Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   How Specifications Live Forever (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/24550-how-specifications-live-forever.html)

asdf1001 08-28-2003 07:03 AM

How Specifications Live Forever
 
How Specifications Live Forever
================================

When you see a space shuttle sitting on the launch pad, there
are two big booster rockets attached to the sides of the main
fuel tank. These are the solid rocket boosters, or SRBs.

The SRBs are made by Morton Thiokol at a factory in Utah.

Originally, the engineers who designed the SRBs wanted to make
them much fatter than they are. Unfortunately, the SRBs had to
be shipped by train from the factory to the launch site in
Florida and the railroad line runs through a tunnel in the
mountains. The SRBs had to be made to fit through that tunnel.

Now, the width of that tunnel is just a little wider than the
U.S. Standard Railroad Gauge (distance between the rails) of 4
feet, 8.5 inches.

That's an exceedingly odd number. Did you ever wonder why that
gauge was used? Because US railroads were designed and built by
English expatriates, and that's the way they built them in
England.

Okay, then why did the English engineers build them like that?

Because the first rail lines of the 19th century were built by
the same craftsmen who built the pre-railroad tramways, and
that's the gauge they used.

I'll bite, why did those craftsmen choose that gauge? Because
they used the same jigs and tools that were previously used for
building wagons, and you guessed it, the wagons used that wheel
spacing.

Now I feel like a fish on a hook! Why did the wagons use that
odd wheel spacing?

Well, if the wagon makers and wheelwrights of the time tried to
use any other spacing, the wheel ruts on some of the old, long
distance roads would break the wagon axles. As a result, the
wheel spacing of the wagons had to match the spacing of the
wheel ruts worn into those ancient European roads.

So who built those ancient roads?

The first long distance roads in Europe were built by Imperial
Rome for the benefit of their legions. The roads have been used
ever since.

And the ruts?

The initial ruts, which everyone else had to match for fear of
destroying their wagons, were first made by Roman war chariots.
And since the chariots were made by Imperial Roman chariot
makers, they were all alike in the matter of wheel spacing.

Well, here we are. We now have the answer to the original
question. The United States standard railroad gauge of 4 feet,
8.5 inches derives from the original specification for an
Imperial Roman army war chariot.

Specs and bureaucracies live forever.

That's nice to know, but it still doesn't answer why the
Imperial Roman war chariot designers chose to spec the chariot's
wheel spacing at exactly 4 feet, 8.5 inches.

Are you ready?

Because that was the width needed to accommodate the rear ends
of two Imperial Roman war horses!!!

Well, now you have it. The railroad tunnel through which the
late 20th century space shuttle SRBs must pass was excavated
slightly wider than two 1st century horses' butts.

Consequently, a major design feature of what is arguably the
world's most advanced transportation system was spec'd by the
width of a horse's behind!

So, the next time you are handed a specification and wonder what
horses' rear end came up with it, you may be exactly right.
Now you know what is "behind" it all.

~Author Unknown~

Cynthetiq 08-28-2003 07:24 AM

nothing is ever really new, everything is built on some existing technology.

Liquor Dealer 08-28-2003 07:28 AM

That was very interesting - thanks for the research.

i_t_man 08-28-2003 09:00 AM

Sorry, I've got to call B.S. on this. I read this story and thought "wait a minute, they redesigned the Space Shuttle because the boosters wouldn't fit through a train tunnel?"

There are lot's of ways to transport oversized item like that, so I did some research and found this:

http://www.snopes.com/history/american/gauge.htm

By the way Snopes.com is the best place to go whenever you get something like this in your e-mail.

Nisses 08-28-2003 09:16 AM

well, most of the story is still true when you read that page, it's just details that are different.

But yeah, the boosters were sort of stupid :)

skippy 08-28-2003 10:13 AM

The answer here is amazingly simple.

Sionce when are UNITED STATES railroad sizes the standard at all? Yes it's true about how the US standard has evolved (according to out friend I T MAN, thank you!) But the reality is that the european railway size was definitely influenced by the size of two horses. Interstingly I t Man has been devious in a small way in the information he provided... There are differences of opinion about how wide a horses ares is. The three gauges of railroad mentioned in the article were within 4 inches of width of each other. THEY WERe ALL STILL influenced by the percieved size of the width of a horse cart. For me ... being within 4 or even six inches is enough to say that ASDF's story is true. Thanks for the opportunity to comment

skippy

i_t_man 08-28-2003 11:20 AM

I should have been more clear, sorry.

I don't pretend to know anything about railroad gauges. They could be based on the alignment of the stars for all I know.

My objection was that like most stories/facts, the internet takes it and details keep getting added to make the story more interesting.

The facts about railroad gauges are interesting but they would be a lot more interesting if we could somehow tie it to the space shuttle or something modern and high tech. But often the person or people that put these "yarns" together often overshoot the mark into ridiculousness as is the case here.

skysooner 08-28-2003 12:37 PM

I work in a highly technical field, yet I see this all the time. We do things because that is the way it has always been done. A barrel of oil is 42 gallons. How did this come about? It was the size of the containers used to transport oil when the first oil wells were drilled. Other countries sell oil by the cubic meter rather than the barrel. It also applies when people use their problem solving skills. They use the same methods over and over without really questioning why they are doing something a certain way.

rogue49 08-28-2003 12:48 PM

Everything is based on everything else.
And although is might be because of not wanting to change,
it is more likely because of economy of implimentation.

Why recreate the wheel?

But this will be true for ANYTHING
even the most modern and sophisicated standards of measurement are based on an agreement of parties to use that standard.

If aliens came down here, they would be asking WHY are you using that scale?
http://www.remote-control.net/convert/tables/general/

Why a second?
Or a meter?
Or a liter?

For example, why is the second based on it's standards?
You can see in the link above there are four different ways of measuring a second.
But let's say you pick seconds as a portion of minutes,
then it's based on...

"The second is the duration of 9,192,631,770 periods of the radiation corresponding to the transition
between the two hyperfine levels of the ground state of the cesium 133 atom"
http://physics.nist.gov/cuu/Units/current.html

and that's officially derived by only one country's standards
http://www.nist.gov/

BTW, this link is fascinating...look at how many different measurements there are, ways of calculating them
and the implications of each.
Some might save fractions of a penny, that add up to billions in the long run
maybe on a national or global scale.

I love this kind of shit.
How one thing affects another, and so on.

JBX 08-28-2003 12:57 PM

Things that make you go Hmmm.

hobo 08-28-2003 01:56 PM

I remember my old math teacher told us a story of why we most often use X and Y to represent variables. I forget what it was, but it had something to do with printing presses.

Thraeryn 08-28-2003 02:35 PM

hobo, it was probably something about the number of Xs and Ys available. If you have twenty full alphabet sets that you use to print a complete page, you're bound to have about, say, twenty leftover Xs and Ys. Why not put `em to mathematical use?

TheHornDog 01-29-2005 01:45 PM

still makes ya think tho

whocarz 01-31-2005 03:14 AM

Pretty old thread, but I thought I'd comment. The supposed fact that the ruts in roads were caused by "Roman war chariots" is, in actuality, not a fact, but instead, bullshit. By the time Rome had become an Imperial power, chariots as war machines had been obsolete for centuries. The only purpose a chariot would have served in Imperial Rome would be ceremonial. A better answer would be that those ruts were caused by wagons, because yes, the ancients had wagons just like less ancient people did, and used them for many things, including trade and supplying armies and so on.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:53 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360