Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community

Tilted Forum Project Discussion Community (https://thetfp.com/tfp/)
-   General Discussion (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/)
-   -   New search engine (https://thetfp.com/tfp/general-discussion/138238-new-search-engine.html)

ShaniFaye 07-28-2008 06:38 AM

New search engine
 
on cnn today there is an article about the new search engine to enter the fray... Cuil
Quote:

Ex-Google workers launch rival search engine - Jul. 28, 2008
Ex-Googlers launch rival search engine
Developers of new engine say it offers a more comprehensive way to search the Internet.

SAN FRANCISCO (AP) -- Anna Patterson's last Internet search engine was so impressive that industry leader Google Inc. bought the technology in 2004 to upgrade its own system.

She believes her latest invention is even more valuable - only this time it's not for sale.

Patterson instead intends to upstage Google, which she quit in 2006 to develop a more comprehensive and efficient way to scour the Internet.

The end result is Cuil, pronounced "cool." Backed by $33 million in venture capital, the search engine plans to begin processing requests for the first time Monday.

Cuil had kept a low profile while Patterson, her husband, Tom Costello, and two other former Google engineers - Russell Power and Louis Monier - searched for better ways to search.

Now, it's boasting time.

Web index: For starters, Cuil's search index spans 120 billion Web pages.

Patterson believes that's at least three times the size of Google's index, although there is no way to know for certain. Google stopped publicly quantifying its index's breadth nearly three years ago when the catalog spanned 8.2 billion Web pages.

Cuil won't divulge the formula it has developed to cover a wider swath of the Web with far fewer computers than Google. And Google isn't ceding the point: Spokeswoman Katie Watson said her company still believes its index is the largest.

After getting inquiries about Cuil, Google asserted on its blog Friday that it regularly scans through 1 trillion unique Web links. But Google said it doesn't index them all because they either point to similar content or would diminish the quality of its search results in some other way. The posting didn't quantify the size of Google's index.

A search index's scope is important because information, pictures and content can't be found unless they're stored in a database. But Cuil believes it will outshine Google in several other ways, including its method for identifying and displaying pertinent results.

Content analysis: Rather than trying to mimic Google's method of ranking the quantity and quality of links to Web sites, Patterson says Cuil's technology drills into the actual content of a page. And Cuil's results will be presented in a more magazine-like format instead of just a vertical stack of Web links. Cuil's results are displayed with more photos spread horizontally across the page and include sidebars that can be clicked on to learn more about topics related to the original search request.

Finally, Cuil is hoping to attract traffic by promising not to retain information about its users' search histories or surfing patterns - something that Google does, much to the consternation of privacy watchdogs.

Cuil is just the latest in a long line of Google challengers.

Other contenders: The list includes swaggering startups like Teoma (whose technology became the backbone of Ask.com), Vivisimo, Snap, Mahalo and, most recently, Powerset, which was acquired by Microsoft Corp. (MSFT, Fortune 500) this month.

Even after investing hundreds of millions of dollars on search, both Microsoft and Yahoo Inc. (YHOO, Fortune 500) have been losing ground to Google (GOOG, Fortune 500). Through May, Google held a 62% share of the U.S. search market followed by Yahoo at 21% and Microsoft at 8.5%, according to comScore Inc.

Google has become so synonymous with Internet search that it may no longer matter how good Cuil or any other challenger is, said Gartner Inc. analyst Allen Weiner.

"Search has become as much about branding as anything else," Weiner said. "I doubt [Cuil] will be keeping anyone at Google awake at night."

Google welcomed Cuil to the fray with its usual mantra about its rivals. "Having great competitors is a huge benefit to us and everyone in the search space," Watson said. "It makes us all work harder, and at the end of the day our users benefit from that."

But this will be the first time that Google has battled a general-purpose search engine created by its own alumni. It probably won't be the last time, given that Google now has nearly 20,000 employees.

Patterson joined Google in 2004 after she built and sold Recall, a search index that probed old Web sites for the Internet Archive. She and Power worked on the same team at Google.

Although he also worked for Google for a short time, Monier is best known as the former chief technology officer of AltaVista, which was considered the best search engine before Google came along in 1998. Monier also helped build the search engine on eBay's (EBAY, Fortune 500) online auction site.

The trio of former Googlers are teaming up with Patterson's husband, Costello, who built a once-promising search engine called Xift in the late 1990s. He later joined IBM Corp. (IBM, Fortune 500), where he worked on an "analytic engine" called WebFountain.

Costello's Irish heritage inspired Cuil's odd name. It was derived from a character named Finn McCuill in Celtic folklore.

Patterson enjoyed her time at Google, but became disenchanted with the company's approach to search. "Google has looked pretty much the same for 10 years now," she said, "and I can guarantee it will look the same a year from now." To top of page
lol I def dont think its ready today, its running REALLY REALLY slow and its not bringing back results for things I know should be there. It has a way for you to request they crawl your site if you're a webmaster so that was kind of cool.

Who has heard about this? do you think it will ever be bigger than google?

Halx 07-28-2008 06:52 AM

Cuil's search robot ignores robots.txt and spiders at an unrestrained pace. The result is that is causes websites to crash and indexes content that its not supposed to. Its brought down a couple of our (my work's) sites so far. We had to block its range of IPs. What a pain in the ass.

ShaniFaye 07-28-2008 07:02 AM

because Im trying to understand how all this works....could you explain "indexes content its not supposed to"?

Cynthetiq 07-28-2008 07:12 AM

if you have a website that doesn't have permissions built into it like a invision or vbulletin, but just a raw HTML site with directories, you can limit spiders with a small file robots.txt. It is a nice convention to tell spiders please don't crawl this directory.

Baraka_Guru 07-28-2008 07:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx (Post 2496236)
Cuil's search robot ignores robots.txt and spiders at an unrestrained pace. The result is that is causes websites to crash and indexes content that its not supposed to. Its brought down a couple of our (my work's) sites so far. We had to block its range of IPs. What a pain in the ass.

Not cuil. :lol:

They will need to work that out, but Cuil might have some potential. I think this is generally a good sign. The Internet will always need innovators if it's going to be a place for people to find relevant information. It's just that they need to approach it the right way.

I think the intelligent organization of infinite information is way cuil.

I'm indexed in Cuil already.

snowy 07-28-2008 07:31 AM

I tried searching my name--my real name--to see what they came up with; when I tried to advance a page, it told me it found no results. Very strange. It also only came up with super-old archived content here on the TFP when I searched for my username. Let's just say I won't be switching any time soon.

Redlemon 07-28-2008 07:32 AM

I tried it out earlier today. I'm not sure about the presentation of data; the 3 columns is kind of nice, but then requiring scrolling as well kind of defeats the usefulness of columns.

Also, I tried a search on something that I don't get a lot of hits for on other sites: "Perfect Thyroid", a ska-funk band I used to like that isn't together anymore. I was impressed that the auto-guess algorithm found the band name, but I was confused that it gave me zero results on a term that it knew.

Hearing Halx's report, I'm much less inclined to give them any more of my time. No, wait, I just Googled for "cuil robot.txt"* and found that they claim to respect robot.txt, and further that...
Quote:

Originally Posted by Cuil - Webmaster Info
Occasionally, we have seen other Web crawling robots masquerading as Twiceler. You can be sure it’s Cuil crawling your site if the robot has one of the following IP addresses:
38.99.13.121 38.99.44.101 64.1.215.166 208.36.144.6
38.99.13.122 38.99.44.102 64.1.215.162 208.36.144.7
38.99.13.123 38.99.44.103 64.1.215.163 208.36.144.8
38.99.13.124 38.99.44.104 64.1.215.164 208.36.144.9
38.99.13.125 38.99.44.105 64.1.215.165 208.36.144.10
38.99.13.126 38.99.44.106

Truth or a cover story? Or a botnet trying to damage the reputation of Cuil? I don't know.

____
*Yes, I appreciate the irony of this statement.

ktspktsp 07-28-2008 07:42 AM

The site seems to throw a "we didn't find any results" page if it has problems - I'm pretty sure it has at least one page indexed with the word "Iceland" in it..

Anyway, with a search site, brand name and usability are much more important than total indexed paged (as long as a sufficient amount of pages have been indexed). Most users do not go past the first page of results.

Cuil obviously has no brand name yet, and I don't like the presentation - have columns is interesting, but since the results are not lined up horizontally, it makes it difficult to get a good view of the result on the first look. Too much eye movement is required.

The explore by category box is interesting but it helps you broaden out your search instead of narrowing it down. So I don't think that's particularly useful.

So I'm impressed at this point. We'll see how it evolves.

Oh, and crawling aggressively and ignoring robots.txt files is just rude.

dlish 07-28-2008 08:00 AM

dont like the layout..aint cuil with me. maybe its cos its new..maybe im still used to the listings looking like googles...

i too searched my name and got nothing.. maybe i should be relieved..

hambone 07-28-2008 09:00 AM

Hey, at least someone is trying to do things another way. Competition should spark both sides to do things better than they even are at present.

I will stick with google for now, but it is a good thing to have others trying stuff out.

dlish 07-28-2008 09:38 AM

i agree hambone. the more competition the better.

speaking of which what ever happened to magellan, lycos, webcrawler adn all those search engines that were there at the start of the internet revolution?

speshul-k 07-28-2008 10:24 AM

While search certainly could do with a boost, I'm not sure if Cuil has the right idea. Their layout is not swaying me by any means.
Search needs to be simple, direct and above all help the user find what they're looking for. Or at least try and point them in the right direction.

Reese 07-28-2008 03:04 PM

A search for my name only came up with my grandfather's obituary in our local newspaper called the messenger.. There's a logo of the Joan of Arc movie beside it... My username doesn't find as many results as Google although it does find different cybermikes.

ktspktsp 07-28-2008 03:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hambone (Post 2496294)
Hey, at least someone is trying to do things another way. Competition should spark both sides to do things better than they even are at present.

Oh, it would certainly be nice to see some strong competition to google. Unfortunately this site isn't it.

ItWasMe 07-28-2008 03:42 PM

I searched my username. There's a bad poem on allpoetry dot com by an itwasme, and so ya know that is someone else.

Now I can't get it to do anything.

I kind of like how the other search engines have images/maps options. This one may very well come back with 1000 pages of results instead of the usual 100 pages or so, but I rarely get past page 10 without getting bored looking. Most of the time, I've found what I want on the first page result, maybe the second.

blahblah454 07-28-2008 04:00 PM

Its new, give it a break.

I don't really care to try it out as of now as google is just fine with me and I know that it doesn't have any problems (that I know about or that effect me). But its always good to have competition and I hope the best for Cuil and their future.

In fact I would go so far as to say that I hope they upstage google. Google is kind of becoming too large and powerful for its own good, they hold more sway than I think any one company deserves to have. Corporate power should be distributed at all times, too much corruption is acquired with size and power.

noodle 07-28-2008 04:09 PM

oh man. every search page of my previous user name was a tfp page.
apparently, i don't exist in real life. :lol:

Baraka_Guru 07-28-2008 04:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by noodle (Post 2496540)
oh man. every search page of my previous user name was a tfp page.
apparently, i don't exist in real life. :lol:

You exist in our hearts, dear noodle.

Search engines be damned!

Charlatan 07-28-2008 04:36 PM

servers overloaded.

ktspktsp 07-28-2008 04:37 PM

Here's a couple of interesting, more visual search sites.

They're not actually that useful for searching (except perhaps in a wikipedia-type search-widening way) but they have innovative interfaces:
Quintura
Kartoo

I wonder what a search engine of the future will look like...

jewels 07-28-2008 04:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ktspktsp (Post 2496553)
They're not actually that useful for searching (except perhaps in a wikipedia-type search-widening way) but they have innovative interfaces:
Quintura
Kartoo

I wonder what a search engine of the future will look like...

Kartoo is VERY scary ... :paranoid:

monokrome 07-28-2008 05:15 PM

This is definitely a neat little search engine. I don't think it'll match Google, based on the simple fact that Google is less complicated - and that's what keeps 90% of people that find you. The big bulky look doesn't help, nor does the dark color scheme. Most people tend to like brighter color schemes.

With that said, this search engine is pretty neat. The fact that it takes your original search and generates a bunch of "related category" tabs is really nice. I'll probably use this engine a lot when I'm looking for things information on things that I'm less knowledgable about. The keywords might help someone more accurately find what they are looking for. The engine is running very nicely here, also. Don't see any slowing down.

Overall, I'll definitely be putting it in my bookmarks... But Google stays on my homepage.
-----Added 28/7/2008 at 09 : 24 : 59-----
Quote:

Originally Posted by Halx (Post 2496236)
Cuil's search robot ignores robots.txt and spiders at an unrestrained pace. The result is that is causes websites to crash and indexes content that its not supposed to. Its brought down a couple of our (my work's) sites so far. We had to block its range of IPs. What a pain in the ass.

Not to come off as offensive, but that seems more your fault than Cuil's fault. Robots.txt is silly, anyway. Your server should be able to handle anything their crawler can do :P

Blocking yourself from an entire search engine is a good way to lose users... Albeit, probably not many.

SSJTWIZTA 07-28-2008 06:08 PM

i seen this on attack of the show at 7 o'clock.

ive yet to check it out. from what i read here im thinking that its not going to work to well.

ItWasMe 07-28-2008 07:33 PM

I couldn't get it to do much earlier. I did a search for paint shop pro just now. I like how it separates it into catagories for you. This one says all results/paint shop pro tutorials/paint shop pro 5/paint shop pro tubes/more. Except for the fact that psp5 was many years ago ~ psp 10 or 11 is out now ~ that's pretty cool.

little_tippler 07-29-2008 04:07 AM

I'm not sure what they are boasting about really...

a search for my real name came up with almost nothing and google usually gets plenty. My TFP username brought zero results, which seems impossible.

I also agree the visual layout isn't great.

But innovation is always good...who knows, it might actually be cuil sometime soon.

Though I've got to say that's a silly name heh.

UKking 07-29-2008 07:01 AM

One thing is for sure.. they definitely underestimated the traffic that would come their way on launch day. It's crippling their servers which means people are getting 404s and 'no results found' errors.

It'd be interesting to see it when everything has died down and its working at full speed.

SSJTWIZTA 07-29-2008 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ItWasMe (Post 2496637)
I like how it separates it into catagories for you. This one says all results/paint shop pro tutorials/paint shop pro 5/paint shop pro tubes/more.

Yeah, that works excellent for music searches.

Say i type in "NoFX."

Right from the results screen i can look up tabs, lyrics, similar bands, bands on the same record labels, bands on Fat Mikes record label, ext., ext.

biznatch 07-30-2008 10:14 AM

My first assumption on the name was "Cool" speeling with "UI"(user interface) instead of "OO". Which could kind of go along with their different layout idea.
Maybe I'll give it a shot if it gains some success.
However I don't see the mainstream, non tech-news-following, average user using this instead of the tried and true.
Nevertheless, as others have said, this is not a bad thing, and I'd like to see google come under some pressure. It's hard to become No.1, let's see how long long they can stay No.1.
But I do hope Google never shuts down. i love my Gmail too much.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
© 2002-2012 Tilted Forum Project


1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360