Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   Negros in the Census (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/154891-negros-census.html)

raging moderate 06-21-2010 05:07 PM

Negros in the Census
 
so, whilst trolling around on the internet, I "stumbled" upon a site that shows the census Race section since the 1700s. I didn't realize that, in 2010, we still describe black people as "negros." My first response is WTF. Is this an acceptable label for anyone these days? If so I was unaware...

Racebox.org - The Census since 1790

http://www.racebox.org/images/2010.jpg

Baraka_Guru 06-21-2010 05:11 PM

As you can see, it lists Black, African American, and Negro. They're covering the bases just in case there are old-fashioned people out there I guess.

Yeah, the word is quite archaic and even insulting to some. Think of the words Negroid, Negress, and Jewess, etc.---all quite archaic and probably offensive.

You get the same issue with the indigenous peoples in North America. It isn't clear what they prefer to use to identify them, and many don't care. However, you get Native American, First Nations, etc. And within certain peoples, you get issues. For example, the Inuit are no longer called Eskimos, and the various peoples of Asia are no longer considered Oriental.

Seaver 06-21-2010 05:12 PM

Negro College Fund
National Association the Advancement of Colored People

My friend in college was taught by his mother to identify himself as Negro and never African American. Negro is simply an older term for Blacks (latin origin), and was actually the PC term for a long time.

There's a reason there are multiple lines for the same race. It's a complex historical and political history, for which self identification is important. I'm sure my friends mother would have been angry if it wasn't on the list.

MSD 06-21-2010 05:29 PM

That is there because in the 2000 census so many people identified as "other - negro" that it was more efficient to add it back despite the current political incorrectness. Like it or not, it helps to make sure people are represented properly.

levite 06-21-2010 06:12 PM

That's the government for you. Personally, I felt proud to stand up and be counted amongst my coreligionist Hebrews and Israelitish-Americans.

Grancey 06-21-2010 07:53 PM

As a child in Alabama I had friends who referred to themselves as "negro". As I got older they began to refer to themselves as "African American". Suddenly, at some point that changed to "black". I usually asked my friends what they preferred and went with that. I looked at the US Census website and this is the official statement on the term "negro" being used on the census form.

http://2010.census.gov/2010census/about/whole.php

Quote:

In this day and age, why is the word “Negro” included as part of the race question on the 2010 Census form?

The wording of the race category labeled “Black, African Am., or Negro” is based on Office of Management and Budget standards and Census Bureau research that showed a segment of the population still identifies itself as “Negro.” The Census Bureau has a research team dedicated to investigating issues and analyzing data on the nation’s diverse racial and ethnic groups. The Census Bureau is testing the removal of the term “Negro” from the question on race, and results of this research will inform design changes for future surveys and the 2020 Census. We are sorry if some are offended by the use of this word in the 2010 Census and hope that it will not stop them from returning their forms and being fully counted by the census.

Ourcrazymodern? 06-23-2010 08:05 AM

I wonder why "White" has no qualifiers?

flat5 06-23-2010 08:47 AM

..

Lasereth 06-23-2010 09:19 AM

My wife read an article that said the reason it's still on there is because last time it was left off and some blacks complained because it was their preferred term. Now it's included, and of course people are complaining on the other side as well.

Plan9 06-23-2010 09:34 AM

It is only racist when a honky says it.

Walt 06-23-2010 11:43 AM

Meh. My only beef with the census was that it lists "Colombian, Salvadorian, Japanese, Korean, Vietnamese" as if nationality and "race" are somehow the same thing.

FWIW, I described myself simply as "American".

Daniel_ 06-23-2010 01:21 PM

They should just ask for your pantone reference

Plan9 06-23-2010 01:31 PM

Why don't we go by blood type? This race/ethnicity shit is a bunch of Dr. Seuss nonsense.

...

This reminds me of the bang-someone-of-a-different-skin-color thread I was supposed to start.

Cynthetiq 06-23-2010 03:14 PM

I was going to say that it was very star belly sneeches.

I pick american too but my cousins put filipino american.
Quote:

Why don't we go by blood type? This race/ethnicity shit is a bunch of Dr. Seuss nonsense.

...

This reminds me of the bang-someone-of-a-different-skin-color thread I was supposed to start.

Ourcrazymodern? 06-24-2010 09:04 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Cynthetiq (Post 2800761)
very star belly

Drawing lines is ABSOLUTELY NECESSARY!

(as long as we do it)

:crazy:

raging moderate 06-27-2010 08:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ourcrazymodern? (Post 2800627)
I wonder why "White" has no qualifiers?

you know that being White doesn't really count as having a race. it seems like it's more often considered to be a non-race. You are either one of a dozen darker-skinned nationalities, or you are "white."

Jeon 06-27-2010 11:10 PM

hey now, we have "Caucasian"

flat5 07-03-2010 03:57 AM

Check out this page. Sure surprised me. It's as if it was written 100 years ago.

A trucker carrying a load of bowling balls - A nigger couple in heaven

FuglyStick 07-03-2010 07:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Plan9 (Post 2800659)
It is only racist when a honky says it.

Cracker

flat5 07-03-2010 08:55 AM

..

remy1492 07-04-2010 12:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Plan9 (Post 2800730)
Why don't we go by blood type? This race/ethnicity shit is a bunch of Dr. Seuss nonsense.

...

This reminds me of the bang-someone-of-a-different-skin-color thread I was supposed to start.

agree, Gattaca everybody


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360