Quote:
New York Post Chimp Cartoon Compares Stimulus Author To Dead Primate
Sam Stein
Huffington Post
A cartoon likening the author of the stimulus bill, perhaps President Barack Obama, with a rabid chimpanzee graced the pages of the New York Post on Wednesday.
The drawing, from famed cartoonist Sean Delonas, is rife with violent imagery and racial undertones. In it, two befuddled-looking police officers holding guns look over the dead and bleeding chimpanzee that attacked a woman in Stamford, Connecticut.
"They'll have to find someone else to write the next stimulus bill," reads the caption.
An email to Delonas and a call to the New York Post went unreturned. The cartoon appears both on the New York Post website and page 12 of the Wednesday paper.
At its most benign, the cartoon suggests that the stimulus bill was so bad, monkeys may as well have written it. Others believe it compares the president to a rabid chimp. Either way, the incorporation of violence and (on a darker level) race into politics is bound to be controversial. Perhaps that's what Delonas wanted.
UPDATE: Rev. Al Sharpton has weighed in on the cartoon in a statement:
"The cartoon in today's New York Post is troubling at best given the historic racist attacks of African-Americans as being synonymous with monkeys. One has to question whether the cartoonist is making a less than casual reference to this when in the cartoon they have police saying after shooting a chimpanzee that "Now they will have to find someone else to write the stimulus bill."
"Being that the stimulus bill has been the first legislative victory of President Barack Obama (the first African American president) and has become synonymous with him it is not a reach to wonder are they inferring that a monkey wrote the last bill?"
|
New York Post Chimp Cartoon Compares Stimulus Author To Dead Primate
On the surface, it might look like a harmless cartoon, suggesting the stimulus bill is as though it were written by a primate (i.e. a chimp, a baboon, etc.), but deep down, is this racist?
Someone along the line--the cartoonist/editor/publisher, etc.--must have thought of the potentially racist undertones of this. I'm not quite familiar or can relate to the issue of race as it is in America, but here in Toronto, it is an issue, to say the least.
I don't think a cartoon referring to a black man as a primate would go over very well here either.
I don't like it, and I don't care if the direct imagery refers to another
story. It's what's implied that counts.
What do you think?