![]() |
Quote:
The point is that if you are independent you are no longer subject to the whims of anyone else to pay the rent and buy the groceries, hence the mention of trust fund kiddies and the rich. (For the record, I am not a bush supporter. None of parties managed field a candidate I liked.) |
hope that nothing i said indicated i understood you to be a bush supporter--if i did, i retract it, as it did not cross my mind either way.
what i objected to (maybe read into, i dont know) your post was extending the obvious questions of economic rationality (how one gets over in the "marketplace" of cultural goods, if one does) to prescriptions about production as such. on the other hadn, the bit about the "text of time" was obviously problematic, particularly if you are yourself going to shift into something like a sociological understanding of how cultural production is regulated (by saying that one must be authorized or made acceptable as the poster producer for matters related to dissent, for example). later on, it got entangled with questions of "responsibility" (not from you...rather from artelevision) which pushed the matter into yet more nebulous space.... |
As an artist I think that is the lamest thing I ever heard, much like Duchamp's Nude Descending a Staircase, it cause uproar. Duchamp went on to continue a great career in art. What better than to get this much publicity for free? To those of you that think we live in the free-est country in the world...travel. You will see that we really don't. We just live in a country in the world. Sure, there are some where you will be killed for actions like a monkey-president painting, but there are a lot more where you won't. Sad that our constitution is only wins when the stronger man flexes it.
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:55 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project