Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community  

Go Back   Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community > Chatter > General Discussion


 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-28-2003, 12:08 PM   #1 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: South Bend
Overpopulation

Quote:
Originally posted by Phaenx
Humans tend to crowd into small places, ever been to Montana? Pennsylvania? That's a cute site, but they're only trying to scare you.

(make a new thread to respond)
Ok, I will admit...that is a good point. However, we need to keep places like Montana and our National & State Parks virtually untouched.

It was all beautiful land like that until we turned it into huge cities reaking of pollution.
chizzle is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 12:19 PM   #2 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Remember LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION.

Liquor Dealer once posted on why he'd never be interested in living in New York City. It's one of the most densly populated places in the world. But as far as I'm concerned the quality of life that I lead here surpasses what I can get in Montana. I can take public transportation. I can walk to parks, theater, libraries, concerts, restaurants, shops, and museums. I cannot do any of that in Montana.

I grew up in Los Angeles, I went to National Parks all my llife, and I still love to go to them. Places grow because that's what happens. People who like to live in small towns, well that mentality picks up from growing towns and moves further out. In my lifetime, I have watched the desert between Los Angeles and Las Vegas grow from tumbleweed territory to bumper to bumper traffic of Banana Republic/GAP/Starbucks gentrification.

Back to New York.... back in the 1600's NY was a wilderness area, with streams, mountains, trees, and wildlife. It took a couple hundred years to get it to as crowded as it is today. Some streams still exist underneath the towers of Manhattan, they just run across on concrete conduits. I can tell you that some of the people who lived in New York were responsible for some of the abilities to get into the interiors of the United States easily and profitably.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.

Last edited by Cynthetiq; 07-28-2003 at 12:22 PM..
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 12:20 PM   #3 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: MI
i don't mean to sound like hitler here, but our only hope is to kill anyone that scores low on tests of intelligence and physical ability. only the strong/smart should survive
TaLoN is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 12:22 PM   #4 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: South Bend
Quote:
Originally posted by Cynthetiq
Remember LOCATION, LOCATION, LOCATION.
So you do agree then that we are crowded and overpopulated? or not?
chizzle is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 12:29 PM   #5 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
Quote:
Originally posted by chizzle
So you do agree then that we are crowded and overpopulated? or not?
Studies, (i'm trying to locate them) have shown that urban sprawl is happening but it isn't encroaching on the National Parks. There is still plenty of space here inside the US to develop other cities. Go to the Bureua of Land Management and you will find that just in the Western United States there is still plenty of undeveloped land.



I know some people who commute from Pennsylvania all the way to New York City taking about 2.5 hours of commuting time daily. I know some others on Long Island who do about the same level as well. Both of them stated to me their choice was because cost of home ownership and quality of life, but their incomes were based on NYC salaries because they could not secure local employment.

There are also cases of people in the San Francisco area who drive about 4 hours daily to commute to their jobs. So yes, there is urban sprawl. Yes, there is crowding, but I would not say that NYC or SF is overcrowded or overpopulated.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 12:31 PM   #6 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: South Bend
Quote:
Originally posted by TaLoN
i don't mean to sound like hitler here, but our only hope is to kill anyone that scores low on tests of intelligence and physical ability. only the strong/smart should survive
As clever as that might sound...it would cause lots of problems and probably wouldn't be the "right" thing to do. For every action their is a reaction. I think it would piss of the familys of the murdered and might leave the rest with a guilty conscious.

I think the best thing to do is provide free birth control education to every nation in the world. Free condoms and birth control should be distributed regularly.

I heard something disturbing the other day. Russia has an average of 1 condom per person, per year or something like that. Russia is bad off financially but, they are not considered third world (are they?)

Imagine how bad it is in Africa and places like that where most the population has HIV and they are reproducing like crazy.

They already don't have enough food to feed the existing, let alone enough food to feed the existing's offspring. It is natural to want to have sex...we are sexual creatures...but, we must provide birth control to control world population.
chizzle is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 12:38 PM   #7 (permalink)
Tilted Cat Head
 
Cynthetiq's Avatar
 
Administrator
Location: Manhattan, NY
I do think that you need to edit your premise and clarify just what your topic encompasses. It's pretty broad, I thought originally you were only talking about the US, but globally is slightly different.

I see that you are well traveled. Looking at this from a larger global perspective, it's not just about people staying to one place or area, but it's about land habitablility and the ability for people to survive on those lands. If you were to talk about Iceland, well there is not that much habitable land, but what is habitable tends to attract more people. Taken to a global perspective, it seems to be along those same lines.
__________________
I don't care if you are black, white, purple, green, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, hippie, cop, bum, admin, user, English, Irish, French, Catholic, Protestant, Jewish, Buddhist, Muslim, indian, cowboy, tall, short, fat, skinny, emo, punk, mod, rocker, straight, gay, lesbian, jock, nerd, geek, Democrat, Republican, Libertarian, Independent, driver, pedestrian, or bicyclist, either you're an asshole or you're not.
Cynthetiq is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 12:42 PM   #8 (permalink)
My future is coming on
 
lurkette's Avatar
 
Moderator Emeritus
Location: east of the sun and west of the moon
Overpopulation isn't (necessarily) about space - we've got plenty of space for new people. It's about resources. How much land does it take to house new people, pave their roads, build their schools, keep up with the rising Western standard of living, and especially, grow their food. The problem with overpopulation isn't necessarily in Western countries, either, where the population growth rate is generally even or negative. It's in developing nations where there are already too few resources to take care of existing populations. Overpopulation destabilizes these societies and leads to violence, famine, yadda yadda yadda.
__________________
"If ten million people believe a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing."

- Anatole France
lurkette is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 12:52 PM   #9 (permalink)
The Northern Ward
 
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Quote:
Originally posted by chizzle
As clever as that might sound...it would cause lots of problems and probably wouldn't be the "right" thing to do. For every action their is a reaction. I think it would piss of the familys of the murdered and might leave the rest with a guilty conscious.

I think the best thing to do is provide free birth control education to every nation in the world. Free condoms and birth control should be distributed regularly.

I heard something disturbing the other day. Russia has an average of 1 condom per person, per year or something like that. Russia is bad off financially but, they are not considered third world (are they?)

Imagine how bad it is in Africa and places like that where most the population has HIV and they are reproducing like crazy.

They already don't have enough food to feed the existing, let alone enough food to feed the existing's offspring. It is natural to want to have sex...we are sexual creatures...but, we must provide birth control to control world population.
More food for the wild animals. Plus, with all the civil war and slaughters going on there, Africa is rarely a problem unless we go there to try and "fix" it. The HIV is taking it's toll as well, so I wouldn't worry about overpopulation there.
__________________
"I went shopping last night at like 1am. The place was empty and this old woman just making polite conversation said to me, 'where is everyone??' I replied, 'In bed, same place you and I should be!' Took me ten minutes to figure out why she gave me a dirty look." --Some guy
Phaenx is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 01:12 PM   #10 (permalink)
Loser
 
Location: South Bend
Quote:
Originally posted by lurkette
Overpopulation isn't (necessarily) about space - we've got plenty of space for new people. It's about resources. How much land does it take to house new people, pave their roads, build their schools, keep up with the rising Western standard of living, and especially, grow their food. The problem with overpopulation isn't necessarily in Western countries, either, where the population growth rate is generally even or negative. It's in developing nations where there are already too few resources to take care of existing populations. Overpopulation destabilizes these societies and leads to violence, famine, yadda yadda yadda.
Well said Lurkette, I agree with you 100%!
chizzle is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 01:51 PM   #11 (permalink)
Observant Ruminant
 
Location: Rich Wannabe Hippie Town
The resources idea is good -- not so much how many people, but what kind of drain they are on the planet's resources. If we've got the resources to keep going indefinitely at this population, the world is not overpopulated. But if we're burning through resources faster than they're created, we are overpopulated. And I think the latter case is true.

As to why certain areas are overpopulated -- because that's where the money is. Major metro areas are centers of money, wealth, and economic activity: meaning, you can get a job, if not always buy a house. In Montana, buying a house would be cheap -- but getting a job? The economy there is small, it probably can't support any more people than the ones who live there now, unless they bring their own jobs with them or choose to retire there (don't need jobs).

There are big cultural and social advantages to the big city, but it's the big city economy that keeps people there. If there was some way to decentralize the economy more -- if more people didn't necessarily have to live near their employers -- you'd see the inhabitants of major metro areas spread out across the U.S. faster like a bag of ball bearings thrown onto a hardwood floor. Big city money, small-town expenses -- yeah, that'd do it.
Rodney is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 02:01 PM   #12 (permalink)
Invisible
 
yournamehere's Avatar
 
Location: tentative, at best
Sorry to disagree with some of you, but we're <i>already</i> past the point where we can expect the resources of the world to satisfactorily sustain us at a decent standard of living.

If we took all the resources of the world and distributed them equally among everyone living, do you have any idea what a shitty standard of living we'd have?

Overpopulation alone isn't the problem, though - it's man's inherent tendencies to favor the good of the individual (himself) over the good of the many that has, and will , lead to our downfall. If this piques your interest at all, I suggest you read <i>The Tragedy of the Commons,"</i> a short essay on our greedy nature. Here's a <A HREF="http://www.constitution.org/cmt/tragcomm.htm">link</A>. Go ahead - it's a good read.

In a nutshell, it states that if a village field (commons) has enough forage to sustain a herd of 20 cattle, and there are 20 families in the village - each with one cow, everyone in the the village will fare well. However, being human, it's only a matter of time before one or more of the villagers realizes that with a second cow, he would be twice as well off, and - even though the good of his village will suffer (because the commons can't support 21 cows - only 20) he'll acquire the second cow anyway - favoring his individual benefit over the losses of the village - even though he is part of the village. This is because the positive aspect of adding another cow to the commons is his alone, while the negative aspect is shared by all 20 families

Now - imagine if the village only had 10 families. Then <i>every</i> family could have 2 cows. Of course, it's only a matter of time before someone would want three . . . . . or four . . .
__________________
If you want to avoid 95% of internet spelling errors:
"If your ridiculous pants are too loose, you're definitely going to lose them. Tell your two loser friends over there that they're going to lose theirs, too."
It won't hurt your fashion sense, either.
yournamehere is offline  
Old 07-28-2003, 02:14 PM   #13 (permalink)
Crazy
 
Location: VA
How about looking at who is reproducing to cause the population growth. It seems that the people NOT reproducing are more often the very busy professionals who care more about money than family (ie: intelligent people). if this is true, the the population growth is leading to an overall less intelligent population.
__________________
-- If at first you don't succeed, try something else. You're obviously no good at that.
brad-va is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 01:45 AM   #14 (permalink)
Tilted
 
Quote:
Originally posted by TaLoN
i don't mean to sound like hitler here, but our only hope is to kill anyone that scores low on tests of intelligence and physical ability. only the strong/smart should survive
It is easier that that sir. Jonathan Swift's Modest Proposal?
soapysonic is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 01:54 AM   #15 (permalink)
Crazy
 
when it gets too overpopulated, a plague comes and solves your problems.
__________________
cough
maxero is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 02:48 AM   #16 (permalink)
Conspiracy Realist
 
Sun Tzu's Avatar
 
Location: The Event Horizon
Overpopulation may be taken care of naturally with plagues and such; but as the future moves forward so will medicine which will contribute to a future problem. (a far future problem)

THere will come a day that there will be a populus to big for sustaining life. The far future of the human race rests in the hopeful discovery of wormhole manipulation.
__________________
To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit.- Stephen Hawking
Sun Tzu is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 04:57 AM   #17 (permalink)
Metal and Rock 4 Life
 
Destrox's Avatar
 
Location: Phoenix
I"m happy right now living in PA without a shitload of population.

I'll take nature ANYDAY over neighbors.
__________________
You bore me.... next.
Destrox is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 05:25 AM   #18 (permalink)
Banned
 
There is nothing more beautiful than New York City in the morning. Forests be screwed!
HaloLauren is offline  
Old 07-29-2003, 07:22 AM   #19 (permalink)
Banned
 
dasfdas

think thats overpopulation? No way man, China is wayyyy overpopulated. it makes Pennsylyvania look like nothing
jeenyus is offline  
 

Tags
overpopulation

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:58 AM.

Tilted Forum Project

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360