Right slams MOH Award
 

I was wondering how long and exactly how the religious right would find fault with Obama awarding the Medal of Honor to a living soldier

Source

I always wonder when I read about a someone being awarded major medals of honor, seems to me that there's likely a lot of service men and women who earn them yet never are awarded. But to claim this man didn't earn it because he was saving lives of fellow soldiers rather then killing the emeny seems rather lame.

Thoughts?

Wow....really?

is this the moron that has an issue with the reason for this recipient?

That's the man, I use the term "man" here ironically. Never served, doesn't have a clue as far as I'm concerned.

I hope a lot the right comes out and toasts him but I fear Rush et el will join in the ugliness.

If his superiors thought he deserved the award, he deserves it. Saving the lives of your buddies is just as important as killing the enemy. Reading the Wikipedia article, he did manage to kill one enemy soldier.

Reading further, it looks like the Medal of Honor isn't just for combat operations either. Mary Edwards Walker - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The writer is just another whackjob looking for things to complain about.

Thanks Dogzilla, seems like something like this both right and left could come together and agree.

The guy writes for something called the American Family Association and is stating that it's more honourable and more courageous to kill someone than it is to save lives.

He then goes on to call the awarding the saving of lives as a "feminization" (and even makes the preposterous assumption that this is a bad thing).

The guy needs to check himself. He's undermined the very idea of family.

I already hate myself for saying this but having read the official accounts of his actions I find them to be very brave and definitely worthy of respect... but the justification of giving him a Medal of Honor for this just doesn't work. If you award him the honor based on the entire ambush then his whole squad obviously acted impressively, but if you award him the honor based solely on his lone actions of running out to rescue the other soldier then it just doesn't remotely compare with the standard that seems to have been set for the Medal of Honor.

The problem is that either his entire unit deserves commendation or you have to narrow down the scope of what actions you're looking at so much that it becomes silly to award a Medal of Honor for it. I wouldn't have seen any problem with giving his entire unit the Distinguished Service Cross or something but it just seems wrong the way this is being justified.


Regardless of all the politics behind that though Mr. Fischer is very loudly announcing that he creates a vacuum to the entire world.

If they didn't find something to complain about, nobody would tune in. And they have to be more outrageous to get more advertisements and media promotion...

Hell, I'm surprised they're not checking his citizenship status.

"Damn Latinos are stealing all our medals!" - Rich White People

This would be high on the list of things I'm unqualified to offer an opinion on as it should be for him. What a dumbass.

...as does that entire organization on a regular basis... but I digress.

/threadjack

+1

I like that someone was given this award for saving lives instead of taking them. Clearly this young man is a hero by any reasonable metric. If the AFA has nothing to contribute, they should go about their business of collapsing due to their own incompetence and radicalization.

If I remember correctly, Sgt. Giunta shot the two men dragging off his comrade, killing one of them. Furthermore, the two men he "rescued" ended up dying of their wounds. So, this notion of taking/not taking lives is moot. He took a life and he didn't really save a life.

I agree with SecretMethod that this didn't seem to rise to the level of MOH status, but I wasn't there and don't know the true level of risk involved in the action. I'll trust those who nominated.

While I am not "the right", I don't view him as speaking for "the right". He speaks for himself, and he's a dick.

I wouldn't say "THEY" or "THE right" or any plural association with people of conservative beliefs. Especially with a comment as strange and out there as this one.

Its ONE GUY. Yet posters use this to paint "THEY (conservatives/religious)" with the same brush.

This is akin to a wacko Liberal putting Jesus defamation art in say a National art gallery. ONE man, not indicative of a GROUP.

-thought this board was past that 3rd grade polarization and taking the media bait-

A member of the christian religious right saying we need more death in war.
Now there's something to ponder. How Christ-like, huh?

ya know, we all talk about this slime in forums such as this, around the water cooler, etc. why don't we individually and/or collectively send him a copy of our comments so that maybe he might get the hint that he isn't traveling the moral high ground that he thinks he is?

just a thought...

You mean Bryan Fischer? I doubt he cares. He's writing this crap for people who agree with him, not for people like us.