Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   Sperm donor must pay child support (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/64097-sperm-donor-must-pay-child-support.html)

Karby 07-28-2004 12:44 PM

Sperm donor must pay child support
 
Quote:

HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania (AP) -- A state appeals court ruled that a verbal agreement between a woman and her sperm donor was invalid, and ordered the man to pay child support for the woman's twins.

The three-judge panel ruled Thursday that the deal between Joel McKiernan and Ivonne Ferguson -- in which McKiernan donated his sperm and would not be obligated to pay any support -- was unenforceable because of "legal, equitable and moral principles."

Despite an agreement that appeared to be a binding contract, the father is obligated to provide financial support, the court decided.

"It is the interest of the children we hold most dear,"' wrote Senior Judge Patrick Tamalia.

McKiernan's attorney said he may appeal.

http://www.cnn.com/2004/LAW/07/23/sp....ap/index.html

no one forced that woman to go to a sperm bank. a guy donates sperm, fine. but she was the one who wanted the kid, she was one who went to the sperm bank, she was one who wanted to get herself pregnant, and now this guy will have to pay for raising up the resulting kid on the basis of "legal, equitable and moral principles?" What principles? this is some bull.

Seaver 07-28-2004 12:50 PM

Can you say appeal? Sorry but that ruling was bullshit.

the_marq 07-28-2004 12:53 PM

So this lady just fucked up the whole sperm donor program for everyone.

You'd have to be a moron to donate sperm now...and then they wouldn't want you. Paging Captain Yossarian.

Cynthetiq 07-28-2004 01:12 PM

that's just lame, but it sounds like she bypassed going to an actual sperm bank facility.

MooseMan3000 07-28-2004 01:17 PM

...

blink, blink.

...


If that was the whole story, I would say I've lost faith in our legal system.

HOWEVER.

The two knew each other beforehand. They had a two year long affair. They entered an agreement where he was going to donate sperm and she was going to be insemenated with said sperm. It's not as if he anonymously donated the sperm and some random woman asked him to pay child support. It was, in effect, their illegitimate child.

If that man in good conscience agreed to donate the sperm when he knew that the woman would not be able to support to child(ren), he SHOULD be forced to pay child support.

ARTelevision 07-28-2004 01:18 PM

The family courts will have to assign legal fatherhood in this case and really in all cases - they're all about that - especially in support-related cases. I don't see any way around it. I spent a lot of years involved in child-custody stuff and you don't want to get me started on that - especially the way fatherhood is...um, treated by the family courts. But I can see this sort of thing as inevitable.

MooseMan3000 07-28-2004 01:38 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by ARTelevision
The family courts will have to assign legal fatherhood in this case and really in all cases - they're all about that - especially in support-related cases. I don't see any way around it. I spent a lot of years involved in child-custody stuff and you don't want to get me started on that - especially the way fatherhood is...um, treated by the family courts. But I can see this sort of thing as inevitable.
I assume you mean that the father is held responsible for nearly everything, even if he doesn't appear to be.

I have to say that I'm biased in the other direction, because my parents divorced 7 or 8 years ago, and my dad was given a reasonable child support and custody package. He is an attorney, and he makes a reasonable income, and the child support he was going to have to pay for myself and my younger sister was well within his budget. However, it was supposed to be paid on a monthly basis, and after all these years he's paid his monthly requirement roughly 3 times. My mother is a high school teacher, and she certainly cannot afford to support her children alone, but the courts haven't seen fit to force my father to pay. As such, my mother is selling her house, and she now has 3 part time jobs to try to stay afloat.

Man, those family courts sure do put too much burden on the father. [/sarcasm]

sexymama 07-28-2004 04:39 PM

Read the entire article. This man was stupid to not put the agreement in writing. He knew the woman for two years. They had an affair that was ending. He must have known that she couldn't be totally trusted. Plus, she says they never made the agreement. This is clearly a case of he said/she said and we'll never know the exact truth.

As for messing up sperm banks -- it should have no effect as this is a completely different situation.

World's King 07-28-2004 04:44 PM

There is one more part of American life that's now discreidted.

ARTelevision 07-28-2004 04:48 PM

http://www.acfc.org/

MooseMan3000, thanks for the sarcasm. duly noted.
I acknowledge and respect your anecdotal experience.

In any event, it's well enough known that family courts are self-avowedly biased toward mothers. It's a tradition that extended from its cultural roots directly into law.

In any event, the courts will assess fatherhood obligations to sperm donors - I do not doubt that.
That's the point of the thread.

Averett 07-28-2004 05:11 PM

Quote:

Sperm donor must pay child support
HARRISBURG, Pennsylvania (AP) -- A state appeals court ruled that a verbal agreement between a woman and her sperm donor was invalid, and ordered the man to pay child support for the woman's twins.

The three-judge panel ruled Thursday that the deal between Joel McKiernan and Ivonne Ferguson -- in which McKiernan donated his sperm and would not be obligated to pay any support -- was unenforceable because of "legal, equitable and moral principles."

Despite an agreement that appeared to be a binding contract, the father is obligated to provide financial support, the court decided.

"It is the interest of the children we hold most dear,"' wrote Senior Judge Patrick Tamalia.

McKiernan's attorney said he may appeal.

The decision could have implications for sperm and egg donors who expect anonymity, said Arthur Caplan, a professor and medical ethicist at the University of Pennsylvania.

"Anybody who is a sperm donor ought to understand that their identity could be made known to any child that's produced, and they could be seen by the courts as the best place to go to make sure the child has adequate financial support," he said Friday.

According to the trial judge's opinion, Ferguson and McKiernan met while working together and had a two-year affair. The relationship waned by late 1993, when Ferguson convinced McKiernan to act as a sperm donor with no responsibility for any child born as a result, the opinion said.

McKiernan, who has paid up to $1,520 a month in support since losing the case at trial, said he was not pleased with the ruling, but declined to comment further.

Ferguson's lawyer, Elizabeth Hoffman, said there was never evidence of an agreement between the two in which McKiernan would not have to pay any support.

"There was no evidence except his word and her word and it was a matter of credibility," he said.
Please quote the full article next time. Just that little bit you pasted missed quite a lot of information.

StormBerlin 07-28-2004 08:03 PM

Quote:

Originally posted by MooseMan3000
...

blink, blink.

...


If that was the whole story, I would say I've lost faith in our legal system.

HOWEVER.

The two knew each other beforehand. They had a two year long affair. They entered an agreement where he was going to donate sperm and she was going to be insemenated with said sperm. It's not as if he anonymously donated the sperm and some random woman asked him to pay child support. It was, in effect, their illegitimate child.

If that man in good conscience agreed to donate the sperm when he knew that the woman would not be able to support to child(ren), he SHOULD be forced to pay child support.

Yep.

pocon1 07-30-2004 05:38 PM

Never trust women.

ariekitten 07-30-2004 08:51 PM

i think rulings that lean toward pressing hard on legal fathers or not also depends ALOT on the state you're living in. while Mooseman has experienced the courts' lack of enforcement, others have experienced where the courts are too harsh on the legal fathers.

i know a guy who is having a kid with his gf but now she doesn't want anything to do with the guy, yet he has been devoted to the relationship and the developing baby the whole time. he's now going to hafta fight for custody rights, and they are trying to really rob him as far as the child support goes.

texas seems to be a state where they're not consistent from one case to another....

but as far as that sperm donating case, i think he should hafta pay at least something because he donated non-annonymously to a woman he had already had relations with, and he never got it in writing that he would be duty-free. *shrug* but still that woman shouldn't have done what she did.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:24 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360