of that scale. Has anyone else heard of this?

Give me $400 and I can build a simple Flux Compression Generator, the most basic EMP weapon. Basically it consists of two electromagnetic coils, one inside of the other, and uses an explosive to short them against each other, creating a moving short circuit in the primary coil that amplifies the magnetic field and projects it outward.

I won't get into details, but it's not exactly rocket science to create something capable of hitting a few square miles. The problem is that every wire in the "blast" radius will be magnetized, and when those fields collapse shortly after the initial attack, power surges can damage systems miles away.

Quote:

Originally Posted by hulk
Sure, if that Cub has afterburners. Ain't anything without four engines and a bomb bay lifting a nuke.

Ever heard of a W88 warhead?

IanSturgill 05-05-2005 09:32 AM

I agree. Most countries don't have the capability to launch any sort of attack on us. And if they did, i would hope our military would quash their efforts with multiple shows of gigantic force.

Cuatela 05-05-2005 11:56 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hulk
Sure, if that Cub has afterburners. Ain't anything without four engines and a bomb bay lifting a nuke.

Sorry, but the F-105 was specifically designed to carry nuclear weapons. It had...one engine. (see this article for more information)

Adonis1782 05-08-2005 08:56 PM

My thoughts on terrorism..... hhhmmmmm I believe our government uses so called "terror" alerts to try to keep the American people scared. Some would say it is quite similar to some of the scare tactics Hitler used in his days.

MSD 05-09-2005 03:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Adonis1782
My thoughts on terrorism..... hhhmmmmm I believe our government uses so called "terror" alerts to try to keep the American people scared. Some would say it is quite similar to some of the scare tactics Hitler used in his days.

Yes, our government is a bunch of Nazis. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

squirrelyburt 05-09-2005 05:30 AM

They are able to reach us, even more scary if they sell or allow one of their devices to go to terrorists. They have missiles that can only go a few hundred miles, but they have ships, we have coastline. The U.S. can easily be reached from international waters.

buy candles.

Charlatan 05-09-2005 06:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MrSelfDestruct
Yes, our government is a bunch of Nazis. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Come, come, that was a bit of a jump... Adonis didn't say they were Nazis they just use similar tactics... We all know that fear is used by governments, ad agencies, etc. to get people to do what they want them to do...

Whether Bush and Co. are doing this intentionally or not is the real question. Adonis seems to think yes and others no.

Sleepyjack 05-09-2005 07:17 AM

This is like the plot of Goldeneye; they had an EMP satelite and were planning to put the world back to the stone age; just before robbing heaps of banks!

Albeit, that's a movie and James Bond saved the day anyway :D

Adonis1782 05-10-2005 02:12 PM

Thank you Charlatan. I believe our government uses many means, on purpose, to try to have supreme control of our lives.

pattycakes 05-10-2005 02:58 PM

everything is terrorism anymore

its a bunch of bullshit to get out attention and make us fearful. dont get me started on how everything has be come terrorism. If you say ill kiull you all thats a terror threat now. Not just a threat a terroristic threat

Phage 05-10-2005 08:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pattycakes
everything is terrorism anymore

"Anymore" is not the same as "nowadays"!

Correct:
"Do they do this anymore?" <- This is asking if they do this "any more", or nowadays with an implied past.

Crazy Midland/Northern Irish Misuse:
"Everything is terrorism anymore." <- This makes no sense! "Any" and "more" make no sense when broken apart in this context!

/Pet peeve rant.

spindles 05-10-2005 09:38 PM

Didn't they use one of these thingys in the remake of Ocean's eleven? Drove it right where they wanted it in the back of a truck.

I believe that everything hollywood does is plausible ;)


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:33 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360