|
View Poll Results: debating Bill of Rights? | |||
Would love to debate it | 8 | 47.06% | |
Would hate to debate it | 0 | 0% | |
Too much of a headache to argue about | 0 | 0% | |
Don't bother me, American Idol is on | 0 | 0% | |
Why does Bill O' Rights get his own thread? | 9 | 52.94% | |
I'll wait for the supreme court to decide for me | 0 | 0% | |
Voters: 17. You may not vote on this poll |
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools |
03-28-2006, 01:52 PM | #1 (permalink) |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
bill of rights debates
how popular, or unpopular, would threads be about each individual BoR amendments?
edit - debating interpretations, maybe even court decisions on them. I pose this because such a huge issue about supreme court nominations was made and how it would affect things.
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." Last edited by dksuddeth; 03-28-2006 at 02:06 PM.. |
03-28-2006, 01:59 PM | #2 (permalink) |
Asshole
Administrator
Location: Chicago
|
I'm not sure how you would frame the conversations, so I gave a smartass vote. What are you contemplating here? A discussions of the benefits of each one? Whether they're right or wrong? Interpretation?
Personally, I love discussions like this, but I'm not sure where you'd start or even want to discuss. Edit - given your recent edit, I'm all for a debate on interpretations, although I can't do any better than Family Guy's right to Bear Arms bit.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." - B. Franklin "There ought to be limits to freedom." - George W. Bush "We have met the enemy and he is us." - Pogo Last edited by The_Jazz; 03-28-2006 at 02:26 PM.. |
03-28-2006, 02:27 PM | #4 (permalink) |
spudly
Location: Ellay
|
I think it's an interesting idea, but if you want to do it I'd suggest limiting it to one amendment at a time - or at least staggering the threads out by a week each. That wouldn't be the worst idea in terms of the expectations of discourse either... It wouldn't take long for people to figure out that they ought to do their homework before diving in head first.
__________________
Cogito ergo spud -- I think, therefore I yam |
03-28-2006, 03:47 PM | #6 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
Quote:
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
|
03-28-2006, 03:59 PM | #8 (permalink) |
paranoid
Location: The Netherlands
|
Sounds interesting. Also for us non-US types out there. Such discussions could give good perspectives of US politics.
If you could though, please add an introduction to the discussions to give everybody an idea of what's what, or give some references....
__________________
"Do not kill. Do not rape. Do not steal. These are principles which every man of every faith can embrace. " - Murphy MacManus (Boondock Saints) |
03-28-2006, 04:27 PM | #9 (permalink) | |
Junkie
Location: bedford, tx
|
Quote:
__________________
"no amount of force can control a free man, a man whose mind is free. No, not the rack, not fission bombs, not anything. You cannot conquer a free man; the most you can do is kill him." |
|
Tags |
bill, debates, rights |
|
|