View Single Post
Old 06-29-2005, 05:02 PM   #38 (permalink)
Psycho Dad
Mulletproof
 
Psycho Dad's Avatar
 
Location: Some nucking fut house.
How 'bout them Cowboys?

Quote:
Stadium eminent domain imminent for homeowners

Arlington: They say offers are too low; city says plan won't change

11:07 PM CDT on Friday, June 24, 2005

By JEFF MOSIER / The Dallas Morning News

ARLINGTON – The Arlington City Council is expected to authorize on Tuesday eminent domain proceedings against as many as 19 properties needed for a new Dallas Cowboys stadium and approve resolutions paving the way for 33 more condemnations in the coming weeks.

Mayor Robert Cluck said the properties are owned by individuals who are either unwilling to sell or are demanding an unreasonable price for their homes or lots. Some have not responded to the city's offers, he said, and a few would not allow city negotiators on their property.

"If they can't make reasonable counteroffers," Dr. Cluck said, "we have to use this tool."

City officials said they would continue to negotiate with property owners through Tuesday to try to avoid the need for condemnation. However, Dr. Cluck said, some homeowners are unlikely to settle without legal action.

The city's announcement came a day after the U.S. Supreme Court released a decision confirming that cities have wide latitude in condemning property for economic development purposes. That decision, which Dr. Cluck said didn't affect the timing of next week's votes, means that federal appeals of condemnations for the stadium in Arlington are unlikely.

Robert Magnus, whose house is on the condemnation list, said he was unaware of the City Council's vote next week, but he's not surprised. He had hoped that the Supreme Court would help him with its Kelo v. New London case.

Mr. Magnus would not say how much the city has offered him for the house he's owned for two years, but he said it wasn't enough to pay off his mortgage.

"They are just giving me pennies and telling me to get out," he said.

City officials said they are required to pay fair market value for the properties, and in addition, they are offering incentives ranging from $5,250 for renters to $22,500 for homeowners who agree to accept an offer and move quickly. Also, some moving expenses would be paid by the city.

Glenn Sodd, a Corsicana attorney specializing in eminent domain cases, could not be reached for comment Friday. He has said that he represents the owners of 15 homes and lots and four apartment complexes that are on the stadium site and that he would take the cases to the state Supreme Court if necessary.

The City Council approved resolutions last week stating that 19 properties are needed for the stadium. Dr. Cluck said those resolutions were the first steps toward the filing of eminent domain proceedings. At next week's meeting, 33 more of those resolutions are on the agenda.

The council also is expected to vote on the voluntary purchase of nine other properties. The city has already agreed to purchase prices for a dozen other homes.

A majority of the 33 homes on the resolution list are rental properties owned by Charlie Scott, a major landlord in that neighborhood. Mr. Scott could not be reached Friday.

Walter Herrington, who owns 10 homes in the neighborhood that will be cleared for the stadium, said he wants to be avoid going to court, but he wants the city to pay enough to allow him to purchase more rental houses elsewhere.

"I would love to keep it out of the courts, but they're going to have to pay me what I need," he said.
And the abuse begins.

As someone pointed out on another forum where this is being discussed... What exactly is fair market value? The government (or now some private entity) makes an offer of what they want to pay. From there, there is no other value because it has been determined that the property is worth X amount of dollars and no one is is willing to make a fair market value because the government has already determined that the land is only to be used for what it was to be purchased for via eminent domain.

And I'll agree with those who want to say that eminent domain has a purpose and that it needs to be used from time to time, but forcing someone to sell to build a playground for a bunch of spoiled millionaire atheletes is not the same as expanding a school campus.
__________________
Don't always trust the opinions of experts.
Psycho Dad is offline  
 

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132 133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181 182 183 184 185 186 187 188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 202 203 204 205 206 207 208 209 210 211 212 213 214 215 216 217 218 219 220 221 222 223 224 225 226 227 228 229 230 231 232 233 234 235 236 237 238 239 240 241 242 243 244 245 246 247 248 249 250 251 252 253 254 255 256 257 258 259 260 261 262 263 264 265 266 267 268 269 270 271 272 273 274 275 276 277 278 279 280 281 282 283 284 285 286 287 288 289 290 291 292 293 294 295 296 297 298 299 300 301 302 303 304 305 306 307 308 309 310 311 312 313 314 315 316 317 318 319 320 321 322 323 324 325 326 327 328 329 330 331 332 333 334 335 336 337 338 339 340 341 342 343 344 345 346 347 348 349 350 351 352 353 354 355 356 357 358 359 360